Re: documentation was Re: Worked around (dirty...)

2003-07-03 Thread Kevin Mark
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 01:16, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:06:57PM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: > > Basically the submission process for the LDP goes like this: > > I forgot step zero: subscribe to the discuss mailing list. Which is where > you present the idea you're thin

Re: documentation was Re: Worked around (dirty...)

2003-07-02 Thread Emma Jane Hogbin
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 08:06:57PM -0400, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote: > Basically the submission process for the LDP goes like this: I forgot step zero: subscribe to the discuss mailing list. Which is where you present the idea you're thinking about writing and where you get your feedback from. Puttin

documentation was Re: Worked around (dirty...)

2003-07-02 Thread Emma Jane Hogbin
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 03:18:07PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > a recent discussion on another list I am on mentioned frustrations at > the LDP for many of the same reasons: converting it to the 'not simple > for beginners format' Docbook - which they said the LDP did not provide > an 'example' to ge