which look normal
and the only relation i think found (reason to display it) is because
libstd++6 depends on it.
Also listed packages like 'wink' not in the repos any more.
dpkg -l may show packages which are not installed but are mentionned
in installed packages dependencies (
kages like 'wink' not in the repos any more.
dpkg -l may show packages which are not installed but are mentionned in
installed packages dependencies (Recommends, Suggests, Conflicts...) or
were installed and removed but not purged (leaving config files).
2018 20:24, aprekates wrote:
In a new installed system with Debian 9.6
$ dpkg -l
will list only packages with 'ii' state and a couple of 'rc'.
But if i run:
$ dpkg -l w*
i will get a dozen also of 'un' packages.
So i dont understand the logic of altering the o
Dan Ritter writes:
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>> On 21 de dezembro de 2018 20:24, aprekates wrote:
>> > In a new installed system with Debian 9.6
>> >
>> > $ dpkg -l
>> >
>> > will list only packages with 'ii' state and a
any more.
On 22/12/18 2:18 π.μ., Oliver Schoede wrote:
On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 01:10:34 +0200
aprekates wrote:
In my case both:
$ dpkg -l w*
and
$ dpkg -l 'w*'
will report the same list
Hi!
I'm getting the same sort of output and it seems to me these are
packages, dpkg
On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 01:10:34 +0200
aprekates wrote:
> In my case both:
>
> $ dpkg -l w*
>
> and
>
> $ dpkg -l 'w*'
>
> will report the same list
>
Hi!
I'm getting the same sort of output and it seems to me these are
packages, dpkg know
In my case both:
$ dpkg -l w*
and
$ dpkg -l 'w*'
will report the same list
# dpkg -l w*
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On 21 de dezembro de 2018 20:24, aprekates wrote:
> > In a new installed system with Debian 9.6
> >
> > $ dpkg -l
> >
> > will list only packages with 'ii' state and a couple of 'rc'.
> >
> > But if
On 21 de dezembro de 2018 20:24, aprekates wrote:
> In a new installed system with Debian 9.6
>
> $ dpkg -l
>
> will list only packages with 'ii' state and a couple of 'rc'.
>
> But if i run:
>
> $ dpkg -l w*
>
> i will get a dozen also
In a new installed system with Debian 9.6
$ dpkg -l
will list only packages with 'ii' state and a couple of 'rc'.
But if i run:
$ dpkg -l w*
i will get a dozen also of 'un' packages.
So i dont understand the logic of altering the output when
i use a pattern .
On 3/13/17, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2017-03-13 00:23:54 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>> Let me rephrase my question. If "dpkg -l" cannot do it, is there some
>> other command that will only show packages from the current
>> repositories?
>
> Perha
packages that are available in repositories?
> >
> > Impossible. 'dpkg -l' only shows packages which have files on the system.
> >
> > Perhaps you would like to reframe your query?
>
> Let me rephrase my question. If "dpkg -l" cannot do it
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Sat 11 Mar 2017 at 10:21:13 -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>
>> The output from "dpkg -l" is showing some packages that are not
>> present in the repositories I track.
>
> You are referring to the repositori
On Sat 11 Mar 2017 at 10:21:13 -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> The output from "dpkg -l" is showing some packages that are not
> present in the repositories I track.
You are referring to the repositories you track now. What about those
repositories you no longer track. (Doe
The output from "dpkg -l" is showing some packages that are not
present in the repositories I track. How to change this behaviour so
it only shows packages that are available in repositories?
Consider for example
% dpkg -l \*flash\*
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Statu
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 01:02:58PM +0100, alberto fuentes wrote:
desired = remove, status = install
I dont remember marking this packages in anyway, nor are they removed on a
full-upgrade or autoremove. So what are these packages about?
Luckily, "dpkg -l" gives you a nice header
desired = remove, status = install
I dont remember marking this packages in anyway, nor are they removed on a
full-upgrade or autoremove. So what are these packages about?
$ dpkg -l |grep -vE ^ii
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 4:23 PM, giovanni_re wrote:
> Thanks Aaron & Tom -
> That's progress, but not there yet. ;)
> Further suggestion? Thanks :)
You're welcome.
I assumed that you only wanted installed packages because I thought
that "dpkg -l" was meant f
2010/6/27 giovanni_re :
> Is there a way to mashup "apt-cache search " & "dpkg -l"
> - so that given a SearchTerm,
> it would find all the related package names in the cache,
> then do a "dpkg -l" on those package names?
>
>
> --
> To
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 13:27:14 -0700, "giovanni_re" said:
> Note: One way might be to:
> 1) Do the apt-cache search
> 2) For each line
> 2a) Pull out the package name
> 2b) Write an apt-cache search for that name only to a temp file
Er, that should have been a "dpk
6/26/2010 5:57 PM, giovanni_re wrote:
> >>> Is there a way to mashup "apt-cache search " & "dpkg -l"
> >>> - so that given a SearchTerm,
> >>> it would find all the related package names in the cache,
> >>> then do
Thanks Aaron & Tom -
That's progress, but not there yet. ;)
Further suggestion? Thanks :)
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 04:39:41 -0400, "Tom H" said:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 7:57 PM, giovanni_re wrote:
> > Is there a way to mashup "apt-cache search " &
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 7:57 PM, giovanni_re wrote:
> Is there a way to mashup "apt-cache search " & "dpkg -l"
> - so that given a SearchTerm,
> it would find all the related package names in the cache,
> then do a "dpkg -l" on those package names?
On 6/26/2010 6:58 PM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> On 6/26/2010 6:55 PM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
>> On 6/26/2010 5:57 PM, giovanni_re wrote:
>>> Is there a way to mashup "apt-cache search " & "dpkg -l"
>>> - so that given a SearchTerm,
>>&
On 6/26/2010 6:55 PM, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> On 6/26/2010 5:57 PM, giovanni_re wrote:
>> Is there a way to mashup "apt-cache search " & "dpkg -l"
>> - so that given a SearchTerm,
>> it would find all the related package names in the cache,
On 6/26/2010 5:57 PM, giovanni_re wrote:
> Is there a way to mashup "apt-cache search " & "dpkg -l"
> - so that given a SearchTerm,
> it would find all the related package names in the cache,
> then do a "dpkg -l" on those package names?
dpkg -l
Is there a way to mashup "apt-cache search " & "dpkg -l"
- so that given a SearchTerm,
it would find all the related package names in the cache,
then do a "dpkg -l" on those package names?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.o
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 04:13:43 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
[...]
> I have no idea what the first
> three lines of the dpkg -l output below are trying to tell me.
>
>
> :/# dpkg -l postfix
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
> | Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked
No, I did not know about that. Neat trick. Thanks
Tony
-Original Message-
From: celejar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 11:35 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: screen width of dpkg -l|grep package name
On 1/25/07, Tony Heal <[EMAIL PROTEC
On 1/25/07, Tony Heal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Here is my issue. If I use dpkg –l | grep cupsys I get this. Note that the
package name is incomplete. I believe this is caused by the screen width
getting set to 80 columns.
ii cupsys 1.1.23-10sarge Common UNIX Pr
I am trying to determine how to get a complete list of installed packages
using 'dpkg -l'.
Here is my issue. If I use dpkg -l | grep cupsys I get this. Note that the
package name is incomplete. I believe this is caused by the screen width
getting set to 80 columns.
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 23:47:31 -0400, H.S. wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>Today I reinstalled Etch on my machine. After upgrading and everything,
>I noticed that "dpkg -l" is not listing some of the packages which are
>not already installed. I was looking for vim for example
Hello,
Today I reinstalled Etch on my machine. After upgrading and everything,
I noticed that "dpkg -l" is not listing some of the packages which are
not already installed. I was looking for vim for example, and "dpkg -l
vim" did not list it. However "apt-get -s ins
On 2/1/06, Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060201 08:47]:
>
> > I understand that the package below is not installed but the
> > confiruration files remain
>
> Yes, that's correct.
>
>
> > #
* Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060201 08:47]:
> I understand that the package below is not installed but the
> confiruration files remain
Yes, that's correct.
> # dpkg -l |grep apache
> rc libapache2-mod 4.3.10-16 server-side, HTML-embedded scripting languag
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:17:31PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I understand that the package below is not installed but the
>confiruration files remain
>
># dpkg -l |grep apache
>rc libapache2-mod 4.3.10-16 server-side, HTML-embedded scripting languag
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:17:31PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I understand that the package below is not installed but the
> confiruration files remain
>
> # dpkg -l |grep apache
> rc libapache2-mod 4.3.10-16 server-side, HTML-embedded scripting languag
&g
Hi all,
I understand that the package below is not installed but the
confiruration files remain
# dpkg -l |grep apache
rc libapache2-mod 4.3.10-16 server-side, HTML-embedded scripting languag
How do I purge the configuration files too and get this package out of
dpkg listing?
Thankyou so
Sebastian Kayser wrote:
Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
I would like to save the names of all the installed packages.
# dpkg -l | awk '{print $2}'
Does the work, but some packages with long names are name truncated.
What's the option to provide to display the full name?
Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> I would like to save the names of all the installed packages.
>
> # dpkg -l | awk '{print $2}'
>
> Does the work, but some packages with long names are name truncated.
> What's the option to provide to display the full name?
a)
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:37:50PM +0200, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to save the names of all the installed packages.
>
> # dpkg -l | awk '{print $2}'
>
> Does the work, but some packages with long names are name truncated.
> What's
Hi,
I would like to save the names of all the installed packages.
# dpkg -l | awk '{print $2}'
Does the work, but some packages with long names are name truncated.
What's the option to provide to display the full name?
Thank you.
--
Administration & Formation à l'ad
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:20:55PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
> I see that when I run
> # dpkg -l
>
> I get a nice listing of installed packages, but if I pipe
> that command into less or more or even grep ,
> then the listing gets scrunched up, and it cuts of
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I see that when I run
# dpkg -l
I get a nice listing of installed packages, but if I pipe
that command into less or more or even grep ,
then the listing gets scrunched up, and it cuts off the end of
packages with longer names.
Is there a way to display it to
Hello,
I see that when I run
# dpkg -l
I get a nice listing of installed packages, but if I pipe
that command into less or more or even grep ,
then the listing gets scrunched up, and it cuts off the end of packages
with longer names.
Is there a way to display it to show the long name? or
is
Adam Funk wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 May 2004 10:40, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> > I would backup /var/backups. That directory includes a copy of the
>
> I already back up /etc. Where do the /var/backups/dpkg.status.* files
> come from?
The come from:
/var/lib/dpkg/status
> > dpkg status file and a
On 18. May 2004 at 2:03PM GMT,
Adam Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 May 2004 14:50, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> > Those both set the COLUMNS shell variable but fail to export it to the
> > dpkg subprocess (you need an explicit 'export' to do tha
On Tuesday 18 May 2004 14:50, Colin Watson wrote:
> Those both set the COLUMNS shell variable but fail to export it to the
> dpkg subprocess (you need an explicit 'export' to do that).
> 'COLUMNS=200 dpkg -l' is a special syntax that adds the variable to
> the en
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 08:34:53AM +, Adam Funk wrote:
> I want to dump a complete list of installed packages to a file as part
> of my backup procedure. man dpkg-query suggests using
> --showformat=format, in particular: "Package information can be
> included by inserting variable referenc
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 01:18:50PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> --- Adam Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Excellent. I had tried these:
> >
> > (COLUMNS=200 ; dpkg -l) |head
> > (COLUMNS=200 && dpkg -l) |head
> >
> > but got the narrow
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 11:40:53AM +, Adam Funk wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 May 2004 10:20, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > --- Adam Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> (Sorry about the long lines but they illustrate the output I'm
> >> talking about.)
> >
--- Adam Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 May 2004 10:20, Thomas Adam wrote:
>
> > --- Adam Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> (Sorry about the long lines but they illustrate the output I'm
> >> talking about.)
>
On Tuesday 18 May 2004 10:40, Bob Proulx wrote:
> I would backup /var/backups. That directory includes a copy of the
I already back up /etc. Where do the /var/backups/dpkg.status.* files
come from?
> dpkg status file and a few other tidbits from the system. From that
> you can recreate your s
On Tuesday 18 May 2004 10:20, Thomas Adam wrote:
> --- Adam Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> (Sorry about the long lines but they illustrate the output I'm
>> talking about.)
>>
>> ``dpkg -l'' on its own in a terminal produces wide o
Adam Funk wrote:
(Sorry about the long lines but they illustrate the output I'm
talking about.)
``dpkg -l'' on its own in a terminal produces wide output, e.g.:
$ dpkg -l perl*
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config
Adam Funk wrote:
> ``dpkg -l'' on its own in a terminal produces wide output, e.g.:
> [...]
> but when I send its output to a pipe or a file, I get narrow
> output:
I thought dpkg -l used COLUMNS or the current tty columns to base its
output. Which makes me think you have
--- Adam Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Sorry about the long lines but they illustrate the output I'm
> talking about.)
>
> ``dpkg -l'' on its own in a terminal produces wide output, e.g.:
COLUMNS=200 dpkg -l | pipe | pipe | pipe | more | more | yay
Chan
(Sorry about the long lines but they illustrate the output I'm
talking about.)
``dpkg -l'' on its own in a terminal produces wide output, e.g.:
$ dpkg -l perl*
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ E
Colin Watson gave me
a command to change the column width of the output. Now I'm
embarrassed to say I cannot find his response (I did save it but
Lord knows where, and I can't find it by searching the archives).
Someone help me out, please?
COLUMNS= dpkg -l
I saw that in the man page befor
mbarrassed to say I cannot find his response (I did save it but
Lord knows where, and I can't find it by searching the archives).
Someone help me out, please?
COLUMNS= dpkg -l
Cheers,
Thanks Colin.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
>I had the same problem some time ago and Colin Watson gave me
> >>a command to change the column width of the output. Now I'm
> >>embarrassed to say I cannot find his response (I did save it but
> >>Lord knows where, and I can't find it by searching the archives)
some time ago and Colin Watson gave me
> >>a command to change the column width of the output. Now I'm
> >>embarrassed to say I cannot find his response (I did save it but
> >>Lord knows where, and I can't find it by searc
rrassed to say I cannot find his response (I did save it but
Lord knows where, and I can't find it by searching the archives).
Someone help me out, please?
COLUMNS= dpkg -l
Cheers,
I saw that in the man page before, but on woody it seems to do nothing:
export COLUMNS=2
dpkg -l
puts out 4
barrassed to say I cannot find his response (I did save it but
> Lord knows where, and I can't find it by searching the archives).
> Someone help me out, please?
COLUMNS= dpkg -l
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
I can't read the full descriptions of certain packages in the above output.
I had the same problem some time ago and Colin Watson gave me
a command to change the column width of the output. Now I'm
embarrassed to say I cannot find his response (I did save it but
Lord knows where, and I can't find
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 12:12:38PM -0800, C. Chad Wallace wrote:
> Mario Vukelic wrote:
> >On Sat, 2004-02-14 at 03:24, Colin Watson wrote:
> It says the same for me in the man page for dpkg-query(8), but when I do
> a dpkg -l, all the packages listed are either 'ii&#x
Mario Vukelic wrote:
On Sat, 2004-02-14 at 03:24, Colin Watson wrote:
'dpkg -p' lists whatever's in /var/lib/dpkg/available; 'dpkg -l' lists
whatever's in /var/lib/dpkg/status.
Uh, for me (dpkg 1.9.21) man says -l lists available, and -p
dpkg -p|--print-avail p
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.10.18
Severity: minor
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 11:07:07AM +0100, Mario Vukelic wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-02-14 at 03:24, Colin Watson wrote:
> > 'dpkg -p' lists whatever's in /var/lib/dpkg/available; 'dpkg -l'
> > lists whatever
On Sat, 2004-02-14 at 03:24, Colin Watson wrote:
> 'dpkg -p' lists whatever's in /var/lib/dpkg/available; 'dpkg -l' lists
> whatever's in /var/lib/dpkg/status.
Uh, for me (dpkg 1.9.21) man says -l lists available, and -p
dpkg -p|--print-avail package
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 10:43:34PM +0200, Shaul Karl wrote:
> Is it a bug that
>
> dpkg -p kernel-source-2.6.2
>
> shows information about kernel-source-2.6.2 while
>
> dpkg -l kernel-source-2.6.2
>
> claims the Version is and the Description is (no d
Shaul Karl wrote:
Is it a bug that
dpkg -p kernel-source-2.6.2
shows information about kernel-source-2.6.2 while
dpkg -l kernel-source-2.6.2
claims the Version is and the Description is (no description
available)? It looks like dpkg -l refers only to packages that are
Is it a bug that
dpkg -p kernel-source-2.6.2
shows information about kernel-source-2.6.2 while
dpkg -l kernel-source-2.6.2
claims the Version is and the Description is (no description
available)? It looks like dpkg -l refers only to packages that are
installed, which is not
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 08:36:38PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 02:56:10PM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> > When I do 'dpkg -l' now all I get back are installed packages. I used
> > to have to grep for an initial 'i' to get just thos
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003 20:36:38 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 02:56:10PM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote:
>> When I do 'dpkg -l' now all I get back are installed packages. I used
>> to have to grep for an initial 'i' to get just those. How d
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 11:45:48PM +0100, GCS wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 08:36:38PM +, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > dpkg -l \*
> >
> > It's been like this ever since I started using Debian, IIRC.
>
> Uh-oh. I just have not kn
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 08:36:38PM +, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dpkg -l \*
>
> It's been like this ever since I started using Debian, IIRC.
Uh-oh. I just have not know this. Good priest learn 'till death
(hungarian sentence). I just bow in front
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 02:56:10PM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> When I do 'dpkg -l' now all I get back are installed packages. I used
> to have to grep for an initial 'i' to get just those. How do I see *all*
> available packages?
dpkg -l \*
It's been li
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 02:56:10PM -0500, Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I do 'dpkg -l' now all I get back are installed packages. I used
> to have to grep for an initial 'i' to get just those. How do I see *all*
> available packages?
Hmmm. It
On 21 Dec 2003 at 14:56, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> When I do 'dpkg -l' now all I get back are installed packages. I used
> to have to grep for an initial 'i' to get just those. How do I see
> *all* available packages?
Are you looking for something in particular? If so
When I do 'dpkg -l' now all I get back are installed packages. I used
to have to grep for an initial 'i' to get just those. How do I see *all*
available packages?
--
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood
shed; if you will not fight when
David Z Maze wrote:
"Yildiz, Murat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
and run apt-setup and let read all 8 cd's
but it seems it doesn't write available and status files again.
The canonical way to do this is to run 'apt-get update', hit 'u' in
aptitude, or select "update" from dselect's main menu.
"Yildiz, Murat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> where does "dpkg -l" or deselect|select reads package info?
> /var/lib/dpkg/available or status? or both?
> I tried to delete these two files
Ow. Don't do that; you've now caused dselect to forget that
Hi,
where does "dpkg -l" or deselect|select reads package info?
/var/lib/dpkg/available or status? or both?
I tried to delete these two files and run apt-setup and let read all 8 cd's
but it seems it doesn't write available and status files again.
What to do when these t
try
COLUMNS=132 dpkg -l
instead, that'll have more space to have each field in the table bigger.
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Oleg wrote:
> Hi
>
> A question about good old dpkg -l $args | grep ^ii :
>
> Is there any way to convince dpkg not to shorten the second field of the
>
Hi
A question about good old dpkg -l $args | grep ^ii :
Is there any way to convince dpkg not to shorten the second field of the
output, i.e. make sure the full names of packages are displayed?
Thanks
Oleg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
On approximately Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 02:31:25PM -0700, Gary Hennigan wrote:
> "Hanspeter Roth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > the command `dpkg -l ...' prints a name colunm which length is
> > limited. As a result long package names are cut and may be displa
"Hanspeter Roth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the command `dpkg -l ...' prints a name colunm which length is
> limited. As a result long package names are cut and may be displayed
> ambigiously.
> Is there an option to habe the name colunm wider?
Run it like:
Hello,
the command `dpkg -l ...' prints a name colunm which length is
limited. As a result long package names are cut and may be displayed
ambigiously.
Is there an option to habe the name colunm wider?
-Hanspeter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
dpkg-awk "Status: .* installed$" -- Package | cut -d: -f2.
-Ramesh
-Original Message-
From: Jim Woodruff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 1:27 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: "dpkg -l" redirection
Does anyone have a way of redi
On 10 Mar 2002, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-03-10 at 19:26, Jim Woodruff wrote:
> > Does anyone have a way of redirecting the standard output of "dpkg -l" to
> > a file without the truncation that takes place?
>
> $ COLUMNS=200 dpkg -l > file
>
Than
On Sun, 2002-03-10 at 19:26, Jim Woodruff wrote:
> Does anyone have a way of redirecting the standard output of "dpkg -l" to
> a file without the truncation that takes place?
$ COLUMNS=200 dpkg -l > file
--
Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTE
Does anyone have a way of redirecting the standard output of "dpkg -l" to
a file without the truncation that takes place?
Thanks in advance for any advice.
Jim
--
Jim Woodruff < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 11:03 pm, dman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:48:57PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> | What do ii & ri mean in the 1st column of the dpkg output?
>
> You snipped it out :
>
> Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
>
>
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:48:57PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
| -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
| Hash: SHA1
|
|
| What do ii & ri mean in the 1st column of the dpkg output?
You snipped it out :
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What do ii & ri mean in the 1st column of the dpkg output?
ii xlibs 4.1.0-9X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1.1.3-5compression library - runtime
ii zlib1g-dev 1.1.3-5compression library - devel
On Thursday 03 January 2002 03:30 am, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 03-Jan-2002 Alec wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I noticed that (on woody) searching for a file with auto-apt will
> > sometimes produce no results, while dpkg -L may list the file. E.g.
> > $
On 03-Jan-2002 Alec wrote:
> Hi
>
> I noticed that (on woody) searching for a file with auto-apt will sometimes
> produce no results, while dpkg -L may list the file. E.g.
> $ auto-apt search pa_sml
> $ dpkg -L camlp4 | grep pa_sml
> /usr/lib/camlp4/pa_sml.cmo
>
>
Hi
I noticed that (on woody) searching for a file with auto-apt will sometimes
produce no results, while dpkg -L may list the file. E.g.
$ auto-apt search pa_sml
$ dpkg -L camlp4 | grep pa_sml
/usr/lib/camlp4/pa_sml.cmo
Why?
Thanks
Alec
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 02:52:24PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
| Michael P. Soulier wrote:
|
| > Beyond stretching my terminal to it's maximum possible width, is there a
| > way to control the field width of the display from dpkg -l?
| >
| > ie.
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 02:52:24PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
>
> This should do it:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] msoulier]$ COLUMNS=255 dpkg -l 'netscape*' | grep ^i
Cool, thanks. I'll look at --get-selections as well, as suggested by the
other helpful person.
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
