>
> "Brian M. Rectanus" wrote:
> >>
> >> At 09:38 AM 11/22/97 +, Chuma Agbodike wrote:
> >> >Do diald and ipmasquerading serve the same purpose ?
> >> >Or do I have to use both ? I have a 3 node ethernet lan.
> >> >The all had windows on them. Now I installed Linux 2.0.29 (debian 1.
"Oliver Elphick" wrote:
>That _may_ involve a nameserver lookup across the network or it may be
>relovable from cached data.
^
Sorry. That isn't an English word; I meant to say `recoverable'.
--
Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isle of Wight
"Brian M. Rectanus" wrote:
>>
>> At 09:38 AM 11/22/97 +, Chuma Agbodike wrote:
>> >Do diald and ipmasquerading serve the same purpose ?
>> >Or do I have to use both ? I have a 3 node ethernet lan.
>> >The all had windows on them. Now I installed Linux 2.0.29 (debian 1.3)
>> >on the
>
> At 09:38 AM 11/22/97 +, Chuma Agbodike wrote:
> >Do diald and ipmasquerading serve the same purpose ?
> >Or do I have to use both ? I have a 3 node ethernet lan.
> >The all had windows on them. Now I installed Linux 2.0.29 (debian 1.3)
> >on the unit that has the modem on it. And would lik
On Sat, Nov 22, 1997 at 09:38:55AM +, Chuma Agbodike wrote:
> Do diald and ipmasquerading serve the same purpose ?
> Or do I have to use both ? I have a 3 node ethernet lan.
> The all had windows on them. Now I installed Linux 2.0.29 (debian 1.3)
> on the unit that has the modem on it. And woul
At 09:38 AM 11/22/97 +, Chuma Agbodike wrote:
>Do diald and ipmasquerading serve the same purpose ?
>Or do I have to use both ? I have a 3 node ethernet lan.
>The all had windows on them. Now I installed Linux 2.0.29 (debian 1.3)
>on the unit that has the modem on it. And would like the other u
Do diald and ipmasquerading serve the same purpose ?
Or do I have to use both ? I have a 3 node ethernet lan.
The all had windows on them. Now I installed Linux 2.0.29 (debian 1.3)
on the unit that has the modem on it. And would like the other units
to access the internet via the modem on LINUX uni
7 matches
Mail list logo