Re: eth0 and networkmanager

2009-09-14 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 05:35:02PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:27:26 -0700 > Arthur Barlow wrote: > > > I understand that NetworkManager was designed as a tool for the > > woeful state of wireless connections and linux, but I'm using a > > I don't think that the state of

Re: eth0 and networkmanager

2009-09-13 Thread Celejar
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:27:26 -0700 Arthur Barlow wrote: > I understand that NetworkManager was designed as a tool for the > woeful state of wireless connections and linux, but I'm using a I don't think that the state of wireless in linux is all that woeful, and to the extent that it is, the prob

Re: eth0 and networkmanager

2009-09-12 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 07:34:07PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 05:27:26PM -0700, Arthur Barlow wrote: > > I understand that NetworkManager was designed as a tool for the woeful state > > of wireless connections and linux, but I'm using a workstation with a > > "har

Re: eth0 and networkmanager

2009-09-11 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 05:27:26PM -0700, Arthur Barlow wrote: > I understand that NetworkManager was designed as a tool for the woeful state > of wireless connections and linux, but I'm using a workstation with a > "hard-wired" connection and networkmanager cannot seem to manage it. It > shows "i

eth0 and networkmanager

2009-09-11 Thread Arthur Barlow
I understand that NetworkManager was designed as a tool for the woeful state of wireless connections and linux, but I'm using a workstation with a "hard-wired" connection and networkmanager cannot seem to manage it. It shows "ifupdown(eth0)" as being unmanaged, which I suppose is no big deal, but