Peter Daum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Not really related to the problem, but why do you use unibyte mode?
>> It is very much deprecated, you will not be able to edit or view utf-8
>> encoded text.
>
> Fortunately, I don't usually need UTF-8 (Even in multibyte mode and with
> a suitable font, I
Peter Daum writes:
> Fortunately, I don't usually need UTF-8 (Even in multibyte mode and with
> a suitable font, I never managed persuading emacs to correctly display
> an utf-8-encoded file)
Unless you live on an island, sooner or later you will retrieve UTF-8
encoded files, as this is standard i
s. I installed several
> other emacsens on the same system (including a shiny new emacs 22.1
> compiled from the original source) and in all other installations, the
> code snippet above will redefine the "ä" key as expected.
I can confirm that it works in Emacs 22.
> Since I am plann
t above will redefine the "ä" key as expected.
Since I am planning to use Debian on lots of machines, I would strongly
prefer if there was some workaround for the emacs21 debian package
instead of using a self-made emacs on all machines.
Unfortunately, I can't figure out, which mo
On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 21:17 +1000, flebber wrote:
> Hi
>
> This is my first post to the list so if i have done anything untoward
> please let me know.
>
> I am on debian etch using gnome I have been trying to get emacs or
> emacs21 as it seems to be called to work prop
Hi
This is my first post to the list so if i have done anything untoward
please let me know.
I am on debian etch using gnome I have been trying to get emacs or
emacs21 as it seems to be called to work properly.
It is not rendering fonts so words in the buffers are not there they are
merely
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 18:56:25 -0600, Charles Blair wrote:
>Thanks for your continuing help. In response to "aptitude keep-all"
> and to
> "aptitude install -fsD" I got a long list of packages that "have been
> kept back".
> No single item in the list seemed enlightening.
>
> The second
Thanks for your continuing help. In response to "aptitude keep-all"
and to
"aptitude install -fsD" I got a long list of packages that "have been
kept back".
No single item in the list seemed enlightening.
The second command also gave as response:
*
0 upgraded
t; ***
>
> It seems that an attempt now to install ANY additional package has
> aptitude wanting
> to delete emacs21 and (even worse) to remove grub (version 0.97-23).
The libc6-* versions are OK for a current Etch. Maybe aptitude remembers
something s
-11(/var/lib...Binary-1...20070226-09:38...)
***
It seems that an attempt now to install ANY additional package has
aptitude wanting
to delete emacs21 and (even worse) to remove grub (version 0.97-23).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
>Thanks for any ideas about how to deal with this situation.
Can you repost the version number of libc6 currently on your system? (It
looks like you are transcribing the messages rather than copy/pasting
them directly. "2.3.6.ds1-2.3.6.ds1-i" seems weird to me, did you maybe
mak
This is an attempt to supply more detail on a problem reported in
another recent post.
I have installed a dual-boot of etch and Windows XP on a recently
purchased HP machine that has a SATA hard disk (i386).
Recently I have installed gcc-4.1 and emacs-21 using downloads
of the "weekly
On 2007-03-14, Charles Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I recently installed the testing (etch) incarnation of debian,
> and have added emacs (emacs21). I would like to add gnumeric
> and a number of other packages, but aptitude warns me that, to
> do so, I have to dow
I recently installed the testing (etch) incarnation of debian,
and have added emacs (emacs21). I would like to add gnumeric
and a number of other packages, but aptitude warns me that, to
do so, I have to downgrade some things (libc6 is one), and that
this will delete emacs21.
--
To
OK, so this is the real fix. Move
FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/"
to the top (above the misc). I don't understand why, but this gives
great fonts for xemacs21.
I've revised the web page accordingly.
Art Edwards
Daniel Johnson wrote:
Twice now I have found ema
By now, you have probably fixed this problem, but I have been wrestling
with font issues for several weeks now. I include a rough webpage with a
recipe that has led to consistently pleasing fonts in both gnome and KDE.
Art Edwards
Daniel Johnson wrote:
Twice now I have found emacs21 display
Twice now I have found emacs21 display squares instead of fonts after
doing an update in Sid, and once they were fixed by an update. It
seems that it is either an update to X, or some fonts package that
breaks things rather than emacs. I believe both times that it broke
apt was updating both X
Hi,
I am sorry for jumping in this thread a bit late. I hope that this is
still relevant.
On May 08 2006, Carl D. Blake wrote:
> I've been trying to install emacs21 on unstable for the last few days
> and aptitude keeps reporting that emacs21-bin-common package is
> broken.
If yo
; testing at the same
> > > time?
> >
> > i don't think even testing is working... both testing
> > and unstable have the same version number.. so wait
> > till the bug is fixed. (or use xemacs as suggested)
>
> The problem is not the emacs21 package but rat
is working... both testing
> and unstable have the same version number.. so wait
> till the bug is fixed. (or use xemacs as suggested)
The problem is not the emacs21 package but rather its dependency, the
emacs21-common package:
$ apt-cache policy emacs21-common
emacs21-common:
Insta
On 5/9/06, Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:06:59PM -0400, Michael Marsh wrote:
> The OP didn't say he wanted/needed GNU Emacs, he said he was trying to
> install emacs21.
I would have thought the latter implied the former.
> He can
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:06:59PM -0400, Michael Marsh wrote:
> The OP didn't say he wanted/needed GNU Emacs, he said he was trying to
> install emacs21.
I would have thought the latter implied the former.
> He can get essentially the same functionality with xemacs21 while
On 5/9/06, Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 07:41:35PM -0400, Michael Marsh wrote:
> You can also install xemacs21, which can live happily alongside
> emacs21, and has no dependencies on emacs21 (that I can see).
..., and is also not GNU Emacs.
> OK, I'll ask a stupid question. How do you setup
> the sources.list file
> so you can use unstable, but install emacs from
> testing at the same
> time?
i don't think even testing is working... both testing
and unstable have the same version number.. so wait
till the bug is fixed. (or use xemac
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 07:41:35PM -0400, Michael Marsh wrote:
> You can also install xemacs21, which can live happily alongside
> emacs21, and has no dependencies on emacs21 (that I can see).
..., and is also not GNU Emacs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
On 5/9/06, Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you need emacs you can install the version from testing and forbid
further upgrades of these packages until this dependency issue is fixed.
You can also install xemacs21, which can live happily alongside
emacs21, and has no depend
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 02:17, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 15:32:38 -0700, kruton wrote:
> > --- "Carl D. Blake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I've been trying to install emacs21 on unstable for
> > > the last few da
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 15:32:38 -0700, kruton wrote:
> --- "Carl D. Blake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I've been trying to install emacs21 on unstable for
> > the last few days
> > and aptitude keeps reporting that emacs21-bin-common
> > p
On 5/8/06, Carl D. Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been trying to install emacs21 on unstable for the last few days
and aptitude keeps reporting that emacs21-bin-common package is broken.
I keep waiting thinking that the problem will be resolved, but nothing
has been do
kruton wrote:
> couple of days back, when I was upgrading to v7.0.16
> of xorg, these emacs packages were "removed". i am
> hoping that the dependency issues are fixed before i
> need to use emacs again..
> --kruton
>
I had noticed that xfs-xtt has some dependency issues with xorg v7.0.16.
I ev
--- "Carl D. Blake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been trying to install emacs21 on unstable for
> the last few days
> and aptitude keeps reporting that emacs21-bin-common
> package is broken.
> I keep waiting thinking that the problem will be
> resolve
I've been trying to install emacs21 on unstable for the last few days
and aptitude keeps reporting that emacs21-bin-common package is broken.
I keep waiting thinking that the problem will be resolved, but nothing
has been done about it. aptitude reports that the following packages
have
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 09:40:37AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello:
>
> TIA, while upgrading from woody to sarge emacs would not properly install.
> Error info
>
> Setting up emacs21 (21.4a-1) ...
> emacs-install emacs21
> install/auctex: Setting up for emacs21.
Hello:
TIA, while upgrading from woody to sarge emacs would not properly install.
Error info
Setting up emacs21 (21.4a-1) ...
emacs-install emacs21
install/auctex: Setting up for emacs21... emacs-install:
/usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/auctex emacs21 failed at
/usr/lib/emacsen-common
Hello!
i have tried this:
> Do this:
>
> apt-get clean
> apt-get install xemacs21-mule
>
but i get a simular message:
Setting up xemacs21-mule (21.4.6-8) ...
emacs-install xemacs21
emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor xemacs21
emacsen-common: byte-compiling for xemacs21
cp: canno
Do this:
apt-get clean
apt-get install xemacs21-mule
Regards.
El sáb, 29 de 03 de 2003 a las 00:38, Bjoern Schiessle escribió:
> Hello,
> i have tried to install emacs21 on my Debian woody system with apt-get.
> But i get always following message:
>
> "apt-get install emacs
Hello,
i have tried to install emacs21 on my Debian woody system with apt-get.
But i get always following message:
"apt-get install emacs21
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
emacs21 emacsen-common
0 packages upgrad
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 01:13:37PM +0100, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> Hi list
>
> I have just installed emacs21 for being able to use the preview-latex
> package. I really hate this menu bar with Icons (they make me think of
> Word...).
> Can I disable this Icon menu bar, and
Joerg
> I have just installed emacs21 for being able to use the preview-latex
> package. I really hate this menu bar with Icons
> Can I disable this Icon menu bar, and get back to my old text-mode
I think what you are looking for is
(tool-b
Hi list
I have just installed emacs21 for being able to use the preview-latex
package. I really hate this menu bar with Icons (they make me think of
Word...).
Can I disable this Icon menu bar, and get back to my old text-mode menu (I
can turn this one on with "menu-bar-mode 1", but t
Shyamal Prasad writes:
> Does Emacs 21 do this consistently? Or do you get this error only the
> first time?
Consistently.
>
> I'd suggest searching the bug reports to see if it has not been
> reported. If that is the case, and you can reproduced this problem
> consistenly, it is always w
"markus" == markus hoenicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
markus> If I run vm as a mail client in Emacs 20, I have no
markus> problem accessing my pop3 and smtp servers. If I try the
markus> same in Emacs 21, I get a message:
markus> Temporary nameserver resolution problem
I installed tramp and tried to use it in emacs21, but ran into bug
#89339 so I install the version of tramp in unstable and now, when I
attemp to open a file, it will try to find it in my root dir.
C-x C-f /[name]file
C-x C-f /[scp/name]file
and
C-x C-f /[scp/user@name]file
don't work and
add dependency on dpkg (>= 1.9.0) for new install-info.
>
> But trying to install I get dependency errors. Emacs21 depends on dpkg
>>=1.9.0 and potato comes with 1.6.15. I guess nothing in emacs21
> really depends on dpkg except for maybe the install/remove scripts?
> Then
Hi
I have an old laptop (486DX4-75) happily running potato. I use it for
writing using emacs20 and LaTeX. I usually does that in X, to get
colour syntax highlighting. But emacs21 supports this also in the
console (freeing memory not running X). So I am interested in getting
emacs21 to work on
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 03:33:10PM +0200, Carel Fellinger wrote:
> In that case a likely candidate for upheaval is `libreadline'.
> Look at `/etc/inputrc' and see that (input|output)-meta is on.
>
> # Be 8 bit clean.
> set input-meta on
> set output-meta on
>
...
>
> Hope this
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 08:34:05AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:41:11PM +0200, Carel Fellinger wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 05:42:57PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 05:03:34PM +0200, Henrik Enberg wrote:
> > ...
> > > > M-< goes to the top
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:41:11PM +0200, Carel Fellinger wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 05:42:57PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 05:03:34PM +0200, Henrik Enberg wrote:
> ...
> > > M-< goes to the top
> > > M-> goes to the bottom
> ...
> > On the woody computer at work Es
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 05:42:57PM +0200, Johann Spies wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 05:03:34PM +0200, Henrik Enberg wrote:
...
> > M-< goes to the top
> > M-> goes to the bottom
...
> On the woody computer at work Esc-< and Esc-> does what M-< and M->
> should do.
Yep, that's how it's suppose
erence between C-home and home on
> the console.
>
> > Or is there another way to go to the top or bottom of the document in
> > emacs21?
>
> M-< goes to the top
> M-> goes to the bottom
Thanks for this answer. I replied on a similar one yesterday from my
ho
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 08:11:01PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Johann> Or is there another way to go to the top or bottom of the
> Johann> document in emacs21?
>
> M-> or M-x end-of-buffer.
Thanks Marshal,
I missed that one somehow. With that working I
op or bottom of the document in
> emacs21?
M-< goes to the top
M-> goes to the bottom
--
I acted to show my love for Jodie Foster.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johann> Or is there another way to go to the top or bottom of the
Johann> document in emacs21?
M-> or M-x end-of-buffer.
Good luck.
Marshal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One of the differences between emacs20 and emacs21 is the behaviour of
the Home and End keys.
I found the following problem in emacs21:
Movement to the top or bottom of the document is supposed to be the
result of Cntrl_Home and Cntrl_End respectively. But that only works
in the X11 environment
This will swap your left windows and alt keys, so you can use Alt for
Meta and (in wmaker and probably other window managers) the windows
key to switch windows.
1. Use xkeycaps to rearrange the keyboard how you'd like, and save the
modifications in a file such as ~/.xmodmap. Mine looks like th
On 08-Apr-2002 Holger Rauch wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I noticed that in Debian Woody the Alt key does not work as Meta key when
> using Emacs 21 under X (XFree 4.1.0.1). What do I have to put in my .emacs
> file to get it to work? (I was looking at the FAQ using Help->Emacs FAQ,
> but found nothing there.
Hi!
I noticed that in Debian Woody the Alt key does not work as Meta key when
using Emacs 21 under X (XFree 4.1.0.1). What do I have to put in my .emacs
file to get it to work? (I was looking at the FAQ using Help->Emacs FAQ,
but found nothing there.) Searching with google revealed:
(define-key f
At Mon, 08 Apr 2002 12:02:11 +0200,
Jan Ulrich Hasecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After upgrading emacs21 yesterday mule-ucs does not compile. Starting
> emacs21 the source is loaded.
If the above means that mule-ucs is very slow, see the following:
In message
http://lists.debia
At Mon, 08 Apr 2002 12:02:11 +0200,
Jan Ulrich Hasecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> apt-get install --reinstall mule-ucs takes a while but completes
> without errors but there are no byte-compiled files in
> /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/mule-ucs/
I saw /usr/share/emacs21/site-lisp
Hi!
After upgrading emacs21 yesterday mule-ucs does not compile. Starting
emacs21 the source is loaded.
apt-get install --reinstall mule-ucs takes a while but completes
without errors but there are no byte-compiled files in
/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/mule-ucs/
Any hints?
Ciao!
juh
--
To
The following is the tail of piped stderr from attempting to build
("debuild -b -uc -us") emacs21 on an essentially testing system. Can
anybody guess what package I'm missing or need to upgrade? "apt-get
build-dep" doesn't complain about anything.
> tail -n 15 ..
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:11:36PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:10:43PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> > > Chris Jenks wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I thought that the book said the book said that the ultimate question
> > > > is, "what is 6
Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:10:43PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> > Chris Jenks wrote:
> > >
> > > I thought that the book said the book said that the ultimate question
> > > is, "what is 6 * 9?"
> >
> > That was 6 * 7 (!),
>
> No, it _is_ 6 * 9, extracted from arthu
> No, it _is_ 6 * 9, extracted from arthur's head using scrabble letters.
> The full question is: "What do you get when you multiply six by nine?"
yep. And no one makes jokes in base 13 (Douglas Adams, approximativly
translated from english to french and from french to english.)
--
Isa
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 01:10:43PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> Chris Jenks wrote:
> >
> > I thought that the book said the book said that the ultimate question
> > is, "what is 6 * 9?"
>
> That was 6 * 7 (!),
No, it _is_ 6 * 9, extracted from arthur's head using scrabble letters.
The full que
Richard Hector wrote:
>
> had to make up an answer,
Oops - a question. But it's an answer to "what is the question?" :-)
Richard
--
I'm currently looking for work; see my Curriculum Vitae here:
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/~rhector/cv.html
Chris Jenks wrote:
>
> I thought that the book said the book said that the ultimate question
> is, "what is 6 * 9?"
That was 6 * 7 (!), was after the earth had been destroyed and the mice
had to make up an answer, and was rejected as "too literal, too
factual". The better solution (but still made
At 03:42 PM 3/4/02, Gary Turner wrote:
On Mon, 04 Mar 2002 11:22:23 +, Randy Orrison wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 03:03:22AM -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
>| On Sun, 03 Mar 2002 20:31:55 -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
>| >Gary Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>| >> If you can't get an answer th
On Mon, 04 Mar 2002 11:22:23 +, Randy Orrison wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 03:03:22AM -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
>| On Sun, 03 Mar 2002 20:31:55 -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
>| >Gary Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>| >> If you can't get an answer there, then the
>| >> only answer is "42"
>
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 03:03:22AM -0600, Gary Turner wrote:
| On Sun, 03 Mar 2002 20:31:55 -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
| >Gary Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >> If you can't get an answer there, then the
| >> only answer is "42"
| >Oh, thanks, I didn't know about that list. But your referenc
On Sun, 03 Mar 2002 20:31:55 -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
>Gary Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> If you can't get an answer there, then the
>> only answer is "42"
>
>Oh, thanks, I didn't know about that list. But your reference to "42"
>sailed right over my head...
"42" is the answer; the
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 08:31:55PM -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Gary Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi Harry, try here [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've seen all
> > kinds of discussions on just this type of question. Some serious emacs
> > dev types hang out there. If you can't get an answer t
Gary Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Harry, try here [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've seen all
> kinds of discussions on just this type of question. Some serious emacs
> dev types hang out there. If you can't get an answer there, then the
> only answer is "42"
Oh, thanks, I didn't know about t
On Sun, 03 Mar 2002 08:29:04 -0800, Harry Putnam wrote:
>A fairly long-time emacs user, I'm accustomed to using a site-start.el
>
>Probably good reasons for all this, I'm just curious what they are?
Hi Harry, try here [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've seen all
kinds of discussions on just this type of
wondered if this change is something to do with my installation or if
> it is something debian has setup.
>
can't help here, sorry.
> Also curious about the the way files get installed with emacs21 and
> emacsen-common packages.
>
> I see it sets up /usr/share/emacs with
e the way files get installed with emacs21 and
emacsen-common packages.
I see it sets up /usr/share/emacs with subs of site-lisp and emacs-21
when the default is /usr/local/share/emacs/ .
It also creates the ones under /usr/local but they are empty. Why both?
Seems like, if the official deb e
I have installed emacs21 today and while experimenting with it I noticed
the following changes in behaviour - both of them causing problems for
me:
1. According to the emacs news the Home and End keys will no longer take
me to the beginning or end of buffer. I have to use C-Home and C-End.
No
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 06:43:20PM +0100, Dominique Deleris wrote:
> Does anybody know when emacs21 will hit Woody?
As there's just been a low priority upload, a minimum of 10 days,
provided that the maintainer doesn't upload another version between now
and then. Even in 10
Hello,
Does anybody know when emacs21 will hit Woody?
I'd really appreciate it :)
I apt-source compiled emacs21 from unstable, but I am not pleased
with this "mix" of testing and unstable...
Cheers,
--
Dominique Deleris
http://potatoworld.tuxfamily.org
? (I'm asking because this is the reason
> I didn't finish compiling dpkg 1.9.17 on a potato box).
>
> If that's ok, I'll go on and do it!
>
> (BTW, I installed Emacs21 on potato, with the dpkg that's i npotato. The
> onlyproblem is that when installing the
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Matthew Garman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 01:23:03PM -0500, Josh McKinney wrote:
> > > I'm a fairly experienced user (since 1988) and I'm used to doing lots
> > > of customization, but I've not noticed anything annoying so far. What
> > > has been very impressive is tha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> Has anyone got Emacs21 up and running on stable?
> Built it last night, the install uses texinfo 4.0b which you can build
> from the unstable sources, it also depends on dpkg 1.9.17 from unstable
> which you can just build from the unstab
> debug the post-removal script /var/lib/dpkg/info/emacs21.postrm
>
> There must be some typing error where the suidunregister is called.
>
> Then try to purge the package again.
>
>Martin
Also, it seems that there's a backport of Emacs21 (doesn
Martin Fluch writes:
> Hmm, debug the post-removal script /var/lib/dpkg/info/emacs21.postrm
>
> There must be some typing error where the suidunregister is called.
Thanks, I found it (MOVEMAIL undefined).
Regards,
Igor
Hmm, debug the post-removal script /var/lib/dpkg/info/emacs21.postrm
There must be some typing error where the suidunregister is called.
Then try to purge the package again.
Martin
On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Igor Mozetic wrote:
> I recompiled emacs21 for potato, but wasn't able to
>
I recompiled emacs21 for potato, but wasn't able to
install it since it depends on newer dpkg (>= 1.9.0),
and I have 1.6.15.
Now, I would just like to purge/remove it, but:
# dpkg -P emacs21
(Reading database ... 46195 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing emacs21 .
See todays LWN weekly edition for more on emacs features
(http://www.lwn.net). I found the article quite informative (like most
of LWN's stuff).
hat's ok, I'll go on and do it!
(BTW, I installed Emacs21 on potato, with the dpkg that's i npotato. The
onlyproblem is that when installing the info files, it needs one option
that dpkg will not recognize - but if you don't need the info files,
that works nicely, as far as I could see!)
J.
--
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 08:14:58AM +0100, Glyn Millington wrote:
>
> Before I do the big download. (well, on this modem it's big
> enough).
>
> Has anyone got Emacs21 up and running on stable? I was considering
> building with the source from unstable, but could
Matthew Garman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does the new version of GNU emacs support *console mode* syntax
> highlighting (I guess it's called "font locking" in emacs-speak).
Yes.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
While having never invented a sin, I'm trying to pe
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 01:23:03PM -0500, Josh McKinney wrote:
> > I'm a fairly experienced user (since 1988) and I'm used to doing lots
> > of customization, but I've not noticed anything annoying so far. What
> > has been very impressive is that things just work. On previous major
> > upgrades (1
On approximately Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 01:28:09AM -0700, Jim McCloskey wrote:
>
> I'm a fairly experienced user (since 1988) and I'm used to doing lots
> of customization, but I've not noticed anything annoying so far. What
> has been very impressive is that things just work. On previous major
> up
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 07:36:48PM -0500, DvB wrote:
> This may be taking this thread a little OT, but I have to ask... I've
> heard (on Slashdot, to be exact) that Emacs21 has some "new user
> oriented" features that can be annoying for more experienced users. What
>
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 07:36:48PM -0500, DvB wrote:
> This may be taking this thread a little OT, but I have to ask... I've
> heard (on Slashdot, to be exact) that Emacs21 has some "new user
> oriented" features that can be annoying for more experienced users. What
>
Before I do the big download. (well, on this modem it's big
enough).
Has anyone got Emacs21 up and running on stable? I was considering
building with the source from unstable, but could just as easily get the
raw source and do the job in /usr/local. Any reason why either of
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Faheem Mitha wrote:
> > 3) M-x R locks up emacs 21. I've never seen anything do this before. This
> > command uses ESS to start up R. It is unlikely that someone else who is
> > reading this is using ESS, R and emacs 21, but I thought it worth
> > mentioning. I probably need
retty much what I get. I assume you have R installed?
> I could get out of it by pressing Control-G.
Yes, me too. I guess locking up was an exaggeration.
> The ESS mailing list is your best bet. They will have to support
> emacs21 eventually!
Yes, I just heard from A.J. Rossini.
Thanks, Faheem Mitha.
da hangs there. Is that what you mean? (I'm not sure
since I've never used it).
I could get out of it by pressing Control-G.
The ESS mailing list is your best bet. They will have to support
emacs21 eventually!
Peter
Faheem Mitha wrote:
> 3) M-x R locks up emacs 21. I've never seen anything do this before. This
> command uses ESS to start up R.
We would need to see what the "R" function is.
Peter
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> > 3) M-x R locks up emacs 21. I've never seen anything do this before. This
> > command uses ESS to start up R.
>
> We would need to see what the "R" function is.
Oh, sorry.
ii r-base 1.3.0-1`GNU S
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
