will trillich wrote:
> could you be a little less specific? (just kidding. ;)
>
> "You set up your server to support TLS"... at which point i
> start slamming the oven door on my head again.
Really, it's not that hard. apt-get install -tls. They set up
certs for you. I went the extra mile to set
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 09:58:50PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> will trillich wrote:
> > is there some way to further restrict the relaying? i DO NOT
> > want any black hats turning my server into spam-o-rama.
> > ideas welcome.
>
> As an alternative to the SMTP auth stuff proposed by others, I
> sug
will trillich wrote:
> then he can certainly send email from @serensoft to @out-there
> but then SO CAN ANYBODY ELSE using that small, tiny,
> insignificant worldnet.att.net network (of thousands and
> thousands).
>
> is there some way to further restrict the relaying? i DO NOT want
> any black ha
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 06:51, will trillich wrote:
> 5:05am? whassa matter, couldn't sleep? (that's *my* problem --
> one of them, anyway...)
>
(I get most of my best work done after 2 am. :)
> i noticed (below) you used "basic" instead of "plain" so i
> munged my setup to match:
Actually, that w
Pardon me for coming into the middle of this thread, but I now need to
set up secure relaying on my stable box running Exim. If I read the
messages back from the EHLO command correctly, the "regular" Exim
package is not compiled with authentication options enabled. This
means, does it not, th
5:05am? whassa matter, couldn't sleep? (that's *my* problem --
one of them, anyway...)
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 05:05:32AM -0600, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> It's a very complicated and technical discovery process that I
> have dubbed "guessing". :) (Actually, the best way is to use
> exim -bh to test
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 00:56, will trillich wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 06:10:52PM -0600, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 16:09, will trillich wrote: As for your
> > earlier post about the auth not working, have you checked to
> > see if you have libpam-pwdfile installed? I jus
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 06:10:52PM -0600, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 16:09, will trillich wrote: As for your
> earlier post about the auth not working, have you checked to
> see if you have libpam-pwdfile installed? I just set up SMTP
> plain auth last night following the direct
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 09:07:55PM -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
> >anybody got a pointer to an english version of how to set up
> >smtp authentication via exim 3.3?
>
> I won't pretend to own a clue, myself. Maybe you should try
> the O'Reilly book, _Exim_, "Official Guide For Release 3", by
> Phili
will trillich wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:37:32AM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:48:17PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
>> | On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:59:40PM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
>> | > SMTP Authentication sounds like a prime candidate.
[...]
>
>no
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 04:09:10PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:37:32AM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:48:17PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> > | well it sounds good. isn't that what exim already does? (i guess
> > | not. lead on, mcduf
On Thu, 2003-01-30 at 16:09, will trillich wrote:
--snip--
> right. here's why people (read as 'non-geeks') insist that
> documentation is lacking in the linux world:
--snip--
>
> no clue given HOW to determine which "available authenticators"
> are supplied, WHAT they might be called, nor HOW TO
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:37:32AM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:48:17PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> | On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:59:40PM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
> | > SMTP Authentication sounds like a prime candidate.
> |
> | well it sounds good. isn't tha
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 12:37:32AM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> Are you still using exim 3? (probably, the DD is behind on the releases)
yup -- server ESMTP Exim 3.35 #1 Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:43:20 -0600
[whatever's standard on woody...]
root: /etc/exim# exim -bh 24.128.69.142
Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:59:46AM +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> | Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> |
> | > Note, however, that AUTH PLAIN isn't very secure. You should only
> | > allow it if the client has first initiated a TLS connection. That
> | > requires firs
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:59:46AM +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
| Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
|
| > Note, however, that AUTH PLAIN isn't very secure. You should only
| > allow it if the client has first initiated a TLS connection. That
| > requires first setting up TLS. I don't know if exim 3
Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> Note, however, that AUTH PLAIN isn't very secure. You should only
> allow it if the client has first initiated a TLS connection. That
> requires first setting up TLS. I don't know if exim 3 can restrict it
> to a TLS session only, or how to do it. Either read the
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 08:48:17PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
| On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:59:40PM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
| > SMTP Authentication sounds like a prime candidate.
|
| well it sounds good. isn't that what exim already does? (i guess
| not. lead on, mcduff!)
Yeah, once you confi
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:59:40PM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
> SMTP Authentication sounds like a prime candidate.
well it sounds good. isn't that what exim already does? (i guess
not. lead on, mcduff!)
--
I use Debian/GNU Linux version 3.0;
Linux server 2.4.20-k6 #1 Mon Jan 13 23:49:14 EST 200
TED]
> Subject: exim and relaying -- for ONE user
>
>
> looking for a way to accept HARDLY ANY relays -- hopefully more
> than just "anybody from worldnet.att.net"...
>
> i've got a partner who'd like to be able to send email from
> serensoft.com -- but he&
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:30:35 -0600
will trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> looking for a way to accept HARDLY ANY relays -- hopefully more
> than just "anybody from worldnet.att.net"...
>
> i've got a partner who'd like to be able to send email from
> serensoft.com -- but he's way out in the n
looking for a way to accept HARDLY ANY relays -- hopefully more
than just "anybody from worldnet.att.net"...
i've got a partner who'd like to be able to send email from
serensoft.com -- but he's way out in the northeast using
worldnet.att.net, and i'm way out here in the midwest using
podunk-isp-r
22 matches
Mail list logo
