On Tue 26 Oct 2021 at 19:11:50 (+0100), Brian wrote:
> Assuming that Ctrl-C while dpkg or apt is running is equivalent to a
> power outage, I have found that running the specific command afterwards
> is generally successful.
And it might be worth adding that if apt is downloading a large
package
On Tue 26 Oct 2021 at 13:57:13 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 10:31:54AM -0700, Han wrote:
> >Hi,
> >This might be a dumb question: is dpkg installing (or updating) a
> > package
> >using a .deb file atomic in the event of power outage?
> >By atomic,
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 10:31:54AM -0700, Han wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This might be a dumb question: is dpkg installing (or updating) a package
> using a .deb file atomic in the event of power outage?
>
> By atomic, I meant either the new version of the application is fully
> installed, or not at all.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 10:31:54AM -0700, Han wrote:
>Hi,
>This might be a dumb question: is dpkg installing (or updating) a package
>using a .deb file atomic in the event of power outage?
>By atomic, I meant either the new version of the application is fully
>installed, or n
Hi,
This might be a dumb question: is dpkg installing (or updating) a package
using a .deb file atomic in the event of power outage?
By atomic, I meant either the new version of the application is fully
installed, or not at all. Is this always guaranteed?
I read the `man dpkg` doc, but couldn'
And the problem is back :-(
--
Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your encrypted mailbox today!
https://tutanota.com
13. Apr 2017 19:38 by aquar...@tutanota.de:
> I did apt-get install libgl1-nvidia-glx nvidia-kernel-dkms
> It failed:
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> libg
I did apt-get install libgl1-nvidia-glx nvidia-kernel-dkms
It failed:
The following NEW packages will be installed:
libgl1-nvidia-glx
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/7,479 kB of archives.
After this operation, 45.8 MB of additional disk space will be
After m-a I have choosen the prepare option. It gave this output:
Getting source for kernel version: 3.16.0-4-amd64
Kernel headers available in /lib/modules/3.16.0-4-amd64/build
Creating symlink...
apt-get install build-essential
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Readin
Am Donnerstag, 13. April 2017, 19:25:01 CEST schrieb Aquarius:
> Hans,
>
> How do I do this when in the menu:
When the ncurses GUI is started (ncurses means the ASCII-GUI), then go to and
enter the point "Prepare". This will then install all necessary packages.
> "This opens a ncurses interfac
Hans,
How do I do this when in the menu:
"This opens a ncurses interface. Check now, if all dependencies (kernel-headers
etc. ) are installed. Module-assistant does this for you."?
And can I do: "Then just install libgl1-nvidia-glx and nvidia-kernel-dkms"
with apt-get install as well?
Thanks
Additionally I saw, debian offers prebuilt nvidia-kernel-headers for 3.16
kernel. Maybe these are running for your system? I am running kernel 4.9.0-2-
*, as I am running debian testing.
Hans
Ok, maybe try my way:
When I install nvidia driver, I first check, if all depenedencies are there.
Best way, module-assistant, check, if it is installed.
Then try:
m-a
This opens a ncurses interface. Check now, if all dependencies (kernel-headers
etc. ) are installed. Module-assistant does t
Am Donnerstag, 13. April 2017, 19:00:00 CEST schrieb Aquarius:
> Are you after this info:
Yes, it is then 340 driver.
I wanted to make sure, you chose the correct driver.
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF108M [GeForce GT
> 525M] (rev a1) ?
>
> --
> Securely sent with Tuta
Are you after this info:
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF108M [GeForce GT 525M]
(rev a1)
?
--
Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your encrypted mailbox today!
https://tutanota.com
13. Apr 2017 18:49 by hans.ullr...@loop.de:
> First of all: Which nvidia card do you have?
Yes it was a typo!
Purged it now, going to restart and see.
I'll be back (I hope ...)
thanks.
--
Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your encrypted mailbox today!
https://tutanota.com
13. Apr 2017 18:51 by hans.ullr...@loop.de:
>> update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.16.0-4-amd64
>> d
> update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.16.0-4-amd64
> dpkg --purge libg11-nvidia-glx:amd64 with message:
>
It is libgl1-nvidia-glx, not libg11-*
Is it a typo?
Hans
First of all: Which nvidia card do you have?
lspci shows information.
Hans
Hi,
I switched to init 1. I performed a dkpg --configure on the lib11 etc but it
did not work.
Then I decided to try remove the packages one by one:
dpkg --purge nvidia-glx: succes
dpkg --purge nvidia-driver: succes
dpkg --purge xserver-xorg-video-nvidia: succes with messages among which:
update
Hi,
I tried to find out X I have and it seemed to be lightdm. So I killed that
proces but only my GUI was gone.
Find and Locate did not find nvidia.ko
So this did not work for me.
--
Securely sent with Tutanota. Claim your encrypted mailbox today!
https://tutanota.com
12. Apr 2017 20:26 by han
No, no, it is never too late. If you trust me, I may login to your computer.
To do this, I need your IP snd root password, of course.
You can also use teamviewer, however, my bandwith is really low, so ssh would
be better.
You can send me direct to my e-mail address, if you would like to.
Bes
Hans,
Don't be sorry (yet). I need some time to figure out some steps.
Making a backup now. After that I will re-read your answers and try to try them
all.
If you or someone would want to do schedule a remote login let me know. As I am
doing a Linux course now I would really like to learn from th
Am Mittwoch, 12. April 2017, 20:32:30 CEST schrieb Aquarius:
Hmm, your package can definetely not installed. Is it possible to remove the
packages one-by-one?
If you are able, to remove the nvidia packages, you can download the Nvidia-
driver from the nvidia web site. It is a file named similar N
Meanwhile I tried dpkg --configure libgl1-nvidia-glx:amd64
Output:
Setting up libgl1-nvidia-glx:amd64 (340.101-1) ...
Killed
dpkg: error processing package libgl1-nvidia-glx:amd64 (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 137
Errors were encountered wh
Am Mittwoch, 12. April 2017, 20:18:22 CEST schrieb Aquarius:
Hmm, bad thing. Maybe you should remove kdm, gdm or whatever loginmanager you
are using out of the way, so it will not start after boot and force you into a
bad X.
Then you can try dpkg-configure -a again.
You can also try to delete n
Thanks Hans.
I must add when shutting down I get a black screen with lots of text. The
system will not shut down. I have to press the powerbutton and hold it to power
it off.
After starting up again I performed apt-get --purge remove nvidia-*
The output was:
root@debian:/home/piet# apt-get --p
Hi Aquarius,
looks like you got into trouble with nvidia-driver.
You should uninstall these, then doing a dist-upgrade and then conetrate to
install the nvidia-driver again.
I prefer two possible ways to uninstall all nvidia-packages (but check before
telling "y"):
apt-get --purge remove nvidi
ot configured
nvidia-driver-->not configured
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-->dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
nvidia-glx-->dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Because of the dependency problems I though I'ld run:
dpkg install -f
It gives this output:
The following
Hello again,
this is a wonderful case where rubberduck-debugging might have made
sense. Right after submitting this mail I found the error.
The webserver that runs the install script has a systemd unit with
ProtectSystem=full
set.
This prevents writes to /usr even though its not specifically rea
Hello,
for various reasons I am currently writing a script to install packages
by calling dpkg -i package.deb.
This mechanism has worked fine for a while. Now I need to call said
script using sudo noninteractively from a webserver.
This leads me to my error:
Mar 26 11:36:42 debbuilder package-u
; > snippet what you're referring to? (i.e., install something with "dpkg -i"
> > and paste the output here)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Daniel
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with
On 08/12/08 23:25, NewDeb wrote:
Here is the output with apt-get install (albeit with --download-only. You get
the same output if you were to go ahead with the real install) I am trying
to understand the difference between the NEW packages and the Extra
packages. Why are they being called out sep
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 09:25:39PM -0700, NewDeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard
to say:
> Here is the output with apt-get install (albeit with --download-only. You get
> the same output if you were to go ahead with the real install) I am trying
> to understand the difference between the NEW package
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/difference-between-NEW-and-Extra-packages-in-dpkg-install-tp18950973p18956802
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 12:27:23PM -0700, NewDeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard
to say:
> I am a Debian newbie and was wondering what is the difference between the
> NEW and Extra packages that are installed when dpkg -i is used.
I don't recognize those offhand as dpkg output. Could you paste
On 08/12/08 14:27, NewDeb wrote:
Hi all,
I am a Debian newbie and was wondering what is the difference between the
NEW and Extra packages that are installed when dpkg -i is used.
Why are you installing with dpkg instead of apt-get or aptitude?
--
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
"Do not
--
>>> Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, Ukrainian C++ developer.
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/difference-between-NEW-and-Extra-packages-in-dpkg-install-tp18950973p18951801.html
Sent from the Debian User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NewDeb wrote:
> Thanks for replying !!
> So is it safe to assume that "Extra" list of packages is always a subset of
> the New Packages list.
No. These categories are completely different.
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>> NewDeb wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am a Debian newb
;
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/difference-between-NEW-and-Extra-packages-in-dpkg-install-tp18950973p18951487.html
Sent from the Debian User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NewDeb wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am a Debian newbie and was wondering what is the difference between the
> NEW and Extra packages that are installed when dpkg -i is used.
>
> Thanks
NEW packages - packages recently came to repository
Extra - packages with priority extra
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin ak
Hi all,
I am a Debian newbie and was wondering what is the difference between the
NEW and Extra packages that are installed when dpkg -i is used.
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/difference-between-NEW-and-Extra-packages-in-dpkg-install-tp18950973p18950973.html
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 10:21:20AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday 23 December 2004 6:48 am, Bahadir Balban wrote:
> > just a simple question -
> >
> > if I use dpkg -i option, does it do anything extra than resolving
> > dependencies and extracting the packages?
Yes, lots.
> It calls
On Thursday 23 December 2004 6:48 am, Bahadir Balban wrote:
> just a simple question -
>
> if I use dpkg -i option, does it do anything extra than resolving
> dependencies and extracting the packages?
It calls debconf to set up the package as well.
> In other words, if I know about the dependen
Hi there,
just a simple question -
if I use dpkg -i option, does it do anything extra than resolving
dependencies and extracting the packages?
In other words, if I know about the dependencies of my packages,
simply using the -x (extract) option, would I get a working
installation for a package?
just a simple question -
if I use dpkg -i option, does it do anything extra than resolving
dependencies and extracting the packages?
In other words, if I know about the dependencies of my packages,
simply using the -x (extract) option, would I get a working
installation for a package?
Thanks,
B
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 10:54:56PM -0600, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
| from the dpgk(8) manpage, ll. 119-123:
|
| ACTIONS
|dpkg -i | --install package_file...
| Install the package. If --recursive or -R option is
| specified, package_file must refer to a directory
from the dpgk(8) manpage, ll. 119-123:
ACTIONS
dpkg -i | --install package_file...
Install the package. If --recursive or -R option is
specified, package_file must refer to a directory
instead.
shouldn't this be either
dpgk -i package_file.deb
>
> Preparing to replace libc6 2.1.3-18 (using
> .../libc6_2.2.3-7_i386.deb) ...
> cp: invalid option -- L
> Try 'cp --help' for more information.
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.2.3-7_i386.deb
> (--unpack):
> subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I finally got the iso burned, the OS installed, and am in the middle
of the upgrade to the unstable version so that I can run Xfree86 4.x
when I get a series of dependancy errors that seem to all stem to
libc6 v.2.1.3-18, which I am attempting to rep
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 01:11:56AM -0800, AU,SCOTT CHUONG wrote:
> Tried to upgrade Enlightenment from 0.14 to 0.16 as seen below. I can't
> figure out the unknown option about --assert-long-filenames as it's not in
> the dpkg --help or in the man files of dpkg. Do I have an outdated dpkg
> or an
]
aubase:/usr2/local# dpkg --install enlightenment_0.16.3-5_i386.deb
(Reading database ... 45570 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking enlightenment (from enlightenment_0.16.3-5_i386.deb) ...
dpkg: unknown option --assert-long-filenames
Type dpkg --help for help about inst
heya
I've just been trying to upgrade all my slink stuff to potato and dpkg has
been complaining about a pile of files that it can't overwrite because
they're "also in package ". It currently seems silly to me as
to why a file present in two different packages simultaneously should completely
pre
Shao Ying Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> Could anyone teach me how to use dpkg to install in a specific
> directory, such as /usr/local/.
>
> Thanks!
>
That would defeat the purpose of dpkg. The maintainers of the deb
packages decide (based on File System Standard and Debi
Hi all,
Could anyone teach me how to use dpkg to install in a specific
directory, such as /usr/local/.
Thanks!
Shao Zhang \\/
5/28-30 Victoria AVE OxO
PENSHURST 2035
On Thu, 15 May 1997, Ken Lauffenburger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> OK you dpkg experts, what is the best way out of this one:
>
> gecko# dpkg -i gzip_1.2.4-15.deb
> (Reading database ... 2582 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to replace gzip 1.2.4-15 (using gzip_1.2.4-1
The problem is that the installation script for 'gzip' wants to update
the directory of info files ('/usr/info/dir') to contain a reference
to the gzip documentation. When it is unable to find the file
'/usr/info/dir', it exits with an error. dpkg takes this to mean that
there was something wron
Why don't you try dpkg -r gzip.
Then dpkg -i gzip_1.2.4-15.deb and see what happens.
I hope this helps.
Paul
On Thu, 15 May 1997, Ken Lauffenburger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> OK you dpkg experts, what is the best way out of this one:
>
> gecko# dpkg -i gzip_1.2.4-15.deb
> (Reading database
Hello,
OK you dpkg experts, what is the best way out of this one:
gecko# dpkg -i gzip_1.2.4-15.deb
(Reading database ... 2582 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace gzip 1.2.4-15 (using gzip_1.2.4-15.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement gzip ...
install-inf
g database ... 15702 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing workbone ...
Purging configuration files for workbone ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Debian/tmp/upgrades/tmp # which workbone
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Debian/tmp/upgrades/tmp # dpkg --install workbone-2.3-3.deb
Selecting previously
58 matches
Mail list logo
