Hi Jens,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 01:41:56PM +0200, Jens Holzkämper wrote:
> We get the following results (with a variance within a few seconds)
>
> 4.9 ext4:
> real 2m13.303s
[…]
> 4.18 ext4:
> real 4m3.276s
Absent anyone being able to make a suggestion of exactly what broke
here, perhaps yo
Hi.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 04:44:25PM +0200, Support (Jens) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >> we have a NAS system acting as a place to store our server's backups
> >> (via rsync with link-dest). On that NAS we switched from the stable
> >> kernel (4.9) to the one provided by backports (4.18) because
Hi,
>> we have a NAS system acting as a place to store our server's backups
>> (via rsync with link-dest). On that NAS we switched from the stable
>> kernel (4.9) to the one provided by backports (4.18) because of an
>> unrelated problem. When we do that, we see a slowdown of our backup
>> process
Hi.
On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 01:41:56PM +0200, Jens Holzkämper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have a NAS system acting as a place to store our server's backups
> (via rsync with link-dest). On that NAS we switched from the stable
> kernel (4.9) to the one provided by backports (4.18) because of an
>
Hi,
we have a NAS system acting as a place to store our server's backups
(via rsync with link-dest). On that NAS we switched from the stable
kernel (4.9) to the one provided by backports (4.18) because of an
unrelated problem. When we do that, we see a slowdown of our backup
process, from the back
5 matches
Mail list logo
