Le jeudi 28 avril 2022 à 12:41 +, Keith Bainbridge a écrit :
> Good Evening All
>
> I top posted last night, in error. Sorry
>
> I have asked the devs where the bottom posting setting has gone.
Hello,
(K9 Mail)
Account Settings > Sending mail > Reply after quoted text
Good Evening All
I top posted last night, in error. Sorry
I have asked the devs where the bottom posting setting has gone.
--
All the best
Keith Bainbridge
keithrbaugro...@gmail.com
Sent from my aPhone. Please excuse my brevity.
This is weird, I am clueless how to fix this. Posting here hoping could
be someone notice what wrong.
I used to check Debian mail list archive on web and reply any thread
that I want via clicking the "mailto" link. But somehow, on my newer
machine (fresh installed), the chromium browser not ha
On Thu 26 Nov 2020 at 09:34:25 (+), Joe wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 21:57:10 -0600 David Wright wrote:
>
> > Perhaps the problem is similar to the one I had with this list
> > (hence the change I made above). What happened was that my posts'
> > Envelope-from (set to the same as my From addre
On Thu 26 Nov 2020 at 08:52:30 (+), mick crane wrote:
> On 2020-11-26 03:57, David Wright wrote:
>
> > What sort of rejections and/or bounces have you had?
>
> It showed up that mails to getmail list that uses Exim were refused as
> unsubscribed whereas before was OK.
I take it that was late
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 21:57:10 -0600
David Wright wrote:
> Perhaps the problem is similar to the one I had with this list
> (hence the change I made above). What happened was that my posts'
> Envelope-from (set to the same as my From address above) was being
> changed by my mail hosting service to
On 2020-11-26 03:57, David Wright wrote:
What sort of rejections and/or bounces have you had?
It showed up that mails to getmail list that uses Exim were refused as
unsubscribed whereas before was OK.
I "think" I then subscribed with noctiluc...@sky.com which worked for a
bit but then from l
On Wed 25 Nov 2020 at 00:08:27 (+), mick crane wrote:
> On 2020-11-23 12:19, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Lu, 23 nov 20, 14:27:36, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> > > I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> > > collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound li
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 20:11:29 +
Joe wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:13:03 -0500
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:03:21 +
> > Joe wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > proper email client or webmail. I have to admit I use a netbook
&
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:13:03 -0500
Celejar wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:03:21 +
> Joe wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > proper email client or webmail. I have to admit I use a netbook
> > while away from home, as I have both "smart"phone and tablet, but
> &g
s here]
> >>>
> >>> > I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> >>> > collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound
> >>> > like this is a common practice.
> >>> >
> >>> &g
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 09:03:21 +
Joe wrote:
...
> proper email client or webmail. I have to admit I use a netbook while
> away from home, as I have both "smart"phone and tablet, but they are
> extremely limited toys and they are owned by Google. If I need a mobile
> c
To: header, which contains the Message-ID:s of your
parent message(s).
A sufficiently advanced email client (MUA) takes all the messages,
with all of their unique Message-ID:s, and all of their In-Reply-To:
headers, and constructs a tree in memory, with all of the parent/child
relationships laid out
On Wed, 25 Nov 2020 00:08:27 +
mick crane wrote:
> On 2020-11-23 12:19, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Lu, 23 nov 20, 14:27:36, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> >> So does htis get a new subject in the list?
> >>
> >> Good afternon All
> >>
> >> I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses sepa
gt; answer.
>
Less so than with an external email provider.
I prefer not to open email collection ports to the Net, so I use ssh
with keys and port forwarding, on a non-standard port to keep the logs
cleaner. I forward both web and the email ports, so I can either use a
proper email client or w
On 2020-11-23 12:19, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Lu, 23 nov 20, 14:27:36, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
So does htis get a new subject in the list?
Good afternon All
I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
this i
On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 09:50:34 -0600 John Hasler
wrote:
>> I use Fetchmail to fetch my mail every five minutes from Newsguy.
>> This means that my mail is never on anyone else's server for more
>> than a few minutes. Fetchmail hands it off to Exim which passes it
>> through Mailagent and Spamass
gt;> occasionally.
>>>
>>> Such a setup also typically uses standard locations for the storage
>>> (as opposed to e-mail client specific), which makes it easier to
>>> add more functionality (e.g. serve local e-mail via IMAP) or
>>> replace individual c
;> > I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
>>> > collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound
>>> > like this is a common practice.
>>> >
>>> > What are the advantages of this set of processes over let
I use Fetchmail to fetch my mail every five minutes from Newsguy. This
means that my mail is never on anyone else's server for more than a few
minutes. Fetchmail hands it off to Exim which passes it through
Mailagent and Spamassassin and then delivers it to my inbox. Outgoing
mail is delivered t
On Lu, 23 nov 20, 14:27:36, Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> So does htis get a new subject in the list?
>
> Good afternon All
>
> I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
> collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
> this is a common practice.
>
> What a
On 2020-11-23 at 05:43, Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:21:25 +1100 Keith Bainbridge
> wrote:
>> PS Am I wrong to avoid 'everyting in 1 file' where possible (mail
>> dir rather than mbox in this case)? OK this is probably a whole
>> separate topic.
>
> As I've posted elsewhere, I have abou
re using
an external email service, you can get away with just an email client,
or even use webmail. If you're sending and receiving yourself, you'll
need an MTA and an email distribution method such as POP3 or IMAP, as
well as clients on any devices you have. If you're also collectin
dmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
> this is a common practice.
>
> What are the advantages of this set of processes over letting tbird do
> it all? - or any other client for that matter?
Disadvantages of using your email client to send might include:
. sending is relatively
So does htis get a new subject in the list?
Good afternon All
I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
this is a common practice.
What are the advantages of this set of processes over letting tbird do
it a
Good afternon All
I was interested to read that Flo, the OP, uses separate mail
collection, sendmail and thunderbird. Some of the replies sound like
this is a common practice.
What are the advantages of this set of processes over letting tbird do
it all? - or any other client for that matter?
W
On Tuesday, 27 Oct 2020 at 22:22, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> In my experience such mails are usually forwarded jokes etc, and
> another problem is that they often contain forwards of forwards
> of forwards (etc) with nested sets of attachments (as a succession
This has finally led me to find a positiv
and again on any multipart or message/rfc822 that needs opening,
> > exposing the attachments within.
>
> Ages ago, using an email client that allowed one to edit the raw
> content of emails (handy for doing things like splitting OT parts of
> threads, changing Subjects to what m
Joe writes:
> But I don't think we're alone. I think many Windows users also stop
> seeing ads after a while, and the bottom line is that Net adverts
> don't really work. I think it was P&G proved that a year or two ago,
> pulling most of their 'digital' advertising and seeing no significant
> drop
ttachments within.
Ages ago, using an email client that allowed one to edit the raw
content of emails (handy for doing things like splitting OT parts of
threads, changing Subjects to what meant something to me, etc) I
had scripts that ran within my text editor which would do things like
find all the
On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 09:35:46 +0100
wrote:
> For reference, I have a (severely restrained, no javascript [1])
> Firefox running. Just one tab open, showing just one jpeg from
> XKCD [2]).
>
> Top shows it as the (by far hungriest) memory user, with 263 MB.
> Second, third and fourth are... WebCo
On Mi, 28 oct 20, 07:12:19, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 04:35:46 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > How did we end here? How did we end up paying for the ad
> > industry's infrastrutcture, paying with our privacy, but
> > also with our real money, having to buy RAM and CP
On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 04:35:46 AM to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> How did we end here? How did we end up paying for the ad
> industry's infrastrutcture, paying with our privacy, but
> also with our real money, having to buy RAM and CPU power
> just for their sake?
Assuming that is not a rhetori
On 2020-10-28 08:35, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
How did we end here? How did we end up paying for the ad
industry's infrastrutcture, paying with our privacy, but
also with our real money, having to buy RAM and CPU power
just for their sake?
How do we get out of here?
Good point.
Ad agencies have
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 04:18:40PM -0700, John Conover wrote:
> Patrick Bartek writes:
> > > >
> > > >> On 10/25/20 8:28 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > > >>> I'm not referring to viewing HTML emails. I already can do that in
> > > >>> Claws-Mail using its Dillo plugin. I'm talking about filling
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 7:00 AM Teemu Likonen wrote:
> * 2020-10-25 06:51:36-04, Kenneth Parker wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020, 6:40 AM wrote:
> >> alpine
>
> > +1
>
> It would be useful to add some information how the suggested client
> (Alpine) serves the purpose that was asked by the origi
On Tue 27 Oct 2020 at 22:22:16 (+), Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020, at 21:04, Dan Ritter wrote:
>
> > - Use a good MUA and resign yourself to occasionally sending an
> > email to a browser. Despite your protestations of "logging
> > in", having a browser display your email req
Patrick Bartek writes:
> > >
> > >> On 10/25/20 8:28 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > >>> I'm not referring to viewing HTML emails. I already can do that in
> > >>> Claws-Mail using its Dillo plugin. I'm talking about filling in
> > >>> forms, etc. that are part of the HTML email and sending just
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020, at 21:04, Dan Ritter wrote:
> - Use a good MUA and resign yourself to occasionally sending an
> email to a browser. Despite your protestations of "logging
> in", having a browser display your email requires no such
> thing. The MUA saves the email to a file, then hands
to do this, but
> > it is certainly possible.
>
> Is what you describe doing something you do on a web page or in an
> email?
A web page, for my own use only. I don't send HTML email. No, it's off
the original topic a bit, but that looks unlikely to have a satisfactory
a
ils and click on
> something, a new tab with a new URL opens. Sometime not. Next time,
> I'll check the code.
>
> Not that it matters all that much. All I want is a lightweight email
> client that works with HTML emails, too, so I don't have to switch back
> and forth to
llo doesn't let you click the link, so you never realize
> what it is. Those "rate us from 1-5" things are normally five
> different links to the same online poll, with a parameter telling the
> page what rating you selected. If You opened the links in an
> HTML-aware mailer
On Tuesday, October 27, 2020 12:15:46 PM Joe wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 07:43:43 -0400
>
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > [1]I used to read slashdot regularly, and on slashdot, the front page
> > had a bunch of news stories and a poll. The poll was written as a
> > vanilla HTML form. If you partici
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> [1]I used to read slashdot regularly, and on slashdot, the front page
> had a bunch of news stories and a poll. The poll was written as a
> vanilla HTML form. If you participated in the poll, it would send you
> to a new instance of the home page, because a form *must* load
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 07:43:43 -0400
Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
>
> [1]I used to read slashdot regularly, and on slashdot, the front page
> had a bunch of news stories and a poll. The poll was written as a
> vanilla HTML form. If you participated in the poll, it would send you
> to a new instance of
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 07:43:43 -0400
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 03:16:21PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > The ones I respond to are known to me and are legit --
> > organizations, businesses, government agencies, etc. -- that I do
> > business with. To respond, I must switch
On Sunday, 25 Oct 2020 at 10:36, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 07:19:28 +0200
> Teemu Likonen wrote:
>> GNU Emacs mail clients "Gnus" and "Notmuch Emacs" automatically render
>> HTML mail nicely as plain text. User can can also open HTML and other
>> MIME parts in external viewer lik
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 09:11:42AM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> We still don't know whether
>
> - those forms are plain old HTML forms of yore with a "classical"
> SUBMIT action
> - or they are some AJAX-y abomination in which a piece of Javascript
> plays ping-pong with the server
>
> In
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 03:16:21PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> The ones I respond to are known to me and are legit --
> organizations, businesses, government agencies, etc. -- that I do
> business with. To respond, I must switch to a web browser, login to
> my email account (like gmail), find t
t;From what I've read html forms can be embedded in an email (and probably
have), but the chances of the recipient being able to submit them with
success from within his or her email client are problematic (sporadic
support is apparently the consecrated expression).
It seems like a corner case
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 03:42:24PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
[...]
> Okay. Here's a trivial one to keep it simple:
>
> Recently I went to my bank in person. A few days later I get an HTML
> email [...]
I think we won't advance unless you look into that HTML.
(If you post it here: make sure
On 10/26/20 6:16 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 20:45:50 -0400
Carl Fink wrote:
On 10/25/20 8:28 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
I'm not referring to viewing HTML emails. I already can do that in
Claws-Mail using its Dillo plugin. I'm talking about filling in
forms, etc. that are par
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 21:57:07 -0400
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Carl Fink wrote:
> > On 10/25/20 9:17 PM, John Hasler wrote:
> > > Carl writes:
> > > > I don't remember ever getting an emailed form that was anything
> > > > but a link to a web page.
> > > I think that may be what he means.
> >
>
er.
This happens often enough now to make having to switch to the browser
instead of being able to respond with my usual email client an annoying
inconvenience. Hence, my search for a new email client.
B
On Mon 26 Oct 2020 at 20:48:26 (+), Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:10:10 -0400 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:49:05PM +, Curt wrote:
> > > On 2020-10-26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:38:36PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> > > >> he is talk
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 08:48:26PM +, Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:10:10 -0400
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > But if you're just reading this form in a FILE on your LOCAL MACHINE,
> > which is what email is, then what is /action_page.php supposed to do?
> >
>
> And if the full URL is pres
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:10:10 -0400
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:49:05PM +, Curt wrote:
> > On 2020-10-26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:38:36PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> > >> he is talking about filling in forms, etc. that are part of the
> > >>
On 2020-10-26, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2020, at 13:49, Curt wrote:
>> On 2020-10-26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
>> > But what would the form's Submit action be?
>
>> HTML Forms
>>
>>
>
> ... which works fine when someone is browsing a page served by some
> website's own server... as
On Mon, 26 Oct 2020, at 13:49, Curt wrote:
> On 2020-10-26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > But what would the form's Submit action be?
> HTML Forms
>
>
... which works fine when someone is browsing a page served by some
website's own server... as that partial URL points to a php file which is
part
Greg Wooledge writes:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:49:05PM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2020-10-26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:38:36PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> >> he is talking about filling in forms, etc. that are part of the html
email.
> >> guys, ever heard of the ... html
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 01:49:05PM +, Curt wrote:
> On 2020-10-26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:38:36PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> >> he is talking about filling in forms, etc. that are part of the html email.
> >> guys, ever heard of the ... html tags? that's what he means
On 2020-10-26, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:38:36PM +0100, Michael wrote:
>> he is talking about filling in forms, etc. that are part of the html email.
>> guys, ever heard of the ... html tags? that's what he means.
>
> But what would the form's Submit action be?
HTML F
hey,
On Monday, October 26, 2020 12:57:18 PM CET, Greg Wooledge wrote:
But what would the form's Submit action be?
no idea. and i don't care. ask him...
i am not defending his desire using forms in an email client, i am just
trying to translate what i think he wants.
but to a
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:38:36PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> he is talking about filling in forms, etc. that are part of the html email.
> guys, ever heard of the ... html tags? that's what he means.
But what would the form's Submit action be?
ling in forms, etc. that are part of the HTML email
[...]
he is talking about filling in forms, etc. that are part of the html email.
guys, ever heard of the ... html tags? that's what he means.
[...] and sending just the data without "replying" in the normal sense
he wants an email cli
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 05:07:05PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
[...]
> [...] One cannot interact and transmit data as I need to.
I think this is the core of the problem. Up to now you haven't taken
up the job to specify what that means: in the context of the Web, this
covers a broad field:
-
On 2020-10-26 00:07, Patrick Bartek wrote:
I have Dillo configured NOT to show images initially. Do that for
security. Reloading page usually brings them up. It will follow some
links to other pages, but for viewing purposes only. One cannot
interact and transmit data as I need to. I have to us
Patrick Bartek writes:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 14:07:00 -0500
> John Hasler wrote:
>
> > Patrick Bartek writes:
> > > But I need to view the entire email: images, graphics, etc. and be
> > > able to interact with all the links, etc. and not just view them.
> > > Want to get away from having to logi
Carl Fink wrote:
> On 10/25/20 9:17 PM, John Hasler wrote:
> > Carl writes:
> > > I don't remember ever getting an emailed form that was anything but a
> > > link to a web page.
> > I think that may be what he means.
>
> Can't be. He refers to having to log into a mail account
> in the browser. T
On 10/25/20 9:17 PM, John Hasler wrote:
Carl writes:
I don't remember ever getting an emailed form that was anything but a
link to a web page.
I think that may be what he means.
Can't be. He refers to having to log into a mail account
in the browser. That is never required for these mailed
li
Carl writes:
> I don't remember ever getting an emailed form that was anything but a
> link to a web page.
I think that may be what he means.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On 10/25/20 8:28 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
I'm not referring to viewing HTML emails. I already can do that in
Claws-Mail using its Dillo plugin. I'm talking about filling in forms,
etc. that are part of the HTML email and sending just the data without
"replying" in the normal sense. This is beyo
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 14:07:00 -0500
John Hasler wrote:
> Patrick Bartek writes:
> > But I need to view the entire email: images, graphics, etc. and be
> > able to interact with all the links, etc. and not just view them.
> > Want to get away from having to login to the mail account with a
> > brow
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 11:42:20 -0700 (PDT)
didier gaumet wrote:
> Le dimanche 25 octobre 2020 à 19:00:08 UTC+1, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
>
> > Already have Dillo set up, but I need more than a viewer. I want a
> > client that handles HTML as well as plain text emails, so I don't
> > have to login
unless (I suppose) a folder full of images are
> passed to the browser as well as the html page, AND the image
> references inside the html somehow are modified from whatever
> would have worked inside an email client, so that they browser
> can pick up the images in the folder.
Inter
om whatever
would have worked inside an email client, so that they browser
can pick up the images in the folder.
By "logging-in", I guess the OP is referring to using a webmail system
where the webmail server presents an integrated view of the html page
and the unpacked embedded attached i
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 14:07:00 -0500
John Hasler wrote:
> Patrick Bartek writes:
> > But I need to view the entire email: images, graphics, etc. and be
> > able to interact with all the links, etc. and not just view them.
> > Want to get away from having to login to the mail account with a
> > brow
> Any suggestions?
Surprisingly, Gnus handle very well HTML emails.
Sincerely, Gnus fan Byung-Hee
--
^고맙습니다 _和合團結_ 감사합니다_^))//
Patrick Bartek writes:
> But I need to view the entire email: images, graphics, etc. and be
> able to interact with all the links, etc. and not just view them.
> Want to get away from having to login to the mail account with a
> browser to do so. So, EMACS won't work for me.
Log in to what mail a
Le dimanche 25 octobre 2020 à 19:00:08 UTC+1, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> Already have Dillo set up, but I need more than a viewer. I want a
> client that handles HTML as well as plain text emails, so I don't have
> to login into the mail account via a browser to interact with the email.
I just
https://trojita.flaska.net) as a pure and simple
> imap based email client. but it is not in the debian repositories.
I've heard of it. Haven't researched it.
> it does only one thing: handling email of one single imap account,
> but it does it well enough for me, so i sti
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 01:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
didier gaumet wrote:
> Le dimanche 25 octobre 2020 à 01:10:06 UTC+2, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> > Hi! All,
> >
> > Looking for recommendations for a lightweight email client that
> > will handle HTML as well as plain text
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 07:19:28 +0200
Teemu Likonen wrote:
> * 2020-10-24 16:04:00-07, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > Looking for recommendations for a lightweight email client that will
> > handle HTML as well as plain text to replace Claws-Mail. Have been
> > using Claws-M
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 05:55:02 +0100
Oliver Schoede wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 16:04:00 -0700
> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> >
> >Looking for recommendations for a lightweight email client that will
> >handle HTML as well as plain text to replace Claws-Mail. Have b
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 21:52:54 -0400
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Saturday 24 October 2020 19:04:00 Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > Hi! All,
> >
> > Looking for recommendations for a lightweight email client that will
> > handle HTML as well as plain text to replace Claws-Ma
On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 19:50:14 -0500
Leslie Rhorer wrote:
> On 10/24/2020 6:04 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >
> > Hi! All,
> >
> > Looking for recommendations for a lightweight email client that will
> > handle HTML as well as plain text
>
> I want
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020 17:22:35 +1100
Keith Bainbridge wrote:
> On 25/10/20 12:52 pm, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Both Thunderbird and Balsa have been rejected as T'bird is a
> > behemoth and no longer in development;
>
>
> Um. Why then am I getting new versions every few weeks?
> Currently 83
On Sun 25 Oct 2020 at 07:47:33 (+), Ed wrote:
> On 2020-10-24 19:35-0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > Any suggestions?
> >
> > mutt, with a mailcap that includes:
>
> +1 for mutt.
>
> > X-Message-Flag: Cannot contact reaper.nsa.gov. Trying bucket.cia.gov..
> > X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Prat
Dan Ritter wrote:
> Ed wrote:
> > On 2020-10-24 19:35-0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > mutt, with a mailcap that includes:
> >
> > +1 for mutt.
> >
> > > X-Message-Flag: Cannot contact reaper.nsa.gov. Trying bucket.cia.gov..
> > > X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
> >
> > Thanks for the laug
Ed wrote:
> On 2020-10-24 19:35-0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > > Any suggestions?
> >
> > mutt, with a mailcap that includes:
>
> +1 for mutt.
>
> > X-Message-Flag: Cannot contact reaper.nsa.gov. Trying bucket.cia.gov..
> > X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
>
> Thanks for the laugh :) but
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 08:34:52AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> Teemu Likonen writes:
> > GNU Emacs mail clients "Gnus" and "Notmuch Emacs" automatically render
> > HTML mail nicely as plain text. User can can also open HTML and other
> > MIME parts in external viewer like web browser.
>
> I thoug
Teemu Likonen writes:
> GNU Emacs mail clients "Gnus" and "Notmuch Emacs" automatically render
> HTML mail nicely as plain text. User can can also open HTML and other
> MIME parts in external viewer like web browser.
I thought of suggesting Gnus as well, but that usually results in
horrified outc
On Sunday, October 25, 2020 1:04:00 AM CEST, Patrick Bartek wrote:
Any suggestions?
since this is a debian user mailinglist, my answer will be slightly off
topic.
but i use 'trojita' (https://trojita.flaska.net) as a pure and simple imap
based email client. but it is not in
On 2020-10-25 01:51-0700, didier gaumet wrote:
> It seems that in the past, Debian provided the claws-mail-fancy-plugin
> package (a GTK2 HTML viewer).
> That is no longer the case but Debian is now providing the
> claws-mail-dillo-viewer (a Dillo HTML viewer), and in addition to this, from
> B
* 2020-10-25 06:51:36-04, Kenneth Parker wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020, 6:40 AM wrote:
>> alpine
> +1
It would be useful to add some information how the suggested client
(Alpine) serves the purpose that was asked by the original poster.
--
/// Teemu Likonen - .-.. https://www.iki.fi/tlikonen/
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020, 6:40 AM wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2020, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > Any suggestions?
>
> alpine
>
+1
On Sun, 25 Oct 2020, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Any suggestions?
alpine
Le dimanche 25 octobre 2020 à 01:10:06 UTC+2, Patrick Bartek a écrit :
> Hi! All,
>
> Looking for recommendations for a lightweight email client that will
> handle HTML as well as plain text to replace Claws-Mail. Have been
> using Claws-Mail for years and before it Sylpheed
[...]
> > Any suggestions?
>
> Have you looked at protonmail.com? Encrypted all over the place. Web based,
> though.
Original poster was asking for a client, not for a service.
Much less for a commercial service.
And he clearly stated *not* web based.
Cheers
- t
signature.asc
Descriptio
On 2020-10-24 19:35-0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > Any suggestions?
>
> mutt, with a mailcap that includes:
+1 for mutt.
> X-Message-Flag: Cannot contact reaper.nsa.gov. Trying bucket.cia.gov..
> X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Thanks for the laugh :) but not sure which client you're usin
1 - 100 of 326 matches
Mail list logo
