On 13 Mar 1999, John Goerzen wrote:
> Max Kamenetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > No, I haven't tried downgrading yet, though I know that the problem is not
> > with the kernel version. I get the same problem with kernel 2.2.3. I'd
> > also be very surprised if this were an MTA problem becaus
Max Kamenetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, I haven't tried downgrading yet, though I know that the problem is not
> with the kernel version. I get the same problem with kernel 2.2.3. I'd
> also be very surprised if this were an MTA problem because pine works
> fine. I haven't tried downgr
On 13 Mar 1999, John Goerzen wrote:
> I don't know if this is a problem with glibc2.1 or Exim -- neither of
> which I have the opportunity to test (my development platform is Alpha
> running sendmail).
>
> It is possible that your kernel version is causing trouble; being an
> "unstable" and devel
Max,
I don't know if this is a problem with glibc2.1 or Exim -- neither of
which I have the opportunity to test (my development platform is Alpha
running sendmail).
It is possible that your kernel version is causing trouble; being an
"unstable" and development kernel could have its risks.
Have
I just upgraded my potato system to the latest version of libc and exim,
and I'm not faced with the problem of elm sending blank e-mails. If I
send a test message or reply to someone else's e-mail, the message comes
out blank. The mail buffer gets written to a file in /tmp just like it's
supposed
5 matches
Mail list logo