Re: exim/procmail & mutt: some mboxes read as 'new', others don't

2000-10-14 Thread will trillich
On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 10:30:11AM +0200, Kai Weber wrote: > + Manoj Victor Mathew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Use the config command "mailboxes" in your .muttrc to specify > > which mbox files need to be checked for new mail. > > > > My .muttrc reads ... > > > > mailboxes `echo $HOME/Mail/inbox*

Re: exim/procmail & mutt: some mboxes read as 'new', others don't

2000-07-28 Thread Kai Weber
+ Manoj Victor Mathew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Use the config command "mailboxes" in your .muttrc to specify > which mbox files need to be checked for new mail. > > My .muttrc reads ... > > mailboxes `echo $HOME/Mail/inbox*` `echo $HOME/Mail/per*` \ > `echo $HOME/Mail/gen*` `echo $HOME/Mail/list*`

Re: exim/procmail & mutt: some mboxes read as 'new', others don't

2000-07-24 Thread Manoj Victor Mathew
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 11:40:49AM -0500, Will Trillich wrote: > based on various patterns found in incoming mail, i have my ~/.procmailrc > splitting it up to various mbox's in ~/Mail. when i run mutt and 'c'hange > from mbox to mbox, it defaults to the next mbox with new mail -- or it > should, b

Re: exim/procmail & mutt: some mboxes read as 'new', others don't

2000-07-24 Thread Alberto Brealey
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 11:40:49AM -0500, Will Trillich wrote: > and haven't figured it out: mutt's confused about which mboxes have new > mail if i'm not mistaken, you tell mutt which mailboxes it should check for new mail with the 'mailboxes = ' statement in .muttrc. > mutt correctly knows

exim/procmail & mutt: some mboxes read as 'new', others don't

2000-07-24 Thread Will Trillich
i've got an interesting glitch happening with procmail (exim) and mutt, and haven't figured it out: mutt's confused about which mboxes have new mail based on various patterns found in incoming mail, i have my ~/.procmailrc splitting it up to various mbox's in ~/Mail. when i run mutt and 'c'han