Re: dumbass wm question

2000-05-28 Thread kmself
On Fri, May 26, 2000 at 03:45:41PM -0500, Brad wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 10:42:29AM -0700, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote: > > > >Unix, Windows, Mac, OpenVMS, etc. Client-server -- though the > >nomenclature is backwards from the usual meaning, your display is a > >"server", and app

Re: dumbass wm question

2000-05-26 Thread Brad
On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 10:42:29AM -0700, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote: > >Unix, Windows, Mac, OpenVMS, etc. Client-server -- though the >nomenclature is backwards from the usual meaning, your display is a >"server", and applications are "clients", running on it. You'll >hear people

Re: dumbass wm question

2000-05-25 Thread kmself
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 09:50:21AM +0100, Dominic Blythe wrote: > can somebody please explain the relationship between desktop, > window-manager, filemanager, X etc? i jus' don' get it. Since no one's tackled this... Reversing orders: - The X Window System (the full and proper name), aka X or X

Re: dumbass wm question

2000-05-19 Thread Mike Werner
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 10:10:42AM +0100, Dominic Blythe wrote: > so is there a full-on desktop that's pretty tiny? > if i want to know what time/day it is i can look at the clock on my wall etc I've tried a few different ones, and here's what I've found. KDE - resource hog FVWM95 - not bad, bas

RE: dumbass wm question

2000-05-19 Thread Stephan Engelke
Hi, Dominic Blythe writes: > so is there a full-on desktop that's pretty tiny? > if i want to know what time/day it is i can look at the clock on my > wall etc Maybe take a look at xfce (www.xfce.org). I am not sure what you mean by "tiny". If memory usage is a concern, you are probably better

RE: dumbass wm question

2000-05-19 Thread Stephan Engelke
Dominic Blythe writes: > thanks very much stephan - that clears it up a bit. > > so i could survive with, for instance X + sawmill + midnight commander, but > then I wouldn't necessarily have all the handy taskbar/configuration > utilities? sort of :-) Since neither KDE nor GNOME are mopnolithic

RE: dumbass wm question

2000-05-19 Thread Dominic Blythe
so is there a full-on desktop that's pretty tiny? if i want to know what time/day it is i can look at the clock on my wall etc > -Original Message- > From: Stephan Engelke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 May 2000 10:06 > To: Dominic Blythe > Subject: Re:

dumbass wm question

2000-05-19 Thread Dominic Blythe
can somebody please explain the relationship between desktop, window-manager, filemanager, X etc? i jus' don' get it. i want to cut down the amount of resource my given to gui, people keep saying sawmill is small, enlightenment is this, kde is that, but i don't know what all the bits are. cheer