to the config
shared-network datacenter.tio.nl {
subnet 10.0.1.0 netmask 255.255.254.0 {
}
}
Is this the recommended way or is there a better way? I want to keep one dhcp
server per location and not have one dhcp server for all locations. That helps
a lot with keeping the configs
gt; shared-network datacenter.tio.nl {
> subnet 10.0.1.0 netmask 255.255.254.0 {
> }
> }
> Is this the recommended way or is there a better way? I want to keep one dhcp
> server per location and not have one dhcp server for all locations. That
> helps a lot with keeping the config
Hi,
I want to move my DHCP servers to my datacenter as I am going to shut down the
hypervisor hosts on some locations.
If I just move the VM running the isc-dhcp-server software to the DC and change
the ip of the VM then I get a warning when I try to start the dhcp software
Dec 8 16:12:12
I run two dhcpd servers on my LAN with failover and DDNS updates. In the
past I have set certain machines up with fixed addresses and host
names, like so:
host dragonw
{
option host-name "dragonw";
hardware ethernet ee:ee:ee:ee:ee:ee;
fixed-address iii.iii.ii.i;
ddns-hostname dragonw;
Hi Dan / list,
>> I am running multiple isc-dhcp servers on Debian Linux.
>> I have several sites with multiple networks and I use the isc-dhcp-server to
>> hand out ip numbers in the various network segments. In most of the networks
>> I have more then enough free
Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running multiple isc-dhcp servers on Debian Linux.
> I have several sites with multiple networks and I use the isc-dhcp-server to
> hand out ip numbers in the various network segments. In most of the networks
> I have more then enough free
Hi,
I am running multiple isc-dhcp servers on Debian Linux.
I have several sites with multiple networks and I use the isc-dhcp-server to
hand out ip numbers in the various network segments. In most of the networks I
have more then enough free ip numbers all the time.
However, in some networks I
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:12:07PM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> However, now, based on your response I am thinking the AirStation is
> just forwarding the DNS queries on to the nameservers it is given in
> response to its DHCP query, and not actually caching anything...
Very likely, yes.
> wou
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 08:14:29AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 07:34:16AM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:39:13PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > I strongly recommend just running your own caching DNS resolver on the
>
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 07:28:00AM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> And, is dhclient a separate piece of software from systemd.networkd?
Yes.
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 07:34:16AM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:39:13PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > I strongly recommend just running your own caching DNS resolver on the
> > DHCP server host. ISP nameservers are often slow and unreliable.
>
&g
ot; might be exactly what
> I was after -- could an "appropriate dhclient hook" perhaps be used to
> update the name servers being offered by the DHCP server?
Sure it can. What you need is to
copy /etc/dhcp/dhclient-enter-hooks.d/resolvconf under a different name
and make changes
; > DNS requests from your LAN to correct DNS. Something like this should do
> > > the trick:
> >
> > Not so straightforward because you still need to get the ISP's DNS and
> > update the iptables rules whenever the DNS change.
>
> I strongly recommend
d do this trick.
> I'd start with copying and modifying resolvconf one.
>
>
I think the concept of "appropriate dhclient hook" might be exactly what
I was after -- could an "appropriate dhclient hook" perhaps be used to
update the name servers being offered by t
> the trick:
>
> Not so straightforward because you still need to get the ISP's DNS and
> update the iptables rules whenever the DNS change.
I strongly recommend just running your own caching DNS resolver on the
DHCP server host. ISP nameservers are often slow and unreliable.
Hi.
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 22:21:04 +0200
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 24/08/2017 à 11:30, Reco a écrit :
> >
> > Somewhat hackish, but straightforward way to achieve this is to redirect
> > DNS requests from your LAN to correct DNS. Something like this should do
> > the trick:
>
> Not so
Le 24/08/2017 à 11:30, Reco a écrit :
Somewhat hackish, but straightforward way to achieve this is to redirect
DNS requests from your LAN to correct DNS. Something like this should do
the trick:
Not so straightforward because you still need to get the ISP's DNS and
update the iptables rules w
Hi.
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 08:25:16 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 24 Aug 2017 at 12:30:35 (+0300), Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > In-Reply-To: <20170824074515.y4z2ummdigk2fcbn@kazuki.local>
> >
> [...]
>
> If you type:
>
> :
> set edit_headers
>
> you should get the heade
g device, the language can't be
> changed. So I like to futz with the settings on the AirStation as little
> as possible.
>
> So I run dhcpd on the firewall machine, facing only the
> local-network-facing interface, so that when the AirStation asks for an
> IP address, it can be
On Thu 24 Aug 2017 at 12:30:35 (+0300), Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> In-Reply-To: <20170824074515.y4z2ummdigk2fcbn@kazuki.local>
>
[...]
If you type:
:
set edit_headers
you should get the headers included in your composition window,
and you can then stick the In-Reply-To: amongst its pe
Hi.
In-Reply-To: <20170824074515.y4z2ummdigk2fcbn@kazuki.local>
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 04:45:15PM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> Is there any clever way to pass through the name server settings
> the DHCP server provides, so that if the ISP should change its name
> serv
the
local-network-facing interface, so that when the AirStation asks for an
IP address, it can be provided with one.
The Airstation is _itself_ running a DHCP server on its LAN ports /
WiFi, which is how the rest of my machines on my network get their local
IP addresses. So the DHCP server on m
the dhcpd.conf file
> >> > in
> >> > its proper place.
> >> >
> >> > Bonno Bloksma
> >>
> >> This is like 5 years old. At least back then I noticed the same
> >>
> >> so from within /etc/dhcp ln -s dhcpd.conf -> ..
Hi all,
On Mo 18 Jan 2016 14:25:18 CET, Mike Gabriel wrote:
I will rebuild my chroots, test removing again the CFLAGS export in
debian/rules and test the resulting packages once more.
New upload (+squeeze10) of isc-dhcp has just been dput to squeeze-lts.
The new version should be availabl
c/dhcp ln -s dhcpd.conf -> ../dhcpd.conf
I can confirm that the latest upgdate to isc-dhcp-server on 15-jan-2015
broke my squeeze-lts installation exactly in the same way. There
definitely is an issue with the update and it did not appear at any
earlier time.
Regards,
Toomas Tamm
Estonia
Tha
dhcpd.conf -> ../dhcpd.conf
I can confirm that the latest upgdate to isc-dhcp-server on 15-jan-2015
broke my squeeze-lts installation exactly in the same way. There
definitely is an issue with the update and it did not appear at any
earlier time.
Regards,
Toomas Tamm
Estonia
(Resent)
Hello,
Mike Gabriel a écrit :
>
> I did not meet that issue on my test rig. I will check the recently
> upload package and report back.
FWIW, I just upgraded the isc-dhcp-server package on my i386 Squeeze
server and did not meet that issue. It only has /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf
Hi Bonno,
On Fr 15 Jan 2016 08:20:59 CET, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
Please fix the package in Squeeze-lts so I can have the dhcpd.conf
file in its proper place.
I double checked yesterday's upload of isc-dhcp-server to squeeze-lts.
The fix introduced there is very unrelated to file name
-> ../dhcpd.conf
and no issue since then. I think the reason was that dhcp-server is now
called isc-dhcp-server. But I do not recall why they renamed it.
What does the maintainer says - there must have been reason for doing so.
I did not meet that issue on my test rig. I will check the recen
ame
>
> so from within /etc/dhcp ln -s dhcpd.conf -> ../dhcpd.conf
>
> and no issue since then. I think the reason was that dhcp-server is now
> called isc-dhcp-server. But I do not recall why they renamed it.
>
> What does the maintainer says - there must have been reas
e then. I think the reason was that dhcp-server is now
called isc-dhcp-server. But I do not recall why they renamed it.
What does the maintainer says - there must have been reason for doing so.
Hi Debian-lts list,
CC to Debian User because most people probably will not read debian-lts as well.
I have one old Squeeze-lts system that is just running a DHCP server. Up until
the update a few minutes ago there was no problem.
I just did an apt-get update and apt-get upgrade, a few packages
I myself have no experience with that. Citing from the dhcpd man page of package
dhcpcd5 I'm using:
"
... If the hostname is currently blank, (null) or local‐
host, or force_hostname is YES or TRUE or 1 then dhcpcd sets the hostname
to the one supplied by the D
Le 06/07/2015 11:50, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit :
> I'm a Slackware user currently fiddling with Debian, and I'm
> experimenting with central hostname management. On my network's server,
> I have Dnsmasq running with the following configuration:
Anyone ?
--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durab
Hi,
I'm a Slackware user currently fiddling with Debian, and I'm
experimenting with central hostname management. On my network's server,
I have Dnsmasq running with the following configuration:
# /etc/dnsmasq.conf
domain-needed
bogus-priv
interface=eth1
dhcp-range=192.168.2.100,192.168.2.200,24h
ne
> OpenBSD on a router and the other on Debian arm isc-dhcp-server on a
> cubietruck.
Training is almost always worth the effort as long as something is
learned in the process.
> One sends sync messages and the other connects to ip-ports - duh!
> The philosophy of OpenBSD dhcp seem
On Thursday 21 May 2015 15:33:09 Bob Proulx wrote:
> Pol Hallen wrote:
> > On same network 192.168.1.0/24 I can put 2 AP with each one own dhcp
> > server? (obviously with different range but on same network).
> >
> > router IP 192.168.1.1
> > AP1 IP 192.168.1.2
Pol Hallen wrote:
> On same network 192.168.1.0/24 I can put 2 AP with each one own dhcp server?
> (obviously with different range but on same network).
>
> router IP 192.168.1.1
> AP1 IP 192.168.1.2 (dhcp 192.168.100-149)
> AP2 IP 192.168.1.3 (dhcp 192.168.150-199)
What is the
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:45:58PM CEST, Darac Marjal
said:
> On Thu, 21 May 2015 15:10:11 +0200
> Pol Hallen wrote:
>
> > Hi all and sorry for the OT
> >
> > On same network 192.168.1.0/24 I can put 2 AP with each one own dhcp
> > server? (obviously with di
You can, but you will need to make sure that both servers are marked as
"not authoritative" (if such a feature is available).
not available...
Be aware, though, that this could cause a
newly-arriving client to take a bit longer to connect (Client: "I'd
like to use 192.168.234.123... anyone? ..
On Thu, 21 May 2015 15:10:11 +0200
Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi all and sorry for the OT
>
> On same network 192.168.1.0/24 I can put 2 AP with each one own dhcp
> server? (obviously with different range but on same network).
You can, but you will need to make sure that both servers a
Hi all and sorry for the OT
On same network 192.168.1.0/24 I can put 2 AP with each one own dhcp
server? (obviously with different range but on same network).
router IP 192.168.1.1
AP1 IP 192.168.1.2 (dhcp 192.168.100-149)
AP2 IP 192.168.1.3 (dhcp 192.168.150-199)
Thanks for help!
Pol
Russell L. Carter wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Russell L. Carter wrote:
> >> Ok, I need to do some experimenting here. I've broken out a long patch
> >> cable to bypass the switch
> >
> > I would really be surprised if the switch has broken down. Not impossible
> > of course. But what are the
7;d not have such a shiny head today if I had done
this months ago, when I first noticed the weirdness. I just used the
DD-WRT AP DHCP server so that I could maximize my procrastination
metrics.
So then the problem was to figure what was awry with the switch, a
D-Link DGS-1224T. I thought I had
Russell L. Carter wrote:
> Ok, I need to do some experimenting here. I've broken out a long
> patch cable to bypass the switch
I would really be surprised if the switch has broken down. Not
impossible of course. But what are the odds? I think it very
unlikely. If I were to guess I would guess
nly have
> the one and so the global definition should be fine. This is just looking
> to the future.
Right.
>> and I've set INTERFACES="eth0 eth1" in /etc/default/isc-dhcp-server.
>
> If you don't want dhcp to server DHCP requests to the 10.0.11.0/24 subnet
Russell L. Carter wrote:
> I've got an internal net with several dual-homed jessie boxen.
I see that you have 10.0.10.0/24 on one and 10.0.11.0/24 on the
other. Is that correct? And you only want dhcpd to serve DHCP
requests on the 10.0.10.0/24 network?
> I would like to get isc-dhc
Hi,
After wearing out the google I'm going to foist my problem onto you
good folk.
I've got an internal net with several dual-homed jessie boxen. I
would like to get isc-dhcp-server up so I can configure my new UniFi
toy. The server has two statically configured interfaces, eth
Thanks Pascal!
Thats it.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ml ml a écrit :
>>
>> i set up a DHCP Server. Here are my installed packages:
>> --
>> ii dhcp3-server 4.1.1-
Hello,
ml ml a écrit :
>
> i set up a DHCP Server. Here are my installed packages:
> --
> ii dhcp3-server 4.1.1-P1-15+squeeze2
> ISC DHCP server (transitional package)
> ii isc-dhcp-server 4.1.1-P1
Hello List,
i set up a DHCP Server. Here are my installed packages:
--
Server:~# dpkg -l | grep dhcp
ii dhcp3-client 4.1.1-P1-15+squeeze2
ISC DHCP server (transitional package)
ii dhcp3-common 4.1.1-P1-15+squeeze2
On 10/01/12 23:23, J. Bakshi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have two different gateway.
Where? On the same box as the dhcp server?
Please supply some basic information about your network - eg, routing,
servers, gateways, subnets, and the *reason*/mechanism that gateways
change, client OS a
Hi
On 10/01/12 12:23, J. Bakshi wrote:
Hello,
I have two different gateway. One of the gateway has been defined at
dhcpd3.conf file.
Now if I change the gateway at dhcpd3.conf and restart the isc server; the
client still
hold the old gateway. How can I force the isc server to immediately in
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:53:16 +0530, J. Bakshi wrote:
> I have two different gateway. One of the gateway has been defined at
> dhcpd3.conf file. Now if I change the gateway at dhcpd3.conf and restart
> the isc server; the client still hold the old gateway. How can I force
> the isc server to immedi
Hello,
I have two different gateway. One of the gateway has been defined at
dhcpd3.conf file.
Now if I change the gateway at dhcpd3.conf and restart the isc server; the
client still
hold the old gateway. How can I force the isc server to immediately inform the
client
about this change ?
Thanks
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 22:09:40 +0200, Victor Nitu wrote:
> On 11/23/2011 08:53 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> Not sure if this thread will give you any hint:
>>
>> ***
>> DHCP server (version 4) with an alias IP address
>> https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/d
2011/11/24 Victor Nitu :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> <..>
>
> How can I start the dhcp server *after* booting the system, to avoid
> manual interaction? Tried a (re) update-rc.d , putting it in rc.local,
> making a separate script, any mor
, the current setup won't permit it as easy as you can say it, but
my (somehow updated) question is: why there isn't any error when
starting it manually, but not going to happen *ever* at boot time?
I compared the init.d script with a working (starting) wheezy setup, and
haven't found an
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Victor Nitu wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/23/2011 08:53 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> Not sure if this thread will give you any hint:
>>
>> ***
>> DHCP server (version 4) with an alias IP add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/23/2011 08:53 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> Not sure if this thread will give you any hint:
>
> ***
> DHCP server (version 4) with an alias IP address
> https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/2010-September/012052.html
> ***
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 01:16:01 +0200, Victor Nitu wrote:
> I wonder if anybody here has a workaround for issue #605657 [1], the
> DHCP server not starting when only alias interfaces have an address.
>
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605657
>
> This issue
Victor Nitu wrote:
> I wonder if anybody here has a workaround for issue #605657 [1],
> the DHCP server not starting when only alias interfaces have an address.
>
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605657
>
> This issue is hanging around for a while, and ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
I wonder if anybody here has a workaround for issue #605657 [1],
the DHCP server not starting when only alias interfaces have an address.
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605657
This issue is hanging around for a
Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> [...] some was new like the use of the letters EOF in stead of the
> "real" EOF character.
That's only because the OP used the << construct. Let me demonstrate.
In this example, where I've written ^D you would need to press Ctrl/D:
cat >/tmp/file1
type your stuff here
^D
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:01:56AM +0200, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> >Obviously, if you create a cron job to run, then you can forget
> >about having the "at" scheduler in any script that might be
> >called, just have the script do what needs to be done /at/ the
> >crontab scheduled tim
Hi Andrew,
Obviously, if you create a cron job to run, then you can forget about having the "at" scheduler in
any script that might be called, just have the script do what needs to be done /at/ the crontab
scheduled time.
The whole idea of using at in stead of cron is because this was just a
Obviously, if you create a cron job to run, then you can forget about
having the "at" scheduler in any script that might be called, just have
the script do what needs to be done /at/ the crontab scheduled time.
;-)
cheers
AndrewM
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.o
On 20/10/2011 12:07 AM, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
Hi,
On 19/10/2011 11:45 PM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
Using Debian Lenny I want to restart my dhcp server tonight at 7pm using
the at command so I enter:
at 7pm /etc/init.d/dhcp3-server restart
and get
syntax error. last token seen: /
The same for
at
On 19/10/11 13:54, Darac Marjal wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:45:20PM +0200, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
Hi,
Using Debian Lenny I want to restart my dhcp server tonight at 7pm using the at
command so I enter:
at 7pm /etc/init.d/dhcp3-server restart
and get
syntax error. last token seen: /
The
Hi,
On 19/10/2011 11:45 PM, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
Using Debian Lenny I want to restart my dhcp server tonight at 7pm using
the at command so I enter:
at 7pm /etc/init.d/dhcp3-server restart
and get
syntax error. last token seen: /
The same for
at 7pm "/etc/init.d/dhcp3-server restart&quo
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 02:45:20PM +0200, Bonno Bloksma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using Debian Lenny I want to restart my dhcp server tonight at 7pm using the
> at command so I enter:
> at 7pm /etc/init.d/dhcp3-server restart
> and get
> syntax error. last token seen: /
> The
Hi,
Using Debian Lenny I want to restart my dhcp server tonight at 7pm using the at
command so I enter:
at 7pm /etc/init.d/dhcp3-server restart
and get
syntax error. last token seen: /
The same for
at 7pm "/etc/init.d/dhcp3-server restart"
So how am I supposed to enter this command?
On Sun 07 Aug 2011 at 14:17:03 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> > For your own sanity you probably want to add 'auto eth0' in addition
> > to the 'allow-hotplug eth0' line.
>
> Replace "allow-hotpug eth0" with "auto eth0". Don't just add it
Bob Proulx wrote:
> Csanyi Pal wrote:
> > * /etc/network/interfaces
> > allow-hotplug eth0
> > auto eth0
This is a good place to add a reference to a good document on this
file. In addition to the normal documentation, Osamu Aoki did us the
great service by creating the following documentation:
Csanyi Pal wrote:
> Bob Proulx writes:
> > Your server is configured to use dhcp to acquire a network address?
>
> Yes, of course.
It was a serious question. Servers are often configured with static
addresses. Another popular alternative is to use the dhcp server to
assign
a second gateway on your secondary interface
> and are gatewaying back to yourself. You will get the default gateway
> from your ISP on eth1 when network-manager dhcp's an address and
> gateway. That is the one you want. Remove this second gateway
> statement from eth0
Bob Proulx writes:
> Csanyi Pal wrote:
>> I must recover my server system through ssh connection so so I must
>> to setup dhcp-server on my desktop system first so it can provide for
>> the server an IP address.
>
> Your server is configured to use dhcp to acquire a
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Csanyi Pal wrote:
>
> I have my desktop machine and my headless server machine being running
> on booth Debian GNU/Linux Squeeze operating system.
>
> I must recover my server system through ssh connection so so I must to
> setup dhcp-server on
Csanyi Pal wrote:
> I must recover my server system through ssh connection so so I must to
> setup dhcp-server on my desktop system first so it can provide for the
> server an IP address.
Your server is configured to use dhcp to acquire a network address?
> On my desktop system
Hi,
I have my desktop machine and my headless server machine being running
on booth Debian GNU/Linux Squeeze operating system.
I must recover my server system through ssh connection so so I must to
setup dhcp-server on my desktop system first so it can provide for the
server an IP address.
On
e Internet before from my main computer
> with this setup. I used the instructions at
> http://www.cyberdogtech.com/firewalls/ (with some adaptations for
> Lenny) to set up Debian Lenny and Shorewall. I used the instructions
> at
> http://failserver.nl/blog/2009/03/how-to-install-a-dhcp-ser
structions at http://www.cyberdogtech.com/firewalls/ (with
some adaptations for Lenny) to set up Debian Lenny and Shorewall. I used the
instructions at
http://failserver.nl/blog/2009/03/how-to-install-a-dhcp-server-in-linux-debian-lenny/
to set up a DHCP server.
Unfortunately, I made an unsuccessful attempt to
On Sat January 17 2009 02:44:09 Ken Teague wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 09:35:37PM -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
> > On Thu January 15 2009 13:28:19 Rod James Bio wrote:
> > > I was wondering if anyone had tried to configure a single linux dhcp
> > > server to give IP to
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 09:35:37PM -0800, Mike Bird wrote:
> On Thu January 15 2009 13:28:19 Rod James Bio wrote:
> > I was wondering if anyone had tried to configure a single linux dhcp
> > server to give IP to different network. We have multiple networks here
> > in our area
On Fri January 16 2009 00:17:02 Rod James Bio wrote:
> Mike Bird wrote:
> > On Thu January 15 2009 13:28:19 Rod James Bio wrote:
> >> I was wondering if anyone had tried to configure a single linux dhcp
> >> server to give IP to different network. We have multiple net
Mike Bird wrote:
On Thu January 15 2009 13:28:19 Rod James Bio wrote:
I was wondering if anyone had tried to configure a single linux dhcp
server to give IP to different network. We have multiple networks here
in our area and I am thinking of using a single dhcp server to serve all
other
On Thu January 15 2009 13:28:19 Rod James Bio wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone had tried to configure a single linux dhcp
> server to give IP to different network. We have multiple networks here
> in our area and I am thinking of using a single dhcp server to serve all
> other n
Dear All,
I was wondering if anyone had tried to configure a single linux dhcp
server to give IP to different network. We have multiple networks here
in our area and I am thinking of using a single dhcp server to serve all
other networks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
2008/11/12 Jesus arteche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> hey,
>
> I want to know if its possible create several subnets inside the same
> subnetwork with dhcp server, i mean i have my subnet 192.168.2.0 and i want
> to create the subnet 192.168.2.0 (192.168.2.1-192.168.2.63...netm
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:53:26 +0100
"Jesus arteche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to know if its possible create several subnets inside the same
> subnetwork with dhcp server, i mean i have my subnet 192.168.2.0 and
> i want to create the subnet 192.168.2.0
&g
hey,
I want to know if its possible create several subnets inside the same
subnetwork with dhcp server, i mean i have my subnet 192.168.2.0 and i want
to create the subnet 192.168.2.0 (192.168.2.1-192.168.2.63...netmask
255.255.255.192), subnet 192.168.2.64 (192.168.2.65-192.168.2.123...netmask
solution for this little big problem ?
Hi,
I just pressed F1 and asked for DHCP. The first choice was Netsh commands
for DHCP. It seems that you can try :
netsh > DHCP > server localhost > dump
or
netsh > DHCP > server localhost > export
But I do not have access to a Wind
Hello there
Currently i have a Windows 2000 DHCP-Server that i want to have on a
Debian machine.
I currently have approx 30 subnets with approx. 1000 ip's that has been
locked to a MAC-adresse.
I want all that converted; but havent found a program or scripts that
can do it for me
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 11:50:18PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> look at dnsmasq. I don't use the dhcp part, but it works just fine
> out-of-the-box for dns. The box that connects to my (dialup) modem runs
> dnsmasq and has all my hosts in /etc/hosts. The other boxes on my
> network know the
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:34:58PM +1000, Lachlan wrote:
>
>> my idea to fix this is to have an old laptop (old as in i upgraded 3
>> months ago, running lenny but hasn't been updated since august) that
>> i'm thinking could be used as the network dhcp instead of my mode
2008/11/4 Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:34:58PM +1000, Lachlan wrote:
>
>> my idea to fix this is to have an old laptop (old as in i upgraded 3
>> months ago, running lenny but hasn't been updated since august) that
>> i'm thinking could be used as the network d
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 02:34:58PM +1000, Lachlan wrote:
> my idea to fix this is to have an old laptop (old as in i upgraded 3
> months ago, running lenny but hasn't been updated since august) that
> i'm thinking could be used as the network dhcp instead of my modem
> (which i'm thinking is half
i been have tremendous trouble getting my network to see hostnames and
and other pc's. it will see everything randomly one day and then be
missing the next.
my idea to fix this is to have an old laptop (old as in i upgraded 3
months ago, running lenny but hasn't been updated since august) that
i'm
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:25:07PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/07/08 14:15, Tony Heal wrote:
> > I need to determine if a DHCP server is available on a remote system.
> > Without changing my static network config or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/08 14:15, Tony Heal wrote:
> I need to determine if a DHCP server is available on a remote system.
> Without changing my static network config or adding any non standard
> packages not already installed by the sarge /
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
