On 2025-07-11, Nicolas George wrote:
> hw (HE12025-07-11):
>> (S)FTP is still in use like for cameras, scanners (printers) and phones.
>
> Do you have a few examples of brand and models of cameras and phones
> that use FTP?
Some high-end cameras use it. Phones, not so much.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 11:54 AM Andrew Makhorin wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I meant how long do you let the system keep chugging along after
> > it appears to hang?
> >
>
> The system itself remains working. The "Files" window gets dark and doesnt
> response, and
On Jul 11, 2025, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Dan Purgert wrote:
> > On Jul 11, 2025, Nicolas George wrote:
> > > Greg (HE12025-07-11):
> > > > Does that mean to a different filesystem on the same disk it's a move
> > > > rather
> > > > than a copy?
> > >
> > > The fact that it is on the same disk is not
> On 11 Jul 2025, at 16:45, Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> Dan Purgert wrote:
>>> On Jul 11, 2025, Nicolas George wrote:
>>> Greg (HE12025-07-11):
Does that mean to a different filesystem on the same disk it's a move
rather
than a copy?
>>>
>>> The fact that it is on the same disk is n
Dan Purgert wrote:
> On Jul 11, 2025, Nicolas George wrote:
> > Greg (HE12025-07-11):
> > > Does that mean to a different filesystem on the same disk it's a move
> > > rather
> > > than a copy?
> >
> > The fact that it is on the same disk is not relevant. Apart from that, I
> > suggest you re-re
On Jul 11, 2025, Nicolas George wrote:
> Greg (HE12025-07-11):
> > Does that mean to a different filesystem on the same disk it's a move rather
> > than a copy?
>
> The fact that it is on the same disk is not relevant. Apart from that, I
> suggest you re-read Dan's mail more carefully, everything
Greg (HE12025-07-11):
> Does that mean to a different filesystem on the same disk it's a move rather
> than a copy?
The fact that it is on the same disk is not relevant. Apart from that, I
suggest you re-read Dan's mail more carefully, everything was in it.
--
Nicolas George
Greg wrote:
> On 2025-07-11, Nicolas George wrote:
> > Greg (HE12025-07-11):
> >> On 2025-07-11, Dan Ritter wrote:
> >> >
> >> > If the target location is on a different filesystem, a "move" is
> >> > a full copy followed by a delete of the source.
> >> Is that true?
> >
> > Yes, absoltely.
> >
On 2025-07-11, Nicolas George wrote:
> Greg (HE12025-07-11):
>> On 2025-07-11, Dan Ritter wrote:
>> >
>> > If the target location is on a different filesystem, a "move" is
>> > a full copy followed by a delete of the source.
>> Is that true?
>
> Yes, absoltely.
>
>> If the source is deleted as pa
Greg (HE12025-07-11):
> On 2025-07-11, Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > If the target location is on a different filesystem, a "move" is
> > a full copy followed by a delete of the source.
> Is that true?
Yes, absoltely.
> If the source is deleted as part of the process it's no longer a "copy."
Indeed
On 2025-07-11, Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> If the target location is on a different filesystem, a "move" is
> a full copy followed by a delete of the source.
Is that true? If the source is deleted as part of the process it's no
longer a "copy."
On Jul 11, 2025, mick.crane wrote:
> On 2025-07-11 10:52, Andrew Makhorin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Jul 11, 2025, Andrew Makhorin wrote:
> > > > I encountered a serious bug on moving files from one folder to
> > > > another with standard "Files"
On 2025-07-11 14:03, Andrew Makhorin wrote:
Sorry, I meant how long do you let the system keep chugging along
after
it appears to hang?
The system itself remains working. The "Files" window gets dark and
doesnt
response, and it's impossible to close it.
When moving fi
On Thu Jul 10, 2025 at 5:48 PM BST, hw wrote:
The Debian package doesn't seem to be managed well. It even still
uses an init.d script instead of a service file.
Agreed. The last two versions of it were non-maintainer uploads; the
last of those was 18 months ago; the last actual maintainer upl
> Sorry, I meant how long do you let the system keep chugging along after
> it appears to hang?
>
The system itself remains working. The "Files" window gets dark and doesnt
response, and it's impossible to close it.
> When moving files on the same disk impression
mick.crane wrote:
>
> When moving files on the same disk impression is, at least with dragging in
> the desktop file manager, it seems instant. Whereas to another disk seems to
> make new files. I guess that when on the same disk the OS changes only
> something about the f
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 13:39:44 +0100, mick.crane wrote:
> When moving files on the same disk impression is, at least with dragging in
> the desktop file manager, it seems instant. Whereas to another disk seems to
> make new files. I guess that when on the same disk the OS cha
On 2025-07-11 10:52, Andrew Makhorin wrote:
On Jul 11, 2025, Andrew Makhorin wrote:
> I encountered a serious bug on moving files from one folder to another
> with standard "Files" application in Gnome. Namely, when the number of
> files in the distination folder is abou
hw (HE12025-07-11):
> (S)FTP is still in use like for cameras, scanners (printers) and phones.
Do you have a few examples of brand and models of cameras and phones
that use FTP?
--
Nicolas George
On Jul 11, 2025, hw wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 13:55 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > [...]
> > Nowadays it seems like scp and sftp are the norm, not ftp.
>
> (S)FTP is still in use like for cameras, scanners (printers) and phones.
> For local usages I don't want to do all the hassle the certi
On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 13:55 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 1:39 PM Charles Curley
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 18:58:03 +0200
> > hw wrote:
> >
> > > When running it on Debian, filezilla shows a password request for
> > > anonymous logins, and the login fails. T
On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 19:09 +0200, john doe wrote:
> On 7/10/25 18:58, hw wrote:
> > On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 16:28 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > > On Thu Jul 10, 2025 at 11:45 AM BST, hw wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Right. Anonymous logins are allowed and I have created a system account
> > > > 'ftp
On Jul 11, 2025, Andrew Makhorin wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 11, 2025, Andrew Makhorin wrote:
> > > I encountered a serious bug on moving files from one folder to another
> > > with standard "Files" application in Gnome. Namely, when the
> > > number
>
> On Jul 11, 2025, Andrew Makhorin wrote:
> > I encountered a serious bug on moving files from one folder to another
> > with standard "Files" application in Gnome. Namely, when the number of
> > files in the distination folder is about 4,500, the "Files&
On Jul 11, 2025, Andrew Makhorin wrote:
> I encountered a serious bug on moving files from one folder to another
> with standard "Files" application in Gnome. Namely, when the number of
> files in the distination folder is about 4,500, the "Files" application
>
I encountered a serious bug on moving files from one folder to another
with standard "Files" application in Gnome. Namely, when the number of
files in the distination folder is about 4,500, the "Files" application
deadly hangs, and only restaring the system helps. The
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 1:39 PM Charles Curley
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 18:58:03 +0200
> hw wrote:
>
> > When running it on Debian, filezilla shows a password request for
> > anonymous logins, and the login fails. This is not what the man page
> > says. The ftp user doesn't have a passwor
On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 18:58:03 +0200
hw wrote:
> When running it on Debian, filezilla shows a password request for
> anonymous logins, and the login fails. This is not what the man page
> says. The ftp user doesn't have a password anyway. Apparently,
> Debians pure-ftpd version doesn't understan
On 7/10/25 18:58, hw wrote:
On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 16:28 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Thu Jul 10, 2025 at 11:45 AM BST, hw wrote:
Right. Anonymous logins are allowed and I have created a system account
'ftp', and it still doesn't work. It keeps asking for a password when
trying to log in
On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 16:28 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Thu Jul 10, 2025 at 11:45 AM BST, hw wrote:
> >
> > Right. Anonymous logins are allowed and I have created a system account
> > 'ftp', and it still doesn't work. It keeps asking for a password when
> > trying to log in as 'anonymous'
On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 16:46 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Thu Jul 10, 2025 at 3:25 PM BST, hw wrote:
> > So am I to assume that it's broken on Debian
>
> The problem could be the presence of /etc/pure-ftpd/conf/NoAnonymous,
> which causes the start-up wrapper to pass -E (= --noanonymous) t
On Thu Jul 10, 2025 at 3:25 PM BST, hw wrote:
So am I to assume that it's broken on Debian
The problem could be the presence of /etc/pure-ftpd/conf/NoAnonymous,
which causes the start-up wrapper to pass -E (= --noanonymous) to the
daemon. Try removing that file and restarting the daemon.
I
On Thu Jul 10, 2025 at 11:45 AM BST, hw wrote:
Right. Anonymous logins are allowed and I have created a system account
'ftp', and it still doesn't work. It keeps asking for a password when
trying to log in as 'anonymous' or 'ftp'.
Conventionally, when logging into an anonymous ftp server, as
On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 13:52 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 01:41:51PM +0200, hw wrote:
> > On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 12:55 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > I'd have a look at /var/log/auth.log, or however this is spelt in
> > > systemd-ese these days.
> >
>
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 01:41:51PM +0200, hw wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 12:55 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > I'd have a look at /var/log/auth.log, or however this is spelt in
> > systemd-ese these days.
>
> The log says nothing new:
>
>
> [...] pure-ftpd: pam_unix(pure-ftpd:auth)
On Thu, 2025-07-10 at 12:55 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 12:45:22PM +0200, hw wrote:
> >
> > Right. Anonymous logins are allowed and I have created a system account
> > 'ftp', and it still doesn't work. It keeps asking for a password when
> > trying to log in as 'anony
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 12:45:22PM +0200, hw wrote:
>
> Right. Anonymous logins are allowed and I have created a system account
> 'ftp', and it still doesn't work. It keeps asking for a password when
> trying to log in as 'anonymous' or 'ftp'.
>
> I have the same on Fedora, and there it does not
09 at 20:19 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 23:08:05 +0200, hw wrote:
> > > > where does pure-ftpd store files when anonymous logs in?
> > > >
> > > > Even its man page is missing in Debian.
> > >
> > > Accord
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 5:49 AM hw wrote:
>
> So I have created the ftp user with a home directory to use for files
> from the anonymous user. But still pure-ftpd is, contrary to the man
> page, asking for a password and the login fails.
>
> Why is this not working?
You prob
On Thu Jul 10, 2025 at 7:41 AM BST, hw wrote:
And why is is so difficult and troublesome on Debian?
Possibly because running an anonymous ftpd in 2025 is quite a niche
interest.
Some of the other recent replies look to point in the right direction.
Last time I did this myself, I used vsftpd, a
On Thu, Jul 10, 2025 at 4:49 AM hw wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2025-07-09 at 20:19 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 23:08:05 +0200, hw wrote:
> > > where does pure-ftpd store files when anonymous logs in?
> > >
> > > Even its man page is
So I have created the ftp user with a home directory to use for files
from the anonymous user. But still pure-ftpd is, contrary to the man
page, asking for a password and the login fails.
Why is this not working?
And why is is so difficult and troublesome on Debian? It wasn't an
issue a
On Wed, 2025-07-09 at 20:19 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 23:08:05 +0200, hw wrote:
> > where does pure-ftpd store files when anonymous logs in?
> >
> > Even its man page is missing in Debian.
>
> According to packages.debian.org, the package &
On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 23:08:05 +0200, hw wrote:
> where does pure-ftpd store files when anonymous logs in?
>
> Even its man page is missing in Debian.
According to packages.debian.org, the package "pure-ftpd" depends on
the package "pure-ftpd-common", and the
Hi,
where does pure-ftpd store files when anonymous logs in?
Even its man page is missing in Debian. Are we supposed to create an
ftp user having a home directory to store such files in, or what's the
Debian way of specifying the directory for the files?
Subject: Recommended backup software to clone Android (Linux) phones to image
files
Good day from Singapore,
Acronis True Image backup software can be used to clone Windows 10 and 11 to
image files with the extension of .tibx.
I am wondering if Acronis True Image backup software can be used
In clearing out my older archives, deduplicating the redundant, etc.
I still found many Debian files missing from or not present in official
Debian locations. Some of these may also be older than what Debian may
wish to preserve. I believe they all date from slink (2.1) through
woody (3.0). I
ssion on the
> FTP
> > Group.
> > drwxrwxr-x 2 root ftp 4096 Apr 11 17:53 ftp
> > drwxrwxr-x 2 root root 40 Apr 11 18:19 empty
> >
> > Does anyone have any ideas why VSFTPD can not receive uploads. I am able
> to
> > successfully download files.
>
> Ca
download files.
Thanks
Tim
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org/ <https://www.debian.org/>
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀
Hi,
There is a config file for vsftp.
/etc/vsftpd.conf
As I recall you have to enable something in the config file.
Best regards,
Fred
the directories have write permission on the FTP
Group.
drwxrwxr-x 2 root ftp 4096 Apr 11 17:53 ftp
drwxrwxr-x 2 root root 40 Apr 11 18:19 empty
Does anyone have any ideas why VSFTPD can not receive uploads. I am able to
successfully download files.
Thanks
Tim
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:56:47AM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:45:32 +0100
> wrote:
>
> Hello to...@tuxteam.de,
>
> >I thought that too, but according to the man page, apt-get update does
> {snipped}
>
> Okay, fair enough. I'm new to apt-file so haven't fully absorbed al
On 2025-03-13, wrote:
>
> You don't need apt-file update anymore. Apt update or apt-get update do
> the trick. (Apt-file update won't hurt, though).
Maybe you could fix the wiki in this case.
https://wiki.debian.org/apt-file
-meaning cron job, but that seems
> > to be the secret :-)
>
> apt-get update only updates the package lists from the repositories
> configured in /etc/apt/sources.list.
>
> apt-file update fetches the latest file index for all packages.
>
> IOW, you should run apt-get
nly updates the package lists from the repositories
configured in /etc/apt/sources.list.
apt-file update fetches the latest file index for all packages.
IOW, you should run apt-get update (packages) before apt-file update
(the files inside those packages).
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:45:32 +0100
wrote:
Hello to...@tuxteam.de,
>I thought that too, but according to the man page, apt-get update does
{snipped}
Okay, fair enough. I'm new to apt-file so haven't fully absorbed all
required knowledge yet.
>Hanlon's Corollary: it's almost never the gremlins
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 09:19:12AM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:59:49 +0200
> Henrik Ahlgren wrote:
>
> Hello Henrik,
>
> >> Why when I run `apt-file show phoenix` nothing happens?
> >Just to confirm, you ran `apt-get update` before that, correct?
>
> apt-*file* update
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:59:49 +0200
Henrik Ahlgren wrote:
Hello Henrik,
>> Why when I run `apt-file show phoenix` nothing happens?
>Just to confirm, you ran `apt-get update` before that, correct?
apt-*file* update (emphasis is mine), surely?
--
Regards _ "Valid sig separator is {das
Modaresi Soft Hard writes:
> I added our Repo to sources.list.d/
>
> Why when I run `apt-file show phoenix` nothing happens?
Just to confirm, you ran `apt-get update` before that, correct?
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 02:13:05AM +, Modaresi Soft Hard wrote:
> We created several packages in
> https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:celenity (OBS)
Apt-file relies on the Contents file, which your repository must provide
(possibly you have to tell your instance of apt-file where
We created several packages in
https://build.opensuse.org/project/show/home:celenity (OBS)
I added our Repo to sources.list.d/
Why when I run `apt-file show phoenix` nothing happens?
What should I observe in the packaging?
You can download deb files and the files we use to create a deb
ed
sources.list, and it's not often I've needed to do that.
Synaptic actually uses apt tools to install and update, and they will
use either sources.list or the sources.list.d files, whichever is
there. It's only if you need, for some reason, to manipulate
repositories that ther
On 2025-02-08, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 02:25:51PM -, Greg wrote:
>>On 2025-02-06, Charles Curley wrote:
>>>
>>> I suspect we'll be living with mixed .list and .sources files as
>>> suppliers upgrade what they ship.
>>
&
On 2025-02-08, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 14:25:51 -, Greg wrote:
>> I haven't been following the long thread about the modernization of apt
>> sources.
>>
>> I'm running Bookworm. Is it recommended to modernize, or is the modern
>> method intended for some future date? As
On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 14:25:51 -, Greg wrote:
> I haven't been following the long thread about the modernization of apt
> sources.
>
> I'm running Bookworm. Is it recommended to modernize, or is the modern
> method intended for some future date? As everything works nicely on this
> new insta
On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 02:25:51PM -, Greg wrote:
On 2025-02-06, Charles Curley wrote:
I suspect we'll be living with mixed .list and .sources files as
suppliers upgrade what they ship.
I haven't been following the long thread about the modernization of apt
sources.
I
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 14:25:51 - (UTC)
Greg wrote:
> On 2025-02-06, Charles Curley wrote:
> >
> > I suspect we'll be living with mixed .list and .sources files as
> > suppliers upgrade what they ship.
>
> I haven't been following the long thread abo
On 2025-02-06, Charles Curley wrote:
>
> I suspect we'll be living with mixed .list and .sources files as
> suppliers upgrade what they ship.
I haven't been following the long thread about the modernization of apt
sources.
I'm running Bookworm. Is it recommended to mod
With the previous discussion on modernizing one's apt sources files, I
went ahead and did it on two of my trixie installations.
The two original sources files were preserved, which might be useful
for some oddball installations.
Note that sources.list, which resides in /etc/apt, is replac
Le 11/18/24 à 11:50, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
Help yourseof :)
https://sources.debian.org/src/coreutils/
(Of course, apt-get source coreutils would do the same).
Cheers
Thank you tomas,
After a second reading of
https://sources.debian.org/src/coreutils/9.5-1/src/test.c/,
it seems tha
Dear debian and linux enthusiasts,
Have you ever stopped and wondered:
Are `/usr/bin/[` and `/usr/bin/test` truly unique across all unices?
# diff /usr/bin/\[ /usr/bin/test
Binary files /usr/bin/[ and /usr/bin/test differ
# ls /usr/bin/\[
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 67K Sep 20 2022 '/us
x27;m not brilliant at all.
>
> But I'm eager to see if Greg has something to educate us ;-)
POSIX doesn't care whether you ship separate binary files or a single
binary file to implement commands. It's the implementor's choice;
in this case, the implementor is GNU c
Am 18.11.2024 um 11:45 schrieb Yassine Chaouche:
Dear debian and linux enthusiasts,
Have you ever stopped and wondered:
Are `/usr/bin/[` and `/usr/bin/test` truly unique across all unices?
interesting question (and observation below). I can't say I ever really
cared, and I'm not even sure now
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 11:45:53AM +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
> Dear debian and linux enthusiasts,
>
> Have you ever stopped and wondered:
> Are `/usr/bin/[` and `/usr/bin/test` truly unique across all unices?
>
> # diff /usr/bin/\[ /usr/bin/test
> Binary files /usr/bi
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 11:45:53AM +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
So, why keep them separate?
Is this about some old Unix tradition?
an optimization somewhere somehow?
Because gnu policy is command behavior to not be dependent on the name
of the binary. Historically gnu utilities were often co
are whether you ship separate binary files or a single
binary file
so far I'm aware of that...
... find that the two
programs shared a single binary file, and either used a hard link or
a symbolic link from one to the other. That was fashionable in the
past, primarily as a means of reduc
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 12:30:03PM +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
> Le 11/18/24 à 11:50, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
> >
> > Help yourseof :)
> >
> > https://sources.debian.org/src/coreutils/
> >
> > (Of course, apt-get source coreutils would do the same).
> >
> > Cheers
>
>
> Thank you toma
On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 10:23 AM Semih Ozlem
wrote:
>
> I did a recent upgrade from debian 11 to debian 12. Nautilus is sometimes not
> showing all the files in a directory, although from the command prompt
> through ls command I can see that the files are there. Why could this be an
On Fri, 1 Nov 2024 14:17:12 +0300
Semih Ozlem wrote:
> I did a recent upgrade from debian 11 to debian 12. Nautilus is
> sometimes not showing all the files in a directory, although from the
> command prompt through ls command I can see that the files are there.
> Why could this be
Hi everyone,
I did a recent upgrade from debian 11 to debian 12. Nautilus is sometimes
not showing all the files in a directory, although from the command prompt
through ls command I can see that the files are there. Why could this be
and how can it be fixed?
Thank you in advance.
Sincerely
I need to install files .fw on bullseye but I only find the framework
program this program works for bullseye too? I don’t think so
Are there some different programs for Linux?
imagination I'm afraid. 😀
Ok, what I really mean is that it shouldn't be failing consistently.
> If I were you I'd be looking at how often it fails compared to how often
> it is run. Are there files left behind in /var/log for every invocation
> for example.
Ok, that is ha
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 4:00 PM Andy Smith wrote:
> However, if popularity-contest experiences a problem during submit then
> it does leave behind a file named like /var/log/popularity-contest.12345
> (and possibly another with .gpg on the end) where "12345" was the
> process ID of the running popu
;m afraid. 😀
> I don't know how else I could look into why popularity-contest
> consistently fails.
If I were you I'd be looking at how often it fails compared to how often
it is run. Are there files left behind in /var/log for every invocation
for example.
I'd probably a
Even very big files should not be the problem, because, when the header is
found all date until the footer are the file.
When you are quick and do not overwrite your device (thus create an iumage as
soon as possible!), also big data can be saved.
And here comes scalpel in handy: scalpel has
On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 06:30:07PM +0200, Hans wrote:
> Even very big files should not be the problem, because, when the header is
> found all date until the footer are the file.
Well, but that file content is cut up in little 4K snippets strewn around
your disk's free space.
Th
it reads
(form the imagefile) and then finds headers and footers (similar to scalpel)
apt show extundelete
[...]
Description: utility to recover deleted files from ext3/ext4 partition
extundelete uses the information stored in the partition's journal to
attempt
to recover a file that has
On 2024-10-25, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 03:54:58PM -0300, Bruno Schneider wrote:
>> I noticed that I have hundreds of files whose names start with
>> "popularity-contest" in /var/log. They don't even seem to be logs.
>> They seem to be dat
> Thank you for the detailed answer.
youre welcome.
>
> I have tried ext4magic. My impression is that it might have an issue
> with reading journal and that it is unnecessary strict walking through
> inodes (zeroing invalidates checksums if I remember it correctly). It
> may
checksums if I remember it correctly). It
may restore some files, however I can not figure out what approach
extundelete or other tools may use to noticeably improve success rate
since important data is overwritten.
I was very successfull with photorec and autopsy.
Does autopsy/sleuthkit use some
Yes, whilst extundelete is not so easy to use, I was very successfull with
photorec and autopsy.
Last time I had to revover 2 TB music files for a friend, and photorec gave me
all files back. However, i had to rename the filenames to the title of the
music, but here puddletag could help. As
On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 09:57:11AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 26/10/2024 02:03, Hans wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 25. Oktober 2024, 20:32:29 CEST schrieb loulet...@sina.com:
> > > Hi folksIs there possible to recover deleted files in ext4 filesystem?
> >
> > Try ext
On 26/10/2024 02:03, Hans wrote:
Am Freitag, 25. Oktober 2024, 20:32:29 CEST schrieb loulet...@sina.com:
Hi folksIs there possible to recover deleted files in ext4 filesystem?
Try extundelete.
[...]
Using an image, you can try nice tools like foremost, scalpel or autopsy to
recover files
Thanks Hans,I will try these step.
- 原始邮件 -
发件人：Hans
收件人：debian-user@lists.debian.org
主题：Re: recover files
日期：2024年10月26日 03点04分
Am Freitag, 25. Oktober 2024, 20:32:29 CEST schrieb loulet...@sina.com:
> Hi folksIs there possible to recover dele
Am Freitag, 25. Oktober 2024, 20:32:29 CEST schrieb loulet...@sina.com:
> Hi folksIs there possible to recover deleted files in ext4 filesystem?
>
Try extundelete.
Hint: Make an image from the whole partition using dd before do any recover
tries. Then u
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 03:54:58PM -0300, Bruno Schneider wrote:
> I noticed that I have hundreds of files whose names start with
> "popularity-contest" in /var/log. They don't even seem to be logs.
> They seem to be data that popularity-contest sends away.
popularity
I noticed that I have hundreds of files whose names start with
"popularity-contest" in /var/log. They don't even seem to be logs.
They seem to be data that popularity-contest sends away.
Has anyone else noticed this? Is this a bug? It seems they are in the
wrong place or, at l
Hi folksIs there possible to recover deleted files in ext4 filesystem?
On 10/20/24 13:00, William Torrez Corea wrote:
I am trying to boot my USB but this device is unrecognizable for the BIOS.
How can I convert filesystems through DD?
I want to save a copy of the file in MSDOS or GPT.
What is the make and model of your computer?
What is the make and model of
you want to do; than we can give you more precise help.
>
> I want to save a copy of the file in MSDOS or GPT.
MS-DOS is an operating system. It used the File Allocation Table (FAT)
file system, of which there are many variants.
GPT is a partition table layout.
You don't save fil
I am trying to boot my USB but this device is unrecognizable for the BIOS.
How can I convert filesystems through DD?
I want to save a copy of the file in MSDOS or GPT.
--
With kindest regards, William.
*Larry Wall invented a messy programming language -- and changed the face
of the Web*
1 - 100 of 9927 matches
Mail list logo
