Ahhh, that's it, the firewall! I am my own worst enemy. I installed
Guarddog, and I was blocking IPP (Internet Printing Protocol).
Unblocking it made the nasty messages go away.
Thanks to everyone who replied. Without your help, I probably would have
replaced my motherboard instead!
I still highl
; A couple of people wrote back that this was a hardware error. I don't
> know if there is any relationship between this "spurious" error and
> the ethernet error.
>
> I'm curious if anybody has a clue about what's going on.
>
I get those spurious inter
Hello
Robert Storey (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Just recently, I'm getting a most peculiar message popping up on my
> screen about once every 30 seconds or so:
>
> DROPPED IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=192.168.0.2 DST=192.168.0.255 LEN=129
> TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=0 DF PROTO=UDP SPT=631 LEN=109
>
>
d fine for days.
>
> A couple of people wrote back that this was a hardware error. I don't
> know if there is any relationship between this "spurious" error and the
> ethernet error.
>
> I'm curious if anybody has a clue about what's going on.
>
> than
ut very infrequently):
spurious 8529A interrupt: IRQ7
A couple of people wrote back that this was a hardware error. I don't
know if there is any relationship between this "spurious" error and the
ethernet error.
I'm curious if anybody has a clue about what's going on.
th
Hi folks,
It's possible that the original poster has been allocated a block of 32
IP addresses from someone in which case the mask of 255.255.255.224 is
correct, changing from a 27-bit to 24-bit mask would cause more problems
than it cures.
> Your netmask doesn't look good to me, try editing your
for the on the card ON solid.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Ron Rademaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 6:10 PM
> Subject: Re: Ethernet Error
>
>
> > Why do you think the problem is with
1:32 PM
To: Ron Rademaker
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject:Re: Ethernet Error
Ok. That sounds like a plan. When I run route, I see an entry for the
localnet associated with eth0 and an entry for the lo (no gateway assigned
to either). I'm not completly familiar with
solid.
- Original Message -
From: Ron Rademaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: Ethernet Error
> Why do you think the problem is with the card? What about your route
> table, is all correct there? And ipchains,
Why do you think the problem is with the card? What about your route
table, is all correct there? And ipchains, you don't have them so you
can't get anything out or in can you?
What exactly does it say when you try to ping?
Sound like a route problem to me!
Ron Rademaker
On Tue, 30 May 2000, St
Hello, I'm using Slink on an AMD-233 powered computer. I have a 3Com905-TX
Ethernet card installed. The modules appears to be loading with the kernel
as eth0. When I run ifconfig I can see the the eth0 card with the correctly
assigned IP information.
The problem: I can't ping to the cards IP addre
I'm running potato (i386) with the 2.2.10 kernel primarily for samba and
netatalk services. It appears that one Mac on the network (a 9500/120 with
OS 8.1) causes the same error message to start popping up on the console -
eth0: tx interrupt but no status - and file transfers slow to a crawl.
/pr
Hi Kam,
you have to specify io port and interrupt for your ethernet card.
Via 'modconf':
Under net/your_card/Install in the box below "Please enter bla bla bla"
write the parameters
io=0 irq=n (replace xxx and n with the proper values, maybe you can
even omit irq)
Via '/etc/conf.modules:
Hi, i just run 'modconfig' to install the network driver, it found the
problem. My ethernet is called SMC8000 16-Bit ISA(10Mbp), which it can
run Novell IPX and TCP/IP software.
SMC9194: You shouldn't use auto-probing with insmod!
loading device 'eth0' ...
/lib/modules/2.0.29/net/smc9194.o :init_
On Tue, 18 Feb 1997 21:12:47 GMT Fingers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm trying to get my new debian system fully configured, i've setup
> everything fine so far. I thought everything was going fine till i tried to
> dialup my isp to run dselect to update some things this is what i got out of
> Feb 18 20:46:37 uk pppd[1065]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS1
> Feb 18 20:46:41 uk pppd[1065]: local IP address 194.247.41.27
> Feb 18 20:46:41 uk pppd[1065]: remote IP address 194.247.41.30
> Feb 18 20:46:41 uk pppd[1065]: ppp not replacing existing default route to
> eth0[0.0.0.0]
> So the conn
>Feb 18 20:46:41 uk pppd[1065]: ppp not replacing existing default route =
>to eth0[0.0.0.0]
>Feb 18 20:46:41 uk pppd[1065]: Cannot determine ethernet address for =
>proxy ARP
You have the option 'proxyarp' added, either in your ppp/options file or
in diald configuration file (if you're using dial
Hi,
I'm trying to get my new debian system fully configured, i've setup everything
fine so far. I thought everything was going fine till i tried to dialup my isp
to run dselect to update some things this is what i got out of the log file.
Feb 18 20:46:36 uk pppd[1065]: Serial connection establ
18 matches
Mail list logo
