I am bumping my head up against the requirement imposed by Tk and exmh
that the xhosts lists be empty.
Apart from the option of recompiling Tk, which I have been rather
strongly advised against:
Is there *no* way other than xhosts I can use to open up access to
X on the local display to
> Shaul Karl wrote:
> >
> > The following is an bad attempt to use exmh `Apply command to body'
> > feature.
> > However I believe it boils down to a tcl or a sh quoting question.
> >
> > What I am trying to do is to filter a message by applying a filt
Shaul Karl wrote:
>
> The following is an bad attempt to use exmh `Apply command to body'
> feature.
> However I believe it boils down to a tcl or a sh quoting question.
>
> What I am trying to do is to filter a message by applying a filter to
> its body.
>
> No
The following is an bad attempt to use exmh `Apply command to body'
feature.
However I believe it boils down to a tcl or a sh quoting question.
What I am trying to do is to filter a message by applying a filter to
its body.
Now this filter
sed -n "s/Inst//p" $file > /
Hi!
I installed exmh and nmh, but when starting exmh, it´s doing nothing.
ii exmh 2.1.1-1.1 An X user interface for MH mail.
ii nmh1.0.2-9A set of electronic mail handling programs.
When I do an strace, the last output is:
<...>
read(4, "# ma
Hello,
Since a couple of days exmh was broken ;
I mean that any key input within the compose window makes
in segfaulting.
I just dicovered that it's also the case of StarOffice 5.2's text
processing module.
Any clue ?
D.
P.S. By the way bugs.debian.org seems to be buggy itself !
Hello,
Since a couple of days, one update of woody broke my exmh
(tcl/tk based mail client). Trying an input (evan a single alt) in
a composing window causes exmh to segfault immediately.
receiving mail is still ok
any clue ?
Thoanks.
When I type "exmh" in an xterm, it just hangs. No window pops up or
anything!
Any ideas about what's wrong? I haven't created the ~/Mail directory
--- I presumed it would do that fo
I am having problems getting Exmh to enter the correct sender
in my header. It keeps putting [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In exim.conf I wrote a rewrite script
^(root|postmailer|mailer-daemon)@* [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ffr
but it did not work. Is there something wrong with the
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:40:44PM -0600, Lance Hoffmeyer wrote:
>
> I am having problems getting Exmh to enter the correct sender
> in my header. It keeps putting [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In exim.conf I wrote a rewrite script
>
> ^(root|
I am having problems getting Exmh to enter the correct sender
in my header. It keeps putting [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In exim.conf I wrote a rewrite script
^(root|postmailer|mailer-daemon)@* [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ffr
but it did not work. Is there something wrong with the
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 12:27:47PM -0400, hawk (hawk@fac13.ds.psu.edu) wrote:
>
> I keep dinking around wiht options, but haven't found a way to work.
>
> There seems to be no solution to the rude and clueless who send mime
> messages with html. Unfortunately, exmh insists
I keep dinking around wiht options, but haven't found a way to work.
There seems to be no solution to the rude and clueless who send mime
messages with html. Unfortunately, exmh insists on defaulting to the
html rather than the plain text. I see different ways to display/not
display t
I'm using ``xhost local:root'' to enable su using X. I'm having exmh
open most of the time, which removes this setting more or less
immediately. Is there a way to stop it from doing so?
TIA
Christoph Simon
--
^X^C
q
quit
:q
^C
end
x
exit
ZZ
^D
?
help
.
your incoming mail. Once you've done that, exmh
should work OK.
- --
Graeme.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Life's not fair," I reply. "But the root password helps." - BOFH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE5HnriPjGH3lNt65URAnRNAJ9odW3dLCzS6P
hello,
I would like to know how to fix this problem when trying to run exmh the
first time.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ exmh
exmh: inc: no mail to incorporate
No Path entry in your .mh_profile file.
Run the "inc" command to get your
MH environment initialized right.
I tried running ./i
On Sun, 09 Jan 2000 15:00:51 CST, Brad writes:
>Yuck... Robert, please try to keep lines to 72 or 76 chatacters in
>length.
mea culpa. anyone knows how to set that with exmh (2.3.3 3/22/99)?
&rw
--
-- +++ EUnet/[EMAIL PROTECTED], 15.-17.2.'2k,
I've seen this problem a couple of times before, and it's happening
again.
My mail is not being deleted from the spool when exmh incorporates it.
As a result, the same messages are incorporated again and again. Using
inc from the command line seems to solve the problem. Some
let me revise that--it is not a loop for the open mailbox. Closer
inspection shows that exmh is not deleting mail from the spool after
incorporation, causing it to be reincorporated every few minutes.
I've been using exmh for about three years, with the same
configuration (save for diff
My unread messages are breeding!
My configuration for exmh has largely been unchanged for years, save
for those needed to accomodate for the differences between FreeBSD and
debian in .maildelivery. Suddenly, the messages oin the open mailbox
are duplicating themselves every few minutes. And
> OK this is a new user question... but I checked the man pages, the docs and
> the Web pages on this issue and came up dry.
>
> According to the manual/web pages on exmh, once I have all the proper
> software installed (I do) I can run
> wish -f exmh.install
>
OK this is a new user question... but I checked the man pages, the docs and
the Web pages on this issue and came up dry.
According to the manual/web pages on exmh, once I have all the proper
software installed (I do) I can run
wish -f exmh.install
according to the README.exmh I am to
trapstep wrote:
>Hi!
>
>i now use exmh for my mails, but i miss a "sent-mail" folder :-( doesn't exm
>h
>save the mails i send? if yes, where will i find them and if no, is there a
>way to automatically send me a copy of all outgoing mail?
Yo
Hi!
i now use exmh for my mails, but i miss a "sent-mail" folder :-( doesn't exmh
save the mails i send? if yes, where will i find them and if no, is there a
way to automatically send me a copy of all outgoing mail?
TIA
Stefan Bunse
--- Forwarded Message
On 1999/04/28, shaul wrote:
> I am having problems with inc in exmh.
> I understand that nmh 1.0.3 fixed that.
> However, the current deb package requires glibc2.1, which is in the unstable
> tree.
> Before trying to package the current nmh sources wit
I am trying Exmh and like it a lot. It works great on my Debian 2.1
system except for sending mail. Whenever I compose a message and click
'send' I get this error message:
post: problem initializing server; [BHST] no servers available
send: message not delivered to anyone
I under
> > The reason I am even thinking about it is that the presort Inc
> > method of my exmh sometimes get stucked. To be more specific, It
> > seems that there are so me messages, which I can't fully
> > characterize, that cause Inc to terminate its action. Where this
x shouldn't even know it
exists. I can't find it anywhere in .exmh*, any of the preferences, or
anywhere else I can think of.
Where in the world is this set???
rick
--
grr. As of yestderday's updates to frozen, exmh seems to be broken
again. It gives an error of
invalid command name "Gpg_Init"
while executing
"Gpg_Init"
(procedure "Pgp_Init" line 157)
invoked from within
"Pgp_Init"
(procedure &
Package: exmh
Version: 1:2.0.2-1
When using the Reply... in exmh, Reply all does not give me a Cc field and it
does not list the one that the mail was sent to (only the one that sent it).
This was not like this in the past so I probably was not aware to the fact
that somehow I managed to change
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mark Phillips
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have just managed to reproduce the error at the commandline using
>the inc command (nmh). I have sent off a message to the nmh-workers
>telling them about the bug.
It's nmh? I tried to use nmh, too, when upgrading to hamm. But th
ize it still too small to be conclusive on this point, but
> it is a lead. What could lead to an incorporation failure however is
> still beyond me.
>
> What I need to do now is get more detailed debugging info from exmh.
> At the moment all the log really tells me is:
>
>
> > > There have been a number of reports from people recently that doing
> > > a presort inc sometimes fails from within exmh.
> >
> > I have been doing some further experiments.
>
> If it helps, I had it happens yesterday twice: The first time was on
> There have been a number of reports from people recently that doing
> a presort inc sometimes fails from within exmh.
I have been doing some further experiments.
The output from exmh is as follows:
BgAction Inc IncInner
BackgroundPending Inc
exmh-bg {Inc_Presort +MyIncTmp: {child
Hi,
There have been a number of reports from people recently that doing a
presort inc sometimes fails from within exmh. The same thing has
happened to me several times. It seems to be something to do with
certain mail files which cause the problem. I can do a manual inc
from the command line
to the
# appropriate locations.
for i in [123456789]*; do
/usr/lib/mh/slocal -verbose < $i
done
> > 2. Once when this happened, I made a copy of my mail file before I manually
> > incorporated the mail. Then I copied back the mail file, and tried to
> > incorporate it using th
>
> > > It seems that there are some messages, which I can't fully characterize,
> > > that cause Inc to terminate its action.
> > [etc etc...]
> >
> > There are quite a few people who saw EXACTLY this problem (including
> > myself). I saw a
> > It seems that there are some messages, which I can't fully characterize,
> > that cause Inc to terminate its action.
> [etc etc...]
>
> There are quite a few people who saw EXACTLY this problem (including
> myself). I saw a few emails on EXMH mailing l
Mark, this works for me with nmh. From my .mh_profile:
Alternate-Mailboxes:[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], ruben
repl: -annotate -nocc me -cc to -cc cc
(actually my line is longer with formats and filters, but you get the idea
- the alternate mailboxes stuff is what (n
> > Odd. I run nmh+exmh without such modifications, and
> > reply all works. Reply goes TO sender, with cc to others.
>
> Yes, something very odd is happening. I tried using the command line
> "repl" as follows:
>
> /usr/bin/mh/repl +inbox 10 -ed
> Odd. I run nmh+exmh without such modifications, and
> reply all works. Reply goes TO sender, with cc to others.
Yes, something very odd is happening. I tried using the command line
"repl" as follows:
/usr/bin/mh/repl +inbox 10 -editor xemacs -cc to -cc cc
and it s
>
> I bet you are running nmh, right? Add the line
> *Mops.reply.m.c_replyall: Msg_Reply -cc to -cc cc -group
>
> to your .exmh-defaults
Odd. I run nmh+exmh without such modifications, and
reply all works. Reply goes TO sender, with cc to others.
Helge Hafting
I bet you are running nmh, right? Add the line
*Mops.reply.m.c_replyall: Msg_Reply -cc to -cc cc -group
to your .exmh-defaults
/Anders
You wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In exmh, when you select "Reply.../Reply All" it allows you to reply, but
> only to the sender, not to a
> > In exmh, when you select "Reply.../Reply All" it allows you to reply, but
> > only to the sender, not to all!
> >
> > What is wrong?
>
> Hello Mark,
>
> Please try this in your home directory :
>
> [emile]<102> cat .exmhbin
Hi,
In exmh, when you select "Reply.../Reply All" it allows you to reply, but
only to the sender, not to all!
What is wrong?
Thanks,
Mark.
_/\___/~~\
/~~\_/~~\__/~~\__Mark_Phillips__
On Tue, Dec 15, 1998 at 01:19:16AM +0200, shaul wrote:
>
> I am using exmh to handle my email (MUA ?). The MTA is smail (is it also the
> MDA ? What are the differences between MDA and MTA ?).
MUA: Mail User Agent: interactive mailer
examples: mutt, pine, Outlook, etc.
MTA: Mail Trans
>>>shaul wrote:
> I am using exmh to handle my email (MUA ?). The MTA is smail (is it also the
> MDA ? What are the differences between MDA and MTA ?).
> I want to presort my email messages.
> Can you recommend a way to do it (procmail ? exmh capabilities for thi
> > I want to presort my email messages.
> > Can you recommend a way to do it (procmail ? exmh capabilities for this
> > task,
> > if it got any ? other ?). Is the proposed way a popular one ? Is there a
> > HOWTO, or similar staff, that explain how to do it
> I want to presort my email messages.
> Can you recommend a way to do it (procmail ? exmh capabilities for this task,
> if it got any ? other ?). Is the proposed way a popular one ? Is there a
> HOWTO, or similar staff, that explain how to do it ?
Choose the Preferences/Incorpora
I am using exmh to handle my email (MUA ?). The MTA is smail (is it also the
MDA ? What are the differences between MDA and MTA ?).
I want to presort my email messages.
Can you recommend a way to do it (procmail ? exmh capabilities for this task,
if it got any ? other ?). Is the proposed way a
> Thanks for this! I used the script that you included below and eventually
> managed to work out what the problem is.
>
> It would seem that you need to chmod .maildelivery so that only you have
> rw access to it. This didn't seem to be in the documentation anywhere!
> That I could find anyway.
Dear Steve,
> I think I had the same problem and tracked it down with
> the enclosed--see where it goes awry. (It simulates what
> exmh does.)
Thanks for this! I used the script that you included below and eventually
managed to work out what the problem is.
It would seem that yo
Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> mark at ist.flinders.edu.au: loses; [USER] 550 relaying to
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> prohibited by administrator
> post: 1 addressee undeliverable
> send: message not delivered to anyone
>
>
> What on earth does this mean and why isn't it working???
Try
Hm-m-m-m
That's indeed strange. Am I right that you use "presort" in "ways to inc"
(Top 10 menu)?
You know what, I saw something similar... It was about 1 month ago, my exmh
kept incorporating same mails again and again. It looked like I had a
corrupted mail i
On Fri, 11 Dec 1998, Alexander Kushnirenko wrote:
> I think you need "rcvstore". Here is my .maildelivery (Debian slink)
> cc debian-user@lists.debian.org | ? "/usr/lib/mh/rcvstore +debian/user"
> to debian-user@lists.debian.org | ? "/usr/lib/mh/rcvstore +debian/user"
> default -
I think those "folder" words should be "+".
-Jongki
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to setup exmh to presort my email messages when I do an inc.
> I have created a .maildelivery file in my home directory, namely:
>
> X-mailing-listdebian-user f
Hi,
I am trying to setup exmh to presort my email messages when I do an inc.
I have created a .maildelivery file in my home directory, namely:
X-mailing-list debian-user folder ? list/deb-user
default - folder ? inbox
but when I try to do an inc, it
> > > I can now successfully send email to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" using
> > > elm, but when I try and send a similar message using exmh, it complains
> > > that:
> > >
> > > mark at ist.flinders.edu.au: loses; [USER] 550 relaying to
> >
On Thu, 10 Dec 1998, Emile Carcamo wrote:
> > I can now successfully send email to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" using
> > elm, but when I try and send a similar message using exmh, it complains
> > that:
> >
> > mark at ist.flinders.edu.au: loses; [USE
Hi,
I've just set up my machine so it can email the rest of the world, at
least I thought I had.
I can now successfully send email to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" using
elm, but when I try and send a similar message using exmh, it complains
that:
mark at ist.flinders.edu.au: loses; [USE
I am losing mail. I have the following installed.
ii mh 6.8.4-25 Rand mail handling system.
ii mutt0.93.2-1 Text-based mailreader supporting MIME and
th
ii exmh2.0.2-2An X user interface for MH mail.
Recently I have been losing mail
while fighting slink, i ran FreeBSD for a day. Don't do this with your
ext2 partitions; it doesn't work quite right (@!*#(*&$(().
ANnyway, I had to modify my .maildeliver for the different location of
rcvstore. I forgot to undo this before logging in after i restored my
file system, and it
Whenever I am trying to attach a file to a message using exmh, it says that
its default type is audio/basic.
When I used to do the same thing under bo, it used to show the correct type of
the file.
does anybody else exprienced it ?
Is it a matter of some settings that has to be changed ?
I tried
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> From time to time I am still trying to convince exmh to use the login and
> address of my ISP's account ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>
[ ... excerpts from PPP-HOWTO, on configuring MH ... ]
>
> But it didn't give me the correct From field.
>
>From time to time I am still trying to convince exmh to use the login and
address of my ISP's account ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Couple of days ago I run into something relevant from exmh help. It is written
in /usr/lib/exmh/html/ppp.howto.html
Start quoting:
"
ABOUT SETTING U
I've installed exim and tried fetchmail a la the attachment.
The mail server at my ISP is mail.nac.net and I'm fairly sure
I remember my password (though I don't need it using Netscape).
Can anyone tell where I've gone wrong? TIA (or as we said
back in the olden days, adTHANKSvance)
--
-
've written a perl to check my maibox using pop3, but all that
> the configuration mentioned was smtp. Might this be a problem?
> This message is coming to you via good old netscape.
exmh, like so many things in Linux, can be configured in many ways. I
think the typical way t
I've installed it, and it looks realy cool, but it doesn't fetch
my mail. I told it the name of the mail server at my ISP, but it
never asked for a password and I don't see anywhere in all those
bazillion configuration options where to specify it. Also,
I've written a perl to check my maibox usin
> Question: How to change exmh configuration so that it will let smail do what
> I
> want ? That is, how to prevent exmh from disturbing smail to set the From:
> header the way I want it to be ?
You want to change this in nmh or MH (whichever you're using), not in EXMH.
-s test [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> results in
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (shaul)
> However, when I am using exmh I get
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MH adds its own From: line, and smail sees it so doesn't add it's own.
You have to convince smail to override it anyway.
Can sm
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (shaul)
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 1998 02:27:02 +0300 (IDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: test
Fri Jul 17 02:27:02 IDT 1998
However, when I am using exmh I get
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: test
; > and
> > that mail could be filtered to a junk box in this manner.
> >
> > But looking through the exmh documentation about .maildelivery, this
> > doesn't
> > seem to be an option: I can sort by the contents of any field, but it
> > doesn't
&
Richard E. Hawkins Esq. writes:
>
>
> reading through a newsgroup, someone pointed out what should have been
> obvious: bulk emailings almost never have a "to:" or "cc:" in the header,
> and
> that mail could be filtered to a junk box in this man
Hi,
I've been a Debian user for over two years now. I'm still running the stable
bo release and using exmh for mail under X.
In the last week or two exmh has stopped functioning properly. Normally when
I send mail out I use the 'whom' option on the 'More...&#
reading through a newsgroup, someone pointed out what should have been
obvious: bulk emailings almost never have a "to:" or "cc:" in the header, and
that mail could be filtered to a junk box in this manner.
But looking through the exmh documentation about .maildelivery, t
Do any of you know how to solve the .Xauthority
and exmh tk send problem for Debian? I have only
found the openwin solution in the docs.
Thanks,
Art
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 28 Mar 1998, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> I would like to use exmh for my mail client, instead of elm. I would like to
> set up procmail for the filtering and sorting. Early experiments succeeded
> in moving mail to elm-style files but not in a format which is acceptable t
"Oliver Elphick" wrote:
>Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> ...
> >Could anyone send me an example of a .procmail file for use with exmh?
>
>This is my ~/.procmailrc:
>
>MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail
>LOCKFILE=$HOME/procmail/lock
>LOGFILE=$HOME/procm
Erik van der Meulen wrote:
...
>Could anyone send me an example of a .procmail file for use with exmh?
This is my ~/.procmailrc:
MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail
LOCKFILE=$HOME/procmail/lock
LOGFILE=$HOME/procmail/new
LOGABSTRACT=all
TRAP=$HOME/procmail/postprocess
DEFAULT=inbox/.
#:0 c
#backup/.
#
I would like to use exmh for my mail client, instead of elm. I would like to
set up procmail for the filtering and sorting. Early experiments succeeded
in moving mail to elm-style files but not in a format which is acceptable to
ex(mh) directories.
Could anyone send me an example of a .procmail
gt; visible_name=domain # !! HERE !! fake name if you wish...
> > more_hostnames=localhost
> > -domains
> > hostnames=linuxbox.domain# here is the true name
> >
> > For EXMH/MH program one need to modify:
> > /etc/mh/mtstailor
> >
/etc/smail/config
> visible_name=domain # !! HERE !! fake name if you wish...
> more_hostnames=localhost
> -domains
> hostnames=linuxbox.domain# here is the true name
>
> For EXMH/MH program one need to modify:
> /etc/mh/mtstailor
>
> loc
Hello,
This seems to be an exmh problem, although maybe it is an nmh issue. I'm
running nmh version 0.22 and exmh version 2.0.2 on a Debian hamm system.
Message indexes in my inbox have grown to beyond 13000 messages. But exmh
can't display any message with index greater than (f
# !! HERE !! fake name if you wish...
more_hostnames=localhost
-domains
hostnames=linuxbox.domain# here is the true name
For EXMH/MH program one need to modify:
/etc/mh/mtstailor
localname: domain
There is also file /etc/mailname - but I failed to understand
On Thu, 12 Mar 1998 12:35:57 CST, wrote:
> Hi, All
>
> I have problem sending e-mails from EXMH, but I can receive them succesfully.
> It looks like ordinary Mail program works fine (I can both send and receive e
> -mails). Here is the message from EXMH:
> post: problem i
Hi, All
I have problem sending e-mails from EXMH, but I can receive them succesfully.
It looks like ordinary Mail program works fine (I can both send and receive
e-mails). Here is the message from EXMH:
post: problem initializing server; [RPLY] 550 '<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' sender
> I'm trying to install the exmh package, but I'm running into an interesting
> problem. It depends on tcl40 or tcl41, and I have tcl42. ALso, it depends
> on tk74 or tk75. I have tk76. Is this a bug/problem, or normal?
This is a stable system, right? I guess the dependenc
I'm trying to install the exmh package, but I'm running into an interesting
problem. It depends on tcl40 or tcl41, and I have tcl42. ALso, it depends
on tk74 or tk75. I have tk76. Is this a bug/problem, or normal?
Please cc to me, as I sub and unsub the group often, depending on
Hi,
Well the title should have been "exmh questions become smail questions."
Thanks to Martin Bialasinski for suggesting setting up my own domain.
Is there a domain name reserved for private networks like the reserved
ip address ranges? I picked home.bradshaw, but I'd switch to t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I saw a suggestion to use someething like "@home.net" for local users.
> The MUA's I've seen try to qualify the username and that dummy address
> might be the thing to use. Please send your suggestions, or I'll post
> if I get things improved a little more.
>
This was
Hi everyone,
Thanks for the suggestion to look at GNUS and the other responses.
My setup is similar to what Daniel Martin? described on his web page.
I had to enter several lines in the frommap to correct what the different
mail programs considered to be the from address:
bradshaw
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Bradshaw) writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm considering using exmh for my mail reader. I want to filter mail
> into different folders and be able to see which folders have messages in
> them. Suggestions of other mail readers with this feature would be
> we
Lee Bradshaw wrote:
>I'm considering using exmh for my mail reader. I want to filter mail
>into different folders and be able to see which folders have messages in
>them. Suggestions of other mail readers with this feature would be
>welcome.
I use procmail to write
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Bradshaw) writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm considering using exmh for my mail reader. I want to filter mail
> into different folders and be able to see which folders have messages in
> them. Suggestions of other mail readers with this feature would be
&g
Hi,
I'm considering using exmh for my mail reader. I want to filter mail
into different folders and be able to see which folders have messages in
them. Suggestions of other mail readers with this feature would be
welcome.
However I'm currently having some problems. exmh seems to de
Lance Levsen wrote:
>
> Oh yeah, on other thing. The last filter should be to your +inbox. and shoul
> d
> be generic:
>
> :0
> *
> |/usr/lib/mh/rcvstore +inbox
>
> This allows anything that failed all tests to get dumped into the inbox
> instead of the bit bucket (or where ever el
Oh yeah, on other thing. The last filter should be to your +inbox. and should
be generic:
:0
*
|/usr/lib/mh/rcvstore +inbox
This allows anything that failed all tests to get dumped into the inbox
instead of the bit bucket (or where ever else it might go or do).
-Lance
--
-
If I had a nea
Hi Mario. Here's how I do it with procmail. Took me a little bit to
figure
out, but now there's no problem. This may or may not help you, I use a dialup
and gwpop, but you can use any MTA that will send mail through a filter.
In Exmh (I'm using 2.0zeta) under Preference
--- Begin Message ---
Hello
I'm using exmh. I Have several folders and i would like to have INC separating
the mails for each folder. I chose pre-sort (or something like that) in the
prefs
but I don't know what i have to do to specify the criteria, and in this way
inc does
nothing (
I'm having a devil of a time getting this set up right; I'm not sure
that I'm following the instructions properly.
I have a debian 1.3 system.
I've set up smail as "satellite," with eyry.econ.iastate.edu as the
identifier for mail from my system, and iastate.edu as the correct reply
to system.
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
