On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:32:26PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> I have not been following this thread, but it seems that nobody has
> mentioned the excellent debiantool make-kpkg yet. To install a new
> kernel I just do:
>
> 1. cd /usr/src/linux
> 2. make menuconfig
> 3. make-kpkg kernel-image
>
I have not been following this thread, but it seems that nobody has
mentioned the excellent debiantool make-kpkg yet. To install a new
kernel I just do:
1. cd /usr/src/linux
2. make menuconfig
3. make-kpkg kernel-image
4. dpkg -i ../kernel-image-
5. reboot
Works like a charm
Diego
> * Bob Row
I read somewhere to run "make install" after step # 8. Doing that, it takes
care of steps 9 through 15 listed below. I don't believe this is a "Redhat
thing" either. I've used it with the official "linus" kernels downloaded from
ftp.us.kernel.org. Matter of fact, I believe it may be mentioned i
What happened to 'make install' somewhere after 6? I'm coming from RH 6.2
here, as well as from a lack of a lot of experience compiling kernels.
At 02:40 PM 01/08/2001 -0500, David B. Harris wrote:
To quote Rino Mardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 07:03:26PM +0100 or thereabout
To quote Rino Mardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 07:03:26PM +0100 or thereabouts, tom wrote:
# > Howdy Guys,
# >
# > I just ugraded from 2.0.36 to 2.2.18 (hey, I'm slow...) on a
# > potato system. I did not do it the "debian way", however, and
# > I still appear to have 2.0.36
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 07:03:26PM +0100 or thereabouts, tom wrote:
> Howdy Guys,
>
> I just ugraded from 2.0.36 to 2.2.18 (hey, I'm slow...) on a
> potato system. I did not do it the "debian way", however, and
> I still appear to have 2.0.36 installed, and running top give
> me ye olde "warning
tom wrote:
> Howdy Guys,
>
> I just ugraded from 2.0.36 to 2.2.18 (hey, I'm slow...) on a
> potato system. I did not do it the "debian way", however, and
> I still appear to have 2.0.36 installed, and running top give
> me ye olde "warning: /boot/System.map has an incorrect kernel
> version"
>
>
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 07:03:26PM +0100, tom wrote:
> I looked at lilo.conf, made one change. Here are all the steps I
> took:
[snip]
> 15. lilo
It isn't clear to me from what you wrote: after you edited
lilo.conf, did you then run /sbin/lilo to reread that file and
rewrite the boot sector?
Howdy Guys,
I just ugraded from 2.0.36 to 2.2.18 (hey, I'm slow...) on a
potato system. I did not do it the "debian way", however, and
I still appear to have 2.0.36 installed, and running top give
me ye olde "warning: /boot/System.map has an incorrect kernel
version"
I looked at lilo.conf, made
9 matches
Mail list logo