On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 02:39:34AM +, Joseph Jones said
> Could someone just check over this for me please? I'm having no end of
> trouble trying to get my nforce's onboard interface working.
>
> If this isn't the problem, could someone suggest what is? The forcedeth
> patch installed cleanl
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 09:52:36AM -0600, Kent West said
> Joseph Jones wrote:
> >Output follows (hope you don't mind me cc'ing to you and the list):
> >
> >00:04.0 Ethernet controller: nVidia Corporation nForce Ethernet
> >Controller (rev c2)
> >Subsystem: Asustek Computer, Inc.: Unknown devi
Kent West wrote:
Joseph Jones wrote:
Adam Aube wrote:
On Thursday 05 February 2004 12:06 pm, Joseph Jones wrote:
I try to get [the network] working by starting up my PC. I was under
the
impression that that was all was requied after installing the kernel
(it's all my Via Rhine based card needed
Joseph Jones wrote:
I'm using a custom 2.4.22 kernel with the forcedeth (the reverse
engineered driver for my onboard adaptor) patch applied.
I'm unfamiliar with this option, but I do recall seeing something about
this option in the past couple of days (maybe it was even part of this
thread)
Joseph Jones wrote:
Adam Aube wrote:
On Thursday 05 February 2004 12:06 pm, Joseph Jones wrote:
I try to get [the network] working by starting up my PC. I was under
the
impression that that was all was requied after installing the kernel
(it's all my Via Rhine based card needed).
Upon bootup,
Adam Aube wrote:
On Thursday 05 February 2004 12:06 pm, Joseph Jones wrote:
Adam Aube wrote:
Your interfaces file looks fine. Exactly what happens when you try to
get your network interface working, and how do you try to do it?
I try to get it working by starting up my PC. I was under the
impres
Kent West wrote:
Joseph Jones wrote:
On Wednesday 04 February 2004 09:39 pm, Joseph Jones wrote:
Could someone just check over this for me please? I'm having no end of
trouble trying to get my nforce's onboard interface working.
I try to get it working by starting up my PC. I was under the
i
On 2004-02-05, Joseph Jones penned:
> Adam Aube wrote:
>> On Wednesday 04 February 2004 09:39 pm, Joseph Jones wrote:
>>
>>>Could someone just check over this for me please? I'm having no end
>>>of trouble trying to get my nforce's onboard interface working.
>>>
>>>If this isn't the problem, could
Joseph Jones wrote:
On Wednesday 04 February 2004 09:39 pm, Joseph Jones wrote:
Could someone just check over this for me please? I'm having no end of
trouble trying to get my nforce's onboard interface working.
I try to get it working by starting up my PC. I was under the
impression that tha
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 12:08, Joseph Jones wrote:
> Adam Aube wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 February 2004 09:39 pm, Joseph Jones wrote:
> >
> >>Could someone just check over this for me please? I'm having no end of
> >>trouble trying to get my nforce's onboard interface working.
> >>
> >>If this isn't
Adam Aube wrote:
On Wednesday 04 February 2004 09:39 pm, Joseph Jones wrote:
Could someone just check over this for me please? I'm having no end of
trouble trying to get my nforce's onboard interface working.
If this isn't the problem, could someone suggest what is? The forcedeth
patch installed c
Joseph Jones wrote:
Could someone just check over this for me please? I'm having no end of
trouble trying to get my nforce's onboard interface working.
If this isn't the problem, could someone suggest what is? The forcedeth
patch installed cleanly, and appears to be trying to work.
To bolster yo
On Wednesday 04 February 2004 09:39 pm, Joseph Jones wrote:
> Could someone just check over this for me please? I'm having no end of
> trouble trying to get my nforce's onboard interface working.
>
> If this isn't the problem, could someone suggest what is? The forcedeth
> patch installed cleanly,
Could someone just check over this for me please? I'm having no end of
trouble trying to get my nforce's onboard interface working.
If this isn't the problem, could someone suggest what is? The forcedeth
patch installed cleanly, and appears to be trying to work.
Many thanks
Joe.
/etc/network/
Ron Farrer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> #include
>
> I'm building a firewall out of an old 486 and was wondering if it was
> best to use two NICs of the same type/brand or to use different ones? Is
> there any gotchas for doing one over the other?
Thanks to everyone that responded. It seems tha
Ron Farrer wrote:
>
> #include
>
> I'm building a firewall out of an old 486 and was wondering if it was
> best to use two NICs of the same type/brand or to use different ones? Is
> there any gotchas for doing one over the other?
You will have to set the IO to different addresses for the cards,
Damon Muller wrote:
>
> Quoth Ron Farrer,
> > I'm building a firewall out of an old 486 and was wondering if it was
> > best to use two NICs of the same type/brand or to use different ones? Is
> > there any gotchas for doing one over the other?
>
> I find that's it's easier to use two different c
[Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 07:44:52PM -0700] Ron Farrer :
> best to use two NICs of the same type/brand or to use different ones?
> Is there any gotchas for doing one over the other?
None at all, AFAIK. I am using an Intel Ether Pro+ and an RTL 8029A on
the router. The LAN consists of machines ha
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 01:06:29PM +1000, Damon Muller wrote:
| Quoth Ron Farrer,
| > I'm building a firewall out of an old 486 and was wondering if it was
| > best to use two NICs of the same type/brand or to use different ones? Is
| > there any gotchas for doing one over the other?
|
| I find t
Damon Muller wrote:
> Quoth Ron Farrer,
> > I'm building a firewall out of an old 486 and was wondering if it was
> > best to use two NICs of the same type/brand or to use different ones? Is
> > there any gotchas for doing one over the other?
>
> I find that's it's easier to use two different card
Quoth Ron Farrer,
> I'm building a firewall out of an old 486 and was wondering if it was
> best to use two NICs of the same type/brand or to use different ones? Is
> there any gotchas for doing one over the other?
I find that's it's easier to use two different cards (not just different
brands, b
#include
I'm building a firewall out of an old 486 and was wondering if it was
best to use two NICs of the same type/brand or to use different ones? Is
there any gotchas for doing one over the other?
TIA,
Ron
--
Email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgprVNANKEkhk.pgp
Description:
John Galt wrote:
> Wrong! eth0:1 and eth0:0... _Never_ say something's impossible...
Especially when it is on _Linux_.
Oki
oft product.
-- Ferenc Mantfeld
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 16:56:06 -0600 (MDT)
From: John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matthew Sackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dual NICs
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Matthew Sackman wrote:
>On Wed, May 16,
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 11:22:06PM +0100, Matthew Sackman wrote:
>
> Um I'm getting slightly confused here: what I need is one card which has two
> or more independant eth ports on it which can be assigned seperate IPs. I.e.
> not IP aliasing - each eth port has only one IP address, but each eth p
- Forwarded message from -
To: John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dual NICs
On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 01:06:31AM -0600, John Galt wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2001, Zac Epkes wrote:
>
> >You can not have 1 NIC with 2 IPs simply not possible, i think u can buy
>
On Tue, 15 May 2001, Zac Epkes wrote:
>You can not have 1 NIC with 2 IPs simply not possible, i think u can buy
>network cards with upto 4 ports that all act alone, or something similar...
Wrong! eth0:1 and eth0:0... _Never_ say something's impossible...
>- overid3 =)
>
>
>On Tuesday 15 May 20
hi ya
http://www.adaptec.com/worldwide/product/proddetail.html?prodkey=ANA-62022&cat=%2fTechnology%2fFast+Ethernet%2fDuraLAN+Network+Interface+Cards
Adaptec Duo64 ANA-62022 ( Dual NIC )
http://www.adaptec.com/worldwide/product/proddetail.html?cat=Test&prodkey=ANA-62044
Adaptec Quartet 6944A ( Q
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> You can not have 1 NIC with 2 IPs simply not possible,
Perfectly possible.
The mail server at work has 3 IPs. One of the ethernet ports on the
firewall has 2 IPs.
Think IP aliases (the o
hi ya
if you need 4 eth ports for each different ethernet cable...
thats one problem...
- use 2x dual nic pic cards..
- use one quad nic pci card
- but i sounds like oyu need a quad nic card
( intel, adaptec, dlink )..
if you need 4 virtual ip# and dont care that
You can not have 1 NIC with 2 IPs simply not possible, i think u can buy
network cards with upto 4 ports that all act alone, or something similar...
- overid3 =)
On Tuesday 15 May 2001 14:12, Matthew Sackman wrote:
> Hay all.
>
> Does anyone have any knowledge of a network card that has two
> i
Adaptec makes a 4-port PCI card, Intel has some two port cards. I'm sure
there are others out there as well. If I remember correctly, the Adaptec
unfortunately took an IRQ for each port, which was a bit of a pain.
--Rich
Matthew Sackman wrote:
>
> Hay all.
>
> Does anyone have any knowledge o
Hay all.
Does anyone have any knowledge of a network card that has two
independant eth ports on it? The reason I ask is that I've
gotta get 4 eth ports into a server squashed into a 2U rack
which means I only have 3 expansion cards available...
I look forward to hearing from you!
Matthew
--
M
Got a question for the group.
I've heard at work that I am going to be asked to add a network card in our
web server so that our private network (10.1.0.0) can share resources on the
web server. The web server will not be allowed to forward any traffic by
default. This is being done by anoth
34 matches
Mail list logo
