Detta e-postmeddelande innehåller konfidentiell information.

2025-06-19 Thread Rune Nordal
Friskrivning: Vänligen meddela oss om denna e-postadress (debian-user@lists.debian.org) inte tillhör dig. Om (A) ägaren till e-postadressen är avliden och (B) e-postadressen tilldelades dig efter att mottagaren gick i pension eller avgick. Informationen i detta e-postmeddelande är

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-24 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there On 23/05/2025 10:56, Joe wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2025 11:57:28 -0400 The Wanderer wrote: On 2025-05-22 at 10:53, Jan Claeys wrote: On Wed, 2025-05-21 at 15:16 +0100, Joe wrote: There was a time you could have emailed postmaster@ and asked that a message be forwarded to the per

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-23 Thread Joe
On Thu, 22 May 2025 11:57:28 -0400 The Wanderer wrote: > On 2025-05-22 at 10:53, Jan Claeys wrote: > > > On Wed, 2025-05-21 at 15:16 +0100, Joe wrote: > > > >> There was a time you could have emailed postmaster@ and > >> asked that a message be forwarded to the person, but I think now > >> fe

Re: No link with BCM57412 (Broadcom Extreme NetXtreme-E 10Gb) [SOLVED]

2025-05-22 Thread Michael Stone
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 11:19:10PM +0200, Mihaly Zachar wrote: I configured an IP in the ens2f1np1 anyway and what happened? It worked .. :( I thought that there should be link even if there is no IP configured... Lesson learned. Interface won't report link until it's configured up; setting th

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-22 Thread Greg
On 2025-05-22, The Wanderer wrote: > > These days, I would be *surprised* if most mail-accepting domains *did* > have a postmaster address - and even more so if they actually had > someone monitoring it, or otherwise ensuring that mail sent to it didn't > just get dropped into the bit bucket. Cou

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-22 Thread The Wanderer
On 2025-05-22 at 10:53, Jan Claeys wrote: > On Wed, 2025-05-21 at 15:16 +0100, Joe wrote: > >> There was a time you could have emailed postmaster@ and >> asked that a message be forwarded to the person, but I think now >> few domains actually have a postmaster user or alias. > > Any mailserver a

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-22 Thread Jan Claeys
On Wed, 2025-05-21 at 15:16 +0100, Joe wrote: > There was a time you could have emailed postmaster@ and asked > that a message be forwarded to the person, but I think now few > domains actually have a postmaster user or alias. Any mailserver accepting mail for a particular domain without having a

Re: No link with BCM57412 (Broadcom Extreme NetXtreme-E 10Gb) [SOLVED]

2025-05-21 Thread Mihaly Zachar
On May-19 13:55, Dan Ritter wrote: > Mihaly Zachar wrote: > > I have never used fibre connection yet. Now I got a server where the HW > > (Dell R440) and the network connections are provided by others, my task > > is to install a Linux on it. > > > > I installed a fresh Debian 12, the built-in

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-21 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 12:26 PM john doe wrote: > > Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have the > first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)? > > I know that it is possible to send e-mails to that domain I'm just > missing the

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-21 Thread Joe
On Wed, 21 May 2025 15:21:15 +0200 john doe wrote: > Hello all, > > Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have > the first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)? > > I know that it is possible to send e-mails to that domain I'm just

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-21 Thread Hans
Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2025, 15:24:36 CEST schrieb Jonathan Dowland: > On Wed May 21, 2025 at 2:21 PM BST, john doe wrote: > > Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have the > > first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)? > > In general

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-21 Thread The Wanderer
On 2025-05-21 at 09:24, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Wed May 21, 2025 at 2:21 PM BST, john doe wrote: > >> Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have >> the first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)? > > In general, no. T

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-21 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Wed May 21, 2025 at 2:21 PM BST, john doe wrote: Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have the first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)? In general, no. -- Please do not CC me for listmail. 👱🏻 Jonathan Dowland ✎j...@debian.org 🔗

Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-21 Thread john doe
Hello all, Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have the first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)? I know that it is possible to send e-mails to that domain I'm just missing the correct e-mail for that specific person and to directly message

Re: No link with BCM57412 (Broadcom Extreme NetXtreme-E 10Gb)

2025-05-19 Thread Dan Ritter
Mihaly Zachar wrote: > I have never used fibre connection yet. Now I got a server where the HW > (Dell R440) and the network connections are provided by others, my task > is to install a Linux on it. > > I installed a fresh Debian 12, the built-in NIC (BCM5720) is working, it > also can see the

No link with BCM57412 (Broadcom Extreme NetXtreme-E 10Gb)

2025-05-19 Thread Mihaly Zachar
Dear All, I have never used fibre connection yet. Now I got a server where the HW (Dell R440) and the network connections are provided by others, my task is to install a Linux on it. I installed a fresh Debian 12, the built-in NIC (BCM5720) is working, it also can see the BCM57412 card ports, b

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-19 Thread tomas
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 11:13:19PM +0200, Paul Duncan wrote: > On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 at 12:10, Richmond wrote: > > > Roger Price writes: > > > > > > > > Some people will try it on though, like saying your posts have to wrap > > at 72 characters or their email client can't cope. > > > > Is that be

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-19 Thread Paul Duncan
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 at 12:10, Richmond wrote: > Roger Price writes: > > > > Some people will try it on though, like saying your posts have to wrap > at 72 characters or their email client can't cope. > Is that because they are using systems which use punched cards? Paul. -- *Paul Duncan*

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-19 Thread Nicolas George
Richmond (HE12025-04-19): > Some people will try it on though, like saying your posts have to wrap > at 72 characters or their email client can't cope. If the mail is in text/plain without format=flowed, then “less than 80 even with a few quote marks in front” IS the etiquette, it has been for dec

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-19 Thread Richmond
Roger Price writes: > I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when I > write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue. I think he must be having a laugh. Tell him it *is* blue. Some people will try it on though, like saying your posts have to wrap at 72 chara

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-18 Thread Brad Rogers
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 16:06:07 +0200 (CEST) Roger Price wrote: Hello Roger, >On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Alain D D Williams wrote: > >> ... when he tries to tell you how to do it > >Very easy for him - he's a manager - he will say "Use software!". >Problem solved. Roger This thread reminds why I le

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-18 Thread James H. H. Lampert
On 4/17/25 5:37 AM, Roger Price wrote: I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when I write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue. Have you ever considered the possibility that you are being hazed? -- JHHL

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Roger Price
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Alain D D Williams wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 06:42:57PM +0200, Roger Price wrote: > > ... he wanted me to be the first to write in blue, and then others > > would follow. > > Ah, at last the reason. *He* has a personal problem and expects the rest of > the > world to

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Roger Price
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Since the sender has no knowledge of what MUA (or browser) any receiver > > is using there's no way to know how to configure whatever they're using. > > ... and the OP has presumably received an email from that guy so they > can check the headers to

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Stefan Monnier
> Since the sender has no knowledge of what MUA (or browser) any receiver > is using there's no way to know how to configure whatever they're using. There's only one user of interest here (the idiot requesting a specific color) and the OP has presumably received an email from that guy so they can

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Richard Owlett
Thank you for the link to https://useplaintext.email/ . It may help me explain why I have SeaMonkey set to disable JavaScript, cookies, and ignore site specified images/background when surfing. [I date back to days of Netscape Navigator ;]

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread debian-user
Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Looking at > > https://framalistes.org/sympa/arc/ospo.onramp/2025-03/msg1.html > > as an example, it appears your text may become blue if you precede > > your message with and follow > > it with > > Yeah, making it a link might render it blue. > If you do that, I

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Alain D D Williams
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Roger Price wrote: > Long ago he was a senior manager in a major IT manufacturer known for its > color. > I've known him for many years. I don't fancy the job of telling him how > stupid > he is. IT also involves human problems. In that case just te

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Nicolas George
> On 4/17/25 9:52 AM, Roger Price wrote: > > The mailing list is run by framalistes.org . They accept > > almost anything and forcibly HTMLize it. Roger James H. H. Lampert (HE12025-04-17): > That's ass-backwards. That would be ass-backwards if that were true. Fortunately, that is just not true

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread David Wright
On Thu 17 Apr 2025 at 10:17:54 (-0400), Dan Ritter wrote: > Alain D D Williams wrote: > > I read/write email using mutt in a mate terminal. It is black & white. If I > > ssh > > in from my laptop it is yellow & black (I cannot remember why I set it up > > like > > that). > > For about a decade,

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread James H. H. Lampert
On 4/17/25 9:52 AM, Roger Price wrote: The mailing list is run by framalistes.org . They accept almost anything and forcibly HTMLize it. Roger That's ass-backwards. Then again, looking at their site, so is everything else they do, including their TOU. I wonder if that's a symptom of excess

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Nicolas George
David Wright (HE12025-04-17): > Same here: coloured bash prompt, with reverse video for root. I see your reverse-video prompt and I raise with: My *keyboard* becomes red when I type in a terminal with a root shell or processes descended from one. I had forgotten I had that enabled, though, since

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Stefan Monnier
> Looking at > https://framalistes.org/sympa/arc/ospo.onramp/2025-03/msg1.html as > an example, it appears your text may become blue if you precede your > message with and follow it with > Yeah, making it a link might render it blue. If you do that, I think it'd be worthwhile to make it a va

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread debian-user
Roger Price wrote: > On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: > > On 17.04.2025 19:06, Roger Price wrote: > > > Very easy for him - he's a manager - he will say "Use software!". > > > Problem solved. Roger > > > > > I'd use software called GIMP. &shrug; > > Your 1.png is neat.

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Alain D D Williams
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:37:36PM +0200, Roger Price wrote: > I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when I > write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue. I would reply to say that writing in blue makes you depressed and that your doctor has advised against

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Richard Owlett
On 4/17/25 8:19 AM, Nicolas George wrote: to...@tuxteam.de (HE12025-04-17): Now it depends on how vengeful you are: you might end up with RTF (out of categoty 3), or you might explain to your president that, when the mails are all blue, people with a monochrome monitor will be incapable to read

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Roger Price
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, James H. H. Lampert wrote: > On 4/17/25 5:37 AM, Roger Price wrote: > > I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when I > > write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue. > > Have you ever considered the possibility that you are being hazed?

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Roger Price
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote: > On 17.04.2025 19:06, Roger Price wrote: > > Very easy for him - he's a manager - he will say "Use software!". Problem > > solved. Roger > > > I'd use software called GIMP. &shrug; Your 1.png is neat. The mailing list is run by framalistes.or

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Alain D D Williams
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 06:42:57PM +0200, Roger Price wrote: > I wondered, but his manner and the way he spoke about his visual difficulty > suggested that he wanted me to be the first to write in blue, and then others > would follow. Roger Ah, at last the reason. *He* has a personal problem a

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread James H. H. Lampert
On 4/17/25 9:42 AM, Roger Price wrote: On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, James H. H. Lampert wrote: Have you ever considered the possibility that you are being hazed? I wondered, but his manner and the way he spoke about his visual difficulty suggested that he wanted me to be the first to write in blue, an

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Alexander V. Makartsev
On 17.04.2025 19:06, Roger Price wrote: On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Alain D D Williams wrote: ... when he tries to tell you how to do it Very easy for him - he's a manager - he will say "Use software!". Problem solved. Roger I'd use software called GIMP. &shrug; -- With kindest regards, Alexan

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
mail : I tried adding > the > ASCII codes that produce colored text in a X terminal, for example the > command > echo -e "This is a test of \e[3;91m italic red \e[0m ", but they are ignored > in > an e-mail message body. > > Is there some way of producing col

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 9:45 AM Roger Price wrote: > > On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Nicolas George wrote: > > > Roger Price (HE12025-04-17): > > > I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when > > > I > > > write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue. > > > > That is

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Nicolas George
Roger Price (HE12025-04-17): > Very easy for him - he's a manager - he will say "Use software!". Problem > solved. Roger “I did. I am sure my mail is blue. Is it not?” and join a screenshot. Regards, -- Nicolas George

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Dan Ritter
Alain D D Williams wrote: > I read/write email using mutt in a mate terminal. It is black & white. If I > ssh > in from my laptop it is yellow & black (I cannot remember why I set it up like > that). For about a decade, I color-coded the default text in my terminals to indicate where I was SSHd

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Roger Price
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Alain D D Williams wrote: > ... when he tries to tell you how to do it Very easy for him - he's a manager - he will say "Use software!". Problem solved. Roger

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread The Wanderer
On 2025-04-17 at 09:52, Alain D D Williams wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Roger Price wrote: > >> Long ago he was a senior manager in a major IT manufacturer known >> for its color. I've known him for many years. I don't fancy the >> job of telling him how stupid he is. IT a

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread tomas
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 02:55:31PM +0200, Roger Price wrote: > On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Nicolas George wrote: > > > Roger Price (HE12025-04-17): > > > I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when > > > I > > > write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue. > > >

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Roger Price
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, Nicolas George wrote: > Roger Price (HE12025-04-17): > > I have been told by the elderly president of a club I belong to that when I > > write on the club's mailing list, it must be in blue. > > That is idiotic and harmful. I agree with you completely. > Tell you will comp

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread tomas
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 03:19:49PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > to...@tuxteam.de (HE12025-04-17): > > Now it depends on how vengeful you are: you might end up with RTF > > (out of categoty 3), or you might explain to your president that, > > when the mails are all blue, people with a monochrome m

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Nicolas George
to...@tuxteam.de (HE12025-04-17): > Now it depends on how vengeful you are: you might end up with RTF > (out of categoty 3), or you might explain to your president that, > when the mails are all blue, people with a monochrome monitor will > be incapable to read them (perhaps they believe you). Mon

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread The Wanderer
ill comply only if there is a > compelling justification. (There is not.) You could also tell him that he should be able to configure his(?) mail client to display incoming plain-text E-mail in blue. That sort of display formatting is properly a client-side matter, and is not for the sender to det

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread tomas
I tried adding > the > ASCII codes that produce colored text in a X terminal, for example the > command > echo -e "This is a test of \e[3;91m italic red \e[0m ", but they are ignored > in > an e-mail message body. > > Is there some way of producing colored te

Re: Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Nicolas George
here is not.) > I would like to do this > without using HTML. I use alpine to send and receive email : I tried adding > the > ASCII codes that produce colored text in a X terminal, for example the > command > echo -e "This is a test of \e[

Colored e-mail without using \e[3;91m HTML \e[0m

2025-04-17 Thread Roger Price
, for example the command echo -e "This is a test of \e[3;91m italic red \e[0m ", but they are ignored in an e-mail message body. Is there some way of producing colored text without using HTML ? Roger https://useplaintext.email/

Re: Debian 12 and AMD Ryzen 9 9950X with X870-E chipset kernel support

2025-01-31 Thread Šarūnas Burdulis
On 1/21/25 23:23, Johannes Krottmayer wrote: Hi! I have planned to upgrade my (very old) system. The new system will be a mainboard with X870-E chipset and a AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D (the CPU isn't currently available), so have written AMD Ryzen 9 9950X in the mail subject. Has somebody s

Debian 12 and AMD Ryzen 9 9950X with X870-E chipset kernel support

2025-01-21 Thread Johannes Krottmayer
Hi! I have planned to upgrade my (very old) system. The new system will be a mainboard with X870-E chipset and a AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D (the CPU isn't currently available), so have written AMD Ryzen 9 9950X in the mail subject. Has somebody such a combination running with Debian 12? Are ther

Re: Never receive an unsubscription confirmation e-mail

2024-07-27 Thread Andy Smith
Hi, On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 05:39:30PM +0200, rudu wrote: > I wrote an e-mail to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with the > subject "unsubscribe" and sent it, expecting to receive a confirmation > e-mail ... which never comes ... > I also tried https://www.debian.org/Ma

Never receive an unsubscription confirmation e-mail

2024-07-26 Thread rudu
Hello, I'm just trying to suspend my subscription to Debian-user for a few weeks. So, I wrote an e-mail to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with the subject "unsubscribe" and sent it, expecting to receive a confirmation e-mail ... which never comes ... I also tried https:/

Re: question e webkit

2023-11-26 Thread gene heskett
On 11/26/23 17:52, John Hasler wrote: https://webkitgtk.org/ Thanks John. Take care & stay well. Cheers, Gene Heskett. -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940) If we desire respect for the

Re: question e webkit

2023-11-26 Thread John Hasler
https://webkitgtk.org/ -- John Hasler j...@sugarbit.com Elmwood, WI USA

question e webkit

2023-11-26 Thread gene heskett
Hi folks; I'm using qidi-slicer to make gcode from OpenSCAD .3mf output. Right now, the device page has crashed at the gcode viewer's final parse of a 203meg gcode file. The printer and that gcode viewer are apparently separate processes. So I have quite a few copies of webkit running, and o

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-20 Thread Tamas Sohamar
Using another search engine is not an option? On Thu, 21 Sept 2023, 05:55 The Wanderer, wrote: > On 2023-09-20 at 16:50, Tom Browder wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 13:36 Nicolas George > > wrote: > > > >> Tom Browder (12023-09-20): > >> > >>> What if you used an equilavent script but incr

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-20 Thread The Wanderer
On 2023-09-20 at 16:50, Tom Browder wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 13:36 Nicolas George > wrote: > >> Tom Browder (12023-09-20): >> >>> What if you used an equilavent script but increased and >>> randomized time > > ... > >> We can try to exercise some common sense, in particular by >> comp

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-20 Thread Tom Browder
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 13:36 Nicolas George wrote: > Tom Browder (12023-09-20): > > What if you used an equilavent script but increased and randomized time ... We can try to exercise some common sense, in particular by comparing to > similar situations. For example, if you take something that

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-20 Thread tomas
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 08:35:54PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > Tom Browder (12023-09-20): > > What if you used an equilavent script but increased and randomized time > > between each search string? Or do you think just the single search is > > enough to trigger them? > > We can try to exercise

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-20 Thread Nicolas George
Tom Browder (12023-09-20): > What if you used an equilavent script but increased and randomized time > between each search string? Or do you think just the single search is > enough to trigger them? We can try to exercise some common sense, in particular by comparing to similar situations. For ex

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-20 Thread Tom Browder
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 09:35 Andy Smith wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 08:13:43AM +0200, steve wrote: > > Le 19-09-2023, à 16:52:24 +0200, Nicolas George a écrit : > > > what you intend is completely forbidden by Google's terms and > > > service. And they have detection: please only

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-20 Thread steve
Le 20-09-2023, à 08:46:06 +, Andy Smith a écrit : Hello, On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 08:13:43AM +0200, steve wrote: Le 19-09-2023, à 16:52:24 +0200, Nicolas George a écrit : > what you intend is completely forbidden by Google's terms and > service. And they have detection: please only do this

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-20 Thread Andy Smith
Hello, On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 08:13:43AM +0200, steve wrote: > Le 19-09-2023, à 16:52:24 +0200, Nicolas George a écrit : > > what you intend is completely forbidden by Google's terms and > > service. And they have detection: please only do this on a > > computer and network access when you will b

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-19 Thread steve
Dear all, Thank you for your answers, unfortunately they don't help me much (provided code is too complicated for me). Le 19-09-2023, à 16:52:24 +0200, Nicolas George a écrit : steve (12023-09-19): I have a list of 200 keywords and would like for every one to launch a search on a specific we

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-19 Thread Greg Wooledge
ke steve wanted 200 separate searches, one for each keyword. For that, you'd use a very simple loop. > Script: > > me% cat search > #!/bin/sh > export PATH=/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin > set -o nounset > umask 022 > > query=$(tr "

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-19 Thread Karl Vogel
; "+" < keywords | sed -e 's/ /+OR+/g' -e 's/+$//' -e 's/+/+OR+/g') curl -s -L -o pirate.htm "https://www.google.com/search?q=${query}"; ls -l pirate.htm exit 0 Results: me% ./search -rw-r--r-- 1 vogelke 220

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-19 Thread Jason
On 19.09.23 16:52, Nicolas George wrote: If not, then what you intend is completely forbidden by Google's terms and service. And they have detection: please only do this on a computer and network access when you will be the only one inconvenienced when they block your access. It happened on a com

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-19 Thread DdB
Am 19.09.2023 um 16:41 schrieb steve: > I guess I could code a Python script to do that but if something already > exists I'd rather use it. Really, your wording is very vague and thus, i donno, if i even understand, what your trying to accomplish. But from what my phantasies entice, i would maybe

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-19 Thread Nicolas George
steve (12023-09-19): > I have a list of 200 keywords and would like for every one to launch a > search on a specific website and put the result(s) in a file, something > like: > > search keyword website: example.com >> file.csv > > I guess I could code a Python script to do that but if something

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-19 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 19 Sep 2023 16:41 +0200, from dl...@bluewin.ch (steve): > I have a list of 200 keywords and would like for every one to launch a > search on a specific website and put the result(s) in a file, something > like: > > search keyword website: example.com >> file.csv > > I guess I could code a Pyth

[a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-19 Thread steve
Hello, I'm sorry if this question is a bit OT but since the answer will be implemented from a Debian machine, it's not completely OT :) I have a list of 200 keywords and would like for every one to launch a search on a specific website and put the result(s) in a file, something like: search key

Re: Thunderbird and font size used to display plain text e-mails?

2023-05-03 Thread Virgo Pärna
On Sun, 30 Apr 2023 14:26:12 -0600, D. R. Evans wrote: > I have TB configured so as to display incoming e-mail as plain text. They > display correctly, BUT the font used to display the contents in the third > pane > is too large on the new monitor. How *exactly* do I control the

Re: Thunderbird and font size used to display plain text e-mails?

2023-04-30 Thread Default User
on 64-bit debian stable. > > Here is the issue: > > When I open TB, I see three panes: one runs the full height of the TB > window, > and is on the left of the screen. It contains a list of the TB e-mail > folders. > The remaining space is divided into two panes, one vertical

Thunderbird and font size used to display plain text e-mails?

2023-04-30 Thread D. R. Evans
, and is on the left of the screen. It contains a list of the TB e-mail folders. The remaining space is divided into two panes, one vertically above the other. The second pane, the top one of these two, shows the subjects of received e-mails in whatever folder is selected in the first pane. The

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-11 Thread David Wright
the email, in mutt you could attach it as a file: At the Compose Menu where you type y to send, press a and then give the filename. Highlight the attachment in the list, and press Ctrl-E. Change the encoding from whatever it says, like 7-bit, to base64, and press Return. It now doesn't mat

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread David Wright
On Sat 10 Dec 2022 at 20:45:37 (-0500), pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote: > On Sun, 11 Dec 2022 09:49:54 +1100 > David wrote: > > > On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 at 19:05, wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 20:39:34 -0600 Greg Marks > > > wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > > I don't know the RFCs involved, but I'

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread paulf
On Sun, 11 Dec 2022 09:49:54 +1100 David wrote: > On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 at 19:05, wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 20:39:34 -0600 Greg Marks > > wrote: [snip] > > > I don't know the RFCs involved, but I'm guessing they mandate or > > suggest this treatment. > > Here's a reference describing 'mb

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread David
On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 at 19:05, wrote: > On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 20:39:34 -0600 Greg Marks wrote: > > In a recent instance, the body of the e-mail contained a line > > beginning with the word "From"; the sendmail program prefixed the > > line with the character "&g

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread David Wright
On Sat 10 Dec 2022 at 08:24:05 (+0200), Teemu Likonen wrote: > * 2022-12-09 20:39:34-0600, Greg Marks wrote: > > > > I occasionally send e-mail from the command line via Postfix, using a > > script containing the command > > > >/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread Miguel A. Vallejo
I remember some e-mail programs automatically add an extra space in front of a From in the message body if any line starts with From. Probably Thunderbird is one of them. to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 08:36:39AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > [...] > > &

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread debian-user
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 02:57:42AM -0500, pa...@quillandmouse.com > wrote: > > You don't want to do this. Consider an MUA which stores your mail in > > "mbox" format-- one email right after another in one file. The > > delimiter is a line which starts at the left margin with the word > > "From".

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread tomas
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 08:36:39AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: [...] > Technically, it's the 5-character sequence "From " (including the space) > that matters in mbox formats. If you begin a line with "Fromage" [...] I thusly propose to drop the '>' escaping of "From" and change every From at a

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 02:57:42AM -0500, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote: > You don't want to do this. Consider an MUA which stores your mail in > "mbox" format-- one email right after another in one file. The > delimiter is a line which starts at the left margin with the word > "From". Technically

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, pa...@quillandmouse.com wrote: > [...] any other line which starts with "From" must > be "armored". And the way you do that is to precede it with "> ". > I don't know the RFCs involved, but I'm guessing they mandate or > suggest this treatment. It does not look like being fully specified by a

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-10 Thread paulf
On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 20:39:34 -0600 Greg Marks wrote: > I occasionally send e-mail from the command line via Postfix, using a > script containing the command > >/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f -t < file > > In a recent instance, the body of the e-mail contained a line >

Re: e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-09 Thread Teemu Likonen
* 2022-12-09 20:39:34-0600, Greg Marks wrote: > Is there a way to tell the Postfix sendmail command not to alter any > such lines ["From" lines] in the body of the message? I can't answer your actual question but I think Postfix and other "sendmails" do the right thing. In my opinion you shouldn'

e-mail with line in body beginning with "From"

2022-12-09 Thread Greg Marks
I occasionally send e-mail from the command line via Postfix, using a script containing the command /usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f -t < file In a recent instance, the body of the e-mail contained a line beginning with the word "From"; the sendmail program prefixed the line with

Re: bash: which: command not found? + (E: Unable to locate package which? ...)

2022-07-08 Thread tomas
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 08:37:19AM -0500, Albretch Mueller wrote: > [...] that bash utils needed to be declared in > the PATH in order for you to access them. Noticing it and opening > another windows was all it took. Ah, oh. You overwrote your PATH. Makes sense now :) > it amazes me also how a

Re: bash: which: command not found? + (E: Unable to locate package which? ...)

2022-07-08 Thread Tixy
On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 08:37 -0500, Albretch Mueller wrote: > it seemed to have been somehow > blanketed by my "unconscious" that bash utils needed to be declared in > the PATH in order for you to access them. 'which' isn't a 'bash util' whatever that is (presumably you mean a shell built-in). As y

Re: bash: which: command not found? + (E: Unable to locate package which? ...)

2022-07-08 Thread Albretch Mueller
after reading through all your suggestions and still wondering about what exactly was the mistake that I had made, I realized that it was a simple and stupid "type in a rush and let 'the compiler' (sorry!) find the mistake for you" kind of error: it seemed to have been somehow blanketed by my "unc

Re: bash: which: command not found? + (E: Unable to locate package which? ...)

2022-07-08 Thread mick crane
On 2022-07-08 12:48, Greg Wooledge wrote: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianAlternatives thanks mick

Re: bash: which: command not found? + (E: Unable to locate package which? ...)

2022-07-08 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 05:02:47AM -0500, Albretch Mueller wrote: > Actually, I just noticed I couldn't run "cat" as regular user but I > could as root My first guess: you broke your PATH variable, and however you're becoming root (there are many ways, so it would be nice if you told us which one

Re: bash: which: command not found? + (E: Unable to locate package which? ...)

2022-07-08 Thread The Wanderer
On 2022-07-08 at 07:48, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 12:47:19PM +0100, mick crane wrote: > >> here on bookworm >> mick@pumpkin:~$ ls -la /usr/bin |grep which >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 23 Jan 23 18:05 which -> >> /etc/alternatives/which >> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >