Am 2006-02-23 15:29:19, schrieb Rob Sims:
> In mutt: 'L' (I just tried it on my sid box)
Not if "Reply-To:" ist set to the Sender.
> > Note: I have setup my "mutt" to ignore the "Reply-To:" Header.
>
> How can a user get a personal response if you ignore his request for
> responses to go to a
Rob Sims wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 02:04:24AM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2006-02-09 15:27:22, schrieb Digby Tarvin:
Oh no! The "header munging" Thread From Hell Which Will Not Die
has resurrected.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 02:04:24AM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2006-02-09 15:27:22, schrieb Digby Tarvin:
> > There is nothing incorrect in my headers as far as I know, but I do
> > use a 'Reply-to:' to make sure that mail goes to my mailbox rather
> > than just back to wherever I happened
Am 2006-02-09 17:01:35, schrieb Digby Tarvin:
> Hi - thanks for the link.
>
> A quick survey and it does indeed seem that 'Reply-To munging' is
> what is used on nearly all of the other lists I am subscribed to.
I do not know, on which lists you are, but I am on:
+---[ '/home/michelle.konzack/.m
Am 2006-02-09 19:02:34, schrieb Digby Tarvin:
> My remaining grip is that the 'subscribe' command also causes the
> identification of the originator of the message to be replaced by
> the list name in the display:
>1183 L Feb 09 To debian-user@ ( 46) debian-user and
Am 2006-02-09 18:50:15, schrieb Andrei Popescu:
> That explains it. On a mailing list like this one, the Reply-To is
> normally used if you happen to post from a different address then
> the one subscribed (or you are not subscribed at all) and you want
> a CC to that address. BTW setting a Reply-
Am 2006-02-09 15:27:22, schrieb Digby Tarvin:
> Hi
> It seems you are right, in as much as there is an L command that appears
> to be intended to deal with lists, but on your message it just gives me
>
> No mailing lists found!
Put:
subscribe debian-user@lists.debian.org
in your "
Am 2006-02-09 12:37:31, schrieb Digby Tarvin:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:11:29AM -0200, Eduardo wrote:
> > Please do not CC me! Get a proper mailer instead: www.mutt.org
>
> Ok, since someone has brought this up
>
> Why is it that on the other lists I subscribe to a 'reply' to
> a posting b
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 15:27:22 +
Digby Tarvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
Thanks for your message..
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:25:44PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Why is it that on the other lists I subscribe to a 'reply' to
a posting by default goes to the
mat,
which is what I initially wanted..
My mutt seems to accept either version of the commands you
suggested, which for the 'lists' version gives me:
1156 s 02/09 [ 0] Ken Wahl(1.7K) Re: debian-user and mutt...
and for 'subscrube' gives:
1156 sL 02/09 [ 0] Ken W
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:02:34PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote:
> My remaining grip is that the 'subscribe' command also causes the
> identification of the originator of the message to be replaced by
> the list name in the display:
>1183 L Feb 09 To debian-user@ ( 46
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:07:54PM -0500, Erik Karlin wrote:
> To sort of interrupt this thread as it seems to be somewhat resolved,
> does anyone know why DU is the only mailing list that mutt can correctly
> identify signed messages? How and where is that configured, and how can
> I check/debug t
L Feb 09 To debian-user@ ( 46) debian-user and mutt...
1184 r L Feb 09 To debian-user@ ( 38) Re: debian-user and mutt...
1188 sL Feb 09 To debian-user@ ( 67) Re: debian-user and mutt...
1190 sL Feb 09 To debian-user@ ( 47) Re: debian-user and mutt...
1193 O L Feb 09 To debian
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 05:01:35PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote:
> Hi - thanks for the link.
>
> A quick survey and it does indeed seem that 'Reply-To munging' is
> what is used on nearly all of the other lists I am subscribed to.
>
> The arguments made against it in that link certainly make sense,
Hi - thanks for the link.
A quick survey and it does indeed seem that 'Reply-To munging' is
what is used on nearly all of the other lists I am subscribed to.
The arguments made against it in that link certainly make sense,
although the author's prefered solution seems to be the
'reply to all' opt
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:27:22PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote:
> It seems you are right, in as much as there is an L command that appears
> to be intended to deal with lists, but on your message it just gives me
>
> No mailing lists found!
The section of the mutt manual dealing with mailing
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 11:22:50AM -0500, Edward Shornock wrote:
> > Is there a list FAQ I should have consulted - I didn't find one on
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/
> >
> > That is usually the best way to avoid having the same questions
> > asked over and over..
> >
> > Alternativ
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 15:27:22 +
Digby Tarvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for your message..
>
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:25:44PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > >
> > > Why is it that on the other lists I subscribe to a 'reply' to
> > > a posting by default goes to the list,
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:27:22PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for your message..
>
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:25:44PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > >
> > > Why is it that on the other lists I subscribe to a 'reply' to
> > > a posting by default goes to the list, but on this
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:27:22PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote:
> Is there a list FAQ I should have consulted - I didn't find one on
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/
>
> That is usually the best way to avoid having the same questions
> asked over and over..
>
> Alternatively, is there a
Digby Tarvin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:11:29AM -0200, Eduardo wrote:
Please do not CC me! Get a proper mailer instead: www.mutt.org
Ok, since someone has brought this up
Why is it that on the other lists I subscribe to a 'reply' to
a posting by default goes to the list, b
Hi
Thanks for your message..
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:25:44PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >
> > Why is it that on the other lists I subscribe to a 'reply' to
> > a posting by default goes to the list, but on this list it
> > goes only to the original poster, and a 'replay-all' goes to
> > t
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 12:37:31PM +, Digby Tarvin wrote:
>
> Most other lists either have something inserted in the subject line
> to idenify the origin, or they appear to come from the least such
> that selecting messages from 'debian-user@lists.debian.org' would
> suffice...
Hi Digby,
in
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 03:25:44PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 12:37:31 +
>Digby Tarvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
>> To avoid making that mistake I have been manually editing
>> the header of each response, but that is a bit tedious, so I
>> assume there is a better w
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 12:37:31 +
Digby Tarvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:11:29AM -0200, Eduardo wrote:
> > Please do not CC me! Get a proper mailer instead: www.mutt.org
>
> Ok, since someone has brought this up
>
> Why is it that on the other lists I subscribe
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:11:29AM -0200, Eduardo wrote:
> Please do not CC me! Get a proper mailer instead: www.mutt.org
Ok, since someone has brought this up
Why is it that on the other lists I subscribe to a 'reply' to
a posting by default goes to the list, but on this list it
goes only to
26 matches
Mail list logo
