On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 12:10:21PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 12:59:41PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> > The potential workaround, if you really know what you're doing, is to
> > modify dpkg's database so that it doesn't know the other package
> > contains the fil
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 12:59:41PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> Are you upgrading everything at once or are you trying to upgrade
> piecemeal? If you're trying to upgrade one package at a time, then
> don't. The problem you are seeing is that two packages contain the
> same file (at leas
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 12:59:41PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 10:43:07AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> | i'm going from potato to woody and ...
> | i'm getting things like this, a lot:
> |
> |
> | Unpacking replacement eeyes ...
> | dpkg: error processing /var/c
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 10:43:07AM -0600, will trillich wrote:
| i'm going from potato to woody and aside from having to
| i'm getting things like this, a lot:
|
|
| Unpacking replacement eeyes ...
| dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/eeyes_1%3a0.3.12-4_i386.deb
|(--unpack):
| tryi
i'm going from potato to woody and aside from having to
apt-get install apt-utils
by hand, i'm getting things like this, a lot:
Preparing to replace eeyes 1:0.3.11-5 (using .../eeyes_1%3a0.3.12-4_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement eeyes ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archive
5 matches
Mail list logo