Re: dfsg, needs explanation

2008-11-04 Thread Chris Bannister
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 10:44:15AM +0800, Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: > License must not be specific to Debian, basically a reiteration of the last > point > > what does "reiteration of the last point" really means. I'd say that, the last point is just another way of saying "License must not be speci

Re: dfsg, needs explanation

2008-11-01 Thread Daryl Styrk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: > *License must not be specific to Debian, basically a reiteration of the last > point* > > what does "reiteration of the last point" really means. The rights attached to the program must not depend on the program's being part

Re: dfsg, needs explanation

2008-11-01 Thread Mark Allums
Sorry for the repeat message, I lost my internet connection just as it was sending. Also, in the footnote, that should read "The process *may* make some progress" Mark Allums Mark Allums wrote: Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: /License must not be specific to Debian, basically a reiteration of

Re: dfsg, needs explanation

2008-11-01 Thread Mark Allums
Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: /License must not be specific to Debian, basically a reiteration of the last point/ what does "reiteration of the last point" really means. -- Regards, Umarzuki Mochlis http://gameornot.net An iteration is one complete cycle of a process.[0] A "reiteration" is repe

Re: dfsg, needs explanation

2008-11-01 Thread Mark Allums
Umarzuki Mochlis wrote: /License must not be specific to Debian, basically a reiteration of the last point/ what does "reiteration of the last point" really means. -- Regards, Umarzuki Mochlis http://gameornot.net An iteration is one complete cycle of a process.[0] A "reiteration" is repe

dfsg, needs explanation

2008-11-01 Thread Umarzuki Mochlis
*License must not be specific to Debian, basically a reiteration of the last point* what does "reiteration of the last point" really means. -- Regards, Umarzuki Mochlis http://gameornot.net