Re: dual boot win2k and debian

2002-10-13 Thread Shawn Lamson
fixboot and fixmbr. > > > > Good luck, > > > > Qian > > > > On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Shawn Lamson wrote: > > > > > Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 08:09:45 -0700 (PDT) > > > From: Shawn Lamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: dual boot win2k and debian

2002-10-13 Thread Shawn Lamson
boot and fixmbr. > > Good luck, > > Qian > > On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Shawn Lamson wrote: > > > Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 08:09:45 -0700 (PDT) > > From: Shawn Lamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: dual boot win2k and debian

Re: dual boot win2k and debian

2002-10-13 Thread Bob Hilliard
Shawn Lamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just put in a new HD (80Gigs of which only 32G are used currently b/c > my bios is old) and I put Win2k on the first 15 Gigs; then a Lin Swap > drive of 512Megs; then my Debian install of Sarge on various partitions > after that to consume the rest of

Re: dual boot win2k and debian

2002-10-13 Thread Michael D. Crawford
Yes, Qian is right I think. You can, if you wish, install grub in the first sector of a linux filesystem partition. One thing you can then do is dd the first sector into a file, copy it over to Windows and add it to your win2k boot menu (boot.ini) and have Linux be a boot option in the Window

Re: dual boot win2k and debian

2002-10-13 Thread Q. Gong
d of /dev/hda. That's the reason why your W2K was destroyed. Fortunately, you have command fixboot and fixmbr. Good luck, Qian On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Shawn Lamson wrote: > Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 08:09:45 -0700 (PDT) > From: Shawn Lamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: dual boot win2k and debian

2002-10-13 Thread Michael D. Crawford
I think grub itself is installed OK but maybe you don't have the right stuff in your menu.lst. I always have a hard time getting it straight when I first set it up. I have a grub boot for Slackware, Windows 2000 and BeOS. Here is the line that gets me to the Win2k boot menu: title Windows 2

Re: dual boot win2k and debian

2002-10-13 Thread Shawn Lamson
I tried running from floppy grub prompt grub> root (hd0,11) grub> setup (hd0,0) at which point it said it successfully updated the MBR and installed the grub files... then i rebooted and could get to debian fine, but rebooted again and when selecting the option for windows 2000 it just came back

Re: dual boot win2k and debian

2002-10-13 Thread Shawn Lamson
I will try that, but I recall trying it before and getting an error; something like "File not found"... I will reread the grub doc and reboot, give it a shot, and take note of the results (sorry the original post isn't included in this reply) Shawn --- "Michael D. Crawford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

Re: dual boot win2k and debian

2002-10-13 Thread Michael D. Crawford
You should be able to do what you want. It sounds like you are running grub-install from the Linux command line. While that ought to work, I recall reading in the grub doc that they recommend that you install it to the boot sector of your drive from the command line that you can get inside of

dual boot win2k and debian

2002-10-13 Thread Shawn Lamson
Hi all - Sorry if this is not debian specific, let me know if there is a better place to post this (please don't suggest a RedHat List!)... I just put in a new HD (80Gigs of which only 32G are used currently b/c my bios is old) and I put Win2k on the first 15 Gigs; then a Lin Swap drive of 512Meg