Re: [Emu10k1-tools-devel] Re: emu10k1 for debian

2001-10-11 Thread Daniel Bertrand
Hi, The rule of thumb is: -Older driver (post kernel 2.4.8), newer tools: ok -Newer driver, older tools: not ok -Really old driver ( driver version 0.7 or earlier - before 2.4.8 and any 2.2.x): not ok, use "dm" tool instead (http://opensource.creative.com/dist.html). If you find this isn't true,

Re: emu10k1 for debian

2001-10-11 Thread Alexander Kotelnikov
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2001 11:19:22 -0500 > "Scott" == Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Scott> Scott> * Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011011 11:06]: >> Once I wrote about an intention to package emu-tools. I prepared Scott> Scott> How linked are the tools version to the driver

Re: emu10k1 for debian

2001-10-11 Thread Scott Dier
* Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011011 11:06]: > Once I wrote about an intention to package emu-tools. I prepared How linked are the tools version to the driver revision? IE: if i keep with an 'old' cvs snapshot of the driver, will the tools stop working on an upgrade? -- Scott Dier

emu10k1 for debian

2001-10-11 Thread Alexander Kotelnikov
Hello. Once I wrote about an intention to package emu-tools. I prepared prerelease packages, which con be found at people.debian.org/~sacha/debian/unstable One can put deb http://people.debian.org/~sacha/debian unstable/ deb-src http://people.debian.org/~sacha/debian unstable/ in his apt's source