Re: diald auto-dial bug/feature

1998-10-19 Thread Michael Beattie
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Michael Beattie writes: > > I imagine you have no NIC? If so, then for people that do, probably dont > > need to do this. e.g.: > > No Sir, I do have a NIC installed. I'm using an unrouted address (192.168.x.x) > And diald was doing the dirty deed 8-

Re: diald auto-dial bug/feature

1998-10-18 Thread tko
Michael Beattie writes: > I imagine you have no NIC? If so, then for people that do, probably dont > need to do this. e.g.: No Sir, I do have a NIC installed. I'm using an unrouted address (192.168.x.x) And diald was doing the dirty deed 8-) inspite of the additional information in my /etc/hosts f

Re: diald auto-dial bug/feature

1998-10-18 Thread Michael Beattie
On Sat, 17 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 1) edit the /etc/hosts file and add your hostname behind the 'localhost' > example: > old '/etc/hosts' > 127.0.0.1 localhost > > new '/etc/hosts' > 127.0.0.1 localhost westgac3 << use the name returned by 'hostname' > I imagine you have no

Re: diald auto-dial bug/feature

1998-10-17 Thread john
Thomas Kocourek writes: > 2) Then reboot your system. No need to reboot. -- John HaslerThis posting is in the public domain. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Do with it what you will. Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I don't mind. Elmwood, Wisconsin

diald auto-dial bug/feature

1998-10-17 Thread tko
I asked on the list if anyone could tell me how to find what process was connecting to a socket. lsof looked promising but did not work as advertised in it's documentation. However, I did some detective work and found that "diald" was the culprit. Here's how it happens: diald is started by the ini