On Thursday 16 October 2003 07:25, Travis Crump wrote:
> How much of an idiot do you think the former admin was? It seems
> insane that anyone would upgrade libc6 for no good reason.
Hehe, or a complete newbie, who only two weeks after woody was released
realized that he had written "testing" an
->>In response to your message<<-
--received from Travis Crump--
>
> How much of an idiot do you think the former admin was? It seems insane
> that anyone would upgrade libc6 for no good reason. I have a feeling
> that downgrading libc6 is going to break someth
It seems insane
that anyone would upgrade libc6 for no good reason. I have a feeling
that downgrading libc6 is going to break something in /usr/local/...
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 2003-10-15 at 20:30, Paul Yeatman wrote:
> Well, for the record, with not getting anyone else's opinion on this, I
> finally gave things a try and ran
>
> dpkg -i libc6_2.2.5-11.5_i386.deb libc6-dev_2.2.5-11.5_i386.deb
>
> and the only warning (other than the obvious fact that I was
Well, for the record, with not getting anyone else's opinion on this, I
finally gave things a try and ran
dpkg -i libc6_2.2.5-11.5_i386.deb libc6-dev_2.2.5-11.5_i386.deb
and the only warning (other than the obvious fact that I was
downgrading packages) was that such a downgrade would requ
Hi, I've inherited a Debian system that primarily uses the stable
distribution and yet on which the previous manager must have upgraded
libc6, libc6-dev and locales to, likely, the testing distribution as
they are higher versions than available from stable. Now that it is in
my hands, I'd prefer i
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 11:27:42 +1100
Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or you could just wait a few days for it to filter into testing.
I thought it already had.
- Richard.
--
Richard Kimber
http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 02:11:20AM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> Gah, that's horribly extreme. Just install the sid version of php4.
> A better question is why either of you let apt remove it to begin with
Because neither one of them has a clue, of course, as to how apt actually
works. Actually lea
Please don't CC me, I obviously read the list, since I answered your
original question :-)
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 05:33:20PM +0100, Niclas S?derlund wrote:
> Hiya,
>
> the SID-version?
Sid is Debian Unstable. Search on http://packages.debian.org/ for the
'libc6' package in 'unstable', then dow
Hiya,
the SID-version?
Regards,
Niclas
At 16:11 2003-03-17, you wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 07:59:03AM -0600, Michael J. Denton wrote:
> > I need to go down a level on libc6, and want all the dependencie-packages
> > that libc6 brought with it to follow and downgrade to the next level
> > as
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 07:59:03AM -0600, Michael J. Denton wrote:
> > I need to go down a level on libc6, and want all the dependencie-packages
> > that libc6 brought with it to follow and downgrade to the next level
> > aswell. Doable? Or is a re-install faster.
>
> I had the same problem - in m
> I need to go down a level on libc6, and want all the dependencie-packages
> that libc6 brought with it to follow and downgrade to the next level
> aswell. Doable? Or is a re-install faster.
I had the same problem - in my case it was quicker to just reinstall the
machine.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Hiya,
im running apt against the testing-source. With the latest upgrade of libc6
the dependencies broke for php4 which I need for my workstation. Ive seen
why and so on and now I wonder if there is any way you can downgrade a package?
I need to go down a level on libc6, and want all the depend
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 23:12:06 +, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:21:28PM +, Pigeon wrote:
>> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:58:18 -0800 (PST), "nate"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >if libc6 is the ONLY thing he installed it may be possible to force
>> >downgra
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:21:28PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:58:18 -0800 (PST), "nate"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >if libc6 is the ONLY thing he installed it may be possible to force
> >downgrade. one of my friends installed the unstable of libc6 version
> >on a potato syste
libc6 on his stable machine using the unstable's version. He
> >> encountered some problems trying to downgrade (installing the former
> >> .deb). A conflict with libdb1-compat .
> >>
> >> I read in an old forum (August 2001) that downgrading libc6 is not
>
ountered some problems trying to downgrade (installing the former
>> .deb). A conflict with libdb1-compat .
>>
>> I read in an old forum (August 2001) that downgrading libc6 is not
>> supported. Is that true?
>
>if libc6 is the ONLY thing he installed it may be possible to for
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 10:38:51AM +1030, Tom Cook wrote:
> On 0, nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would backup any data you really want if possible before attempting
> > this, technically I don't think its supported, but it is possible at
> > least in my experience.
>
> I've successfully do
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 11:45:56PM +0100, Jerome Lacoste (Frisurf) wrote:
> A question for a friend of mine: is it possible to downgrade libc6. he
> upgraded libc6 on his stable machine using the unstable's version. He
> encountered some problems trying to downgrade (installing the former
> .deb).
the former
> > .deb). A conflict with libdb1-compat .
> >
> > I read in an old forum (August 2001) that downgrading libc6 is not
> > supported. Is that true?
>
> if libc6 is the ONLY thing he installed it may be possible to force
> downgrade. one of my friends ins
I read in an old forum (August 2001) that downgrading libc6 is not
> supported. Is that true?
if libc6 is the ONLY thing he installed it may be possible to force
downgrade. one of my friends installed the unstable of libc6 version
on a potato system about 8 months ago because he thought he co
that downgrading libc6 is not
supported. Is that true?
Jerome
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
22 matches
Mail list logo