On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 07:39:50AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 18:48, John Hasler wrote:
> > iain writes:
> > > ...libgcj3-dev and libstdc++5-dev both depend on LIBC_DEV(yes, with
> > > caps)...
>
> Could he be using an environment variable and forgot to put a $ in front
> of
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 18:48, John Hasler wrote:
> iain writes:
> > ...libgcj3-dev and libstdc++5-dev both depend on LIBC_DEV(yes, with
> > caps)...
Could he be using an environment variable and forgot to put a $ in front
of it?
> I just did an apt-get update from http.us.debian.org and I'm seeing
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:02:39AM +, iain d broadfoot wrote:
> > i hope i'm not the only one stuck with this:
> >
> > most recent gcc3.2 update in unstable, libgcj3-dev and libstdc++5-dev
> > both depend on LIBC_DEV(yes, with caps), which oddly enou
iain writes:
> ...libgcj3-dev and libstdc++5-dev both depend on LIBC_DEV(yes, with
> caps)...
I just did an apt-get update from http.us.debian.org and I'm seeing this as
well. File bugs.
And I was going to do an apt-get upgrade tonight. Thanks for the warning.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 12:02:39AM +, iain d broadfoot wrote:
> i hope i'm not the only one stuck with this:
>
> most recent gcc3.2 update in unstable, libgcj3-dev and libstdc++5-dev
> both depend on LIBC_DEV(yes, with caps), which oddly enough isn't in the system. :D
That would be what the b
i hope i'm not the only one stuck with this:
most recent gcc3.2 update in unstable, libgcj3-dev and libstdc++5-dev
both depend on LIBC_DEV(yes, with caps), which oddly enough isn't in the system. :D
previous version (which i'm holding at) both depend on libc6-dev
instead.
have my mirrors gone in
6 matches
Mail list logo
