Hi,
Patrice Duroux wrote:
> Out of curiosity, I started this transition on some packages from
> experimental and I observed that deborphan is not without
> «disruption».
> [...]
> Is this something to be reported to deborphan as it could also be in
> some other cases than this
Hi,
Out of curiosity, I started this transition on some packages from
experimental and I observed that deborphan is not without
«disruption». Indeed, the added suffix t64 to their name means that
the updated libraries are listed by deborphan even if they are
required by other packages.
I suspect
> By default it does remove automatically installed packages (but not their
> configurations), see the manual page and [1]. So it's quite possible that
> it did just that on your system.
>
> Next time you do an experiment like that, make sure to set up a suitable
> control group[2] :-)
>
> [1] ht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:06:03PM +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Peter Ludikovsky writes:
>
> > What was the output from aptitude purge? The reason I'm asking is that
> > aptitude usually auto-removes packages where the one removed was the
> > only
hose packages that were
installed along with .
Rodolfo
>
> On 12/01/2016 12:26 PM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
>> I did a little experiment with deborphan: first I did: `aptitude install
>> ', and along with it a certain number of other packages were
>> installed. Then I did: `ap
What was the output from aptitude purge? The reason I'm asking is that
aptitude usually auto-removes packages where the one removed was the
only one with dependencies.
Regards.
/peter
On 12/01/2016 12:26 PM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> I did a little experiment with deborphan: first I did: `
Am Donnerstag, 1. Dezember 2016, 11:49:20 CET schrieb Rodolfo Medina:
> Nicolas George writes:
> > Le primidi 11 frimaire, an CCXXV, Rodolfo Medina a écrit :
> Same result: none of them.
>
> Rodolfo
Try
aptitude purge `deborphan --guess-all`
But look, what is going to
Nicolas George writes:
> Le primidi 11 frimaire, an CCXXV, Rodolfo Medina a écrit :
>> I did a little experiment with deborphan: first I did: `aptitude install
>> ', and along with it a certain number of other packages were
>> installed. Then I did: `aptitude purg
Le primidi 11 frimaire, an CCXXV, Rodolfo Medina a écrit :
> I did a little experiment with deborphan: first I did: `aptitude install
> ', and along with it a certain number of other packages were
> installed. Then I did: `aptitude purge ' followed by `deborphan' but
>
I did a little experiment with deborphan: first I did: `aptitude install
', and along with it a certain number of other packages were
installed. Then I did: `aptitude purge ' followed by `deborphan' but
in the output of `deborphan' none of those packages that were insta
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:07:35 -0400 (EDT)
"Robert P. J. Day" wrote:
...
> p.s. starting with a server that had just over 600 packages, i'm now
> down to 460, with no loss in functionality. hopefully, this will make
> that final upgrade as safe as possible.
Just as a miscellaneous reference poi
fslint and cruft are also helpful in keeping a system clean, by
finding out duplicate files, broken links, etc.
--
() ascii-rubanda kampajno - kontraŭ html-a retpoŝto
/\ ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> much thanks to whoever suggested "deborphan" recently to help me
> clean out unused libraries. i've been fairly conservative with it,
> getting rid of libs a bit at a time and making sure things still run.
> p.s. starting with a server that
On Tue,25.Aug.09, 05:00:07, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> the "minimal" part appears to be correct. it's a back-room server,
> ssh-accessible only, no X. i've been removing things to the point
> where i'm now down below 450 packages. i'm a big believer in
> simplicity.
You might want to disable
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Mark Allums wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > theoretically, i can see that it shouldn't cause any breakage.
> > but i was curious when i noticed that "libhal1" on this etch
> > system is listed as an orphan.
> >
> > coming from a fedora universe, i always thought of
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
theoretically, i can see that it shouldn't cause any breakage. but
i was curious when i noticed that "libhal1" on this etch system is
listed as an orphan.
coming from a fedora universe, i always thought of the HAL layer as
fairly fundamental, but i guess i've stripp
much thanks to whoever suggested "deborphan" recently to help me
clean out unused libraries. i've been fairly conservative with it,
getting rid of libs a bit at a time and making sure things still run.
someone else locally suggested to just throw caution to the winds
and run
Csányi Pál wrote:
> Is there an automated way to do this task out there?
Try 'orphaner'.
sudo orphaner
Or
sudo orphaner --purge
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
job quite well. No need the
deborphan. For details check out:
aptitude advantages
http://xpt.sourceforge.net/techdocs/nix/distro/debian/deb10-AptitudeRelated/index.html#_aptitude_advantages
> What if I'm still using that program? I don't *want* it deleted. Just
> because it's
"Mumia W.." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 08/16/2007 05:45 PM, Rick Pasotto wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 08:23:12AM +1000, Wei Wang wrote:
>>> I recommend you always use Aptitude as your primary package
>>> manager. It automatically delete orphaned packages.
>>
>> What if I'm still using t
On 08/16/2007 05:45 PM, Rick Pasotto wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 08:23:12AM +1000, Wei Wang wrote:
I recommend you always use Aptitude as your primary package manager.
It automatically delete orphaned packages.
What if I'm still using that program? I don't *want* it deleted. Just
because i
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 08:23:12AM +1000, Wei Wang wrote:
> I recommend you always use Aptitude as your primary package manager.
> It automatically delete orphaned packages.
What if I'm still using that program? I don't *want* it deleted. Just
because it's not being maintained is no reason to dele
I recommend you always use Aptitude as your primary package manager. It
automatically delete orphaned packages.
Regards
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 08:19 +0200, Csányi Pál wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I purge the orphaned packages on a Debian system:
> sudo deborphan | less
>
> and then c
> > I purge the orphaned packages on a Debian system:
>
> One line/instruction with "debfoster".
> "apt-get autoremove" also does some interesting things.
But not in the Etch with apt version 0.6.. :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 08:19 +0200, Csányi Pál wrote:
> Hello!
Hi,
> I purge the orphaned packages on a Debian system:
One line/instruction with "debfoster".
"apt-get autoremove" also does some interesting things.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Hello,
On [Thu, 16.08.2007 08:19], Csányi Pál wrote:
> I try:
> sudo deborphan | aptitude purge
dpkg --purge `deborphan`
executed as root will do the job.
Johannes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Csányi Pál <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I purge the orphaned packages on a Debian system:
> sudo deborphan | less
>
> and then copy / paste to the aptitude search, and then purge in aptitude.
>
> Is there an automated way to do this task out there?
>
> man deborph
Csányi Pál wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I purge the orphaned packages on a Debian system:
> sudo deborphan | less
>
> and then copy / paste to the aptitude search, and then purge in aptitude.
>
> Is there an automated way to do this task out there?
>
> man deborphan a
Hello!
I purge the orphaned packages on a Debian system:
sudo deborphan | less
and then copy / paste to the aptitude search, and then purge in aptitude.
Is there an automated way to do this task out there?
man deborphan and man aptitude dont shows any suggestion about that.
I try:
sudo
> On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:00 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On 03.02.07 17:21, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > > Funny, I was under the impression Deborphan was deprecated. Aptitude
> > > supposedly gives you similar functionality.
> >
> > oh, no. I don&#
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:00 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 03.02.07 17:21, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > Funny, I was under the impression Deborphan was deprecated. Aptitude
> > supposedly gives you similar functionality.
>
> oh, no. I don't like aptitude and s
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:00 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 03.02.07 17:21, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > Funny, I was under the impression Deborphan was deprecated. Aptitude
> > supposedly gives you similar functionality.
>
> oh, no. I don't like aptitude and s
On 03.02.07 17:21, Greg Folkert wrote:
> Funny, I was under the impression Deborphan was deprecated. Aptitude
> supposedly gives you similar functionality.
oh, no. I don't like aptitude and still use dselect, I hope i won't be
pushed into using aptitude ...
--
Matus UHLAR -
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 05:01:08PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:21:04AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 05:01:08PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:21:04AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: deborphan
Mail-Followu
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 05:01:08PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:21:04AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> >Subject: Re: deborphan
> >Mai
deborphan | xargs dpkg --purge
On 2/3/07, Gerard Robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
my processor is AMD turion 64 x2 TL50.
dist: etch.
deborphan gives:
libgmp3c2
libpisync0
libopal-2.2.0
libident
libtextwrap1
liblzo2-2
libmagick9
libc6-i386
libieee1284-3
libosp5
libpt-plugi
On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 15:34 +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
> Hello,
> my processor is AMD turion 64 x2 TL50.
> dist: etch.
>
> deborphan gives:
>
> libgmp3c2
> libpisync0
> libopal-2.2.0
> libident
> libtextwrap1
> liblzo2-2
> libmagick9
> libc6-i386
>
Gerard Robin wrote:
Hello,
my processor is AMD turion 64 x2 TL50.
dist: etch.
deborphan gives:
and mine gives:
liblzo2-2
libttf-dev
libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2
libdivxdecore0
libsigc++-1.2-5c2
libstdc++5
libgnutls11
libldap-2.3-0
which is funny because I just installed the Sid system from
Gerard Robin schrieb:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:21:04AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: deborphan
Mail-Followup-To: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
On Sat,
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:21:04AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: deborphan
Mail-Followup-To: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 03:3
--- Clive Menzies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On (03/02/07 15:34), Gerard Robin wrote:
> > Hello,
> > my processor is AMD turion 64 x2 TL50.
> > dist: etch.
> >
> > deborphan gives:
> >
> > libgmp3c2
> > libpisync0
> > libopal-2
On (03/02/07 15:34), Gerard Robin wrote:
> Hello,
> my processor is AMD turion 64 x2 TL50.
> dist: etch.
>
> deborphan gives:
>
> libgmp3c2
> libpisync0
> libopal-2.2.0
> libident
> libtextwrap1
> liblzo2-2
> libmagick9
> libc6-i386
> libieee1284-3
&g
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 03:34:10PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
>
> can I remove merely this packages ?
>
That depends. Do you use any of them?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
my processor is AMD turion 64 x2 TL50.
dist: etch.
deborphan gives:
libgmp3c2
libpisync0
libopal-2.2.0
libident
libtextwrap1
liblzo2-2
libmagick9
libc6-i386
libieee1284-3
libosp5
libpt-plugins-v4l
libgnome-pilot2
libjaxp1.2-java
libnm-glib0
libsigc++-1.2-5c2
libpt-plugins-alsa
libldap
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 08:33:15PM -0500, Douglas Tutty wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:54:55AM +, andy wrote:
> > Hey all
> >
> > I've stumbled across references to "deborphan" to help maintain my
> > system. I've installed it and read
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:54:55AM +, andy wrote:
> Hey all
>
> I've stumbled across references to "deborphan" to help maintain my
> system. I've installed it and read the man so think that I have a
> reasonable basic knowledge for what it is meant to d
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:07:24 +0100, Rob Bochan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
you what's safe to delete. In one instance, the Opera browser has (had?)
motif dependencies. However, because Opera is not a Debian package, and
doesn't actually fail to install without the libmotif pa
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 06:54, andy wrote:
> Hey all
>
> I've stumbled across references to "deborphan" to help maintain my
> system. I've installed it and read the man so think that I have a
> reasonable basic knowledge for what it is meant to do, so hav
On 12.12.06 11:54, andy wrote:
> I've stumbled across references to "deborphan" to help maintain my
> system. I've installed it and read the man so think that I have a
> reasonable basic knowledge for what it is meant to do, so have run
> deborphan -zs and hav
Hey all
I've stumbled across references to "deborphan" to help maintain my
system. I've installed it and read the man so think that I have a
reasonable basic knowledge for what it is meant to do, so have run
deborphan -zs and have been given a list of files. In theory,
Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Can I reasonably assume that it is safe to uninstall these packages?
I normally believe in deborphan's output, so I'd say it is. However, if you
want to be sure, just check the rdepends. Most probably you'll see some
package you installed sometime, but then later removed it. I
In my continuing effort to remove unneeded packages from my system I ran
deborphan and came up with the following list of orphaned libs:
libruby
libdvdread3
liba52-0.7.4
libzzip-0-12
libfaad2-0
libhal0
libxosd2
libdirectfb-0.9-20
libstartup-notification0
libsigc++-1.2-5c102
libpostproc0
On 06/12/05 22:43, Tom Allison wrote:
A thousand pardons.
It found version 10 that was replaced by version 11.
I was looking at version 11 being in use, not 10.
You're right, I'm wrong.
Sorry for the waste in bandwidth.
No problems. BTW, here is the command that I use with deborphan
move them:
>
> $ apt-get install deborphan
> $ deborphan >
> $ cat | dpkg --purge
>
> this will use as a package list of the items you want to
> remove (including config files).
>
> worked like a charm for me!
orphaner --purge
is still more charming to me.
--
just a quick small tip... so as not to waste too much list space.
to collect a list of 'orphan' files (files that your current system
doesn't depend on) on your system and then remove them:
$ apt-get install deborphan
$ deborphan >
$ cat | dpkg --purge
this will use as
At 11:23 2000/07/29 -0600, you wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 12:37:04PM +0200, Moritz Schulte wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 07:32:36AM +, Henry White wrote:
> > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd...
> [...]
> > Any ideas or suggestions?
>
> try newer 2.2.17pre's.
I've got th
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 12:37:04PM +0200, Moritz Schulte wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 07:32:36AM +, Henry White wrote:
>
> > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd...
> [...]
> > Any ideas or suggestions?
>
> try newer 2.2.17pre's.
Another data point...
When I installed 2.2.17pr
Hi Henry!
[Henry]
> > > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd...
> > > Segmentation fault
[me]
> > deborphan prior to 0.1.11-3 had big mem leaks
[Henry]
> No go :-[ Now I'm getting those error messages immediately after the
> fetch. Stopped the
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 07:32:36AM +, Henry White wrote:
> VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd...
[...]
> Any ideas or suggestions?
try newer 2.2.17pre's.
moritz
--
/* Moritz Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* http://hp9001.fh-bielefeld.de/~moritz/
* PGP-Key available, encrypt
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 12:51:41PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Hi Henry!
>
> On Sat, 29 Jul 2000, Henry White wrote:
>
> > After the latest apt-get update/upgrade/check (using sources woody and
> > kernel 2.2.17) when i ran deborphan I got an on screen
Hi Henry!
On Sat, 29 Jul 2000, Henry White wrote:
> After the latest apt-get update/upgrade/check (using sources woody and
> kernel 2.2.17) when i ran deborphan I got an on screen message
>
> VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd...
> Segmentation fault
&
After the latest apt-get update/upgrade/check (using sources woody and
kernel 2.2.17) when i ran deborphan I got an on screen message
VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd...
Segmentation fault
then the prompt returns. This also appears in kern.log and syslog as
63 matches
Mail list logo
