Many thanks - now it's back to normal! (whatever that is in these Covid
days!)
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 12:17, piorunz wrote:
> On 29/11/2021 12:02, Terence wrote:
> > Many thanks, Piotr, that's done it. Since the early 1990s I have always
> > been impressed by the support given on the Debian lis
On 29/11/2021 12:02, Terence wrote:
Many thanks, Piotr, that's done it. Since the early 1990s I have always
been impressed by the support given on the Debian lists - wonderful!
You are most welcome!
Now as you have working firefox, you can import everything from old
profile if you are using Mo
;mailto:harrywea...@tutanota.com>:
> >
> > Running debian/stable, amd64, fully updated. No problems here.
> >
> > Just a guess: Are you running NoScript plugin im Firefox? Maybe it
> > is not
> > trusted.
> >
> > Have fun!
> >
&
;:
Running debian/stable, amd64, fully updated. No problems here.
Just a guess: Are you running NoScript plugin im Firefox? Maybe it
is not
trusted.
Have fun!
Hans
> > Duckduckgo shows its search page in Firefox as normal, but
returns no
> > search
Running debian/stable, amd64, fully updated. No problems here.
>
> Just a guess: Are you running NoScript plugin im Firefox? Maybe it is not
> trusted.
>
> Have fun!
>
> Hans
> > > Duckduckgo shows its search page in Firefox as normal, but returns no
> > > searc
Am Sonntag, 28. November 2021, 20:22:25 CET schrieb harrywea...@tutanota.com:
Running debian/stable, amd64, fully updated. No problems here.
Just a guess: Are you running NoScript plugin im Firefox? Maybe it is not
trusted.
Have fun!
Hans
> > Duckduckgo shows its search page in Fire
Terence (12021-11-28):
> Duckduckgo shows its search page in Firefox as normal, but returns no
> search result. It works fine in Chromium as usual.
>
> Has anyone else the same problem/
I do not know if it is related, but I have observed problems of parts of
some pages not di
--
Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox.
29 Nov 2021, 02:22 by terence.j...@gmail.com:
> Duckduckgo shows its search page in Firefox as normal, but returns no search
> result. It works fine in Chromium as usual.
>
> Has anyone else the same problem/
>
&g
Le 28/11/2021 à 17:22, Terence a écrit :
Duckduckgo shows its search page in Firefox as normal, but returns no
search result. It works fine in Chromium as usual.
Has anyone else the same problem/
Works for me (but I do not use the firefox package, I use the upstream
software)
Duckduckgo shows its search page in Firefox as normal, but returns no
search result. It works fine in Chromium as usual.
Has anyone else the same problem/
On 23/02/2021 08:13, Darac Marjal wrote:
On 22/02/2021 22:56, Bob Bernstein wrote:
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
I had the same experience. Gave up on duckduckgo but one time it came
thru
in a pinch.
Why give up on the search engine merely because a rogue util has gone
goofy
On 22/02/2021 22:56, Bob Bernstein wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>
>> I had the same experience. Gave up on duckduckgo but one time it came
>> thru
>> in a pinch.
>
> Why give up on the search engine merely because a rogue util has gone
&
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:21:30 -0500 (EST)
Bob Bernstein wrote:
> I have v. 1.6 via apt-get on an uptodate buster amd64 system.
>
> Every attempt to run a search yields "No results," even if I
> specify 'Boston Red Sox'.
>
> Recommendations? Calm soothing thoughts?
>
> Thank you.
just dow
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021, 2:15 PM Bob Bernstein wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
>
> > I had the same experience. Gave up on duckduckgo but one time it came
> thru
> > in a pinch.
>
> Why give up on the search engine merely because a rogue util has
&g
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
I had the same experience. Gave up on duckduckgo
but one time it came thru
in a pinch.
Why give up on the search engine merely because a
rogue util has gone goofy?
I went looking for duckduckgo search syntax and
found what I need, which is
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Nicholas Geovanis wrote:
I had the same experience. Gave up on duckduckgo but one time it came thru
in a pinch.
Why give up on the search engine merely because a rogue util has
gone goofy?
I went looking for duckduckgo search syntax and found what I
need, which is not
On 22/02/2021 18:21, Bob Bernstein wrote:
> I have v. 1.6 via apt-get on an uptodate buster amd64 system.
>
> Every attempt to run a search yields "No results," even if I specify
> 'Boston Red Sox'.
>
> Recommendations? Calm soothing thoughts?
This sounds like https://github.com/jarun/ddgr/issues
Is this soothing enough?
I had the same experience. Gave up on duckduckgo but one time it came thru
in a pinch.
Thank you.
>
> --
> RSB
>
>
I have v. 1.6 via apt-get on an uptodate buster amd64 system.
Every attempt to run a search yields "No results," even if I
specify 'Boston Red Sox'.
Recommendations? Calm soothing thoughts?
Thank you.
--
RSB
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 03:41:34AM +, Finn wrote:
> arne wrote:
> > I am allergic to ads.
> >
> > So I use an adblocker, ublock origin.
> > I have squid and privoxy proxy's running.
> > Have a local searx as search engine.
> >
>
> Are you running Searx instance in your system locally? If so,
arne wrote:
> I am allergic to ads.
>
> So I use an adblocker, ublock origin.
> I have squid and privoxy proxy's running.
> Have a local searx as search engine.
>
Are you running Searx instance in your system locally? If so, how? Searx
isn't packed for Debian yet. Probably installed using Docker
, yes. because it is possible to avoid these sites for only one
session using duckduckgo. the next session one must again block out
these sites. that is cumbersome and annoying allthough i understand
that duckduckgo somehow must get paid for.
How do you block out those search results? Do you put
wrote:
--< snip >--
I have a similar setup as yours but am getting no popups from my
browser (firefox) and no ad blocker at all as I m using legit sites
that have income from ads. Why do you think the popups originate from
duckduckgo?
@steef,
Are you actually getting pop-up ads, or are yo
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:50:05 +0100
Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:19:37 -0400
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:23:44 +0200
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 06:26:20PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:52:07 +0200
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > ..
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:19:37 -0400
Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:23:44 +0200
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 06:26:20PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:52:07 +0200
> > > wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > >I certainly need to use numerous
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:23:44 +0200
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 06:26:20PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:52:07 +0200
> > wrote:
...
> >I certainly need to use numerous sites (bill
> > paying, banking, etc.) that require JS to function.
>
> Th
rowser
(firefox) and no ad blocker at all as I m using legit sites that have
income from ads. Why do you think the popups originate from duckduckgo?
@steef,
Are you actually getting pop-up ads, or are you just seeing search
results that might be considered advertisements as they focus on a
particular c
On Sunday, 18 Aug 2019 at 22:52, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> This is actually for me a filter criterion: if a site doesn't work
> with javascript, chances are high that I avoid it. I do make some
> exceptions, but very few.
Ditto. My exceptions are my bank and flickr. All else I access via eww
in
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 06:26:20PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:52:07 +0200
> wrote:
[... on disabling javascript]
> Question: is this due to a belief that such sites are (at least for
> your use cases) at best marginally more useful than their non-JS
> utilizing alternatives,
I am allergic to ads.
So I use an adblocker, ublock origin.
I have squid and privoxy proxy's running.
Have a local searx as search engine.
99.% of the visited sites are without ads, no tracking.
Hope this helps.
> Question: is this due to a belief that such sites are (at least for
> your
On 8/18/19 5:16 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> I use NoScript to enable JavaScript only where I want it.
Yeah. And Firefox has a checkbox in the prefs to block pop-ups. I rarely
see a pop-up any more.
I have a hard time believing DDG is what's doing your pop-ups. It'd
destroy their reputation.
On 19/08/2019 08:52, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
This is actually for me a filter criterion: if a site doesn't work
with javascript, chances are high that I avoid it. I do make some
exceptions, but very few.
I use NoScript to enable JavaScript only where I want it.
Kind regards,
--
Ben Caradoc-Da
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:52:07 +0200
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:35:53PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:20:08 -0500
> > Richard Owlett wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I personally find that JavaScript and cookies rarely provide *ME* any
> > > functionality of interest. I surf
On 18-08-19 22:04, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 01:16:59 PM nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', ot
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:35:53PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:20:08 -0500
> Richard Owlett wrote:
>
>
> >
> > I personally find that JavaScript and cookies rarely provide *ME* any
> > functionality of interest. I surf with both disabled. I don't
> > experience problems I see o
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:20:08 -0500
Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> I personally find that JavaScript and cookies rarely provide *ME* any
> functionality of interest. I surf with both disabled. I don't
> experience problems I see often reported. YMMV
It does vary indeed. It seems to me that hardly
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 01:16:59 PM nektarios wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
>
> steef wrote:
> > hi folks,
> >
> > last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
> > DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware'
On 18-08-19 21:20, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 08/18/2019 01:34 PM, steef wrote:
On 18-08-19 19:16, nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious &#x
On 08/18/2019 01:34 PM, steef wrote:
On 18-08-19 19:16, nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
happy wi
On 18-08-19 19:16, nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
happy with the popup of unwanted ads which ca
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
> DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
> happy with the popup of unwanted ads which cannot be blocked
>
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be happy
with the popup of unwanted ads which cannot be blocked permanently: and the last thing makes me suspicious. please, if it is possi
42 matches
Mail list logo
