> root@debian01:/etc/init.d# update-rc.d tightvncserver defaults
> update-rc.d: using dependency based boot sequencing
>
> What is the fix?
None. There is no problem there. That is not an error message. That
is an information statement. You are using dependency based boot
sequen
defaults
update-rc.d: using dependency based boot sequencing
What is the fix?
Thanks,
Art
I found what I was ding wrong:
>>> > The printer has stopped working! I'm suspicious of the
>>> > dependency-based sequencing since that was the only upgrade which
>>> > mentioned the printer, but another one of the upgrades may well have
>>> > disturbed the printing system. Before I start the
other one of the upgrades may well have
> > disturbed the printing system. Before I start the tedious debugging
>
> Manually stopping both daemons and then starting cupsd before the
> Canon daemon ccpd brought everything back together again. Now to
> learn how to use dep
e printing system. Before I start the tedious debugging
Manually stopping both daemons and then starting cupsd before the
Canon daemon ccpd brought everything back together again. Now to
learn how to use dependency-based boot sequencing to have this done
automatically :-) Anyone played with this
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:50:25PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 12:41:18AM +0900, Osamu Aoki was
> heard to say:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 07:54:24AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 03:53:06PM -0400, Charles Kroeger
> > > was heard to say:
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 12:41:18AM +0900, Osamu Aoki was
heard to say:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 07:54:24AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 03:53:06PM -0400, Charles Kroeger
> > was heard to say:
> > > Thanks for that suggestion but I don't use aptitude..I use apt, dpkg
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 12:41:18AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 07:54:24AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 03:53:06PM -0400, Charles Kroeger
> > was heard to say:
> > > Thanks for that suggestion but I don't use aptitude..I use apt, dpkg, and
> > > s
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 07:54:24AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 03:53:06PM -0400, Charles Kroeger
> was heard to say:
> > Thanks for that suggestion but I don't use aptitude..I use apt, dpkg, and
> > smartpm.
> >
> > dpkg -P works but it would seem each package must b
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 03:53:06PM -0400, Charles Kroeger
was heard to say:
> Thanks for that suggestion but I don't use aptitude..I use apt, dpkg, and
> smartpm.
>
> dpkg -P works but it would seem each package must be listed
> seperately. Is there a command that gets all the unpurged stuff i
On Sun,06.Sep.09, 23:19:39, Teemu Likonen wrote:
> On 2009-09-06 23:17 (+0300), Teemu Likonen wrote:
>
> > I think "aptitude purge ~c" is much simpler than a command like:
> >
> > COLUMN=200 dpkg --list | awk '/^rc/ {print $2}' | xargs -r dpkg -P --
> ^^
>
> Must be "COLUMNS".
But
On 2009-09-06 23:17 (+0300), Teemu Likonen wrote:
> I think "aptitude purge ~c" is much simpler than a command like:
>
> COLUMN=200 dpkg --list | awk '/^rc/ {print $2}' | xargs -r dpkg -P --
^^
Must be "COLUMNS".
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
On 2009-09-06 15:53 (-0400), Charles Kroeger wrote:
>> # aptitude purge ~c
>
> Thanks for that suggestion but I don't use aptitude..I use apt, dpkg, and
> smartpm.
Well, use aptitude then! :-)
I think "aptitude purge ~c" is much simpler than a command like:
COLUMN=200 dpkg --list | awk '/^r
On Sat,05.Sep.09, 21:33:42, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> Some questions: is there a command in dpkg to purge these package related
> files 'after' the package has been removed?
I hacked up this little script, which i often use:
apt-get autoclean;
apt-get autoremove;
orphaner;
rm -f /var/cache/apt/ar
> # aptitude purge ~c
Thanks for that suggestion but I don't use aptitude..I use apt, dpkg, and
smartpm.
dpkg -P works but it would seem each package must be listed
seperately. Is there a command that gets all the unpurged stuff in one go,
like your suggestion above with apititude?
Apropos to
On Sat,05.Sep.09, 21:33:42, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> Some questions: is there a command in dpkg to purge these package related
> files 'after' the package has been removed?
Sure, but it is easier to use aptitude:
# aptitude purge ~c
Regards,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don'
I'm using apt 0.7.23.1.
I did an apt-get dist-upgrade
I received the following error messages:
Setting up sysv-rc (2.87dsf-3) ...
info: Checking if it is safe to convert to dependency based boot.
error: Unable to migrate to dependency based boot sequencing.
The error message invoked a s
17 matches
Mail list logo
