On Wednesday 30 March 2016 18:15:30 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 March 2016 17:42:14 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016, at 07:21, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > > Yes, I have finally found out. It's a Giga-Byte GA-H110M-S2H.
> >
> > Oho, that tells me a lot.
>
> Thank you s
On Sunday 20 March 2016 18:53:02 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 20 March 2016 18:43:03 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > And since all this is also going to bring in systemd, and I've not a clue
> > if the real app, one that must run, the sim version of linuxcnc will run
> > on a jessie install.
>
> You can i
On Friday 11 September 2015 23:59:15 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Again, that you all very much.
Again, thaNK you all very much.
Lisi
It just wasn't my day (week? And to think taht I used tio love silver
birches!). I sent this immediatel;y after the other, and managed ot
send it to myself. :-( Sorry, Ray. :-(
On Sunday 06 April 2014 17:47:31 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 06 April 2014 06:54:53 Chris Bannister wrote:
> > $ m
Lisi writes:
> The whole point was that it is difficult
> to remove a directory that has things in it.
rm -rf
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
On Tuesday 28 January 2014 11:05:33 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> # rm .gvfs
ERRATUM!
# rmdir .gvfs
sorry. :-( Typo, I'm afraid. The whole point was that it is difficult
to remove a directory that has things in it.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Thursday 26 September 2013 16:58:49 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Did you burn and image or copy the files?
Sorry. Burn **an** image
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://li
On Tuesday 16 October 2012 11:30:41 Lisi wrote:
> Approximately, in round terms, how may packages are available in Debian
> (Squeeze?)
> 1. in main
> 2. in main, contrib and non-free
many, not may :-(
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
On Wednesday 12 September 2012 07:14:34 Lisi wrote:
> chose
choose
One day I'll succeed in learning to type :-(
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org
On Thursday 03 May 2012 09:58:08 Lisi wrote:
> recieving
Ouch! receiving
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201205031004.25522.lisi.re...@gmail.com
On Sunday 03 July 2011 18:06:55 Lisi wrote:
> that won't *key* you log
that won't *let* you.
Sorry - I'm a lousy typist. :-(
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lis
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Lisi wrote:
> On Monday 06 June 2011 21:25:52 Tom H wrote:
>>
>> You mean "apt-get dist-upgrade" ("aptitude full-upgrade" is the
>> aptitude equivalent).
>
> Thanks - I am much more familiar with aptitude.
You're welcome. I use apt-get but the aptitude options make
On Monday 06 June 2011 21:25:52 Tom H wrote:
> You mean "apt-get dist-upgrade" ("aptitude full-upgrade" is the
> aptitude equivalent).
Thanks - I am much more familiar with aptitude. Because aptitude
has "switched" (by recommendation, not by formal instructions) from aptitude
dist-upgrade to ap
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Lisi wrote:
> On Monday 06 June 2011 20:14:34 Lisi wrote:
>>
>> The fact that you are unfamiliar with apt-get update
>
> should, of course, be apt-get full-upgrade.
You mean "apt-get dist-upgrade" ("aptitude full-upgrade" is the
aptitude equivalent).
--
To UNSUB
On Monday 06 June 2011 20:14:34 Lisi wrote:
> The fact that you are unfamiliar with apt-get update
should, of course, be apt-get full-upgrade. Sorry :-( I'm a lousy typist and
teh keyboard seems to affect my brain.
Lisi
> is not strictly
> relevant here, though if someone who is familiar wit
On Lu, 27 dec 10, 10:19:15, green wrote:
> Andrei Popescu wrote at 2010-12-27 04:40 -0600:
> > On Sb, 18 dec 10, 21:01:12, Frank McCormick wrote:
> > >Use it for a while...you just may change your mind. Speedier than
> > > the foxand enough extensions to make your head swim
> >
> > Unfortu
Andrei Popescu wrote at 2010-12-27 04:40 -0600:
> On Sb, 18 dec 10, 21:01:12, Frank McCormick wrote:
> >Use it for a while...you just may change your mind. Speedier than
> > the foxand enough extensions to make your head swim
>
> Unfortunately vrome is no match for vimperator :(
Then perh
On Sb, 18 dec 10, 21:01:12, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
>
>Use it for a while...you just may change your mind. Speedier than
> the foxand enough extensions to make your head swim
Unfortunately vrome is no match for vimperator :(
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users a
Frank McCormick wrote:
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 23:04:31 +
Lisi wrote:
On Saturday 18 December 2010 13:50:52 green wrote:
Lisi wrote at 2010-12-18 05:21 -0600:
Can anyone explain this* (which is the reason why I have not yet
installed Chromium).
* l...@tux:~$ aptitude show chromium
$ apt-ca
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 23:04:31 +
Lisi wrote:
> On Saturday 18 December 2010 13:50:52 green wrote:
> > Lisi wrote at 2010-12-18 05:21 -0600:
> > > Can anyone explain this* (which is the reason why I have not yet
> > > installed Chromium).
> > >
> > > * l...@tux:~$ aptitude show chromium
> >
> >
On Saturday 18 December 2010 13:50:52 green wrote:
> Lisi wrote at 2010-12-18 05:21 -0600:
> > Can anyone explain this* (which is the reason why I have not yet
> > installed Chromium).
> >
> > * l...@tux:~$ aptitude show chromium
>
> $ apt-cache search chromium
That would just give the same result
Lisi wrote at 2010-12-18 05:21 -0600:
> Can anyone explain this* (which is the reason why I have not yet installed
> Chromium).
> * l...@tux:~$ aptitude show chromium
$ apt-cache search chromium
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 11:21:39 +, Lisi wrote:
> Can anyone explain this* (which is the reason why I have not yet
> installed Chromium).
>
> Thanks,
> Lisi
>
> * l...@tux:~$ aptitude show chromium
You better search for the package name:
s...@stt008:~$ apt-cache search chromium
chromium-data -
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 11:25:13 + Lisi shared
this with us all:
>> > AFAIK, what is open source is Chromium but not Chrome.
>>
>> Can anyone explain this* (which is the reason why I have not yet
>> installed Chromium).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Lisi
~$ aptitude search chromium-browser
i chromium-bro
On Saturday 18 December 2010 11:19:34 Lisi wrote:
> On Friday 17 December 2010 18:48:42 Camaleón wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:41:55 -0800, S Mathias wrote:
> > > Google Chrome Terms of Service(Google Chrome executable), BSD (source
> > > code and Chromium executable except chromium 5 beta),BSD
Can anyone explain this* (which is the reason why I have not yet installed
Chromium).
Thanks,
Lisi
* l...@tux:~$ aptitude show chromium
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http
Dne, 04. 11. 2010 10:13:07 je Klistvud napisal(a):
If the latter, I can only add these 2 cents: on my desktop machine
with an Intel motherboard, the front audio headers require special
(Windows-only, of course) software to fully work. They do work per
se, but if you want to enable rear ja
pick, not pisk :-(
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201009080854.19575.lisi.re...@gmail.com
On Monday 04 January 2010 06:31:57 Chris Jones wrote:
> > Erratum: proprietorial :-(
> >
> > I am a lousy typist - but I cannot work out how my finger hits "a" when I
> > aim for "e". It happens, however, quite often. :-(
>
> Whichever wa
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 07:02:08PM EST, Lisi wrote:
> On Sunday 03 January 2010 23:49:12 Lisi wrote:
> > propriatorial
>
> Erratum: proprietorial :-(
>
> I am a lousy typist - but I cannot work out how my finger hits "a" when I aim
> for "e". It h
On Sunday 03 January 2010 23:49:12 Lisi wrote:
> propriatorial
Erratum: proprietorial :-(
I am a lousy typist - but I cannot work out how my finger hits "a" when I aim
for "e". It happens, however, quite often. :-(
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-r
On Friday 06 March 2009 08:24:10 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 06 March 2009 04:17:09 Alan Hutchinson wrote:
> > I am trying to install DEBIAN LENNY beta 2
>
> Why use a beta? Why not use the
> s/just-released newly released/newly released
> stable, Debian 5 aka Lenny?
:-(
Lisi
--
To UNSU
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please forgive me if this has been posted before, but I think there
> is a mistake in the file /etc/pam.d/other that is distributed with
> the standard install of debian.
You're right; this is bug #10497, #10758 and #12030. It's fixed by
the latest release of
Please forgive me if this has been posted before, but I think there is a
mistake in the file /etc/pam.d/other that is distributed with the standard
install of debian.
The file contains the service in the first field (ie. the keyword OTHER)
which is not required, since it is in the conf file other
34 matches
Mail list logo
