-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2004-04-20 12:08:38 1BFmYn-5Q-00 == [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> T=remote_smtp defer (-44): retry time not reached for any host
>
> The funny is I can send to hotmail via my exim smtp but accept to
> leader.com.my I ha
Dear: Debian Users
I have a problem on exim smtp server. Some mail I send it give me an error
below but when I test with qmail my 2nd smtp server it just working fine.
2004-04-20 12:08:38 1BFmYn-5Q-00 == [EMAIL PROTECTED] T=remote_smtp
defer (-44): retry time not reached for any host
The f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:00:21AM +1100, Ivan Wills wrote:
> Any suggestions on how to check if the firewall is sending a TCP RST?
telnet to the port. If you get "Connection refused," then it is. If
it times out, it's not.
- --
.''`. Paul Jo
Vineet Kumar wrote:
I bounced your message back to the list, to continue the discussion in
the public forum. This way, others may be able to provide input into
the discussion, and still others may benefit from reading the discussion
now and in the public list archives.
* Ivan Wills ([EMAIL PROTEC
I bounced your message back to the list, to continue the discussion in
the public forum. This way, others may be able to provide input into
the discussion, and still others may benefit from reading the discussion
now and in the public list archives.
* Ivan Wills ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040302 10:59]
Vineet Kumar wrote:
* Ivan Wills ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040229 20:49]:
Recently the server has started to take about 30s before sending a email
message. (It never did this before)
It does not matter what the size of the message is. It seems like the
server is waiting for the 30s before listenin
* Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Have you made any recent changes? Perhaps it's queueing your mail
> > before sending for some reason?
> I had this problem, although I recall the delay was nearer a minute.
>
> Are you using mutt? In your .muttrc file you need:
> set sendmail_wait=-1
On (29/02/04 22:12), Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 03:36:05PM +1100, Ivan Wills wrote:
> > Recently the server has started to take about 30s before sending a email
> > message. (It never did this before)
> > It does not matter what the size of the message is. It seems like the
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 03:36:05PM +1100, Ivan Wills wrote:
> Recently the server has started to take about 30s before sending a email
> message. (It never did this before)
> It does not matter what the size of the message is. It seems like the
> ser
* Ivan Wills ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040229 20:49]:
> Recently the server has started to take about 30s before sending a email
> message. (It never did this before)
> It does not matter what the size of the message is. It seems like the
> server is waiting for the 30s before listening to the client.
Hi
I am using Exim 3.35-1woodie2 under Debian Stable.
Recently the server has started to take about 30s before sending a email
message. (It never did this before)
It does not matter what the size of the message is. It seems like the
server is waiting for the 30s before listening to the client.
D
| > What exactly does error "334 VXNlcm5hbWU6" mean?
The 334 is the response code from the server. The data after it is
base64 encoded and decodes to "Username:".
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 09:03:21PM -0500, Jerome R. Acks wrote:
| Solved. I had to change entries in /etc/email-addresses from
| [EMA
Solved. I had to change entries in /etc/email-addresses from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mozilla mail can still send emails using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mozilla Thunderbird cannot and needs to use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] like exim. What is the difference between the way
mozilla mail does SMTP aut
For over a year now I've been using fetchmail, procmail, exim 3.36, and
mutt to send and receive email. After going away for three days, I
return to find that I can no longer send email via exim. I can still
send email using mozilla mail.
When I try to send a email via mutt and exim, I immediat
Andy Firman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 05:43:29PM -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
mike wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 13:27:49 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote
Exim's conf file attached as well as /etc/aliases due to possible
relevance
already checked man mailman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# man m
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 05:43:29PM -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
> mike wrote:
> >On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 13:27:49 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote
> >
> >>Exim's conf file attached as well as /etc/aliases due to possible
> >>relevance
> >>
> >>already checked man mailman
> >>
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED
mike wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 13:27:49 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote
Exim's conf file attached as well as /etc/aliases due to possible relevance
already checked man mailman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# man mailman
No manual entry for mailman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-cache searc
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 01:27:49PM -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote:
> Exim's conf file attached as well as /etc/aliases due to possible relevance
>
> already checked man mailman
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# man mailman
> No manual entry for mailman
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#
> No other documentation
On Sat, 03 Jan 2004 13:27:49 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr. wrote
> Exim's conf file attached as well as /etc/aliases due to possible relevance
>
> already checked man mailman
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# man mailman
> No manual entry for mailman
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-cache
Exim's conf file attached as well as /etc/aliases due to possible relevance
already checked man mailman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# man mailman
No manual entry for mailman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-cache search mailman docs
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-cache search mailman doc
[EMAIL PRO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 15 December 2002 4:53 pm, Eric Cheney wrote:
> On Sunday, 15 December 2002 at 21:15:29 +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 December 2002 5:58 pm, Eric R Cheney wrote:
> > > Any ideas what is wrong?
> >
> > It would help if there were
On Sunday, 15 December 2002 at 21:15:29 +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sunday 15 December 2002 5:58 pm, Eric R Cheney wrote:
>
> > Any ideas what is wrong?
> >
>
> It would help if there were some details - like the relevent parts of
> /etc/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 15 December 2002 5:58 pm, Eric R Cheney wrote:
> Any ideas what is wrong?
>
It would help if there were some details - like the relevent parts of
/etc/exim/exim.conf
- --
Alan Chandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Vers
Hello. I have exim set up at home. Problem is that I can't e-mail
directly to my box from a host external to the network. I can fetch mail
using fetchmail from outside the network, but that's it. When I try to
e-mail from an external host to the box, I eventually get a message
saying "faile
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 07:29:36 -0600 (CST)
From: Cheryl Homiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Mail/exim problem
I looked in the archives and didn't see anything about this but sometimes I do
have problems with the archive
Shyamal Prasad wrote:
Sandip> an error occured while sending mail. the mail server
Sandip> responded: relayin to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sandip> prohibited by administrator. (failed to find hostname from
Sandip> ip address). please check mail receipients and try again
>>
>> I have
Jens Grivolla wrote:
Sandip P Deshmukh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
an error occured while sending mail. the mail server responded:
relayin to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> prohibited by
administrator. (failed to find hostname from ip address). please check
mail receipients and try again
You don't
"Sandip" == Sandip P Deshmukh writes:
Sandip> Shyamal Prasad wrote:
>> "Sandip" == Sandip P Deshmukh writes:
>>
Sandip> an error occured while sending mail. the mail server
Sandip> responded: relayin to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sandip> prohibited by administrator. (failed
Sandip P Deshmukh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> now, i changed smtp server in my mozilla to 192.168.100.21 - my
> machine's ip address. it is unable to deliver message. the error i get
> is:
>
> an error occured while sending mail. the mail server responded:
> relayin to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> prohi
Shyamal Prasad wrote:
"Sandip" == Sandip P Deshmukh writes:
Sandip> an error occured while sending mail. the mail server
Sandip> responded: relayin to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sandip> prohibited by administrator. (failed to find hostname from
Sandip> ip address). please check mail rec
"Sandip" == Sandip P Deshmukh writes:
Sandip> an error occured while sending mail. the mail server
Sandip> responded: relayin to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sandip> prohibited by administrator. (failed to find hostname from
Sandip> ip address). please check mail receipients and try ag
hello all!
patience pays. the error that made me go through all the trouble was in
the first section of exim.conf file.
here is the relevant section:
##
#MAIN CONFIGURATION SETTINGS #
###
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 05:33:38PM -0700, Cam wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm having a little problem w/ exim... I've set it up many times in the
> past successfully, but this time I cannot seem to do it. I have it so
> that it delivers 'local mail only' but that doesn't work at all for some
> reason (shou
Hey,
I'm having a little problem w/ exim... I've set it up many times in the
past successfully, but this time I cannot seem to do it. I have it so
that it delivers 'local mail only' but that doesn't work at all for some
reason (shouldn't local mail only always work??). Anyway, if i try to
send m
* This one time, at band camp, Agics Balazs said:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to compile exom 3.33 on my Debian (Woddy) box, but it fails. The
> message is:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldb
> collect 2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [exim_dmbuild] Error 1
>
> Please help me!
>
I would su
Hi all,
I want to compile exom 3.33 on my Debian (Woddy) box, but it fails. The message
is:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -ldb
collect 2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [exim_dmbuild] Error 1
Please help me!
Thanks!
Balazs
I have a rather peculiar problem with exim 3.12 on a potato
server.
I had a list of spammers' domains which I wanted to block.
As per the exim specs, I created a file, entered the IPs and
used the host_reject_recipients option. A few days after I did this,
mail from two people, whose IP is not
Hi folks,
Just recently I started having a wierd fetchmail problem. This morning I
noticed I didn't have any email. Pretty odd. I'm running woody, exim, and
fetchmail. Checking /var/log/mail.log I see:
Aug 17 00:09:44 quicksilver fetchmail[30949]: 612 messages for eldrik at
maelstr
om.logrus.
Hello.
I'am newbie administrator. I have problem. I want use exim in my company,
but I don't know how should I configure relaying of mails. Here is
description of my problem.
- I have domain (test.com)
- my ISP made host "mail.test.com" MX for test.com
- on "mail.test.com" I put exim
- people i
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 09:49:09PM +0200, Mateusz Mazur wrote:
> Hi.
>
> It wasn't good idea to put all questions in one letter. So know I post
> it single. I will be very great ful fot any help.
>
> Q:
> How should I configure exim to relay mails. People from my office want
> send mails to anywh
Hi.
It wasn't good idea to put all questions in one letter. So know I post
it single. I will be very great ful fot any help.
Q:
How should I configure exim to relay mails. People from my office want
send mails to anywhere and from anywhere (not only from office) and receive
mails from anybody.
T
hi,
i've got a strange exim problem:
when starting "exim -bd -q30m" every time a send a mail to that server i
get
2001-03-27 23:50:49 14i1MX-LI-00 == [EMAIL PROTECTED] T=remote_smtp
defer (0): SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
host pop.wue
hey guys,
i have this tiny problem where exim (presumably) is stamping on a
Resent-To: header with the names of everyone on one of my
smartlist-based mailing lists. i searched on the web and found more
people with this problem, but not m^Hany with the solution. if anyone
knows how to disable
I am having problems getting Exmh to enter the correct sender
in my header. It keeps putting [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In exim.conf I wrote a rewrite script
^(root|postmailer|mailer-daemon)@* [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ffr
but it did not work. Is there something wrong with the re
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:40:44PM -0600, Lance Hoffmeyer wrote:
>
> I am having problems getting Exmh to enter the correct sender
> in my header. It keeps putting [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In exim.conf I wrote a rewrite script
>
> ^(root|postmailer|mailer-daemon)@* [
I am having problems getting Exmh to enter the correct sender
in my header. It keeps putting [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In exim.conf I wrote a rewrite script
^(root|postmailer|mailer-daemon)@* [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ffr
but it did not work. Is there something wrong with the rew
On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 11:29:33AM -0800, Mark Symonds wrote
> Hello,
>
> I have 118 msgs sitting in /var/spool/exim/input That are frozen, all with
> the same error:
>
> 11oG5a-0006tw-00
> ::
> 1999-11-17 17:10:18 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: lookuphost router deferred:
> lowest numbered MX
Hello,
I have 118 msgs sitting in /var/spool/exim/input That are frozen, all with
the same error:
11oG5a-0006tw-00
::
1999-11-17 17:10:18 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: lookuphost router deferred:
lowest numbered MX record points to local host
*** Frozen ***
The master file in /var/named for
Hi,
thanks for the quick reply. Did see this line - but couldnt
resolve, how it worked. Now I understand the spec (!) and
its meaning ... .
> I have a problem confuguring exim.
> When I write mails that are delivered over my ISP, they have
> my local username and local hostname as return-path, reply
> and s an.
[snip]
> Has anyone an example how to do this ? I think this is nothing
> unusual - but I am quit new to exim an the rest w
Hi,
I have a problem confuguring exim.
When I write mails that are delivered over my ISP, they have
my local username and local hostname as return-path, reply
and s an.
I fixed that with setting qualify_domain and qualify_recipient
to my local hostname and the domainname of my ISP / Mailprovider.
Hello,
since I've upgraded to potao I have the following problem: Wenn ever exim
running on my or my friends computer makes an identd request to my
machine, I get the following lines in the xconsole:
Oct 31 03:10:01 seneca identd[11329]: started
Oct 31 03:10:01 seneca identd[11329]: request_threa
In upgrading to potato, I somehow managed to fsck up exim. I can now send &
receive mail locally, and to receive Internet mail, but can't send outgoing
internet mail. The SMTP server I am supposed to connect to for mail sending is
stmp-gw.tc.umn.edu. I tried giving this address in eximconfig, an
On Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 06:47:38AM -0400, Didi Damian wrote:
> Well, it works for me. I'm using kernel 2.2.10. When setting up
> fetchmail, I couldn't get it to work so, after reading these posts,
> I downgraded to slink exim (2.05). Then I realized I had fetchmailrc
> wrong and re-installed exim
Well, it works for me. I'm using kernel 2.2.10. When setting up fetchmail, I
couldn't
get it to work so, after reading these posts, I downgraded to slink exim
(2.05). Then
I realized I had fetchmailrc wrong and re-installed exim 3.02-1. It's working
fine.
My kernel is compiled without IPV6 sup
On 30-Jun-99 Peter Ludwig wrote:
> I'm running slink (upgraded to potato), and I seem to be having a minor
> problem with exim. I cannot receive any email using the system under linux.
>
> I am running exim & fetchmail
>
> Exim version 3.0-2, fetchmail ()
>
> Before I upgraded exim, every
I'm running slink (upgraded to potato), and I seem to be having a minor
problem with exim. I cannot receive any email using the system under linux.
I am running exim & fetchmail
Exim version 3.0-2, fetchmail ()
Before I upgraded exim, everything worked really well, now (since 3.0-1
actually
I'm having trouble with fetchmail and exim.
exim freezes all the mail fetchmail delivers, claiming
1999-06-28 16:19:19 10yUlD-0005m0-00 <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] H=localhost [127.0.
0.1] U=hamish P=esmtp S=1112 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1999-06-28 16:19:19 10yUlD-0005m0-00 remote host address for localhost.ris
I did a fresh install of Deb v2.1 using the 'Web Server plus' option.
It loaded a couple of things different from v1.3.
I have successfully run email between two computers in the office.
However, when I try to email to this group I get an error message. Not
surprisingly, I didn't write it down. T
hello,
I have hamm debian and I installed exim on it. I use this machine as a
server.
I send you the mainlog and rejectlog files. Could someone help me to
understand what's happend with those reject host messages.
Another problem is why I cannot read the e-mail messages from ppp user?
(loggin w
build my DNS server and don't use cache server that
>> much.
well I have finally fixed this problem, I had to configure a full namserver as
for some reason, a cacheing nameserver just didn't so the job, I even tried
smail to see if it was a exim problem and the same thing happened.
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I am using eximon my 2 debian (bo) hosts, but I cannot seem to be able to
send
>> > email between these to hosts, I know this is because the DNS lookup for
that
>> > host is failing as I am only running a cacheing nameserver, so is there
anyway
>> > to tell exim that if the
> Graham Lillico +44 1785 248131 asked:
> I am using eximon my 2 debian (bo) hosts, but I cannot seem to be able
> to send
> email between these to hosts, I know this is because the DNS lookup
> for that
> host is failing as I am only running a cacheing nameserver, so is
> there anyway
> to tell ex
Hi all,
I am using eximon my 2 debian (bo) hosts, but I cannot seem to be able to send
email between these to hosts, I know this is because the DNS lookup for that
host is failing as I am only running a cacheing nameserver, so is there anyway
to tell exim that if the DNS hostname lookup fails then
I know this is not debian specific but maybe someone here has experiance with
this. I have a smail mailhost that sends mail using demand_inet_uusmtp
transport to send mail to a second system using exim that is ultimately bound
for a third system. My mail/force.path entry for the destination site lo
>
>bar.com!foo.com!%s will not work because smail generates a routing error
>because the address must be in internet format for that transport.
Yes this DOES work. I do not know why it did not work when I tried it earlier.
I must have made a type someplace.
All is working well if I put the inter
66 matches
Mail list logo
