Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-09 Thread Kevin Mark
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 01:22:58AM +0100, Olaf Conradi wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:08:49 -0500, Kevin Mark > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments > > appreciated! > > Nice work. Maybe use the alignment functions of

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-09 Thread Brian Nelson
Olaf Conradi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 15:42:36 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 16:20 -0500, Tom Allison wrote: >> > Ron Johnson wrote: >> > > On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 15:04 +0100, Olaf Conradi wrote: >> > >>Most of the development work t

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-09 Thread Kevin Mark
On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 10:47:50AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Holger Levsen wrote: > > unstable is described as suited for "...laptops and desktops on > > non-critical > > systems..." > > testing is described as "... can be used for desktop systems that need

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-09 Thread Olaf Conradi
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:08:49 -0500, Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Folks, > I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments > appreciated! Nice work. Maybe use the alignment functions of xfig on the boxes and arrows? If you really want to be complete, the aging

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-09 Thread Olaf Conradi
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 15:42:36 -0600, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 16:20 -0500, Tom Allison wrote: > > Ron Johnson wrote: > > > On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 15:04 +0100, Olaf Conradi wrote: > > >>Most of the development work that is done in Debian, is uploaded to > > >>this

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 16:20 -0500, Tom Allison wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 15:04 +0100, Olaf Conradi wrote: > > > >>On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:13:41 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh > >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > >>Most of the development work that is

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-09 Thread Tom Allison
Ron Johnson wrote: On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 15:04 +0100, Olaf Conradi wrote: On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:13:41 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] Most of the development work that is done in Debian, is uploaded to this distribution. This distribution will never get released

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 15:04 +0100, Olaf Conradi wrote: > On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:13:41 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] > Most of the development work that is done in Debian, is uploaded to > this distribution. This distribution will never get released; instead,

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-09 Thread Olaf Conradi
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 11:13:41 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok. I could have written that sentence better. Here it is: > > Agreed. Unstable is recommended only for people that "know what they are > doing". Certainly not for desktop usage by casual users (if they a

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-09 Thread Micha Feigin
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Holger Levsen wrote: > > unstable is described as suited for "...laptops and desktops on > > non-critical > > systems..." > > testing is described as "... can be used for desktop systems that need more > > stability.

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-09 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 10:47 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Holger Levsen wrote: > > > unstable is described as suited for "...laptops and desktops on > > > non-critical > > > systems..." > > > testing is described as "

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 10:47 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Holger Levsen wrote: > > unstable is described as suited for "...laptops and desktops on > > non-critical > > systems..." > > testing is described as "... can be used for desktop systems that need more

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-09 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005, Holger Levsen wrote: > unstable is described as suited for "...laptops and desktops on non-critical > systems..." > testing is described as "... can be used for desktop systems that need more > stability..." > > I think this both is wrong. Unstable and testing should not be

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, first I'd like to thank Kevin for his nice diagram! On Wednesday 05 January 2005 20:38, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Very nice! I expect to use it at some conferences (BTW: Looks like a > nice addition to Debian Eyecatcher[1], I'll add it :) ) but then I also got one concern, especially if this diag

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-08 Thread Kevin Mark
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 05:14:56PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > || On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:08:49 -0500 > || Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > km> Hi Folks, > km> I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments > km> appreciated! > > IMHO have one wrong informat

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-08 Thread Kevin Mark
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 07:52:22PM +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > * Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050107 19:46]: > > > Yes, a legend for the acronyms would be fine. > > Oh, I just saw, that your diagramm has a legend. I'm wondering, why I > didn't noticed it the other day.. > > > Y

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-07 Thread Otavio Salvador
|| On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 01:08:49 -0500 || Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: km> Hi Folks, km> I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments km> appreciated! IMHO have one wrong information on that. When the package go to experimental, it comes from DD .deb like when

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-07 Thread Alexander Schmehl
* Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050107 19:46]: > Yes, a legend for the acronyms would be fine. Oh, I just saw, that your diagramm has a legend. I'm wondering, why I didn't noticed it the other day.. Yours sincerely, Alexander signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-07 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi Kevin! * Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050106 05:52]: > > What is the target group of your diagramm? > I wanted to visualize the deb lifecycle for my understanding of 'the > debian way'. So I was the 'target'. I asked for comments here and there > to fill in missing bits. And once I did it

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-06 Thread Clive Menzies
be of most use to those of us who have a desire to understand the debian development process. I can't pretend to have a deeper knowledge of Debian, I've been using it for two years with no previous knowledge of *nix but I find this extremely useful ;) I agree it is a lot of information f

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-05 Thread Kevin Mark
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 01:38:46PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Kevin Mark dijo [Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 01:08:49AM -0500]: > > Hi Folks, > > I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments > > appreciated! > > Very nice! I expect to use it at some conferences (BTW: Looks lik

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-05 Thread Kevin Mark
On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:56:13AM +0100, Alexander Schmehl wrote: > Hi Kevin! > > * Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050103 07:08]: > > > I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments > > appreciated! > > What is the target group of your diagramm? Hi Alexander, I wan

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-05 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi Kevin! * Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050103 07:08]: > I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments > appreciated! What is the target group of your diagramm? Since I don't think people without deeper knowledge of Debian will find your diagram easy to understan

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-05 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Kevin Mark dijo [Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 01:08:49AM -0500]: > Hi Folks, > I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments > appreciated! Very nice! I expect to use it at some conferences (BTW: Looks like a nice addition to Debian Eyecatcher[1], I'll add it :) ) I'd suggest

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-03 Thread Kevin Mark
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:47:02AM +0100, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi Folks, > > I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments > > appreciated! > > It's "volatile", not "volitile" > -- > Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrum)

Re: updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-02 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Folks, > I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments > appreciated! It's "volatile", not "volitile" -- Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrum) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49

updated debian development diagram -- comments?

2005-01-02 Thread Kevin Mark
Hi Folks, I have updated my diagram on the debian developement model. Any comments appreciated! Also, the source is *.fig. Can anyone point to a similar .deb of a graphic document so that I can see what documents a graphics file needs so that I can make a GPL & DFSG compliant package. I exported

Re: debian development

1997-09-25 Thread jdassen
On Sep 25, Gorkem Cetin wrote > I'm not sure if this is the right mailing list, if not flame me :) It is (more or less). > We've (the turkish linux user group) been working on a turkish linux > distribution for some time. Its main purpose is to help users whose native > lang is not english.. It a

debian development

1997-09-25 Thread Gorkem Cetin
Hi. I'm not sure if this is the right mailing list, if not flame me :) We've (the turkish linux user group) been working on a turkish linux distribution for some time. Its main purpose is to help users whose native lang is not english.. It attracted many people here, and everything goes fine by n