John Hasler wrote:
> Ron Johnson writes:
>> Then that should be:
>
>> $ patch --gen-diff
>
>> $ patch --apply-diff
>
> The diff command predates the patch command by many years (it was in
> System III) and does far more than generate files suitable for application
> by patch, which was written
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:52:47 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 09/10/08 22:22, Celejar wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:41:01 -0500
...
> (If you ever wonder why so many conservatives in the US dislike the
> UN [besides the rampant corruption] and the EU, it's because they
> [
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:10:15 +0200, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James A. Donald wrote:
>
> > Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
> > way they do in windows?
>
> I am surprised that no one has told this till now.
>
> The main purpose of diff is to generat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thveillon.debian wrote:
> Johannes Wiedersich a écrit :
>> On 2008-09-10 13:31, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> I am sorry for having accidentally sent that OT message to list.
>>
>> Does anyone know, if there is a way of fixing the missing
> If all rights descend from the government (whether that be an absolute
> monarchy or a parliament), then I'd posit that no, you don't have a right to
> defend home and hearth.
That doesn't follow.
If rights descend from the government, then you have a right to defend
home and hearth if the gover
Ron Johnson wrote:
> This works for me:
> http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson/replytolist-0.2.1.xpi
>
> v0.3.0 fails, since I use IMAP.
>
> I think that you need to install the Mnenhy add-on.
Yes, downgrading to 0.2.1 works for me also. I don't think Icedove needs Mnenhy
(but stock Thunderbird
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 09/11/08 12:19, Jeff Soules wrote:
>> Dismissing most of this because it's little more than an expression of
>> the author's prejudice, but...
>>
>>> We don't like the EU because
>>> of their complete disregard for individual rights. It was conceived
>>> of and
>>> implement
On 09/11/08 12:19, Jeff Soules wrote:
Dismissing most of this because it's little more than an expression of
the author's prejudice, but...
We don't like the EU because
of their complete disregard for individual rights. It was conceived of and
implemented by socialists. It's that simple.
Soci
Dismissing most of this because it's little more than an expression of
the author's prejudice, but...
> We don't like the EU because
> of their complete disregard for individual rights. It was conceived of and
> implemented by socialists. It's that simple.
Socialists?
You mean the kind of people
On 2008-Sep-11, at 5:08 AM, Tim Edwards wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
(If you ever wonder why so many conservatives in the US dislike the
UN [besides the rampant corruption] and the EU, it's because they
[the UN and the EU...] spew lots of pretty words, but don't have
the testicles to enforce
On 09/11/08 02:53, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
On 2008-09-11 09:41, thveillon.debian wrote:
I have "reply to mailing list 0.3.1" and it works ok with Icedove here.
https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/thunderbird/addon/4455
It is considered "experimental" on Mozilla website I just noticed, but
never h
On 2008-09-11 09:41, thveillon.debian wrote:
> I have "reply to mailing list 0.3.1" and it works ok with Icedove here.
>
> https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/thunderbird/addon/4455
>
> It is considered "experimental" on Mozilla website I just noticed, but
> never had a problem with it.
Thanks! It wor
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 11:08:40AM +0200, Tim Edwards wrote:
> ..., or Australia armed with nuclear powered Kangaroos
> and sharks with laser beams :) (we could do it you know - don't try and
> stop us!)
I thought the Kiwis did all the development stuff
Dave
--
... (I tried to get
Ron Johnson wrote:
(If you ever wonder why so many conservatives in the US dislike the UN
[besides the rampant corruption] and the EU, it's because they [the UN
and the EU...] spew lots of pretty words, but don't have the testicles
to enforce them.)
In the UN's case it was specifically des
On 2008-09-11 09:41, thveillon.debian wrote:
> I have "reply to mailing list 0.3.1" and it works ok with Icedove here.
>
> https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/thunderbird/addon/4455
>
> It is considered "experimental" on Mozilla website I just noticed, but
> never had a problem with it.
Thanks. It doe
Johannes Wiedersich a écrit :
On 2008-09-10 13:31, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
[snip]
I am sorry for having accidentally sent that OT message to list.
Does anyone know, if there is a way of fixing the missing
'reply-to-list' functionally of icedove for lenny?
Since the extension doesn't work an
On 2008-09-10 13:31, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
[snip]
I am sorry for having accidentally sent that OT message to list.
Does anyone know, if there is a way of fixing the missing
'reply-to-list' functionally of icedove for lenny?
Since the extension doesn't work any more, I acquired the habit of
On 09/10/08 18:49, John Hasler wrote:
Ron Johnson writes:
Then that should be:
$ patch --gen-diff
$ patch --apply-diff
The diff command predates the patch command by many years (it was in System
III) and does far more than generate files suitable for application by
patch, which was writt
On 09/10/08 22:17, Celejar wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:31:51 +0200
Johannes Wiedersich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
right,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:52:47AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> There was a time when he commanded a huge army...
Not just (a) huge army, but LOTS of huge armies. He commanded kings.
Regards,
Dave
--
Thasai, Ampoe Meuang | Linux - Das System fuer schlaue
Nonthaburi |
On 09/10/08 22:22, Celejar wrote:
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:41:01 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
The one place where I might disagree with the Declaration of
Independence is where Rights come from, since I want to think that
rights come from the barrel of a gun.
You do?
>
Or
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:41:01 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> The one place where I might disagree with the Declaration of
> Independence is where Rights come from, since I want to think that
> rights come from the barrel of a gun.
You do?
> Or, maybe, that those unalienable
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 13:31:51 +0200
Johannes Wiedersich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
> > We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
> > of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
> > right, not from the arbitrary
Ron Johnson writes:
> Then that should be:
> $ patch --gen-diff
> $ patch --apply-diff
The diff command predates the patch command by many years (it was in System
III) and does far more than generate files suitable for application by
patch, which was written by Larry Wall in 1984.
--
John Hasle
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/10/08 18:28, gary turner wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/10/08 16:03, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
The main purpose of diff is to generate a patch which can then be
used to
apply/revert changes across two versions of a file.
That would sanely be called "patch", no
On 09/10/08 18:28, gary turner wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/10/08 16:03, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
The main purpose of diff is to generate a patch which can then be
used to
apply/revert changes across two versions of a file.
That would sanely be called "patch", not "diff".
See man
Ron Johnson wrote:
On 09/10/08 16:03, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
The main purpose of diff is to generate a patch which can then be used to
apply/revert changes across two versions of a file.
That would sanely be called "patch", not "diff".
See man patch. diff consists of differences betw
On 09/10/08 16:03, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
James A. Donald wrote:
Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
way they do in windows?
I am surprised that no one has told this till now.
The main purpose of diff is to generate a patch which can then be used to
apply/revert chang
James A. Donald wrote:
> Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
> way they do in windows?
I am surprised that no one has told this till now.
The main purpose of diff is to generate a patch which can then be used to
apply/revert changes across two versions of a file. The output pro
On 09/10/08 09:39, Rob McBroom wrote:
On 2008-Sep-10, at 7:31 AM, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
right, not from the arbitrary
On 2008-Sep-10, at 7:31 AM, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
right, not from the arbitrary power of the omnipotent state.
http://
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
> We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
> of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
> right, not from the arbitrary power of the omnipotent state.
>
> http://www.jim.com/ James A. Donald
I am happy t
On 2008-09-10 11:18, Johann Spies wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:52:49PM +1000, James A. Donald wrote:
>
>> Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
>> way they do in windows?
>
> You can also look ast colordiff
> (http://freshmeat.net/projects/colordiff/). I have not used it
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:52:49PM +1000, James A. Donald wrote:
> Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
> way they do in windows?
You can also look ast colordiff
(http://freshmeat.net/projects/colordiff/). I have not used it though.
Regards
Johann
--
Johann Spies Te
On 09/10/08 04:04, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
[snip]
Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
way they do in windows?
If you insist that things in linux should be just like in windows, why
bother using linux?
And he uses "in windo
On 2008-09-10 09:52, James A. Donald wrote:
> Under windows, diff usually works like windiff - you see
> the two versions side by side, with the differences
> highlighted by color
>
> git-gui, however gives me a diff where I see a single
> stream annotated with + and -
>
> I find the single strea
Le Mer 10 septembre 2008 09:52, James A. Donald a écrit :
[...]
> Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the
> way they do in windows?
I use Mercurial instead of GIT, but it is very close. I use it under Unix
(Solaris and Linux) and Windows. And I use KDiff3 under Unix and Windows
too.
On Wed,10.Sep.08, 17:52:49, James A. Donald wrote:
[...]
> Can I get file changes recorded in git to display the way they do in
> windows?
I'm almost sure it can be done by combining git with a tool like vimdiff
(vim actually, but I'm sure emacs has something similar).
Regards,
Andrei
--
I recommend meld package
See you later !
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:52 AM, James A. Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Under windows, diff usually works like windiff - you see
> the two versions side by side, with the differences
> highlighted by color
>
> git-gui, however gives me a diff where
Under windows, diff usually works like windiff - you see
the two versions side by side, with the differences
highlighted by color
git-gui, however gives me a diff where I see a single
stream annotated with + and -
I find the single stream display really obscure, ugly,
and confusing.
So if I had
40 matches
Mail list logo
