on Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:32:14AM +1100, Matthew Joyce ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 25 March 2004 01:20, Matthew Joyce wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > what the polite way off appending a largish sig or disclaimer
> > > > > to an email, is it '--' befor
on Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:53:02PM +0100, Joerg Johannes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Am Fr, den 26.03.2004 schrieb Derrick 'dman' Hudson um 15:46:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:59:24AM +0100, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> >
> > | > Not when using inline PGP signatures, then it's considered valid.
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 28 March 2004 12:21 pm, Werner Mahr wrote:
> Am Samstag, 27. MÃrz 2004 21:19 schrieb Brad Sims:
> > On Saturday 27 March 2004 6:06 am, Werner Mahr wrote:
> > > Do I need both lines, or is one for Woody and one for Sarge?
> >
> > I /think/ one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 27. MÃrz 2004 21:19 schrieb Brad Sims:
> On Saturday 27 March 2004 6:06 am, Werner Mahr wrote:
> > Do I need both lines, or is one for Woody and one for Sarge?
>
> I /think/ one is for Woody and one is for Sarge, but as I play with Sid...
>
Daniel Teichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And I heard Paul Johnson exclaim:
>> "Matthew Joyce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Thanks everyone, and for the record I do not intend to actual use it for
>> > a disclaimer which I personally find pointless, but our fundraising
>> > department want
Incoming from Daniel Teichert:
> And I heard Paul Johnson exclaim:
> > "Matthew Joyce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Thanks everyone, and for the record I do not intend to actual use it for
> > > a disclaimer which I personally find pointless, but our fundraising
> > > department want to promot
And I heard Paul Johnson exclaim:
> "Matthew Joyce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Thanks everyone, and for the record I do not intend to actual use it for
> > a disclaimer which I personally find pointless, but our fundraising
> > department want to promote charity events.
>
> That's not an impro
On Saturday 27 March 2004 6:06 am, Werner Mahr wrote:
> Do I need both lines, or is one for Woody and one for Sarge?
I /think/ one is for Woody and one is for Sarge, but as I play with Sid...
Apt will get the one with the newest version as I understand it
--
If Washington fears honest citizens a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 27. MÃrz 2004 02:36 schrieb Brad Sims:
> ## OpenGPG plugins ##
> deb http://ma2geo.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de/public-debian binary/
> deb http://ma2geo.mathematik.uni-karlsruhe.de/public-debian testing/
Do I need both lines, or is one
Am Fr, den 26.03.2004 schrieb Derrick 'dman' Hudson um 15:46:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:59:24AM +0100, Joerg Johannes wrote:
>
> | > Not when using inline PGP signatures, then it's considered valid.
> |
> | OK, sorry for that. But now to something else: I use evolution as mua,
> | and I don't
On Friday 26 March 2004 2:16 am, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> On Friday 26 March 2004 04.04, Brad Sims wrote:
> > Indeed, but Nonbroken email/newsreaders will not quote sigs
>
> Damn. I guess you win this one :-)
No I didn't, it should have been Non-broken NOT Nonbroken
(thoug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 26 March 2004 3:25 pm, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
> ... of course, if you want to do signatures or decrypt stuff with
> PGP/MIME, it's a little trickier than that to make it work, because you
> also need gpg-agent and a pinentry program, whic
On Friday 26 March 2004 1:21 pm, Adam Funk wrote:
> On Friday 26 March 2004 12:30, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> > What you're seeing is the ASCII armored ('armoured' in the rest of
> > the English speaking world outside of the US :) PGP signature. I
> > don't know if there's a way to 'teach' evolution
On Friday 26 March 2004 12:30, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> What you're seeing is the ASCII armored ('armoured' in the rest of the
> English speaking world outside of the US :) PGP signature. I don't
> know if there's a way to 'teach' evolution about them, but if there is
> I've never found it. If you
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:59:24AM +0100, Joerg Johannes wrote:
| > Not when using inline PGP signatures, then it's considered valid.
|
| OK, sorry for that. But now to something else: I use evolution as mua,
| and I don't quite understand what to do with inline PGP signatures.
Upgrade them to P
Hello
Joerg Johannes (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Am Fr, den 26.03.2004 schrieb Paul Johnson um 04:52:
>> Joerg Johannes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>> Errh, your sig starts with "- -- \n". Bad example. Go fix it.
>>
>> Not when using inline PGP signatures, then it's considered valid.
>
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 03:59, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> Am Fr, den 26.03.2004 schrieb Paul Johnson um 04:52:
> > Joerg Johannes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Am Do, den 25.03.2004 schrieb Paul Johnson um 03:03:
> > >> For any signature, it's generally considered polite to put in a "-- "
> > >
Am Fr, den 26.03.2004 schrieb Paul Johnson um 04:52:
> Joerg Johannes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Am Do, den 25.03.2004 schrieb Paul Johnson um 03:03:
> >> For any signature, it's generally considered polite to put in a "-- "
> >> (that is, dash dash space newline) on a line by itself. See
On Friday 26 March 2004 04.04, Brad Sims wrote:
> On Thursday 25 March 2004 2:45 am, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
> >
> > Something around 76 character is considered the polite maximal line
> > length to use in email. Some even argue 72 so that it stays below 80
> > chars even with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Matthew Joyce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks everyone, and for the record I do not intend to actual use it for
> a disclaimer which I personally find pointless, but our fundraising
> department want to promote charity events.
That's not an im
Andreas Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Errh, your sig starts with "- -- \n". Bad example. Go fix it.
>>
>> Renders fine for me. Mutt 1.4i, Solairs 8
>>
>> Must be your MUA. Go fix it :-)
>
> I think it is because of the GPG signature. When signing a message, the
> signature delimiter is
Joerg Johannes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Do, den 25.03.2004 schrieb Paul Johnson um 03:03:
>> For any signature, it's generally considered polite to put in a "-- "
>> (that is, dash dash space newline) on a line by itself. See my signature
>> for an example.
>>
>> See also: http://www.new
On Thursday 25 March 2004 2:45 am, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
>
> Something around 76 character is considered the polite maximal line length to
> use in email. Some even argue 72 so that it stays below 80 chars even with 2
> or 3 levels of quoting.
>
>
> cheers
> -- vbi
>
Ind
> -Original Message-
> From: Colin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 26 March 2004 10:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: email signatures
>
>
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> >>On Thursday 25 March 2004 01:20, Matthew
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 25 March 2004 01:20, Matthew Joyce wrote:
what the polite way off appending a largish sig or disclaimer to an
email, is it '--' before the appendage ?
no, it's "-- " (dash-dash-space)
Not quote. dash-dash-space-newline
No, it's newline-dash-dash-space-newline ;-
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 16:00:20 +0100, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> Brian Brazil (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>> Must be your MUA. Go fix it :-)
>
> I think it is because of the GPG signature. When signing a message, the
> signature delimiter is changed from "-- \n" to "- -- \n". Probably mutt
> is clever
Hello
Brian Brazil (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 10:31:17AM +0100, Joerg Johannes wrote:
>> Am Do, den 25.03.2004 schrieb Paul Johnson um 03:03:
>>> For any signature, it's generally considered polite to put in a
>>> "-- " (that is, dash dash space newline) on a line by i
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 10:31:17AM +0100, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> Am Do, den 25.03.2004 schrieb Paul Johnson um 03:03:
> > For any signature, it's generally considered polite to put in a "-- "
> > (that is, dash dash space newline) on a line by itself. See my signature
> > for an example.
> >
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 25. März 2004 10:31 schrieb Joerg Johannes:
> Am Do, den 25.03.2004 schrieb Paul Johnson um 03:03:
> > For any signature, it's generally considered polite to put in a "-- "
> > (that is, dash dash space newline) on a line by itself. See
Am Do, den 25.03.2004 schrieb Paul Johnson um 03:03:
> For any signature, it's generally considered polite to put in a "-- "
> (that is, dash dash space newline) on a line by itself. See my signature
> for an example.
>
> See also: http://www.newbie.org/
>
> - --
> .''`. Paul Johnson <[EMA
On Thursday 25 March 2004 02.08, Brad Sims wrote:
> Signatures are delimited by dash dash space newline ie "-- "
> and should be, properly speaking, no more than four lines of
> not more than eighty characters per line
Something around 76 character is considered the polite maximal line length to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Matthew Joyce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> what the polite way off appending a largish sig or disclaimer to an
> email, is it '--' before the appendage ?
For any signature, it's generally considered polite to put in a "-- "
(that is, dash dash spa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Monique Y. Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2004-03-25, Matthew Joyce penned:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> what the polite way off appending a largish sig or disclaimer to an
>> email, is it '--' before the appendage ?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>
> The polite way t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Hoeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 25 March 2004 01:20, Matthew Joyce wrote:
>
>> what the polite way off appending a largish sig or disclaimer to an
>> email, is it '--' before the appendage ?
>
> no, it's "-- " (dash-dash-space
Signatures are delimited by dash dash space newline ie "-- "
and should be, properly speaking, no more than four lines of
not more than eighty characters per line
--
The real fun of living wisely is that you get to feel smug about it
-- Hobbes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Thursday 25 March 2004 01:20, Matthew Joyce wrote:
> what the polite way off appending a largish sig or disclaimer to an
> email, is it '--' before the appendage ?
no, it's "-- " (dash-dash-space)
--
===
Martin Hoeller
On 2004-03-25, Matthew Joyce penned:
>
> Hi,
>
> what the polite way off appending a largish sig or disclaimer to an
> email, is it '--' before the appendage ?
>
> thanks
>
The polite way to do it is not at all. I've yet to see a huge honkin'
signature that was actually necessary/productive.
The
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 11:20:11AM +1100, Matthew Joyce wrote:
| Hi,
|
| what the polite way off appending a largish sig or disclaimer to an
| email, is it '--' before the appendage ?
The delimiter for signatures is '\n-- \n'. In other words, a blank
line followed by two dasshes and a space on a
Hi,
what the polite way off appending a largish sig or disclaimer to an
email, is it '--' before the appendage ?
thanks
Matt
Children's Cancer Institute Australia
http://www.ccia.org.au
39 matches
Mail list logo
