Hi,
Thank you, David, for all the information.
Scanning all these DOT files and checking what sort of documentation user/admin
can easily get for them are steps in my process.
I already started checking about the .SEQ file you cited for instance.
Debian Code Search is very helpful.
On the other
On Sun 16 May 2021 at 20:30:03 (+0200), Patrice Duroux wrote:
>
> 2. After this I was curious about the overall content of all the packages
> on any dot files (including directories). For that I used the following to
> 2 commands:
> # the packages concerned
> apt-file --fil
; May be user would be able to select their targets.
>
> 2. After this I was curious about the overall content of all the packages
> on any dot files (including directories). For that I used the following to
> 2 commands:
> # the packages concerned
> apt-file --filter-origins Debian
Search, (also Debian Wiki?) that would provide at least links if
topics are found in each of them.
May be user would be able to select their targets.
2. After this I was curious about the overall content of all the packages
on any dot files (including directories). For that I used the following
On Thursday 16 August 2018 12:46:30 cyaiplexys wrote:
> On 08/16/2018 11:21 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:19:29AM -0400, cyaiplexys wrote:
> >> I actually have several accounts which I want to back up but not
> >> include all the dot files.
On 08/16/2018 11:21 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:19:29AM -0400, cyaiplexys wrote:
I actually have several accounts which I want to back up but not include all
the dot files. It would be too much to go into each account and run a
script. I would like to do it from one
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 04:37:47PM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> $ find /home/me/dirToARchive -print -depth | grep -v -x -f
> paths-to-exclude.txt | cpio -o -H ustar | gz > archive.tar.gz
>
> cpio takes a list of filenames to archive on stdin, so we use find to list
> what we want, then filter that
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:40:14AM -0400, cyaiplexys wrote:
I'm trying to make a gzipped tarball. I want to exclude only a certain
list of dot files but NOT ALL dot files (in other words tar the other
dot files not on the list).
I have (this is just an example):
tar -czf archive.tgz /ho
On 08/16/2018 11:21 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:19:29AM -0400, cyaiplexys wrote:
I actually have several accounts which I want to back up but not include all
the dot files. It would be too much to go into each account and run a
script. I would like to do it from one
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 11:19:29AM -0400, cyaiplexys wrote:
> I actually have several accounts which I want to back up but not include all
> the dot files. It would be too much to go into each account and run a
> script. I would like to do it from one account.
Then do it from /home.
collision between the auto-stripping of
the leading slashes, and your --exclude patterns which still have those
leading slashes on them.
I actually have several accounts which I want to back up but not include
all the dot files. It would be too much to go into each account and run
a script. I wou
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:40:14AM -0400, cyaiplexys wrote:
> tar -czf archive.tgz /home/me/dirToARchive/.
> --exclude=/home/me/dirToARchive/.mysetuptemp
> --exclude=/home/me/dirToARchive/.myotherdotfile
> --exclude=/home/me/dirToARchive/.anotherdotfile
>
> I found it doesn't matter if I put the -
I'm trying to make a gzipped tarball. I want to exclude only a certain
list of dot files but NOT ALL dot files (in other words tar the other
dot files not on the list).
I have (this is just an example):
tar -czf archive.tgz /home/me/dirToARchive/.
--exclude=/home/me/dirToARchive/.mysetu
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 06:37:44PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Thanks. That is really interesting - I love linguistics and etymology. But
> this is an English language list. ;-)
>
> Lisi
Well, when you pop an 'outlandish' bottle,
the outcoming (imp) might not comply with 'inlandish' rules.. ;-)
Am 17.07.2013 um 06:24 schrieb Doug:
Doggpne! Just when I begin to think my German is not bad, something
like
this comes along! (It's not the first time. Quite some years ago I
was
sent to Germany on business, to Stuttgart.
Schwäbisch, Suabian
Listening to the people in
that area speak
On Wednesday 17 July 2013 16:12:58 Wilko Fokken wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:18:33AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 03:13 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > PPS: "Guten Tag miteinander!" or "Hallo miteinander!" or "Hallo
> > > zusammen!"
> > >
> > > Resp. "Moin" is indepe
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:18:33AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 03:13 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > PPS: "Guten Tag miteinander!" or "Hallo miteinander!" or "Hallo zusammen!"
> >
> > Resp. "Moin" is independent of the daytime, so it's the German "Hallo",
>
> Aaaarghhh, my b
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 06:24:46 +0200, Doug wrote:
Doggpne! Just when I begin to think my German is not bad, something like
this comes along! (It's not the first time. Quite some years ago I was
sent to Germany on business, to Stuttgart. Listening to the people in
that area speak among themselves,
On 07/16/2013 09:07 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 02:42 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 23:36 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>>> On Thursday 11 July 2013 06:12:35 Wilko Fokken wrote:
Moin mitnanner,
>>>
>>> Could some kind person please translate this for me?
>>
On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 03:13 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> PPS: "Guten Tag miteinander!" or "Hallo miteinander!" or "Hallo zusammen!"
>
> Resp. "Moin" is independent of the daytime, so it's the German "Hallo",
Aaaarghhh, my broken English sucks.
Not "Hallo" is misinterpreted, but "Moin".
> someti
PPS: "Guten Tag miteinander!" or "Hallo miteinander!" or "Hallo zusammen!"
Resp. "Moin" is independent of the daytime, so it's the German "Hallo",
sometimes misinterpreted for "Guten Morgen" (Good morning!) only, but
it's for "Guten Tag" (Good day!) and "Guten Abend!" (Good evening!) etc.
too.
-
On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 02:42 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 23:36 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 July 2013 06:12:35 Wilko Fokken wrote:
> > > Moin mitnanner,
> >
> > Could some kind person please translate this for me?
> > (although it looks German to me)
>
> It is
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 23:36 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Thursday 11 July 2013 06:12:35 Wilko Fokken wrote:
> > Moin mitnanner,
>
> Could some kind person please translate this for me?
> (although it looks German to me)
It is German.
"Moin" is for "Hello".
"mitnanner" is for "everyone", from t
On Thursday 11 July 2013 06:12:35 Wilko Fokken wrote:
> Moin mitnanner,
Could some kind person please translate this for me? I have Googled for a
translation, but apart from a suggestion that it was probably Finnish
(although it looks German to me), I am none the wiser. I tried Wiktionary,
bu
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 08:05:51PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 11. Juli 2013, 09:55:20 schrieb Andrei POPESCU:
> > > append command:"cd"to .profile
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 3. Modify /etc/passwd: login_dir ==> /home//.rc
> >
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 08:05:51PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 11. Juli 2013, 09:55:20 schrieb Andrei POPESCU:
> > > append command:"cd"to .profile
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 3. Modify /etc/passwd: login_dir ==> /home//.rc
> >
Am Donnerstag, 11. Juli 2013, 09:55:20 schrieb Andrei POPESCU:
> > append command:"cd"to .profile
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 3. Modify /etc/passwd: login_dir ==> /home//.rc
> > ==
> >
> > exam
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 09:55:20AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Jo, 11 iul 13, 07:12:35, Wilko Fokken wrote:
> >
> > The following lines explain, what should be done in order to get the dot
> > files out of the way into a subdirectory.
>
> You included lots of un
On Jo, 11 iul 13, 07:12:35, Wilko Fokken wrote:
>
> The following lines explain, what should be done in order to get the dot
> files out of the way into a subdirectory.
You included lots of unrelated customizations, see below.
> The dot files of root go into subdir "/root/&q
ne cares to do the
> same with the conf files *for users*.
> ...or is it just me?
>
Moin mitnanner,
(To ha: My dot files aint collected into one file, but into one subdir)
(Sorry that this post got a bit lenghty, but the bulk of it is comments
and explanations.)
The following lines e
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 22:13 -0400, david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote:
> i would expect
>
> $ HOME=/mnt/music gedit
>
> to do what you want.
And you are right :). Thank you!
$ echo $HOME
/home/rocketmouse
$ HOME=/mnt/music gedit
$ echo $HOME
/home/rocketmouse
$ ls -hAl /mnt/music/ | grep
hi ralf.
On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 04:44 -0400, shawn wilson wrote:
You could probably do:
su -l $USER HOME=$HOME/$app $app
Hi Shawn,
that's great, thank you very much! I can add this to my next audio
session scripts, so no searching for hidden configs an
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 04:55:55PM +0200, ha wrote:
> Thanks Ralph, I guess it would do it.
> But I didn't plan to separate the conf files completely, I was hoping
> for a solution more alike Wilko's (if it works).
Moin mitnanner,
my solutions via shellscripts work pretty well since about ten
On 07/09/2013 03:53 PM, ha wrote:
On 07/09/2013 12:24 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
su -l $USER HOME=$HOME/$app $app
...
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ su -l $USER HOME=/mnt/music/ gedit
Am I reading this correctly? Shouldn't it be:
su -l $USER HOME=/mnt/music/gedit gedit
No. This doesn't make sense
On 07/09/2013 12:24 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
su -l $USER HOME=$HOME/$app $app
...
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ su -l $USER HOME=/mnt/music/ gedit
Am I reading this correctly? Shouldn't it be:
su -l $USER HOME=/mnt/music/gedit gedit
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.o
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 04:44 -0400, shawn wilson wrote:
> You could probably do:
> su -l $USER HOME=$HOME/$app $app
Hi Shawn,
that's great, thank you very much! I can add this to my next audio
session scripts, so no searching for hidden configs anymore, for apps
that don't allow to set a path by t
> > its been unmaintained for years now. Someone forked it, though, and
> > people on the Arch forums seem to have it working:
> >
> > https://github.com/sloonz/rewritefs
> >
> > I've never used it before.
>
> Interesting, when I make music I wo
thub.com/sloonz/rewritefs
>
> I've never used it before.
Interesting, when I make music I would like to have the dot files that
usually should be in /home, in a music production directory, because the
configurations do change for different audio productions and I want to
be able to resto
On 2013-07-08, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:55 AM, ha wrote:
> > Thanks Ralph, I guess it would do it.
> > But I didn't plan to separate the conf files completely, I was hoping for a
> > solution more alike Wilko's (if it works).
> > After all we all have .config file in our hom
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 7:55 AM, ha wrote:
> Thanks Ralph, I guess it would do it.
> But I didn't plan to separate the conf files completely, I was hoping for a
> solution more alike Wilko's (if it works).
> After all we all have .config file in our home directory.
> It makes sense that all applica
13 03:04 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 14:44 +0200, ha wrote:
Would you care to explain how to accomplish that setup?
It would be nice to have only one file that contains configuration (like
etc/, let's say .conf/) and not to have to search trough two dozens of
dot files eve
and not to have to search trough two dozens of
> > dot files every time I click on the "Browse" button in whatever
> > application - just to find documents/ work/ or data/ directory...
>
> An example for a user that doesn't have the home in /home:
>
> [rocketm
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 14:44 +0200, ha wrote:
> Would you care to explain how to accomplish that setup?
> It would be nice to have only one file that contains configuration (like
> etc/, let's say .conf/) and not to have to search trough two dozens of
> dot files every time I cli
Would you care to explain how to accomplish that setup?
It would be nice to have only one file that contains configuration (like
etc/, let's say .conf/) and not to have to search trough two dozens of
dot files every time I click on the "Browse" button in whatever
application
On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:42:55 +0200
Wilko Fokken wrote:
Hello Wilko,
>As a (private) text prone Debian user, I like having my dot files
>out of the way and not stumbling between my working files.
What dot files? Ones you've created, or those that are generated by
apps you use?
If
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 12:57 +0100, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> So, leave them in $HOME, and create directories such as $HOME/work;
> $HOME/documents
Or even keep the hidden files in $HOME but instead of adding $HOME/work,
HOME/documents, add /home/work, /home/documents or /mnt/work etc..
FWIW I've
On 08/07/13 11:42, Wilko Fokken wrote:
> Moin mitnanner,
>
> As a (private) text prone Debian user, I like having my dot files
> out of the way and not stumbling between my working files.
>
> On the other hand, I dislike hiding them by file managers,
> because I want to d
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 12:42:55PM +0200, Wilko Fokken wrote:
> Moin mitnanner,
>
> As a (private) text prone Debian user, I like having my dot files
> out of the way and not stumbling between my working files.
>
> On the other hand, I dislike hiding them by file managers,
&
Moin mitnanner,
As a (private) text prone Debian user, I like having my dot files
out of the way and not stumbling between my working files.
On the other hand, I dislike hiding them by file managers,
because I want to discover them early at possibly wrong places.
So, by fumbling and messing
With LVM you could put anything on logical partitions which can be
created/increased/decreased/dropped as necessary.
You need a small separate boot partition, which can be shared between
both systems.
You might want to create a swap partition, which also is shared, maybe a
separate partiti
ormal data files will be in the data (or
"documents") partition, the /home directories will exist on their
own partitions just to keep the dot files there. This way, I
think that the two Lennys can share data, but not have problems
with conflicting configuration files. It will also ea
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 13:35 -0400, Craig M. Houck wrote:
> We are using NIS/NFS to allow uses to login to a Debian desktop machine
> that connects them to there Sun Solaris work space. We would like to direct
> the many .dot files that are written to be directed to a sub-directory to
&
We are using NIS/NFS to allow uses to login to a Debian desktop machine
that connects them to there Sun Solaris work space. We would like to direct
the many .dot files that are written to be directed to a sub-directory to
stop any interferance with pre-existing/duplicated files that are created
Hi All
System on unstable here; Gnome; openoffice.org1.1.1;
I can't load dot files in Open Office:
In /usr/bin/oowriter I click 'File' --> Open.
The GUI that's then presented to me let's me access the files in my
~/HOME directory, except the dot files being in th
Alan Shutko wrote:
> Tim writes:
> > I'm using ftp or lftp, and find a file called (eg) .nfs80301.
>
> Some process has an open handle to the file over NFS.
>
> When you have a program with a file open over NFS, but delete the
> file (over nfs) the file is renamed as you see it. When the process
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I can't find the command to delete a file on the remote server. My
ultimate goal is to delete the directory it is contained in.
I'm using ftp or lftp, and find a file called (eg) .nfs80301.
rmdir -f and rm -f both fail. If I delete the offending
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
| On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:09:07AM +0100, Tim wrote:
|
| | rmdir -f and rm -f both fail. If I delete the offending file, a new one
| | takes its place, named (eg) .nfs90301.
| |
| | Any suggestions?
|
| Find out what is c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob Proulx wrote:
| Even though you cannot remove the file it is possible to move the file
| around. You can 'mv .nfs* ../' for example to get the files up a
| level. That empties the directory and would allow you to remove a
| directory for example.
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:09:07AM +0100, Tim wrote:
| rmdir -f and rm -f both fail. If I delete the offending file, a new one
| takes its place, named (eg) .nfs90301.
|
| Any suggestions?
Find out what is creating the file, and solve the real issue.
I know it is related to NFS and locking or
Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm using ftp or lftp, and find a file called (eg) .nfs80301.
Some process has an open handle to the file over NFS.
When you have a program with a file open over NFS, but delete the
file (over nfs) the file is renamed as you see it. When the process
closes, the
> >ls -Ald ~/.??* | grep '^-' | sed 's/^\([^ ]*[ ]*\)\{8,8\}\([^ ]*\)/\2/'
>
> ls -Ald ~/.[^.]* | grep '^-' | tr -s ' ' | cut -d' ' -f9
> It is not that much shorter, but it sure is prettier at least to my eyes. :)
Or if we are just trying to have fun with one line scripting...
for i in $(echo
> >To ignore . and .., use -A (almost all). I also figured that
> >directories weren't needed, so grepped for regular files. Then used sed
> >to print only the 9th word.
> >
> >ls -Ald ~/.??* | grep '^-' | sed 's/^\([^ ]*[ ]*\)\{8,8\}\([^ ]*\)/\2/'
>
> ls -Ald ~/.[^.]* | grep '^-' | tr -s ' ' |
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 07:56:16PM -0400, Brian Nelson wrote:
| Derrick 'dman' Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Henning, Brian wrote:
| > | hello all-
| > | I have the task of moving all my hidden files to another
| > | directory. how can i select onl
Gary Turner wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 12:23:44 -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Henning, Brian wrote:
| hello all-
| I have the task of moving all my hidden files to another directory. how can
| i select only these files and not the standard file
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 12:23:44 -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Henning, Brian wrote:
>| hello all-
>| I have the task of moving all my hidden files to another directory. how can
>| i select only these files and not the standard files.
>|
>| ls .* doesn
> > > ls -ad ~/.[^.]*
This is one of the FAQs in fileutils. Check it out!
http://www.gnu.org/software/fileutils/doc/faq/#ls%20-a%20*%20does%20not%20list%20dot%20files
Bob
pgpTmwImw1vEO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Derrick 'dman' Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Henning, Brian wrote:
> | hello all-
> | I have the task of moving all my hidden files to another directory. how can
> | i select only these files and not the standard files.
> |
> | ls .* doesn't seem t
* Steve Juranich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020628 10:49]:
> > ls -ad ~/.[^.]*
>
> I prefer:
>
> ls -ad ~/.??*
>
>
> Many less keystrokes, but to each his own.
... but not quite the same effect. This shell glob won't catch a file
called, say .g -- it requires 2 characters after the '.' . That's
prob
On 28 Jun 2002, Steve Juranich wrote:
> > ls -ad ~/.[^.]*
>
> I prefer:
>
> ls -ad ~/.??*
>
>
> Many less keystrokes, but to each his own.
>
Midnight Commander is good for this sort of thing.
AC
--
Anthony Campbell - running Linux GNU/Debian (Windows-free zone)
For electronic books on the
> ls -ad ~/.[^.]*
I prefer:
ls -ad ~/.??*
Many less keystrokes, but to each his own.
--
Stephen W. Juranich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Electrical Engineering http://students.washington.edu/sj
On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Henning, Brian wrote:
| hello all-
| I have the task of moving all my hidden files to another directory. how can
| i select only these files and not the standard files.
|
| ls .* doesn't seem to work.
It does (but without "-a" you won't see them), but it
"Henning, Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have the task of moving all my hidden files to another directory. how can
> i select only these files and not the standard files.
>
> ls .* doesn't seem to work.
Really? It does for me (or at least 'ls -d .*'). 'ls -a' will list
all files, even if
On 28-Jun-2002 Henning, Brian wrote:
> hello all-
> I have the task of moving all my hidden files to another directory. how can
> i select only these files and not the standard files.
>
> ls .* doesn't seem to work.
>
try:
find . -name ".*" -print
and go from there.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
hello all-
I have the task of moving all my hidden files to another directory. how can
i select only these files and not the standard files.
ls .* doesn't seem to work.
thanks,
brian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
Alexander Kushnirenko wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> It's a little bit off-topic.
>
> We have a set of Debian computers, which are not quite the same. It would be
> useful to synchronize certain files on all nodes like /etc/profile or
> /etc/X11/Xresources, or /etc/menu and so on. But of course not all t
course not all the files.
>
> Reflection of this problem is synchronization of user's .dot-files on
> different nodes.
Are the machines networked? If so, why would user have different
startup files on different nodes? Don't you have each user's home
directory availab
nodes like /etc/profile or
> /etc/X11/Xresources, or /etc/menu and so on. But of course not all the files.
>
> Reflection of this problem is synchronization of user's .dot-files on
> different nodes.
>
> Would CVS be an appropriate tool for that purpose? Or is there better one
> tool?
>
> Thanks,
> Sasha.
>
em is synchronization of user's .dot-files on
different nodes.
Would CVS be an appropriate tool for that purpose? Or is there better one
tool?
Thanks,
Sasha.
If you must get gimp to show a dotfile (or directory) just type '.' in
the file blank and hit 'tab'. GIMP (and all GTK apps) work like bash
does. Tab gives file completion.
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
On Fri, 24 Jul 1998, Shaleh wrote:
> What dotfiles should GIMP be seeing?
.directories
> As for a book, there a lots of good UNIX books. Any "Teach yourself
> UNIX" type book will work. Linux is fairly standardized. Also, Debian
> is working on some new user docs. Might want to subscribe to
On Fri, 24 Jul 1998, Will Lowe wrote:
> > How can I make GIMP show dotfiles?
> I think this is a gtk-wide thing ... not sure how to go about fix it, but
> all my gtk-using apps don't show dotfiles.
>
> > I should get a book can someone recommend a good one? Not linux for
> > dummies please.
> I
> What dotfiles should GIMP be seeing?
The gtk file selection dialogs don't show _any_ file or directory that
starts with a dot, in any gtk-enabled app.
Will
--
|
What dotfiles should GIMP be seeing?
As for a book, there a lots of good UNIX books. Any "Teach yourself
UNIX" type book will work. Linux is fairly standardized. Also, Debian
is working on some new user docs. Might want to subscribe to
debian-docs and see what they have to say. The /usr/doc/H
> How can I make GIMP show dotfiles?
I think this is a gtk-wide thing ... not sure how to go about fix it, but
all my gtk-using apps don't show dotfiles.
> I should get a book can someone recommend a good one? Not linux for
> dummies please.
If you're not a unix person, try "Running Linux" by M
How can I make GIMP show dotfiles?
Thanks.
P.S.
I should get a book can someone recommend a good one? Not linux for
dummies please.
/\ Richard L. Alhama, Technical Support
/ \--,
.o` /=
85 matches
Mail list logo
