On 6/24/20, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> If you want to match N files against M strings (or regexes) and collate
> them into groups according to which string is first seen in each file,
> use a real programming language.
Oh, well! I was just too hopeful.
> Stop trying to use inappropriate tools. Yo
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:59:03PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:33:19PM +0200, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> > > "grep -l" will stop at the first hit, so even if you could ask
> > > grep which one of the alternatives it found, it'll miss Hegel
> > > in a file where Kant f
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 12:33:19PM +0200, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> > "grep -l" will stop at the first hit, so even if you could ask
> > grep which one of the alternatives it found, it'll miss Hegel
> > in a file where Kant figures first. Is that what you want?
>
> Yes, I am fine with that. I inc
> "grep -l" will stop at the first hit, so even if you could ask
> grep which one of the alternatives it found, it'll miss Hegel
> in a file where Kant figures first. Is that what you want?
Yes, I am fine with that. I include the matches in the Array in a way
that the first one is the most import
Many wonderful comments have already been given. Here are some nitpicks
that will no longer matter once you stop writing this program in bash,
which is a poor choice for this particular job.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 12:20:41PM +0200, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> for iZ in ${!_AR_TERMS[@]}; do
The qu
davidson wrote:
> -o -name "*.[Tt][Xx][Tt]"
or use: -iname "*.txt"
Regards,
Klaus.
--
Klaus Singvogel
GnuPG-Key-ID: 1024R/5068792D 1994-06-27
On Sat, 20 Jun 2020, davidson wrote:
Gah.
$ find . -type f \
\( -name "*.[Hh][Tt][Mm][Ll]" -o -name "[Tt][Xx][Tt]" \) \
-o -name "*.[Tt][Xx][Tt]"
--
@almightygenie 8 Jun 2020 | @Windex
Thanks, Windex. That's a relief. Your drink is even more refreshing
now that I know that it deplores
On Sat, 20 Jun 2020, Albretch Mueller wrote:
_X=".\(html\|txt\)"
_SDIR="$(pwd)"
_AR_TERMS=(
Kant
"Gilbert Ryle"
Hegel
)
for iZ in ${!_AR_TERMS[@]}; do
find "${_SDIR}" -type f -iregex .*"${_X}" -exec grep -il
"${_AR_TERMS[$iZ]}" {} \;
done # iZ: terms search/grep'ped inside text files; echo
On 2020-06-20 03:20, Albretch Mueller wrote:
_X=".\(html\|txt\)"
_SDIR="$(pwd)"
_AR_TERMS=(
Kant
"Gilbert Ryle"
Hegel
)
for iZ in ${!_AR_TERMS[@]}; do
find "${_SDIR}" -type f -iregex .*"${_X}" -exec grep -il
"${_AR_TERMS[$iZ]}" {} \;
done # iZ: terms search/grep'ped inside text files; echo "
On Sat 20 Jun 2020 at 12:20:41 (+0200), Albretch Mueller wrote:
> _X=".\(html\|txt\)"
> _SDIR="$(pwd)"
>
> _AR_TERMS=(
> Kant
> "Gilbert Ryle"
> Hegel
> )
>
> for iZ in ${!_AR_TERMS[@]}; do
> find "${_SDIR}" -type f -iregex .*"${_X}" -exec grep -il
> "${_AR_TERMS[$iZ]}" {} \;
> done # iZ: terms
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 12:20:41PM +0200, Albretch Mueller wrote:
> _X=".\(html\|txt\)"
> _SDIR="$(pwd)"
>
> _AR_TERMS=(
> Kant
> "Gilbert Ryle"
> Hegel
> )
>
> for iZ in ${!_AR_TERMS[@]}; do
> find "${_SDIR}" -type f -iregex .*"${_X}" -exec grep -il
> "${_AR_TERMS[$iZ]}" {} \;
> done # iZ: term
_X=".\(html\|txt\)"
_SDIR="$(pwd)"
_AR_TERMS=(
Kant
"Gilbert Ryle"
Hegel
)
for iZ in ${!_AR_TERMS[@]}; do
find "${_SDIR}" -type f -iregex .*"${_X}" -exec grep -il
"${_AR_TERMS[$iZ]}" {} \;
done # iZ: terms search/grep'ped inside text files; echo "~";
# this would be much faster
find "${_SDIR
On 26/4/16 13:09, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
I've meant to say that as far as I know Windows would not be able to run
keyboard connected so wrongly at all. Even if, like in my case,
motherboard survived such a bad treatment.
For what it's worth, Windows doesn't care either. If I'm not mistaken,
It's my understanding Linux ignores bios entirely and gets its work done
by other means. On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 21:26:05
From: Juan R. de Silva
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: OT: what do you know about Linux?
Resent-Date: Tue, 2
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 21:46:22 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> Juan R. de Silva composed on 2016-04-26 01:26 (UTC):
>
>> On my desktop I still use and old keyboard with PS/2 connector.
>> My mouse an USB one, so the mouse PS/2 port on motherboard remains
>> free.
>
>> A couple of days ago I had to rec
Juan R. de Silva composed on 2016-04-26 01:26 (UTC):
On my desktop I still use and old keyboard with PS/2 connector.
My mouse an USB one, so the mouse PS/2 port on motherboard remains free.
A couple of days ago I had to reconnect my keyboard to motherboard. I was
doing it in hurry and in the
On my desktop I still use and old keyboard with PS/2 connector.
My mouse an USB one, so the mouse PS/2 port on motherboard remains free.
A couple of days ago I had to reconnect my keyboard to motherboard. I was
doing it in hurry and in the dark, just to the touch.
A day later while restarting t
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:29:57 +0200
Aioanei Rares wrote:
> >>
> >> I would like to propose that you have a look at
> >>
> >> http://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/
> >>
> >> and consider contributing.
> >>
> > Good idea. In fact, I have written a pretty complete page about my
> > experi
The Eclectic One wrote:
Hi!
There is a new release (hooray for lenny ;), and I am
sure there will be several user doing a fresh install on their
laptops.
I would like to propose that you have a look at
http://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/
and consider contributing.
...
>Hi!
>
>There is a new release (hooray for lenny ;), and I am
>sure there will be several user doing a fresh install on their
>laptops.
>
>I would like to propose that you have a look at
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/
>
>and consider contributing.
>...
>It won't take you long,
Hi!
There is a new release (hooray for lenny ;), and I am
sure there will be several user doing a fresh install on their
laptops.
I would like to propose that you have a look at
http://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/
and consider contributing.
,[ Quote ]
| DebianOn is an effort to d
RADUIS can be implemented on most distro's (if not all)..
- Original Message -
From: Maurice O'Regan
To: Debian-Users
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 3:47 PM
Subject: do you know about REALMS ?
I have a requirement to implement REALMS in a large network.
Could a Debian box be
I have a requirement to implement REALMS in a large network.
Could a Debian box be used as a realm 'router' ?
maurice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:18:38AM +0800, csj wrote:
> At Wed, 1 Oct 2003 05:09:56 +0100, Pigeon wrote:
> > ISTR from http://www.ftdi.com - who make USB-to-some-easier-format
> > conversion chips - the answer is 'something straightforward'. Long
> > time since I looked at the site though. Chances a
At Wed, 1 Oct 2003 05:09:56 +0100,
Pigeon wrote:
[...]
> > How would Linux recognize it? What would be the modem port?
>
> ISTR from http://www.ftdi.com - who make USB-to-some-easier-format
> conversion chips - the answer is 'something straightforward'. Long
> time since I looked at the site th
On Sunday 28 September 2003 02:35 pm, alex wrote:
> Suppose someone wants to put together or buy a computer ---something
> that is fully compatible with Linux.no makedo patches such as
> for winmodems or other components, etc---how can you make sure
> you're getting what you want?
Nobody m
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 06:40:07AM +0800, csj wrote:
> At Tue, 30 Sep 2003 14:53:43 +0100, Pigeon wrote:
> > A point about USB and modems is that USB is fast enough to make it
> > possible to implement an external winmodem. It may well be
> > safer/cheaper to use an RS232 modem with an RS232-to-USB
on Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 06:23:47PM -0500, Kent West ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> alex wrote:
>
> >Suppose someone wants to put together or buy a computer ---something
> >that is fully compatible with Linux.no makedo patches such as for
> >winmodems or other components, etc---how can you mak
on Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 09:27:38AM +0200, Michael Schulz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > No offense, but while I find that companies like HP, Dell, IBM, and
> > other major vendors are more than happy to sell servers and
> > workstations with Linux, the laptop support absolutely sucks.
>
> You hav
csj writes:
> The only question should be the kernel version. The NDA-conscious
> manufacturer could always code for the latest stable versions of the
> kernel.org kernel (the plain, unpatched, official Linus Torvalds vanilla
> version of Linux).
True for kernel modules and the rare userland prog
At Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:25:01 -0400,
Daniel B. wrote:
>
> Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> >
> > alex wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > > Is there something that prevents manufacturers from clearly
> > > stating that a product is fully suitable for Linux? It's
> > > done for MS Windows. Is this some kind of legal
At Tue, 30 Sep 2003 14:53:43 +0100,
Pigeon wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:11:04AM +0800, csj wrote:
> > At Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:43:35 -0800, Greg Madden wrote:
> > > As with most questions, ask google. There are numerous sites
> > > and hardware compatability lists that have been created. It
Roberto Sanchez wrote:
>
> alex wrote:
> ...
>
> > Is there something that prevents manufacturers from clearly stating that
> > a product is fully suitable for Linux? It's done for MS Windows. Is
> > this some kind of legal or technical issue, or is it some kind of
> > 'business arrangement'?
>
Pigeon said on Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 02:53:43PM +0100:
> A point about USB and modems is that USB is fast enough to make it
> possible to implement an external winmodem. It may well be
> safer/cheaper to use an RS232 modem with an RS232-to-USB converter.
> (having found one of those that's supported
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:11:04AM +0800, csj wrote:
> At Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:43:35 -0800, Greg Madden wrote:
> > As with most questions, ask google. There are numerous sites
> > and hardware compatability lists that have been created. It is
> > a good idea to check the hw compatability lists first
Here are all the details.
In regional Australia, we encounter problems that our city counterparts never
experience. If a phone line happens to go over an electric fence and that
fence gets turned on, it creates an electric field and everybody drops a
connection except me. I've had one of these f
s
> modems go, anything with a Lucent chip or a Rockwell 56K chip
> works well. There are plenty of other options. If you want to
> go into the initial setup/config, the distribution will even
> tell you which ones it is compatible with.
Yes. But how do you know what chipset it has?
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, csj wrote:
> PS/2 keyboards. A case in point: I'm trying to google for
> Linux-compatible USB modems (dialup). The only recommendations I
experience says a modem is linux compatible if it has a
uart chip on it if it doesn't have uart chip on the modem
card or o
Quote/This will only work for expensive or really dumb products like
PS/2 keyboards. A case in point: I'm trying to google for
Linux-compatible USB modems (dialup). The only recommendations I
could find are for the ultra-expensive USR modems. With one or
two exceptions, I couldn't find any Linu
At Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:43:35 -0800,
Greg Madden wrote:
>
> On Sunday 28 September 2003 11:35 am, alex wrote:
[...]
> > What are the indicators that will tell us whether the
> > components are fully Linux compatible, whether they are part
> > of a ready to run Windows computer, a systemless compu
Hi,
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
> Not to shoot the messenger, but this is what I found:
>
> http://h10018.www1.hp.com/wwsolutions/linux/products/clients/clientscert.html
>
>
> Red Hat SuSE
> laptops 7.3 7.2 7.1 8.0 7.3
Michael Schulz wrote:
we (HP) do this with Workstations, Business PCs and Laptops. You just
should consult the vendors website (in our case www.hp.com/linux) to
see if the system is supported (means working with Linux).
Of course this isn't valid for every vendor :(. I would also like that
to be s
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, alex wrote:
> Not exactly a Debian only topic but where else is the degree of
> experience and expertise available besides this Debian list?
>
> Suppose someone wants to put together or buy a computer ---something
> that is fully compatible with Linux.no makedo patches s
alex wrote:
Not exactly a Debian only topic but where else is the degree of
experience and expertise available besides this Debian list?
Suppose someone wants to put together or buy a computer ---something
that is fully compatible with Linux.no makedo patches such as for
winmodems or other
hi alex
> alex wrote:
>
> > Suppose someone wants to put together or buy a computer ---something
> > that is fully compatible with Linux.no makedo patches such as for
> > winmodems or other components, etc---how can you make sure you're
> > getting what you want?
experience and tak
alex wrote:
Not exactly a Debian only topic but where else is the degree of
experience and expertise available besides this Debian list?
Suppose someone wants to put together or buy a computer ---something
that is fully compatible with Linux.no makedo patches such as for
winmodems or other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 28 September 2003 11:35 am, alex wrote:
> Not exactly a Debian only topic but where else is the degree of
> experience and expertise available besides this Debian list?
>
> Suppose someone wants to put together or buy a computer ---something
Hi
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 21:35, alex wrote:
> Is there something that prevents manufacturers from clearly stating
> that a product is fully suitable for Linux? It's done for MS
> Windows. Is this some kind of legal or technical issue, or is it
> some kind of 'business arrangement'?
>
we (H
Not exactly a Debian only topic but where else is the degree of
experience and expertise available besides this Debian list?
Suppose someone wants to put together or buy a computer ---something
that is fully compatible with Linux.no makedo patches such as
for winmodems or other components,
Pierre Blomdahl wrote:
>
> ...wich manufactures who delievered the AGP-7410 VGA card?
>
www.dfi.com
joerg
--
Did you know that if you play a Windows 2000 cd backwards, you
will hear the voice of Satan?
That's nothing! If you play it forward, it'll install Windows 2000.
...wich manufactures who delievered the AGP-7410 VGA card?
Med vänliga hälsningar/Best regards
Pierre Blomdahl
PC AddOn AB
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tlf: +46 (0)8 590 940 15
fax: +46 (0)8 590 940 12
mob: +46 (0)70 31 999 58
www.pcaddon.se
Roderick Cummings wrote:
>
> >From: ktb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> >Subject: Re: do you know any free proxy server?
> >Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 17:44:07 -0500
> >
> >On Sun, Jun 10
Go to www.DeleGate.org
I am sure there are better proxies if you want to install on Linux, but this
supports both Linux and Windows.
Personally I am using it on my wife's Windows computer which is connected to
the Internet. It is providing access to my Linux laptop.
- mike
From: ktb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: do you know any free proxy server?
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 17:44:07 -0500
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 06:21:30AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm assuming www -
squid
You c
I mean those Internet sites, not proxy server software.
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 06:21:30AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm assuming www -
squid
You could easily search yourself at -
http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages
Search for "proxy" and select "Descriptions"
hth,
kent
--
From seeing and seeing the seeing has become so exhausted
Fir
Mathias wrote:
When I dpkg -i kernel-image242.deb
I got error about depmod : Unresolved symbol
Do you know how to fix that?
Hi Eric! This error means that depmod is not shure whether it can use this
symbol (part of a module like parameters). It can have much causes. I think
you should
> When I dpkg -i kernel-image242.deb
> I got error about depmod : Unresolved symbol
>
> Do you know how to fix that?
Hi Eric! This error means that depmod is not shure whether it can use this
symbol (part of a module like parameters). It can have much causes. I think
you should
Dear Ethan or any experieced debian linux user:
When I dpkg -i kernel-image242.deb
I got error about depmod : Unresolved symbol
Do you know how to fix that?
highly appreciate your tech help
sincere
eric ( I am in 2.2.18)
60 matches
Mail list logo
