On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 10:06:30PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
[...]
> All my installations that use a separate filesystem for /boot/ use EXT2. It
> still
> works as good as ever for such an infrequent use environment, with no way to
> get
> ahead of Grub evolution. :)
There are more reasons for
Cindy Sue Causey composed on 2023-02-19 15:30 (UTC-0500):
> Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
>> Hi.. This is just regurgitating something related to my coincidentally
>> referencing several years of GRUB non-boots yesterday. The latest on
>> this Linux From Scratch thread came into my inbox this morning,
resh upgrade to testing.
I've just installed several machines with it (and spent a bunch of time
testing it last night)
The ext4 problem there has been fixed now, for example, and was down
to a new version of e2fsprogs
All the very best, sa ever,
Andy Cater
> However this works out, thank you, Developers!
>
> Cindy :)
> --
> Talking Rock, Pickens County, Georgia, USA
> * gettin' giddy about the next new unstable! *
>
Found a brand new 2023.02.15 Debian bugs reference for this..
On 2/19/23, Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> Hi.. This is just regurgitating something related to my coincidentally
> referencing several years of GRUB non-boots yesterday. The latest on
> this Linux From Scratch thread came into my inbox th
Hi.. This is just regurgitating something related to my coincidentally
referencing several years of GRUB non-boots yesterday. The latest on
this Linux From Scratch thread came into my inbox this morning, and it
just sounds like it might help some Users having booting problems
similar to what I've e
definitely
needed for operation like this?
regards,
martin
Kuupäeval 28. märts 2012 13:49 kirjutas Stefan Monnier
:
>> thanks for replies! Is it possible to "slide" partition using the
>> tools included with e2fsprogs package as well?
>
> The e2fsprogs tools only deal wi
> thanks for replies! Is it possible to "slide" partition using the
> tools included with e2fsprogs package as well?
The e2fsprogs tools only deal with the needs specific to
ext[234] partitions. Sliding a partition can be done for any partition
you like with `dd'.
Jochen, Darac:
thanks for replies! Is it possible to "slide" partition using the
tools included with e2fsprogs package as well? Or is the GNU Parted
only option here if I want to make changes over CLI?
regards,
martin
Kuupäeval 26. märts 2012 17:28 kirjutas Darac Marjal :
> O
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 10:50:27PM +, Martin T wrote:
> I have a 500GB((131072000*4096)/1024^3) ext3 filesystem:
>
[cut]
>
> Is it possible to make partition smaller starting from the beginning?
> If yes, do I need to somehow start file system from the end of the
> partition?
Not directly. T
Martin T:
>
> Is it possible to make partition smaller starting from the beginning?
No.
> If yes, do I need to somehow start file system from the end of the
> partition?
AFAIK that's not possible. The solution for your problem (which involves
initial reformatting) is LVM.
J.
--
There is no ju
I have a 500GB((131072000*4096)/1024^3) ext3 filesystem:
root@debian:~#dumpe2fs /dev/sda9 | egrep "Block count|Block size"
dumpe2fs 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
Block count: 131072000
Block size: 4096
root@debian:~#
..on a 904GB((1953523711-56924160)*512)/(1024^3) partition(sd
On 2012-01-04, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 04/01/12 19:08, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> Apologies Alan, I overlooked your post.
>>
>>
>> On 04/01/12 03:08, Alan Greenberger wrote:
>>> On 2012-01-03, Scott Ferguson wrote:
The auto fsck/root problem (if ever encountered) could be got around by
>>
On 04/01/12 19:08, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> Apologies Alan, I overlooked your post.
>
>
> On 04/01/12 03:08, Alan Greenberger wrote:
>> On 2012-01-03, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>> The auto fsck/root problem (if ever encountered) could be got around by
>>> using the Wheezy live CD/USB[*1] which is th
Apologies Alan, I overlooked your post.
On 04/01/12 03:08, Alan Greenberger wrote:
> On 2012-01-03, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> The auto fsck/root problem (if ever encountered) could be got around by
>> using the Wheezy live CD/USB[*1] which is the path I chose thanks to
>> your chroot tip.
>
> It
On 2012-01-03, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> The auto fsck/root problem (if ever encountered) could be got around by
> using the Wheezy live CD/USB[*1] which is the path I chose thanks to
> your chroot tip.
It looks like you have gotten Wheezy live to work. I have not been able
to. What I have tried
.
regards
Joar Jegleim
On 2 January 2012 21:12, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Camaleón:
>> On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:27:50 +0100, Joar Jegleim wrote:
>>
>>> anybody got any foo on how to install e2fsprogs from wheezy into squeeze
>>> ?
>>> […]
>>> Has anybody
On 03/01/12 07:12, Jochen Spieker wrote:
> Camaleón:
>> On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:27:50 +0100, Joar Jegleim wrote:
>>
>>> anybody got any foo on how to install e2fsprogs from wheezy into squeeze
>>> ?
>>> […]
>>> Has anybody tried this, or g
Camaleón:
> On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:27:50 +0100, Joar Jegleim wrote:
>
>> anybody got any foo on how to install e2fsprogs from wheezy into squeeze
>> ?
>> […]
>> Has anybody tried this, or got any hints ?
>
> No hints, sorry. Sounds like a dangerous moveme
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:27:50 +0100, Joar Jegleim wrote:
> anybody got any foo on how to install e2fsprogs from wheezy into squeeze
> ?
It's tagged as an "essential" package. I would keep my paws out of it :-)
> I really need +16TB partition support which was added in e
Adrian Chapela wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to compile the latest version of e2fsprogs. I have the next
> error during compilation:
>
> make[2]: se ingresa al directorio `/usr/src/e2fsprogs/build/lib/ext2fs'
> CC ../../../lib/ext2fs/alloc_tables.c
> ../../../
Hello,
I am trying to compile the latest version of e2fsprogs. I have the next
error during compilation:
make[2]: se ingresa al directorio `/usr/src/e2fsprogs/build/lib/ext2fs'
CC ../../../lib/ext2fs/alloc_tables.c
../../../lib/ext2fs/alloc_tables.c: In function
‘ext2fs_allocate_group_
On Wed,29.Oct.08, 23:47:18, Fu-Tung Cheng wrote:
> Hi Celejar,
>
> Thank you for the reply.
>
> # more /etc/debian_version
> 3.1
>
> How do you typically go about doing a full upgrade. I know one of the
Read the release notes[1], they were written for this exact purpose.
[1] http://www.debia
Hi Celejar,
Thank you for the reply.
# more /etc/debian_version
3.1
How do you typically go about doing a full upgrade. I know one of the previous
posters said that sarge was being archived and might not be available for a
while.
Thank you,
Fu-Tung
--- On Tue, 10/28/08, Celejar <[EMAIL PR
On 2008-10-28 18:17 +0100, Fu-Tung Cheng wrote:
> # apt-get install ssh
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following extra packages will be installed:
> coreutils cramfsprogs dash debianutils e2fslibs e2fsprogs initrd-tools
> initscript
ng the
> essential package e2fsprogs due to a Conflicts/Pre-Depends loop. This
> is often bad, but if you really want to do it, activate the
> APT::Force-LoopBreak option.
> E: Internal Error, Could not early remove e2fsprogs
This should NOT happen. How did you install this system, [what De
debianutils e2fslibs e2fsprogs initrd-tools
initscripts libacl1 libattr1 libblkid1 libc6 libc6-dev libcomerr2
libdevmapper1.02 libedit2 libkrb53 libncurses5 libpam0g libselinux1
libsepol1 libss2 libssl0.9.8 libuuid1 lsb-base mktemp mount
openssh-blacklist openssh-client openssh-server sysv-rc
Raj Kombiyil wrote:
> Fellow uber-debianers,
> I have a problem with e2fsprogs. (Trying to install uni2ascii for
> example, which depends on e2fsprogs)
> My environment: Debian gnu/linux testing/unstable, Kernel version
> 2.4.27(home brewed), libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22, sysvinit 2.84
Fellow uber-debianers,I have a problem with e2fsprogs. (Trying to install uni2ascii for example, which depends on e2fsprogs)
My environment: Debian gnu/linux testing/unstable, Kernel version 2.4.27(home brewed), libc6 2.3.2.ds1-22, sysvinit 2.84-2woody1
my sources.list
=
#security
deb
i use 'testing' but occasionally installed packages fr sid or unstable.
now when i do 'apt-get install, i have the following error :
> E: This installation run will require temporarily removing the
> essential package e2fsprogs due to a Conflicts/Pre-Depends loop. This
>
drive.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=324550
Anyhow, I eventually discovered that linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
needs a newer e2fsprogs to build its initrd. So I upgraded
to the latest e2fsprogs (1.38-1.1), and linux-image was
happy and I rebooted and got my USB drive back.
So thi
Hi all,
i'm trying to configure a scsi disk:
I have 3 primary partitions
the command
mke2fs /dev/sdb1 works...
mke2fs /dev/sdb2 works...
mke2fs /dev/sdb3 don't. Here the output:
mke2fs /dev/sdb3
mke2fs 1.18, 11-Nov-1999 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
mke2fs: Device not configured while t
.
All generally works well except for installing the package e2fsprogs,
a required package in the hamm base packages.
I get conflicts with the package e2fslibsg and especially with the package
e2fsprogsg, two formerly essential packages.
But "dpkg --purge" of e2fslibsg/e2fsprogsg fails, a
2 file system utilities.
> [...]
> I don't want to "--force" this, but I don't see any other way. Any
> suggestions would be appreciated.
You probably have to use --force this time.
Neither of e2fslibsg or e2fsprogsg do exist now in hamm.
e2fsprogs is now the only pack
ollowing:
dpkg: considering removing e2fslibsg in favour of e2fsprogs ...
dpkg: yes, will remove e2fslibsg in favour of e2fsprogs.
dpkg: regarding e2fsprogs_1.10-17.deb containing e2fsprogs:
e2fsprogsg conflicts with e2fsprogs
e2fsprogs (version 1.10-17) is to be installed.
dpkg: error processing e2fspr
G Kapetanios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GK> I decided to upgrade to e2fsprogs 1.10-17. Mistake.. It wants an
GK> newer version of dump which requires libe2p2. I can't find this
GK> package anywhere. Can anyone help ??
Running 'dpkg -s e2fsprogs' shows that e2fs
I decided to upgrade to e2fsprogs 1.10-17. Mistake..
It wants an newer version of dump which requires libe2p2. I can't find
this
package anywhere. Can anyone help ??
George
---
George Kapetanios
Churchill Co
went back to "Select", got inside there
with the idea of leaving immediately, with nothing
changed, and at trying to do so I was warned that
e2fsprogs conflict with e2fslibsg; however, both were
required! Leaving it to do at will, e2fslibsg got
(appar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On 3 May 1998, Torsten Hilbrich wrote:
> The latter First force the removal of e2fsprogs (IIRC
> --force-remove-essential) and then install e2fslibsg. You need a
> package named comerr2g too.
No. comerr2g and e2fslibsg are obsolete and should be rem
On Sun, 3 May 1998, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> On 3 May 1998, Torsten Hilbrich wrote:
>
> > Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > midnight commander now requires e2fsligsg, but when I tried installing
> > > that, it won't install beca
On 3 May 1998, Torsten Hilbrich wrote:
> Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > midnight commander now requires e2fsligsg, but when I tried installing
> > that, it won't install because of a conflict with e2fsprogs. The packages
> > file says it confli
Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> midnight commander now requires e2fsligsg, but when I tried installing
> that, it won't install because of a conflict with e2fsprogs. The packages
> file says it conflicts with e2fsprogs <= 1.10-7. but I have 1.10-15
> ins
On Sat, 2 May 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I did an 'apt-get upgrade', and apt went ahead and removed e2fslibsg
> in
> favour of e2fsprogs without any messages or warnings. So now I have no
> e2fslibsg, but everything seems to be fine, what will happen
I did an 'apt-get upgrade', and apt went ahead and removed e2fslibsg in
favour of e2fsprogs without any messages or warnings. So now I have no
e2fslibsg, but everything seems to be fine, what will happen if I have to
reboot?
Thanks,
Timothy
PS, for the developers: apt-get
midnight commander now requires e2fsligsg, but when I tried installing
that, it won't install because of a conflict with e2fsprogs. The packages
file says it conflicts with e2fsprogs <= 1.10-7. but I have 1.10-15
installed. e2fsprogs says it conflicts with e2fslibsg (no version
list
Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dselect won't install e2fslibsg because of a conflict with
> e2fsprogs, but it won't remove e2fsprogs because it is an essential
> package. How do I resolve this dilemma?
I did it using the --force-remove-essential flag to d
Dselect won't install e2fslibsg because of a conflict with e2fsprogs, but
it won't remove e2fsprogs because it is an essential package. How do I
resolve this dilemma?
Bob
Bob Nielsen Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tucson, AZ AMPRnet: [EMAIL
Dselect is having a fit about e2fslibsg and e2fsprogs conflicting. It is
happy with just installing e2fslibsg, but when I install e2fsprogs, quota
and mc complain -- even though e2fsprogs provides e2fslibsg.
I need e2fsprogs for obvious reasons -- fsck, etc.. Currently I have
e2fslibsg
Bob Hilliard wrote:
>
> I have just upgraded to e2fsprogs 1.10-11, and no they ARE the
> same file. Sorry to bother you about a non-current version!
>
> bob:vc-2:bob>ls -li /sbin/mkfs.ext2
> 86036 -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root17116 Jan 29 12:56
> /sbin/mkfs
I have just upgraded to e2fsprogs 1.10-11, and no they ARE the
same file. Sorry to bother you about a non-current version!
bob:vc-2:bob>ls -li /sbin/mkfs.ext2
86036 -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root17116 Jan 29 12:56
/sbin/mkfs.ext2*
bob:vc-2:bob>ls -li /sbin/mke2fs
86036 -rwx
root 17116 Jan 29 12:56 /sbin/mkfs.ext2
I have e2fsprogs 1.10-10 on my hamm system. What version do
you have installed?
--
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|_) (_) |_) Palm City, FL USAPGP Key ID: A8E40EB9
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS
A while back there was a warning regarding the hamm version of the
e2fsprogs package - e2fsprogs_1.10-4.deb I believe. I now have
e2fsprogs_1.10-10.deb installed and have had a few weird problems
at home with a partition greater than 2GB in size. Is there a
known problem with this package
>
> Hi,
>
> How does one move to the libc6 e2fsprogs without using force in dpkg ? I
> tried installing commer2g and dpkg tried removing e2fsprogs. How does go
> about upgrading ?
You should install e2fsprogsg. This name change is a bug in itself (appending
g is for the
Hi,
How does one move to the libc6 e2fsprogs without using force in dpkg ? I
tried installing commer2g and dpkg tried removing e2fsprogs. How does go
about upgrading ?
Thanks
George
---
George Kapetanios
Churchill
53 matches
Mail list logo
