Re: df discrepencies

2006-05-05 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2006-05-01 10:08:55, schrieb charlie derr: > On one of the machines that I oversee there is an issue with the df output > that I don't understand. > > here's a part of the output from df -h > > /dev/sda1 440G 420G 0 100% /backup > > if i don't use the -h it looks like this:

Re: df discrepencies

2006-05-01 Thread Greg Folkert
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 15:30 +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote: > On Mon, 01 May 2006 09:14:03 -0500 > Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > charlie derr wrote: > > > On one of the machines that I oversee there is an issue with the df > > > output that I don't understand. > > > > > > here's a part of

Re: df discrepencies

2006-05-01 Thread Greg Folkert
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 10:08 -0400, charlie derr wrote: > On one of the machines that I oversee there is an issue with the df > output that I don't understand. > > here's a part of the output from df -h > > /dev/sda1 440G 420G 0 100% /backup > > if i don't use the -h it looks lik

Re: df discrepencies

2006-05-01 Thread Kevin Buhr
charlie derr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Thanks Kent, Liam and Martin for the quick responses. I wasn't > entirely clear on the situation -- the machine didn't always show this > discrepency, so I don't think it's due to the "system overhead" sort > of thing. Charlie, Martin's got it right.

Re: df discrepencies

2006-05-01 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:30:16PM +0100, Liam O'Toole wrote: > On Mon, 01 May 2006 09:14:03 -0500 > Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > charlie derr wrote: > > > On one of the machines that I oversee there is an issue with the df > > > output that I don't understand. > > > > > > here's a p

Re: df discrepencies

2006-05-01 Thread charlie derr
Liam O'Toole wrote: On Mon, 01 May 2006 09:14:03 -0500 Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm going on very hazy memory here, but it might give you enough info for googling. If I recall correctly, the system wants at least 10% free for "system overhead"; as 20Gig is only about 5% of your 4

Re: df discrepencies

2006-05-01 Thread Martin A. Brooks
charlie derr wrote: On one of the machines that I oversee there is an issue with the df output that I don't understand. here's a part of the output from df -h /dev/sda1 440G 420G 0 100% /backup if i don't use the -h it looks like this: /dev/sda1461293804 44033511

Re: df discrepencies

2006-05-01 Thread Liam O'Toole
On Mon, 01 May 2006 09:14:03 -0500 Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > charlie derr wrote: > > On one of the machines that I oversee there is an issue with the df > > output that I don't understand. > > > > here's a part of the output from df -h > > > > /dev/sda1 440G 420G 0 10

Re: df discrepencies

2006-05-01 Thread Kent West
charlie derr wrote: > On one of the machines that I oversee there is an issue with the df > output that I don't understand. > > here's a part of the output from df -h > > /dev/sda1 440G 420G 0 100% /backup > > if i don't use the -h it looks like this: > > /dev/sda146129

df discrepencies

2006-05-01 Thread charlie derr
On one of the machines that I oversee there is an issue with the df output that I don't understand. here's a part of the output from df -h /dev/sda1 440G 420G 0 100% /backup if i don't use the -h it looks like this: /dev/sda1461293804 440335112 0 100% /bac