Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:27:54 + Magnus Therning
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:13:51AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:59:08 +0100 Florian Kulzer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
I wo
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 08:47:01AM +1100, Star King of the Grape Trees wrote:
>Magnus Therning wrote:
>
>>On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:39:01AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>>
>>> Where is the list of installed packages kept on
>>>these systems, if I can store a list I can make a script out of it and
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:27:54 +
Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:13:51AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:59:08 +0100
> >Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Joey Hess wrote:
> >> > Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>I
Magnus Therning wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:39:01AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
Where is the list of installed packages kept on
these systems, if I can store a list I can make a script out of it and
more quickly return to where I was if a cd reinstall is necessary using
that script to
At 1142354731, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> If not, this is a good time to make coffee unless your
> internet connection is based on *insert super fast
> technology that is used by no debian mirror here*
My commercial ISP hosts a debian mirror so I get blazing
speeds at home: and I work at a UK Univ
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:39:01AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>First thanks much for the steps for doing this upgrade. So far as I
>can tell, it's not possible to rebuild gnome with all the accessibility
>bits included without first being on an unstable distro first. Second
>the Xwindows interfa
Jude DaShiell wrote:
[...]
Where is the list of installed packages kept on
these systems, if I can store a list I can make a script out of it and
more quickly return to where I was if a cd reinstall is necessary using
that script to download the missing packages? I think
First thanks much for the steps for doing this upgrade. So far as I can
tell, it's not possible to rebuild gnome with all the accessibility bits
included without first being on an unstable distro first. Second the
Xwindows interface once I get it talking may enable multimedia access
conssole
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:13:51AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:59:08 +0100
>Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Joey Hess wrote:
>> > Florian Kulzer wrote:
>> >
>> >>I would go so far as to say that "Debian Unstable" is an oxymoron.
>> >
>> >
>> > From WordNet
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:45:31 +0100
Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
because SID breakes. period. you must know what yu are doing, how to fix
problems and avoid doing unattended updates or something like that ;)
I'm curious about this. I've bee
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:59:08 +0100
Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >
> >>I would go so far as to say that "Debian Unstable" is an oxymoron.
> >
> >
> > From WordNet (r) 2.0 (August 2003) [wn]:
> >
> > unstable
> > ...
> > 6: subj
Joey Hess wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
I would go so far as to say that "Debian Unstable" is an oxymoron.
From WordNet (r) 2.0 (August 2003) [wn]:
unstable
...
6: subject to change; variable; "a fluid situation fraught with
uncertainty"; "everything was unstable following t
Florian Kulzer wrote:
> I would go so far as to say that "Debian Unstable" is an oxymoron.
From WordNet (r) 2.0 (August 2003) [wn]:
unstable
...
6: subject to change; variable; "a fluid situation fraught with
uncertainty"; "everything was unstable following the coup"
[s
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:45:31PM +0100, Thomas Jollans wrote:
>On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:39, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 05:16:02AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
[..]
>> Step two is to edit /etc/apt/sources.list. This is the relevant part of
>> mine:
>>
>> deb http://ftp.uk
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:05:56 -0800
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:27:07 +0200
> Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I think many from this list recalls the yaird issue which made an
> > unbootable initrd. I got "hit" directly :) Though I l
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:27:07 +0200
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think many from this list recalls the yaird issue which made an unbootable
> initrd. I got "hit" directly :) Though I learned to *always* keep a second
> kernel installed it still counts as a break.
Good point,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:42:47 -0800
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:45:31 +0100
> Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > because SID breakes. period. you must know what yu are doing, how to fix
> > problems and avoid doing unattended update
Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> ive been running sid for 4 to 5 years and there have been glitches
> (maybe severe ones once a year), but by-in-large if i want to try new
^^^
The term is actually "by and large" and it is actually a nautical term.
Though, t
Clive Menzies wrote:
On (14/03/06 10:42), Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:45:31 +0100
Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
I'm curious about this. I've been running pure sid for over a year
and have never had anything break .
What is people's experience with
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:42:47AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:45:31 +0100
> Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > because SID breakes. period. you must know what yu are doing, how to fix
> > problems and avoid doing unattended updates or something
On (14/03/06 10:42), Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:45:31 +0100
> Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > because SID breakes. period. you must know what yu are doing, how to fix
> > problems and avoid doing unattended updates or something like that ;)
>
> I'm curious
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:45:31 +0100
Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> because SID breakes. period. you must know what yu are doing, how to fix
> problems and avoid doing unattended updates or something like that ;)
I'm curious about this. I've been running pure sid for over a year an
Jude DaShiell wrote:
What would the steps be to go from sarge stable to sarge unstable
using apt-get? For now I'm restricted to console mode until or unless
I figure out how to get debian's xwindows interface talking.
you put two questions. the first is: how to get xwindows working; and 2.
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:39, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 05:16:02AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> >For now I'm restricted to console mode until or unless I
restricted ? I see no restrictions here. Just a little less eye candy *lol*
>
> First off, Sarge is the stable release
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 05:16:02AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>What would the steps be to go from sarge stable to sarge unstable using
>apt-get? For now I'm restricted to console mode until or unless I
>figure out how to get debian's xwindows interface talking.
First off, Sarge is the stable rel
What would the steps be to go from sarge stable to sarge unstable using
apt-get? For now I'm restricted to console mode until or unless I figure
out how to get debian's xwindows interface talking.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
26 matches
Mail list logo
