Make that /usr/bin/perl
On Mon, 06 Nov 2000 22:30:49 Ben Monnahan wrote:
> dpkg-preconfigure is looking for /usr/sbin/perl. I created a symlink
> there
> to the new perl. I'm not sure if this is the proper thing to do but it
> worked for me.
>
> Ben
>
>
> On Mon, 06 Nov 2000 18:21:04 Gordon
dpkg-preconfigure is looking for /usr/sbin/perl. I created a symlink there
to the new perl. I'm not sure if this is the proper thing to do but it
worked for me.
Ben
On Mon, 06 Nov 2000 18:21:04 Gordon Sadler wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 01:30:06AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > It seem
I do beleive this has fixed it. Thank you.
Here's what I 'think' led to this. From another response from Jason
he led me to beleive debconf had been uninstalled, as I was tracking his
apt and the debconf available there (klecker.debian.org/~jgg /apt)
It now appears to my system that the debconf a
Manually link /usr/bin/perl to /usr/bin/perl-5.6; repeat;
update-alternatives --auto perl;
/var/lib/dpkg/info/perl-5.6-base.postinst configure 5.6-1
Gordon Sadler wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 07:19:00PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Gordon Sadler wrote:
> > > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > >
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Gordon Sadler wrote:
> I followed this advice and upgraded to 1.7.1 just a few minutes ago, however
> I am still receiving this error below.
Looks like you removed debconf..
Put it back, by hand!
Jason
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 07:19:00PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Gordon Sadler wrote:
> > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > Building Dependency Tree... Done
> > 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 9 not upgraded.
> > 6 packages not fully installed or removed.
> > Need to get 0B of a
Gordon Sadler wrote:
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 9 not upgraded.
> 6 packages not fully installed or removed.
> Need to get 0B of archives. After unpacking 0B will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 01:30:06AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> It seems I made a `slight' mistake in dpkg 1.7.0 which broke
> update-alternatives. Combined with a perl upgrade that can have some
> nasty effects. I fixed this in dpkg 1.7.1, and I strongly advise
> everyone to immediately upgrad
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> It seems I made a `slight' mistake in dpkg 1.7.0 which broke
> update-alternatives. Combined with a perl upgrade that can have some
> nasty effects. I fixed this in dpkg 1.7.1, and I strongly advise
> everyone to immediately upgrade to that version if
It seems I made a `slight' mistake in dpkg 1.7.0 which broke
update-alternatives. Combined with a perl upgrade that can have some
nasty effects. I fixed this in dpkg 1.7.1, and I strongly advise
everyone to immediately upgrade to that version if you have 1.7.0
installed.
You can grab it from http
10 matches
Mail list logo
