--- Justin Guerin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If that's the case, then the new KDE / Gnome should
> "just work".
Yes...but that is the least of my problems now. I have
another thread going about some other more serious
issues after this "apt-get dist-upgrade".
> What is
> leading you to beli
On Sunday 10 October 2004 10:11, Eric Dickner wrote:
> --- Jule Slootbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > \* stupid question *\
> > i am safe to assume that you restarted gnome/kde
> > after you ran a
> > dist-upgrade correct?
>
> Yes, I restarted using the new "Sarge" kernel and
> everything.
>
> >
On Friday 08 October 2004 12:18 pm, Eric Dickner wrote:
> For my modem-connected machine it is a ginormous
> download, some 500 Meg...
Painful, innit? I did that when I upgraded from Woody to Sarge.
> Will I, or some kind of disconnnect at the ISP, ruin
> the whole thing? Can I then issue the
<#secure method=pgp mode=sign>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Dickner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Will I, or some kind of disconnnect at the ISP, ruin
> the whole thing?
Not really, no.
> Can I then issue the command again and will it recognize the
> packcages it already g
<#secure method=pgp mode=sign>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"jano kupec" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Will I, or some kind of disconnnect at the ISP, ruin
>> the whole thing? Can I then issue the command again
>> and will it recognize the packcages it already got?
>
> apt keep
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 09:18:17 -0700 (PDT), Eric Dickner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For my modem-connected machine it is a ginormous
> download, some 500 Meg...
>
> Will I, or some kind of disconnnect at the ISP, ruin
> the whole thing?
Usually not, eventually you'll find them in /va
> Will I, or some kind of disconnnect at the ISP, ruin
> the whole thing? Can I then issue the command again
> and will it recognize the packcages it already got?
apt keeps downloaded packages (usually) in /var/cache/apt/archives,
untill you decide to remove them with apt-get clean, so the are no
--- Eric Dickner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will I, or some kind of disconnnect at the ISP, ruin
> the whole thing? Can I then issue the command again
> and will it recognize the packcages it already got?
If apt-get is interrupted, it'll continue from where it left off. Note
that you might f
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 09:18:17 -0700 (PDT)
Eric Dickner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For my modem-connected machine it is a ginormous
> download, some 500 Meg...
>
> Will I, or some kind of disconnnect at the ISP, ruin
> the whole thing? Can I then issue the command again
> and will it
Hello,
For my modem-connected machine it is a ginormous
download, some 500 Meg...
Will I, or some kind of disconnnect at the ISP, ruin
the whole thing? Can I then issue the command again
and will it recognize the packcages it already got?
Will it check these downloads for errors with an md5
or
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:54:23 +0100
Richard Kimber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After a dist-upgrade some X packages didn't install properly and now
> nedit doesn't work because it can't find libXp.so.6.
>
> If I ask aptitude to install the libXp package, it wants to remove 505
> packages, which d
After a dist-upgrade some X packages didn't install properly and now nedit
doesn't work because it can't find libXp.so.6.
If I ask aptitude to install the libXp package, it wants to remove 505
packages, which doesn't sound optimal.
Any suggestions?
--
Richard Kimber
http://www.psr.keele.ac.uk/
Hi Debianistas,
I have installed evolution 1.3 and some other packages that make
dist-upgrade want to remove lots of stuff. How do I tell it to ignore a
packages when I dist-upgrade.
-K
--
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Thanks to all who responded. As usual, you can always
learn something new.
Thanks Again
Don
--- Seneca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 06:17:29AM -0800, D. wrote:
> > I'm running Testing on a PII 350 and attempted
> to do
> > a dist-upgrade last night. Here is the results o
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 06:17:29AM -0800, D. wrote:
> I'm running Testing on a PII 350 and attempted to do
> a dist-upgrade last night. Here is the results of the
> apt-get -u dist-upgrade.
> My questions is why is it trying to remove the
> task-x-window-system-core? If I did this wouldn't
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED],Friday, January 24, 2003 9:31 AM
>
> I'm running Testing on a PII 350 and attempted to do
> a dist-upgrade last night. Here is the results of the
> apt-get -u dist-upgrade.
> My questions is why is it trying to remove the
> task-x-window-system-core? If I did this
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 06:17:29AM -0800, D. wrote:
> My questions is why is it trying to remove the
> task-x-window-system-core? If I did this wouldn't I
> have lost my "Desktop" and only had text only mode?
Task packages are (were) empty packages containing only dependencies.
They do not pro
Hi all,
I'm running Testing on a PII 350 and attempted to do
a dist-upgrade last night. Here is the results of the
apt-get -u dist-upgrade.
My questions is why is it trying to remove the
task-x-window-system-core? If I did this wouldn't I
have lost my "Desktop" and only had text only mode?
18 matches
Mail list logo
