Hi,
On Sun, 2007-12-23 at 11:21 +, Paul Csanyi wrote:
> > How can I know whether is Intel Core 2 CPU with EM64T extension?
>
> Well this was a stupid question, sorry!
>
> The answer can be find with Google, and yes,
> Intel Core 2 CPU is with EM64T extension.
/proc
Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:33:43 +0100 keltezéssel Paul Csanyi azt írta:
> Hello!
>
> I red on the web page http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/ that:
> "The port consists of a kernel for all AMD 64bit CPUs
> with AMD64 extension and all Intel CPUs with EM64T
> extension, .."
uot;The port consists of a kernel for all AMD 64bit CPUs
> with AMD64 extension and all Intel CPUs with EM64T
> extension, .."
>
> Before I go to download and install amd64 Debian distribution,
> I whish to know that my Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU is with
> EM64T e
Hello!
I red on the web page http://www.debian.org/ports/amd64/ that:
"The port consists of a kernel for all AMD 64bit CPUs
with AMD64 extension and all Intel CPUs with EM64T
extension, .."
Before I go to download and install amd64 Debian distribution,
I whish to know that my Intel(R)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/10/07 04:45, Krzysztof Lubański wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 20:13 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 08/09/07 19:07, Krzysztof Lubański wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> "[...]it's clearly stated" - I meant the di
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 20:13 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 08/09/07 19:07, Krzysztof Lubański wrote:
> > [...]
> > "[...]it's clearly stated" - I meant the difference between IA-64 and
> > EM64T/AMD64 (emphasized right below "IA-64" heading a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/09/07 19:07, Krzysztof Lubański wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 17:39 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> Well, it's clearly stated on the overview page I provided. EM64T was
>>> recently renamed to "Intel 64&quo
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 17:39 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Well, it's clearly stated on the overview page I provided. EM64T was
> > recently renamed to "Intel 64" - but, yes, the names here can be
> > confusing.
>
> Where? I've looked and looked, bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/09/07 17:17, Linas Žvirblis wrote:
[snip]
>
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>> You're mixing arches. em64t *is* the -amd64 architecture, which,
>> obviously, isn't i386 (-686).
>
> You can install i386 operat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/09/07 17:10, Krzysztof Lubański wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 16:35 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 08/09/07 16:16, Krzysztof Lubański wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> I'm not big into x86-64 business, but AMD64 and EM64
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I'm trying to get the best of my machine based on intel core2 (6550), which is
> compliant with em64t debian arch (at least I thought...) but there is only a
> amd64 install available, which doesn't want to run on Intel machine
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 16:35 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 08/09/07 16:16, Krzysztof Lubański wrote:
> > [...]
> > I'm not big into x86-64 business, but AMD64 and EM64T / Intel 64
>
> Danger!! Danger!!!
>
> Intel has two wildly different 64-bit implementations
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/09/07 16:16, Krzysztof Lubański wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 22:39 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I'm trying to get the best of my machine based on intel core2 (6550), which
>> is
>> compliant with em64t debia
On August 9, 2007 05:39:28 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm trying to get the best of my machine based on intel core2 (6550), which
> is compliant with em64t debian arch (at least I thought...) but there is
> only a amd64 install available, which doesn&#x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/09/07 15:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm trying to get the best of my machine based on intel core2 (6550), which is
> compliant with em64t debian arch (at least I thought...) but there is only a
> amd64 inst
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 22:39 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm trying to get the best of my machine based on intel core2 (6550), which is
> compliant with em64t debian arch (at least I thought...) but there is only a
> amd64 install available, which doesn't want to r
Hi there,
I'm trying to get the best of my machine based on intel core2 (6550), which is
compliant with em64t debian arch (at least I thought...) but there is only a
amd64 install available, which doesn't want to run on Intel machine...
Therefore, I've started with a x386 arch
2) Don't be sent to a shell at the end of the installation, but to the
GUI (Gnome, KDE, etc) ?
Please see http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/324
raju
--
http://kamaraju.googlepages.com/cornell-bazaar
http://groups.google.com/group/cornell-bazaar/about
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
d2-xGeforce 6800GSSATA 200GB SeagateLG 4167bFloppy 1.44onboard network (disabled. Debian don't recognize my network card)PCI network (Just bought to install debian ETCh. Realtek by Encore 10/100)Pentium 4 EM64T
3,06GhzThank you.
Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.
Simon wrote:
so that would mean going from kernel-image-2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp to
kernel-image-2.6.8-12-em64t-p4-smp? Is this correct given your comment
above?
Hm, hard to say, check out
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=kernel-image-2.6&searchon=names&s
On 4/6/06, listrcv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon wrote:
> > Hi There, We have a mail server (postfix>amavis>dbmail) running debian
> > sarge (2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp) running dual xeons with a tyan
> > motherboard and 3ware hardware raid5. Everything has been r
Simon wrote:
Hi There, We have a mail server (postfix>amavis>dbmail) running debian
sarge (2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp) running dual xeons with a tyan
motherboard and 3ware hardware raid5. Everything has been running fine
up to now, but in the last week it has frozen twice. Completly stuck
nee
Hi There, We have a mail server (postfix>amavis>dbmail) running debian
sarge (2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp) running dual xeons with a tyan
motherboard and 3ware hardware raid5. Everything has been running fine
up to now, but in the last week it has frozen twice. Completly stuck
needing a hard reb
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 03:18:04PM +0200, Conny Brunnkvist wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-11-em64t-p4
> Version: 2.6.8-14
>
> There is apparently something wrong with the -em64t-p4 branch.
>
> I have a freshly installed Sarge system. After switching from the
> in
Hi.
I've just installed Debian Sarge on a p4 64bit box. I'm using the
'2.6.8-11-em64t-p4' stock kernel image.
I'm having a problem running iptables. When I try
# iptables -L
I get:
iptables v1.2.11: can't initialize iptables table `filter': Module is
wron
Im getting this error when apt-getting the
kernel-image-2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp package... anyone know what i should
do next? Thanks...
Setting up kernel-image-2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp (2.6.8-8) ...
cpio: (0x): No such file or directory
cp: cannot stat `(0x)': No such fi
erver (xeon nocona processors) and went to install a new SMP-aware
kernel and got this message:
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/kernel-image-2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.8-5_i386.deb
(--unpack):
subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered
On Tuesday 14 December 2004 12:27, Simon Buchanan wrote:
> Replies *below* :)
>
> Adam Aube wrote:
> > Please don't top post (which is putting your reply above the original
> > mesage) - it makes the thread harder to follow.
> >
> > Simon Buchanan wrote:
> >>Adam Aube wrote:
> >>>Simon Buchanan wro
Simon Buchanan wrote:
> Adam Aube wrote:
>> Simon Buchanan wrote:
>>> I tryed the standard "kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686-smp" version and it
>>> installed correctly...
>>> mx1:/# apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp
>>> kernel-i
; server (xeon nocona processors) and went to install a new SMP-aware
>>> kernel and got this message:
>>>dpkg: error processing
>>>/var/cache/apt/archives/kernel-image-2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.8-5_i386.deb
>>>(--unpack):
>>> subprocess pre-inst
Hi Adam... here is the output as requested:
mx1:/# apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
kernel-image-2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp is already the newest version.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 6 not upgraded.
1 not
Simon Buchanan wrote:
> Hi There, I have just completed install of debian testing on my new SMP
> server (xeon nocona processors) and went to install a new SMP-aware
> kernel and got this message:
> dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/kernel-image-2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-s
Hi There, I have just completed install of debian testing on my new SMP
server (xeon nocona processors) and went to install a new SMP-aware
kernel and got this message:
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/kernel-image-2.6.8-9-em64t-p4-smp_2.6.8-5_i386.deb
(--unpack):
subprocess
33 matches
Mail list logo
