Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Looking at a set of installed binary packages built from the same source
> package, I would like to keep the version numbers consistent. There might
> be exceptions, but in general you won't like to mix unstable and experimental
> binary packages from the nvid
Hi folks,
Looking at a set of installed binary packages built from the same source
package, I would like to keep the version numbers consistent. There might
be exceptions, but in general you won't like to mix unstable and experimental
binary packages from the nvidia-graphics-drivers, for example.
On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 11:33 AM Dan Ritter wrote:
> Andy Smith wrote:
> >
> > Sounds like an absolutely shit-tier company. I hope there are
> > alternatives in the 3d-printing world, a world that I know almost
> > nothing about.
>
> Many, but Creality makes really cheap 3D printers, so
> lots of
Andy Smith wrote:
>
> Sounds like an absolutely shit-tier company. I hope there are
> alternatives in the 3d-printing world, a world that I know almost
> nothing about.
Many, but Creality makes really cheap 3D printers, so
lots of people buy them.
-dsr-
Hello,
On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 08:11:38AM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> But Creality apparently disapproves of the hack and so has
> disabled it in the latest firmware.
So what I have learned from this thread is that there is a company
called Creality which:
- Supplies known-broken AppImages o
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 10:42 PM Max Nikulin wrote:
>
> On 30/07/2023 05:16, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> > I'd already reached the conclusion that messing with openssl was a bad
> > idea. Unfortunately, Creality is unresponsive to pleas to fix their
> > software.
>
> I have no experience with 3d pri
On 7/29/23 13:52, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 10:42 AM wrote:
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
On 28/07/2023 17:04, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
I have an AppImage from Creality which segfaults with a QT ssl
error. Googling tells me that the latest version of OpenSSL (3.x)
omits som
On 30/07/2023 05:16, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
I'd already reached the conclusion that messing with openssl was a bad
idea. Unfortunately, Creality is unresponsive to pleas to fix their
software.
I have no experience with 3d printers at all, but I am curious
concerning any progress with a sugg
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023, 6:03 PM Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 04:14:30PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2023, 4:10 PM Brian wrote:
> > > On Fri 28 Jul 2023 at 16:04:10 -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> > > > any way to revert to an earlier version of OpenS
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 04:14:30PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023, 4:10 PM Brian wrote:
> > On Fri 28 Jul 2023 at 16:04:10 -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> > > any way to revert to an earlier version of OpenSSL? I'm on an up-to-date
> > > bookworm system.
> >
> > Insta
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 10:42 AM wrote:
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> > On 28/07/2023 17:04, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> > > I have an AppImage from Creality which segfaults with a QT ssl
> > > error. Googling tells me that the latest version of OpenSSL (3.x)
> > > omits some X509 functionality,
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> On 28/07/2023 17:04, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> > I have an AppImage from Creality which segfaults with a QT ssl
> > error. Googling tells me that the latest version of OpenSSL (3.x)
> > omits some X509 functionality, which can be found in OpenSSL-1.1.
> > (And someone
On 28/07/2023 17:04, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
I have an AppImage from Creality which segfaults with a QT ssl error.
Googling tells me that the latest version of OpenSSL (3.x) omits some
X509 functionality, which can be found in OpenSSL-1.1. (And someone
reports that installing it solves the probl
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 09:10:08PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 28 Jul 2023 at 16:04:10 -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>
> > I have an AppImage from Creality which segfaults with a QT ssl error.
> > Googling tells me that the latest version of OpenSSL (3.x) omits some X509
> > functionality, which
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023, 4:10 PM Brian wrote:
> On Fri 28 Jul 2023 at 16:04:10 -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>
> > I have an AppImage from Creality which segfaults with a QT ssl error.
> > Googling tells me that the latest version of OpenSSL (3.x) omits some
> X509
> > functionality, which can be fo
On Fri 28 Jul 2023 at 16:04:10 -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> I have an AppImage from Creality which segfaults with a QT ssl error.
> Googling tells me that the latest version of OpenSSL (3.x) omits some X509
> functionality, which can be found in OpenSSL-1.1. (And someone reports that
> installi
I have an AppImage from Creality which segfaults with a QT ssl error.
Googling tells me that the latest version of OpenSSL (3.x) omits some X509
functionality, which can be found in OpenSSL-1.1. (And someone reports that
installing it solves the problem.) But I can't find that package. Is there
any
to work around put the following line in your mutt profile
unset smtp_authenticators
songbird
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 05:58:31PM -0400, songbird wrote:
Greg Wooledge wrote:
Also, bugs should be reported to bugs.debian.org, not here.
an FYI to fellow users can be helpful.
That may be true, but even in that case you should describe the issue
you've hit.
--
Please do not CC me for lis
Greg Wooledge wrote:
...
> The only difference between package versions 2.2.3-1 and 2.2.3-2 is
> the patch set that Debian applies.
ok, thanks, i filed a bug report.
songbird
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 05:58:31PM -0400, songbird wrote:
> > On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 11:23:58AM -0400, songbird wrote:
> >> 2.2.3-1 version works
> >> 2.2.3-2 version does not work
> >
> > This isn't a useful bug report until you say *how* version 2.2.3-2 fails.
>
> mutt doesn't send mail.
*si
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 11:23:58AM -0400, songbird wrote:
>>
>> 2.2.3-1 version works
>> 2.2.3-2 version does not work
>
> This isn't a useful bug report until you say *how* version 2.2.3-2 fails.
mutt doesn't send mail.
> Also, bugs should be reported to bugs.debian.or
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 11:23:58AM -0400, songbird wrote:
>
> 2.2.3-1 version works
> 2.2.3-2 version does not work
This isn't a useful bug report until you say *how* version 2.2.3-2 fails.
Also, bugs should be reported to bugs.debian.org, not here.
2.2.3-1 version works
2.2.3-2 version does not work
songbird
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 02:56:06PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/11/2021 14:20, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 02:10:40PM +0100, lina wrote:
> > > Thanks all for the input. My problem originated from after the system
> > > upgrade to bullseye, the gaussian view (gvi
On Thu 11 Nov 2021 at 14:56:06 (+0100), Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> On 11/11/2021 14:20, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 02:10:40PM +0100, lina wrote:
> > > Thanks all for the input. My problem originated from after the system
> > > upgrade to bullseye, the gaussian view (gview) won't b
On 11/11/2021 14:20, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 02:10:40PM +0100, lina wrote:
Thanks all for the input. My problem originated from after the system
upgrade to bullseye, the gaussian view (gview) won't be able to show the
result file.
actually gview stands for G[tk] view (d
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 02:10:40PM +0100, lina wrote:
> Thanks all for the input. My problem originated from after the system
> upgrade to bullseye, the gaussian view (gview) won't be able to show the
> result file.
> As gview is an essential part in my work, these days my work is stranded
> due to
37:22AM +0100, lina wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > In order to have avogadro instead of avogadro2.
> >
> > I intend to downgrade qt5 to qt4.
> >
> > But I can't find the qt4 snapshot from http://snapshot.debian.org/
> >
> > Thanks again for your hel
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 09:37:22AM +0100, lina wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In order to have avogadro instead of avogadro2.
>
> I intend to downgrade qt5 to qt4.
>
> But I can't find the qt4 snapshot from http://snapshot.debian.org/
>
> Thanks again for your help, lin
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 09:37:22AM +0100, lina wrote:
In order to have avogadro instead of avogadro2.
I intend to downgrade qt5 to qt4.
You shouldn't need to: qt4 and 5, in theory at least, should be
co-installable. Alas, Qt4 was enthusiastically purged from Debian at the
earliest opport
On 10.11.21 at 09:37 lina wrote:
> I intend to downgrade qt5 to qt4.
Don't do it. You will probably ruin your system. Many packages depend on
qt5.
As others suggested, you migh try running an older version of Debian
inside a virtual machine.
Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> I intend to downgrade qt5 to qt4.
>
> You are looking for trouble here.
yes indeed - the only thing that make sense is a virtual machine with some
old distro that has qt4
--
FCD6 3719 0FFB F1BF 38EA 4727 5348 5F1F DCFE BCB0
On 10/11/2021 09:37, lina wrote:
Hi all,
In order to have avogadro instead of avogadro2.
I intend to downgrade qt5 to qt4.
You are looking for trouble here.
Jerome
But I can't find the qt4 snapshot from http://snapshot.debian.org/
<http://snapshot.debian.org/>
Thanks aga
Hi all,
In order to have avogadro instead of avogadro2.
I intend to downgrade qt5 to qt4.
But I can't find the qt4 snapshot from http://snapshot.debian.org/
Thanks again for your help, lina
On Sun 08 Mar 2020 at 22:45:12 (+0100), Emanuel Berg wrote:
> Has this problem been mentioned in the BTS, you think? I found
> this [1] but no one seems to match this situation exactly what
> I can see (?)
>
> Can any of you guys reproduce it? I'm on buster [2] with
> imagemagick 6.9 [3]
No.
> c
Has this problem been mentioned in the BTS, you think? I found
this [1] but no one seems to match this situation exactly what
I can see (?)
Can any of you guys reproduce it? I'm on buster [2] with
imagemagick 6.9 [3]
command:
convert -composite bg.png fg.png -gravity center out.png
error mess
Quoting Marco Möller (2020-03-08 13:26:25)
> If the newer version (currently v9.50 in bullseye (testing)) would
> solve the problem, then you may want to ask if someone could place
> this newer version from bullseye into the buster-backports repository.
> Afterwards you could install the backpor
If the newer version (currently v9.50 in bullseye (testing)) would solve
the problem, then you may want to ask if someone could place this newer
version from bullseye into the buster-backports repository. Afterwards
you could install the backported version 9.50 from there without hassle.
This w
On 2020-03-08, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> The solution is *not* to downgrade: It is a security-related change.
>
> The solution is therefore to fix the Postscript code.
>
> That said, if you insist on doing a potentially dangerous _workaround_=20
> then there's h
Hello,
I have not tried this and do not use imagemagick directly (it is
installed as a dependance on my system): perhaps you can deinstall
imagemagick and install graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat instead?
(Sorry, Emmanuel, my mistake, I dit click on "answer" and sent tp you a
private mail)
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> The solution is *not* to downgrade: It is
> a security-related change.
OK, but here they say:
Debian Buster (10) just came into Soft Freeze stage, after Full
freeze it will be too late and this newly introduced bug will
not be fixed for Debian
omp.png'
> @ error/convert.c/ConvertImageCommand/3258."
>
> I heard the solution is downgrade ghostscript but
> 'aptitude versions' only shows one version, 9.27 (or
> 9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u3).
>
> Do I need to add additional sources or how do
> I downgrade to a version
It seems convert doesn't work on Debian Buster, I get an error for
this command
convert -composite $bg $fg -gravity center comp.png
namely this message: "convert-im6.q16: no images defined `comp.png'
@ error/convert.c/ConvertImageCommand/3258."
I heard the solution is d
Dan Ritter wrote:
...
> This is not supported. Upgrades work in one direction.
>
> However, if you want to try:
>
> http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Debian/downgrade.html
that is a very ancient cite and the many caveats
in there make me think that it is a huge waste of
time for an actual system that's
Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Hi all...
>
> A few days ago I downgraded my Debian installation from Sid to Stable by
> changing, in /etc/apt/sources list, all occurrences of `unstable' to `stable'
> in:
>
> --
> deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/
iguration of packages can be downgraded. It is much
> simpler to backup data and reinstall stable.
Agreed. Downgrading some individual packages to stable (e.g. due
to a bug) is often fine (manual checks/fixes might be needed),
but I would never downgrade a full system.
If one goal was to keep som
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 10:23:08AM +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> A few days ago I downgraded my Debian installation from Sid to Stable by
>> changing, in /etc/apt/sources list, all occurrences of `unstable' to `stable'
[...
>> But still, at log in in tty console, there is:
>>
>> Debian GNU/Lin
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 10:23:08AM +0200, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Hi all...
>
> A few days ago I downgraded my Debian installation from Sid to Stable by
> changing, in /etc/apt/sources list, all occurrences of `unstable' to `stable'
> in:
>
> --
stall dpkg apt aptitude
# aptitude full-upgrade
But still, at log in in tty console, there is:
Debian GNU/Linux buster/sid lennovo tty1
How come?
Thanks,
Rodolfo
If i remember correctly, you can't do a downgrade.
Kevin
<>
Hi all...
A few days ago I downgraded my Debian installation from Sid to Stable by
changing, in /etc/apt/sources list, all occurrences of `unstable' to `stable'
in:
--
deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ unstable main
deb-src http:/
> On Feb 24, 2016, at 1:06 AM, brian wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 07:46:50 +, you wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 02:39 -0500, brian wrote:
>>
>>> Anybody know anywhere where I can download a Wheezy live image, or
>>> even just installation disks, for (preferably) 64-bit Wheezy with an
Glenn English wrote:
>
>> On Feb 24, 2016, at 1:06 AM, brian wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 07:46:50 +, you wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 02:39 -0500, brian wrote:
>>>
Anybody know anywhere where I can download a Wheezy live image, or
even just installation disks, for (pre
> On Feb 24, 2016, at 2:42 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
> We have a large set of older images online at
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/
>
> for both live and install media.
Thank you very much. I'm downloading debian-live-7.9.0-amd64-xfce-desktop.iso
as we speak. I hope that's
On 24 February 2016 at 20:51, Glenn English wrote:
>
> > On Feb 24, 2016, at 1:06 AM, brian wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 07:46:50 +, you wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 02:39 -0500, brian wrote:
> >>
> >>> Anybody know anywhere where I can download a Wheezy live image, or
> >>> e
> On Feb 24, 2016, at 1:06 AM, brian wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 07:46:50 +, you wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 02:39 -0500, brian wrote:
>>
>>> Anybody know anywhere where I can download a Wheezy live image, or
>>> even just installation disks, for (preferably) 64-bit Wheezy with an
On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 07:46:50 +, you wrote:
>On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 02:39 -0500, brian wrote:
>
>> Anybody know anywhere where I can download a Wheezy live image, or
>> even just installation disks, for (preferably) 64-bit Wheezy with an
>> XFCE desktop?
>
>Top google hit for me for 'wheezy iso
On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 02:39 -0500, brian wrote:
> Anybody know anywhere where I can download a Wheezy live image, or
> even just installation disks, for (preferably) 64-bit Wheezy with an
> XFCE desktop?
Top google hit for me for 'wheezy iso' is...
https://www.debian.org/releases/wheezy/debian-i
My PC is running Jessie with no problems, and I finally persuaded my
wife to let me upgrade her PC. Disaster! There's some incompatibility
with her machine (an eMachines cheap-and-nasty) and Jessie will run
for about 10-15 minutes then something becomes corrupted, the display
is filled by a weird
Please don't top post - it requires extra effort for people to work out
what you are referring to.
On 29/01/14 13:54, John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell wrote:
> if you knew how to build and install a kernel without using a package
> if you knew the /var/lib/dpkg/status and available and /etc
On 28/01/14 18:40, Garry wrote:
>
>>
>
> It was one of those situations where everything you do gets trumped. I
> decided to use a different server for the openfire install.
>
For people searching for a solution to the same problem:-
Debian Wheezy (note: you'll also need mysql, see the OpenF
Reposting on-list, my apologies Gary for accidentally replying off-list
On 28/01/14 17:56, Garry wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jan 27, 2014, at 11:50 PM, "Scott Ferguson"
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 28/01/14 15:12, Garry wrote:
>>
Re-sending, accidentally sent off-list
On 28/01/14 15:12, Garry wrote:
>
> Is it possible to downgrade from Wheezy to Squeeze?
>
> The reason I want to downgrade is because I am trying to install Openfire and
> unfortunately:
>
> openfire pre-depends on sun-java5-jre | su
2014-01-28 Garry
>
> Is it possible to downgrade from Wheezy to Squeeze?
>
> The reason I want to downgrade is because I am trying to install Openfire
> and unfortunately:
>
> openfire pre-depends on sun-java5-jre | sun-java6-jre |
> default-jre-headless | openjdk-6-jr
Is it possible to downgrade from Wheezy to Squeeze?
The reason I want to downgrade is because I am trying to install Openfire and
unfortunately:
openfire pre-depends on sun-java5-jre | sun-java6-jre | default-jre-headless |
openjdk-6-jre
- - I would prefer downgrading if it’s possible
On 11/07/12 18:23, Camaleón wrote:
[...]
> IIRC, the open source driver still has some problems with powersaving.
This ^. This is the reason I'm stuck with the xorg packets put on hold
for several months now and I can't upgrade them. Unfortunately I'm
having one of those ATi Radeon graphics chip
e, it implies to downgrade
Xserver to a version prior to 1.12.
Now I can wait fglrx 12-5 (wich is supposed to work under the new XOrg.
(...)
In the Spanish mailing list, a user posted an alternative method to
install the latest flgrx package in Wheezy (instructions detailed in this
Debian's fo
ay to make ATI
>>> propietary driver work under Wheezy. Of course, it implies to
>>> downgrade Xserver to a version prior to 1.12.
>>> Now I can wait fglrx 12-5 (wich is supposed to work under the new
>>> XOrg.
>> (...)
>>
>> In the Spanish mai
Today I tried the sid one fglrx-driver and the xserver-xorg* in wheezy box.
It's reported segmental fault.
Fixed by following the advice downgrading the xserver-xorg, at the
same time, the fglrx-driver is from wheezy-backports.
so it came as old days.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-re
On 11/07/12 10:51 AM, Camaleón wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:56:50 -0300, Ezequiel wrote:
(please, keep html turned off, thanks :-) )
Hi all: Searching in the Internet I've found a way to make ATI
propietary driver work under Wheezy. Of course, it implies to downgrade
Xserver to a ve
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 05:56:50 -0300, Ezequiel wrote:
(please, keep html turned off, thanks :-) )
> Hi all: Searching in the Internet I've found a way to make ATI
> propietary driver work under Wheezy. Of course, it implies to downgrade
> Xserver to a version prior to 1.12.
> Now
Hi all: Searching in the Internet I've found a way to make ATI propietary
driver work under Wheezy. Of course, it implies to downgrade Xserver to a
version prior to 1.12.
Now I can wait fglrx 12-5 (wich is supposed to work under the new XOrg.
### All credit belongs to "neg
On 2012-01-05 16:38:04 +, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 03:43:22PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > For Debian/unstable:
> >
> > Does there exist a utility to downgrade a package with its
> > dependencies and reverse-dependencies? The old packages w
Darac Marjal a écrit :
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 03:43:22PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
I was in this situation myself a while ago and decided that the best
solution was as follows:
* Before upgrading, take an LVM snapshot (this, of course, assumes
you ARE on LVM).
* Per
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 03:43:22PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> For Debian/unstable:
>
> Does there exist a utility to downgrade a package with its
> dependencies and reverse-dependencies? The old packages would
> be taken from /var/cache/apt/archives, and the tool should be
For Debian/unstable:
Does there exist a utility to downgrade a package with its
dependencies and reverse-dependencies? The old packages would
be taken from /var/cache/apt/archives, and the tool should be
able to find automatically which packages/versions are needed
to satisfy all the dependencies
On Sunday 16 October 2011 18:00:35 Harry Putnam wrote:
> what does `stable-bpo' mean at:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xorg-server.html
Stable-bpo is stable-backports.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
; packages you want to install. You select the desired package you want
>> to downgrade and jump to the "Versions" tab for instructions.
>
> I must not have the screens you do. Starting synaptic and finding
> `xserver-xorg-core'
>
> For a moment there I was a b
f the
> packages you want to install. You select the desired package you want to
> downgrade and jump to the "Versions" tab for instructions.
I must not have the screens you do. Starting synaptic and finding
`xserver-xorg-core'
For a moment there I was a bit stymi
has many many ramifications.
>
> Can anyone guide me on this, or is this the kind of thing I should
> install a vm guest for?
Synaptic makes a good job when it comes to manage the versions of the
packages you want to install. You select the desired package you want to
downgrade and
Running recently installed wheezy system
I see this version information concerning Xorg server:
aptitude versions xserver-xorg-core
i A 2:1.11.1-1 testing 500
I'd like to experiment with the previous version 1.10. Compare
certain behavior against the current version. But don't
Wayne Topa wrote:
>
> The only dist here (Squeeze, Wheezy, Sid) with a working cups is
> Squeeze. So try a squeeze line in your sources.list but remember
> Downgrading has it's problems. YMMV
>
Yes, thanks. I downgraded and the problem's gone.
I'm having squeeze/testing in my apt source, but
t;
> Pascal Dormeau
thank you, Pascal!
It just confirmed what I was afraid of and read about in another thread -
the solution was to downgrade to 1.4.4
regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:22:03 -0700, jeremy jozwik wrote:
> hello list, i need to downgrade the flashplayer in squeeze from 10.3 to
> a locally saved version that is 10.1.
Why would you do that? Older versions are *plenty* of bugs (and I hardly
doubt they run any better).
> if i si
hello list, i need to downgrade the flashplayer in squeeze from 10.3
to a locally saved version that is 10.1.
if i simply copy over the version saved in
/usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/ and set the permission to be the same as
the installed version flash is shown as not installed in the browser
On Lu, 07 mar 11, 08:42:27, Toni S wrote:
>
> - Using undo mechanism of aptitude (how does this work?)
AFAICT aptitude's undo is only for package selections.
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-of
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 20:22:43 +0100, Jens Van Broeckhoven wrote:
> Op Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:23:36 + (UTC) Camaleón schreef:
>
>
>> If disk space is not a concern, I'd go for a parallel installation. In
>> the event something goes wrong with the new install (or upgrade, if you
>> made a full imag
Op Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:23:36 + (UTC)
Camaleón schreef:
>
> If disk space is not a concern, I'd go for a parallel installation.
> In the event something goes wrong with the new install (or upgrade,
> if you made a full image of the currently installed system), you only
> have to boot with the
ental upgrades of individual packages with
>aptitude instead of upgrading all packages at once / test the new
>service / revert to old version if necessary
This is a good way to go. After testing freezes I tend to do this on my
desktop and laptop as time permits.
>What's your r
email traffic. So I'd like the system not being down for more
> than 12 hours.
>
> In case of any service failures after doing 'sudo aptitude safe-
> upgrade' I'd like to know some methods to smoothly revert to my current
> installation.
(...)
> What's yo
Hi folks,
I have lenny running on a headless virtual server being hosted by a
small hosting provider and now I'd like to upgrade to squeeze. The box
does not serve any commercial purpose, but it does handle a portion of
my private email traffic. So I'd like the system not being down for
more than
Thank you Rob, I had dkpg broken and some apps were gone for the first time,
I don't know why, but I succeeded the second time
That's ok. gnome and gnome-desktop-environment are just meta packages.
> No actual applications are going to be removed except for gdm3.
>
> -Rob
>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 02:40:02PM +0700, Hoang Le wrote:
> When I tried to install gdm, to replace gdm3, I got these message:
>
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> gdm3 gnome gnome-desktop-environment
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> fast-user-switch-applet gdm gdm-th
Thank Tom, it works in term of disabling the user list. That's nice. But do
you know how to downgrade to gdm 2.20 ?
> Debian way:
> sudo -u Debian-gdm gconftool-2
> /apps/gdm/simple-greeter/disable_user_list --set --type=boolean true
>
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Hoang Le wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011, Tom H wrote:
>>
>> I haven't seen Debian's login screen but I assume that you mean that
>> you don't want the latest GNOME's gdm user list.
>>
>> Ubuntu way:
>> sudo -u gdm gconftool-2 /apps/gdm/simple-greeter/disable_user_l
When I tried to install gdm, to replace gdm3, I got these message:
The following packages will be REMOVED:
gdm3 gnome gnome-desktop-environment
The following NEW packages will be installed:
fast-user-switch-applet gdm gdm-themes libdmx1
I think I need to do something else...
On Monday 14 February 2011 06:11:54 pm Hoang Le wrote:
> Because I like the old flat style, not this Mac-like login screen :)
Don't know what your references mean, or what Debian release you are using. If
it
is a gdm3/squeeze issue you can use gdm, both are available.
--
Peace,
Greg
--
To U
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Hoang Le wrote:
>
> Because I like the old flat style, not this Mac-like login screen :)
I haven't seen Debian's login screen but I assume that you mean that
you don't want the latest GNOME's gdm user list.
Ubuntu way:
sudo -u gdm gconftool-2 /apps/gdm/simple-gr
Because I like the old flat style, not this Mac-like login screen :)
Dne, 29. 09. 2009 16:38:40 je Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. napisal(a):
> What version of Debian are you running? If you are as "noob" as you
> say, you
> should be running Lenny. Until you are more comfortable with
> administering a
> Debian machine, running anything else is asking for trouble.
> -
1 - 100 of 384 matches
Mail list logo
