Re: didn't do it quite right...

2001-01-08 Thread tom
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:32:26PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote: > I have not been following this thread, but it seems that nobody has > mentioned the excellent debiantool make-kpkg yet. To install a new > kernel I just do: > > 1. cd /usr/src/linux > 2. make menuconfig > 3. make-kpkg kernel-image >

Re: didn't do it quite right...

2001-01-08 Thread Diego Biurrun
I have not been following this thread, but it seems that nobody has mentioned the excellent debiantool make-kpkg yet. To install a new kernel I just do: 1. cd /usr/src/linux 2. make menuconfig 3. make-kpkg kernel-image 4. dpkg -i ../kernel-image- 5. reboot Works like a charm Diego > * Bob Row

Re: didn't do it quite right...

2001-01-08 Thread Hall Stevenson
I read somewhere to run "make install" after step # 8. Doing that, it takes care of steps 9 through 15 listed below. I don't believe this is a "Redhat thing" either. I've used it with the official "linus" kernels downloaded from ftp.us.kernel.org. Matter of fact, I believe it may be mentioned i

Re: didn't do it quite right...

2001-01-08 Thread Bob Rowe
What happened to 'make install' somewhere after 6? I'm coming from RH 6.2 here, as well as from a lack of a lot of experience compiling kernels. At 02:40 PM 01/08/2001 -0500, David B. Harris wrote: To quote Rino Mardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, # On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 07:03:26PM +0100 or thereabout

Re: didn't do it quite right...

2001-01-08 Thread David B . Harris
To quote Rino Mardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, # On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 07:03:26PM +0100 or thereabouts, tom wrote: # > Howdy Guys, # > # > I just ugraded from 2.0.36 to 2.2.18 (hey, I'm slow...) on a # > potato system. I did not do it the "debian way", however, and # > I still appear to have 2.0.36

Re: didn't do it quite right...

2001-01-08 Thread Rino Mardo
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 07:03:26PM +0100 or thereabouts, tom wrote: > Howdy Guys, > > I just ugraded from 2.0.36 to 2.2.18 (hey, I'm slow...) on a > potato system. I did not do it the "debian way", however, and > I still appear to have 2.0.36 installed, and running top give > me ye olde "warning

Re: didn't do it quite right...

2001-01-07 Thread John Carline
tom wrote: > Howdy Guys, > > I just ugraded from 2.0.36 to 2.2.18 (hey, I'm slow...) on a > potato system. I did not do it the "debian way", however, and > I still appear to have 2.0.36 installed, and running top give > me ye olde "warning: /boot/System.map has an incorrect kernel > version" > >

Re: didn't do it quite right...

2001-01-07 Thread Carl Fink
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 07:03:26PM +0100, tom wrote: > I looked at lilo.conf, made one change. Here are all the steps I > took: [snip] > 15. lilo It isn't clear to me from what you wrote: after you edited lilo.conf, did you then run /sbin/lilo to reread that file and rewrite the boot sector?

didn't do it quite right...

2001-01-07 Thread tom
Howdy Guys, I just ugraded from 2.0.36 to 2.2.18 (hey, I'm slow...) on a potato system. I did not do it the "debian way", however, and I still appear to have 2.0.36 installed, and running top give me ye olde "warning: /boot/System.map has an incorrect kernel version" I looked at lilo.conf, made