Am 2007-03-25 12:32:57, schrieb Allan Wind:
> Please restate that question if this does not help you along.
>
> procmail creates mailboxes on the fly if they are not present. If none
> of your rules matched one of its delivery targets, then it uses $DEFAULT
> as your final target.
>
> mailboxes
Am 2007-03-25 13:34:30, schrieb Mauro Sacchetto:
> ==
> :0
> * ^From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> alice
:0
* ^From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
alice
> :0
> * ^(From|CC|To):[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> debian
Use the procmailmacro:
:0:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debian
Thanks, Greeting
Am 2007-03-25 01:02:19, schrieb Mauro Sacchetto:
> .procmailrc
> ===
> shell=/bin/sh
> MAILDIR=$HOME/mail
> DEFAULT= $MAILDIR/inbox
> LOGFILE=$HOME/procmaillog
> LOG="
> "
You do not need the two lines above.
> VERBOSE=yes
This should be "VERBO
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 01:16:17PM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> I don't think you need to append $MAILDIR to the beginning of every
> line. The way I have procmailrc up is:
>
> >>
> MAILDIR=$HOME/mail/
> LOGFILE=$HOME/.procmaillog
> VERBOSE=no
>
> # Mailing lists
>
> # debian-user
> :0
> *
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 01:02:19AM +0100, Mauro Sacchetto wrote:
> Mutt + fetchmail works fine, but I've a problem with procmail.
> My configuration is the following one:
> .procmailrc
> ===
> shell=/bin/sh
> MAILDIR=$HOME/mail
> DEFAULT= $MAILDI
Allan Wind wrote:
> procmail creates mailboxes on the fly if they are not present. If none
> of your rules matched one of its delivery targets, then it uses $DEFAULT
> as your final target.
> mailboxes are not deleted by either procmail or mutt.
> mutt reads its configuration file upon start-up, p
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 01:02:19AM +0100, Mauro Sacchetto wrote:
> Mutt + fetchmail works fine, but I've a problem with procmail.
> My configuration is the following one:
>
>
> .procmailrc
> ===
> shell=/bin/sh
> MAILDIR=$HOME/mail
> DEFAULT= $M
Mauro,
On 2007-03-25T13:34:30+0200, Mauro Sacchetto wrote:
> But if I show ~/mail, i find only debian k3b mutt openoffice. If I
> receive mail from other sender, for instance a sender not registered
> in .procmailrc, it goes correctly in inbox, created on fly. But I
> don't understand the reason
Allan Wind wrote:
> You should escape dots (\.) so it means what you expect. Double check
> that there is a canned ^FROM expression (opposed to ^FROM_DAEMON);
> perhaps use something like this instead:
[cut]
Thax for your help.
There are some syntactical mistakes
in my configuration files. Now it
On 2007-03-25T01:02:19+0100, Mauro Sacchetto wrote:
> .fetchmailrc
Enable verbose mode in fetchmail to see what it does when handing the
mail off to procmail.
> shell=/bin/sh
You should not need that.
> LOG="
> "
This looks funky.
> VERBOSE=yes
>
> :0
> * ^FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> $MAILDIR/a
Mutt + fetchmail works fine, but I've a problem with procmail.
My configuration is the following one:
.fetchmailrc
===
set postmaster "samiel"
set bouncemail
poll alice via "in.alice.it" timeout 60
with proto POP3
auth password user "[EMAIL PRO
Hi,
I run an IMAP setup similar to what you describe at home here, and I've
also deployed servers for companies with IMAP systems set up there too.
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 09:38:37PM -0400, Jason Bleazard wrote:
> I've found a lot of good documentation about IMAP, fetchmail and
> procmail individ
On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 19:20, prover wrote:
> I'M NOT MEMER OF YOUR MAILING LISTS. MY MAIL IS : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED] IS ONLY FORWARD FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>
> WHY THIS MAILS COME TO ME?
> EVERY DAY COME TO ME 200 MAILS FROM YOUR MAILING LISTS.
>
> CAN YOU DO SOMETHING WITH IT?
From: "Jason Bleazard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael van der Kolff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:21 PM
Subject: Re: IMAP + fetchmail + procmail
> Michael van der Kolff wrote:
> >
> .
> >
> > Cyrus is proba
From: "Michael van der Kolff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Bleazard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: IMAP + fetchmail + procmail
> I'd say that you should _probably_ use exim instead... My setup here
happens
>
From: "allmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason Bleazard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:15 AM
Subject: Re: IMAP + fetchmail + procmail
> One more thing... the "to" line in the /etc/fetchmailrc represents what
the
> local user
From: "Sam Varghese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:28 AM
Subject: Re: IMAP + fetchmail + procmail
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:57 AM
Subject: Re: IMAP + fetchmail + procmail
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 09:38:37PM -0400, Jason Bleazard wrote:
> > I've found a lot of good documentation about IMAP, fetchmail and
> > procmail individually. Howeve
3:38 AM
Subject: IMAP + fetchmail + procmail
> I've found a lot of good documentation about IMAP, fetchmail and
> procmail individually. However, I'm trying to figure out how to make
> them all work together and I'm afraid I don't quite get it. I've tried
&
Michael van der Kolff wrote:
>
.
>
> Cyrus is probably the best IMAP server out there, and I'd recommend you get
> used to it. It is quite a step forward from the UW-IMAP server...
>
> Additionally, you can place a .procmailrc file in your home directory, which
> I believe exim honours.
>
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 09:38:37PM -0400, Jason Bleazard wrote:
> I've found a lot of good documentation about IMAP, fetchmail and
> procmail individually. However, I'm trying to figure out how to make
> them all work together and I'm afraid I don't quite get it. I've tried
> some Google searches
04, 2002 11:38 AM
Subject: IMAP + fetchmail + procmail
> I've found a lot of good documentation about IMAP, fetchmail and
> procmail individually. However, I'm trying to figure out how to make
> them all work together and I'm afraid I don't quite get it. I'
out such
information from the headers, so I'm just telling you in advance).
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Bleazard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:38 AM
Subject: IMAP + fetchmail + procmail
> I've found a lot of good documentation ab
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 09:38:37PM -0400, Jason Bleazard wrote:
> I've found a lot of good documentation about IMAP, fetchmail and
> procmail individually. However, I'm trying to figure out how to make
> them all work together and I'm afraid I don't quite get it. I've tried
> some Google searches
I've found a lot of good documentation about IMAP, fetchmail and
procmail individually. However, I'm trying to figure out how to make
them all work together and I'm afraid I don't quite get it. I've tried
some Google searches and found myself overwhelmed with information that
didn't really apply
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, Stan Brown wrote:
>I'm trying to set up a Debian woody system to replicate what I've had
>working on a HP-UX box for several years.
>
>Here is how it goes. I use fetchmail to retireve email from several
>different POP accounts. Fetchmail then invokes procmail, via the .forward
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 11:39:18PM -0500, Stan Brown wrote:
> I'm trying to set up a Debian woody system to replicate what I've had
> working on a HP-UX box for several years.
>
> Here is how it goes. I use fetchmail to retireve email from several
> different POP accounts. Fetchmail then invokes p
I'm trying to set up a Debian woody system to replicate what I've had
working on a HP-UX box for several years.
Here is how it goes. I use fetchmail to retireve email from several
different POP accounts. Fetchmail then invokes procmail, via the .forward
file. Procmail uses the spambouncer recipies
Vineet Kumar writes:
> The config file is much nicer (no parsing of english-like sentences...
Fetchmail doesn't parse any sentences. It just ignores the "noise words".
> ...just plain old name=value style config
That works fine with fetchmail. The silly "noise words" are optional.
> It doesn'
* John Patton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011129 16:56]:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:08:34PM -0400, cmasters wrote:
> > The problem with this is that often, I have 300+ emails to then sort through
> > one by one. I imnagine I could use those nifty 'save/send/folder ...' hooks
> > for processing of mail ~
On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 02:18:49AM +0800, csj wrote:
| Seeking a little clarification: can procmail delete before download? Or
| must it download then delete? I'm getting the impression that the
Neither -- procmail does nothing with network connections. Procmail
receives the mail message on st
On Friday 30 November 2001 08:41, John Patton wrote:
> I don't know what getmail does, but fetchmail will gather your mail
> from your ISP and will send it straight to exim (or sendmail, etc)
> for processing. By default, exim will use procmail to sort your mail
> if you have a procmail recipe in y
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:35:45PM -0400, cmasters wrote:
| On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 06:41:01PM -0600, John Patton wrote:
| > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:08:34PM -0400, cmasters wrote:
| > Just look at the appropriate man pages for further details. It will
| > require some work, but once set up will
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 02:28:36AM +0100, Stephen Rueger wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 06:41:01PM -0600, John Patton wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:08:34PM -0400, cmasters wrote:
>
> > I don't know what getmail does, but fetchmail will gather your mail
> > from your ISP and will send it
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 06:41:01PM -0600, John Patton wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:08:34PM -0400, cmasters wrote:
> > The problem with this is that often, I have 300+ emails to then sort through
> > one by one. I imnagine I could use those nifty 'save/send/folder ...' hooks
> > for processin
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 06:41:01PM -0600, John Patton wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:08:34PM -0400, cmasters wrote:
> I don't know what getmail does, but fetchmail will gather your mail
> from your ISP and will send it straight to exim (or sendmail, etc) for
> processing. By default, exim wil
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:08:34PM -0400, cmasters wrote:
> The problem with this is that often, I have 300+ emails to then sort through
> one by one. I imnagine I could use those nifty 'save/send/folder ...' hooks
> for processing of mail ~after~ I've recieved it, but I'd like to be able to
> read
cmasters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greetings,
>
> Although I'm sure my reasons are not unique, I thought I'd express them so
> that perhaps they will explain my frustration at getting adequate mail
> processing.
> I then discovered that I could "fetch" my mail on regular intervals an have
>
C. Masters writes:
> Simply, I want mail to be retrieved, pre-sorted, and ready for
> viewing/saving/disposal whenever I log on to my computer.
> Any thoughts?
fetchmail->mailagent->{gnus|mutt} works for my wife and I.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Greetings,
Although I'm sure my reasons are not unique, I thought I'd express them so
that perhaps they will explain my frustration at getting adequate mail
processing.
Previous to my current attempts, I (like many others) used mozilla and/or
kmail to read/sort/file/save my mail. Quite frankly, I
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 11:55:10PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 09:51:04PM +0100, Alex Hunsley ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > "Karsten M. Self" wrote:
>...
> Second: Last time this topic surfaced, indications were that procmail
> doesn't work with the legacy MS Window
* Mark Wagnon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 07/20/01 20:51:35 -0700, Cam Ellison wrote:
> > I looked at what I sent, and half the message is missing. Sorry about that
> > -- I'm still trying to get used to using emacs with mutt.
> >
>
> Are you having problems filtering your mail? For me pro
On 07/20/01 20:51:35 -0700, Cam Ellison wrote:
> I looked at what I sent, and half the message is missing. Sorry about that
> -- I'm still trying to get used to using emacs with mutt.
>
> Here's another go at displaying fetchmailrc:
>
> poll "mail.dccnet.com"
> protocol auto
> username "camelli
This probably made no sense to anyone.
Sorry for wasting the bandwidth -- unbeknownst to me, the first message never
made it.
* Cam Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I looked at what I sent, and half the message is missing. Sorry about that=
> -- I'm still trying to get used to using emacs
I looked at what I sent, and half the message is missing. Sorry about that --
I'm still trying to get used to using emacs with mutt.
Here's another go at displaying fetchmailrc:
poll "mail.dccnet.com"
protocol auto
username "camellison"
password "xx"
set syslog
mda "/usr/bin/procmail -d
On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 12:43:30PM +1000, Bek Oberin wrote:
> Dana J . Laude wrote:
> > I'm about ready to setup all of the above on a Potato 2.2r3
> > system, and was wondering if there is any particular "order"
> > that the packages should be installed?
>
> I think yyou'll find you'll have to
Dana J . Laude wrote:
> I'm about ready to setup all of the above on a Potato 2.2r3
> system, and was wondering if there is any particular "order"
> that the packages should be installed?
I think yyou'll find you'll have to install them before you de-install
everything else (the old ones you had
Greetings,
I'm about ready to setup all of the above on a Potato 2.2r3
system, and was wondering if there is any particular "order"
that the packages should be installed? I'll be uninstalling
Exim, since I want to learn Postfix. (done the Sendmail thing
on other Linux dists)
Just looking for inp
I just recently got fetchmail and procmail working together with ssmtp
to bring my pop email to my machine and throw it into an mbox. The
problem I'm having, though, is that with MUAs like Mutt and Pine are
saying that the format of the mbox the procmail is dumping to is bad.
Is there something t
Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just recently got fetchmail and procmail working together with ssmtp
> to bring my pop email to my machine and throw it into an mbox. The
> problem I'm having, though, is that with MUAs like Mutt and Pine are
> saying that the format of the mbox the procmail
On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 03:42:37AM +0100, MamoMC wrote:
> When I send a message to myself (maurizio) locally exim passes
> the message correctly to procmail (I have a ~/.procmailrc)
> which moves it to ~/Mail/In which is read by Mutt.
>
> If I send a message to an e-mail address outside my PC w
You need to check your system log to see what is happening. I would do
following as root.
1. apt-get install mc
2. poke around /var/log with mc to see all what is happening.
3. check /etc/exim.conf especially around procmail.
exim use fetchmail as local MDA only if it is configured so.
procma
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi! When I send a message to myself (maurizio) locally exim passes
> the message correctly to procmail (I have a ~/.procmailrc) which
> moves it to ~/Mail/In which is read by Mutt. If I send a
> message to an e-mail address outside my PC world a
Hi!
When I send a message to myself (maurizio) locally exim passes the message
correctly to procmail (I have a ~/.procmailrc) which moves it to ~/Mail/In
which is read by Mutt.
If I send a message to an e-mail address outside my PC world and the I fetch it
by fetchmail (~/.fetchmailrc knows
Rino Mardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21/01/2001 (20:24) :
>
> MAILPATH='/usr/spool/mail/bfox?"You have mail":/home/bfox/Mail/Inbox?"You
> have mail in Mail/Inbox"'
You don't need the ?"You have mail" (unless you want some special
message) simply set it as:
export
MAILPATH="/home/username/Mai
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 05:37:28PM +0100 or thereabouts, Daniel de los Reyes
wrote:
> I don't get a message saying if a folder (file) has new mail until I open it
> (to late, that is just what I don't want to have to do)
> If I press c I get a list of all avaliable folders under $Home/Mail
>
> H
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 05:37:28PM +0100, thus spake Daniel de los Reyes:
>
> > Open mutt with "mutt -y" otherwise it will show you your default
> > mailbox and you'll have to move round the others. Hitting "c"
> > will move you to the next box with new mail
Sorry - missed copying my first to
> Open mutt with "mutt -y" otherwise it will show you your default
> mailbox and you'll have to move round the others. Hitting "c"
> will move you to the next box with new mail
I don't get this. If I start mutt -y I get a list of all the folders I have
told mutt that may receive mail.
I don't g
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 12:12:58PM +0100, Daniel de los Reyes wrote:
> It's taking me a bit of time to understand I few things about how Mutt,
> Fetchmail and Procmail work together (I am moving from kmail).
>
> I use exim to send mail and fetch my mail from my ISP's pop server.
>
> I think the
It's taking me a bit of time to understand I few things about how Mutt,
Fetchmail and Procmail work together (I am moving from kmail).
I use exim to send mail and fetch my mail from my ISP's pop server.
I think the process should be:
Fetchmail fetches my mail from my ISP's pop server and handle
In a galaxy not too far away, Jim Lisi spoke on Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 12:53:52PM
-0500:
> Glyn Millington wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 06:06:13PM -0500, thus spake Jim Lisi:
> >
> >> Note: Please CC me, I am having problems with the email addrs subsribed
> >> to the list
> >>
> >> I am t
Glyn Millington wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 06:06:13PM -0500, thus spake Jim Lisi:
Note: Please CC me, I am having problems with the email addrs subsribed
to the list
I am trying to setup fetchmail and procmail so that I can get mail from
two email accounts
and diliver that to my debian bo
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 06:06:13PM -0500, Jim Lisi wrote:
> Note: Please CC me, I am having problems with the email addrs subsribed
> to the list
>
> I am trying to setup fetchmail and procmail so that I can get mail from
> two email accounts
> and diliver that to my debian box into to subfolders
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 06:06:13PM -0500, thus spake Jim Lisi:
> Note: Please CC me, I am having problems with the email addrs subsribed
> to the list
>
> I am trying to setup fetchmail and procmail so that I can get mail from
> two email accounts
> and diliver that to my debian box into to subfol
Note: Please CC me, I am having problems with the email addrs subsribed
to the list
I am trying to setup fetchmail and procmail so that I can get mail from
two email accounts
and diliver that to my debian box into to subfolders under ~/Mail.
exp.
fetchmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I actually managed to solve this, so if I can help anyone, please ask me.
-Geir
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Geir Erik Nielsen wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a new little problem that might be of interest here;
>
> I have a virtual domain mailbox that drops all the mail to a domain into it.
> Er...it is a p
Hello,
I have a new little problem that might be of interest here;
I have a virtual domain mailbox that drops all the mail to a domain into it.
Er...it is a pop mailbox that receives all the mail for a whole domain.
Something will download this mail and distribute it locally once it is
downloaded.
On Fri, 21 Jul 2000, James Green wrote:
> OK so I give up trying to figure this one out :-(
>
> I've got exim up and running. I used eximconf and selected option
> 2. I also have fetchmail and procmail up and running.
>
> Mail comes in from mail.linux.com using imap. The connection is
> tunnel
OK so I give up trying to figure this one out :-(
I've got exim up and running. I used eximconf and selected option
2. I also have fetchmail and procmail up and running.
Mail comes in from mail.linux.com using imap. The connection is
tunnelled over ssh. The connection goes fine and my proc.log sh
Hi!
I made an upgrade to woody. I use fetchmail to fetch my emails
from different pop3 servers. I use procmail to filter these.
Everything was ok on potato. Now I can fetch my mails, but fetchmail
doesn't give any info (it did on potato), and when a downloaded mail
goes to procmail the following m
Hi all -
I've recently been trying to make fetchmail/procmail filter all mails into
a set of mbox-type mailspools. However, when procmail puts a mail into one
of these spools, a number of important header lines are missing (including
the customary beginning 'From').
Mutt compl
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 "Christian T. Steigies" wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
>
>> [about fetchmail splitting mail at lines starting with `From ']
> First thanks for the hints I have received.
> Reading the fetchmail-FAQ I found this:
> X3. Messages containing "From" at s
On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> I have a little trouble with fetchmail (hamm, 4.3.9-1), procmail (hamm,
> 3.10.7-6) tearing mails apart.
> I think I tracked it down, when I fetch a mail containing a line with "From"
> in the text, procmail sorts everything before "From" in the
hange for fetchmail or procmail?
>
> Unless the mail(s) in question were close to the minimal digest
> format, I'd say it is a bug. Those buggy old email implementations
> shouldn't be around anymore :-)
What is a buggy old email implemantation? Are you talking about
fetchmai
On Tue, 26 Jan 1999 14:36:35 +0100 (CET) "Christian T. Steigies"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a little trouble with fetchmail (hamm, 4.3.9-1), procmail
> (hamm, 3.10.7-6) tearing mails apart. I think I tracked it down,
> when I fetch a mail containing a line with "From" in the text,
> proc
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a little trouble with fetchmail (hamm, 4.3.9-1), procmail (hamm,
> 3.10.7-6) tearing mails apart.
> I think I tracked it down, when I fetch a mail containing a line with "From"
> in the text,
It is a common phenomenon with mail system,
Hi,
I have a little trouble with fetchmail (hamm, 4.3.9-1), procmail (hamm,
3.10.7-6) tearing mails apart.
I think I tracked it down, when I fetch a mail containing a line with "From"
in the text, procmail sorts everything before "From" in the correct folder,
everything after "From" (the line with
On Sun, 13 Dec 1998, Shao Zhang wrote:
> fetchmail -v --mda formail -s procmail
I would add quotes:
fetchmail -v --mda "formail -s procmail"
On Sun, 13 Dec 1998, Graham Ashton wrote:
> humbug% cat .forward
> "|IFS=' ' && exec /usr/bin/procmail -f || exit 75 #ashtong"
> humbug% ll .forward
Thanks, I was setting ~/.forward the wrong way ;-)
r i c h a r d l. a l h a m a
technical support group
cyberspace laoag, isp
2900 phils.
Hi,
Could you please clarify my understanding??
I read the document about procmail. I don't understand why we need
to use .forward.(what does it do wanyway??)
In the man page, it says if we use
fetchmail -v --mda formail -s procmail
Then all the mails arrived will be go
On 14 Dec, Richard L. Alhama wrote:
> But when I choosed smail as my MTA, my used to be working ~/.procmailrc
> could not sort mail anymore.
oh. well I have a very similar setup to dave. my .forward and
.procmailrc files seem to be virtually identical (technically).
my fetchmail is done slightl
I used to have a working sendmail/fetchmail/procmail setup until I
reinstalled hamm on my machine(used to be 1.3) after I've messed up init.
But when I choosed smail as my MTA, my used to be working ~/.procmailrc
could not sort mail anymore.
I forgot how I set things up before, maybe a litt
Well, since there seems to be a fair a number of people who can't figure this
out, I thought it might be helpful if I mailed my own setup. First of all read
the mail filtering FAQ (search yahoo for it). This describes more in detail
the system that I use. Anyway, this is how I do it.
In /etc/ppp/i
Hi all,
My fetchmail is now working fine. Thne I want to use procmail as
well to divert all my debian mails to a different folder...
I changed the line in /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/fetchmail
from fetchmail -v
to fetchmail -v --mda formail -s procmail
I also have
Hi,
well I dont know the mail filtering FAQ and so on but if u want procmail
to process your mail:
As far as I know procmail usese a file called .procmailrc in you $HOME
for the rules. So the rules should be there not in .forward.
The .forward is just for sending the mail to procmail in case this
On 19 Jun 1997, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
>
> Bob> here is my ~/.fetchmailrc file:
>
> Bob> poll pop.primenet.com proto pop3 user USERNAME pass PASSWORD
>
> Try adding an `mda' line to it. Here's what I use:
poll mail.provider.com
protocol pop3
username myusername
password MYPASSWD
mda
> Bob> poll pop.primenet.com proto pop3 user USERNAME pass PASSWORD
>
> Try adding an `mda' line to it. Here's what I use:
A different solution that will use your mail daemon is to put
smtphost localhost
in your .fetchmailrc defaults
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail th
> "Bob" == Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> When I try to run fetchmail, my ISP is connected and when
Bob> attempting to retrieve mail, I get the error message:
Bob> reading message 1 (2679 bytes) .fetchmail: SMTP connect to
Bob> (null) failed fetchmail: SMTP trans
I have procmail working now but everyonce in a while it says that it cant
get the lock /var/spool/mail/jasonlck. Do you know why?? Can I fix it??
On Tue, 18 Feb 1997, Kevin M. Bealer wrote:
>Jason Killen wrote:
>>Thanks for the pointer on fetchmail.
>>
>>The part about having procmail send the
Jason Killen wrote:
>Thanks for the pointer on fetchmail.
>
>The part about having procmail send the mail to an intermediate mail box
>is intresting and a little over my head (I don't know much about procmail,
>just a sweep of the man pages.) but I will try to work things out.
>
>Thanks a lot.
>
>O
90 matches
Mail list logo
