Le 10.03.2014 18:13, Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 05:23:59PM +0100,
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Le 07.03.2014 21:27, Mr Queue a écrit :
>You sent this mail using Thunderbird.
You are wrong. I sent this mail using rouncube, a webmail.
Forgive Mr Queue's mistake
I've just noticed that the snippet I quote of my procmailrc is out of
context and lacks the match sigil. Here's my actual recipe. I prefer all
my lists under a sub-folder 'l' (and I use / as my IMAP folder separator
character). You may wish to use some other scheme and possibly
manipulate the list
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 05:11:05PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 07:24:36PM +, Tom Furie wrote:
> > This is the snippet from my .procmailrc for handling Debian mailing
> > lists. Each list gets sorted into it's own directory.
> >
> > :0
> > * ^List-id:
> > * ^List-i
Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:01:51AM +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
I know that some MUAs are able to do such kind of filtering
automatically, but I am using a webmail (roundcube) most of the
time, which have less features, but have the same configuration and
d
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:01:51AM +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> I know that some MUAs are able to do such kind of filtering
> automatically, but I am using a webmail (roundcube) most of the
> time, which have less features, but have the same configuration and
> display on all compu
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 05:23:59PM +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Le 07.03.2014 21:27, Mr Queue a écrit :
> >You sent this mail using Thunderbird.
>
> You are wrong. I sent this mail using rouncube, a webmail.
Forgive Mr Queue's mistake, it was an innocent one, because your MUA
is
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 07:24:36PM +, Tom Furie wrote:
> This is the snippet from my .procmailrc for handling Debian mailing
> lists. Each list gets sorted into it's own directory.
>
> :0
> * ^List-id:
> * ^List-id: $MAILDIR/.Debian.$MATCH/
The only problem with that is that anyone can send
Le 08.03.2014 02:38, Chris Bannister a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 02:28:21PM +0100,
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Ok, I see. Well, asking did not cost a lot, and now I know that it
will not be made to avoid "bloating" subject field.
No. It is because there are *already* sufficien
Le 07.03.2014 21:27, Mr Queue a écrit :
On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:28:21 +0100
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
Sounds like I'll have to ask to the admin of my mail account to
implement something to have some filters, or to bother with mess and
spams for ages ( other solution is to unsubscrib
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 02:28:21PM +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Ok, I see. Well, asking did not cost a lot, and now I know that it
> will not be made to avoid "bloating" subject field.
No. It is because there are *already* sufficient headers for this
purpose. Besides, remember the
On Vi, 07 mar 14, 21:48:09, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 14:27 -0600, Mr Queue wrote:
> > On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:28:21 +0100
> > berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> >
> > > [snip]
> > [snip]
>
> Some people perhaps dislike to have a folder for everything, they
> perhaps prefer t
On Friday 07 March 2014 20:27:56 Mr Queue wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:28:21 +0100
>
> berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> > Sounds like I'll have to ask to the admin of my mail account to
> > implement something to have some filters, or to bother with mess
> > and spams for ages ( other solu
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 14:27 -0600, Mr Queue wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:28:21 +0100
> berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
> > [snip]
> [snip]
Some people perhaps dislike to have a folder for everything, they
perhaps prefer to have just a few folders and prefer to take care about
the subjec
On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 14:28:21 +0100
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Sounds like I'll have to ask to the admin of my mail account to
> implement something to have some filters, or to bother with mess and
> spams for ages ( other solution is to unsubscribe, but I do not
> really like this id
Le 06.03.2014 23:36, Andrei POPESCU a écrit :
On Jo, 06 mar 14, 19:27:37, Brian wrote:
On Thu 06 Mar 2014 at 11:01:51 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
wrote:
> As I am starting to subscribe to various mailing lists, I have
> noticed that some uses a kind of tag in subjects. Obviously, it
On Jo, 06 mar 14, 19:27:37, Brian wrote:
> On Thu 06 Mar 2014 at 11:01:51 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
>
> > As I am starting to subscribe to various mailing lists, I have
> > noticed that some uses a kind of tag in subjects. Obviously, it is
> > added by the ml-engine, not by users
On Thu, 06 Mar 2014 11:08:03 -0800
David Guntner wrote:
> berenger.mo...@neutralite.org grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > As I am starting to subscribe to various mailing lists, I have
> > noticed that some uses a kind of tag in subjects. Obviously, it is
> > added by the ml-engin
#x27;s initial mail snipped a bit for clarity.
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 11:01:51 +0100
From: berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
To:
Subject: feature request for this mailing list
Message-ID:
X-Sender: berenger.mo...@neutralite.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929
Thu
On Thu 06 Mar 2014 at 11:01:51 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> As I am starting to subscribe to various mailing lists, I have
> noticed that some uses a kind of tag in subjects. Obviously, it is
> added by the ml-engine, not by users.
You've missed the tenth aniversary :)
https:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:08:03AM -0800, David Guntner wrote:
> I use Procmail to do my mail filtering for me. The recipe I use is:
>
> # Debian list processing
> # Look for the list address here and put them in their own file
> :0:
> * ^TO_ .*@lists.debian.org
> $MAILDIR/debian/
This is the s
berenger.mo...@neutralite.org grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As I am starting to subscribe to various mailing lists, I have noticed
> that some uses a kind of tag in subjects. Obviously, it is added by the
> ml-engine, not by users.
> I am also receiving more and more spam since 2 mont
On 06/03/14 21:01, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As I am starting to subscribe to various mailing lists, I have noticed
> that some uses a kind of tag in subjects. Obviously, it is added by the
> ml-engine, not by users.
Yes. My local LUG and other lists do the same thing - ap
On 06/03/14 10:01, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
> Hello.
>
> As I am starting to subscribe to various mailing lists, I have
noticed that some uses a kind of tag in subjects. Obviously, it is added
by the ml-engine, not by users.
> I am also receiving more and more spam since 2 months. I
Hello.
As I am starting to subscribe to various mailing lists, I have noticed
that some uses a kind of tag in subjects. Obviously, it is added by the
ml-engine, not by users.
I am also receiving more and more spam since 2 months. I guess my
address was sold to or found by some f** spammers
24 matches
Mail list logo
