Re: fetchmail q

2003-09-11 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Derrick 'dman' Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.11.1843 +0200]: > Have you tried the option > mda "/usr/sbin/sendmail -i %T" > ? Interesting. I am going to try that the next time I am on-site. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. k

Re: fetchmail q

2003-09-11 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 08:46:11AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: | also sprach Jason Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.09.2301 +0200]: | > Doesn't the localdomains example.com mean that those addresses are | > passed onto the smtphost unaltered - as they are supposedly already | > valid address

Re: fetchmail q

2003-09-10 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jason Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.09.09.2301 +0200]: > Doesn't the localdomains example.com mean that those addresses are > passed onto the smtphost unaltered - as they are supposedly already > valid addresses on the receiving machine? That's what I thought, but it contradicts t

Re: fetchmail q

2003-09-09 Thread Jason Chambers
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 07:12:27PM +0200, Martin F Krafft wrote: > i am trying the following with fetchmail: > > poll server > [...] > localdomains example.com > [...] > is * > smtphost localsrv.example.com > smtpaddress office.example.com > > However, smtpaddress is jus

fetchmail q

2003-09-09 Thread Martin F Krafft
i am trying the following with fetchmail: poll server [...] localdomains example.com [...] is * smtphost localsrv.example.com smtpaddress office.example.com However, smtpaddress is just being ignored, fetchmail passes the mail straight through without changing the smtp R