On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 04:38:43PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
>
> i believe i responded before i fully understood your question. i thought
> you were simply looking for an xterm equivalent that supported color.
>
> i must admit i have never used elinks before your post. it seems to
> render we
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 20:16 +, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> Matt Zagrabelny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 16:48 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> >> Dear list,
> >>
> >> I am trying to use elinks with 256 colours. However, as
> >> soon as I switch to 256 colors, the display turns
Matt Zagrabelny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 16:48 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
>> Dear list,
>>
>> I am trying to use elinks with 256 colours. However, as
>> soon as I switch to 256 colors, the display turns to mono. I have
>> tried many terminals, but in vain. Which xterm -e
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 16:48 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I am trying to use elinks with 256 colours. However, as
> soon as I switch to 256 colors, the display turns to mono. I have
> tried many terminals, but in vain. Which xterm -equivalent would you
> recommend, which supports 25
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 16:48 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I am trying to use elinks with 256 colours. However, as
> soon as I switch to 256 colors, the display turns to mono. I have
> tried many terminals, but in vain. Which xterm -equivalent would you
> recommend, which supports 25
Dear list,
I am trying to use elinks with 256 colours. However, as
soon as I switch to 256 colors, the display turns to mono. I have
tried many terminals, but in vain. Which xterm -equivalent would you
recommend, which supports 256 colours?
Thanks.
Kumar
P.S. I *did* use `color' in the conf, no
6 matches
Mail list logo
