On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:05 +0100, Alberto Luaces wrote:
> Tixy writes:
>
> > As per the Debian FAQ [1] I am building packages from source using:
> >
> > dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b
> >
> > However, some source packages produce multiple binary packages, is there
> > a way of just rebuildi
Tixy writes:
> As per the Debian FAQ [1] I am building packages from source using:
>
> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b
>
> However, some source packages produce multiple binary packages, is there
> a way of just rebuilding the specific binary package I'm interested in?
> (I've tried this out i
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:04:51AM +, Tixy wrote:
> As per the Debian FAQ [1] I am building packages from source using:
>
> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b
>
> However, some source packages produce multiple binary packages, is there
> a way of just rebuilding the specific binary package I
As per the Debian FAQ [1] I am building packages from source using:
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -b
However, some source packages produce multiple binary packages, is there
a way of just rebuilding the specific binary package I'm interested in?
(I've tried this out in man pages and using Goog
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 02:29 +, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:31:06 -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to be able to compile a package from source (ghemical, FWIW) so
> > that I can add so additional parameters not normally included which will
> > en
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:31:06 -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to be able to compile a package from source (ghemical, FWIW) so
> that I can add so additional parameters not normally included which will
> enhance the app for my purposes. The enhancements are part of the
> upstream
On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 01:06 +0100, Davide Mancusi wrote:
> Kenward Vaughan ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to be able to compile a package from source (ghemical, FWIW) so
> > that I can add so additional parameters not normally included which will
> > enhance the app for my purposes. The en
Kenward Vaughan ha scritto:
Hi,
I'd like to be able to compile a package from source (ghemical, FWIW) so
that I can add so additional parameters not normally included which will
enhance the app for my purposes. The enhancements are part of the
upstream distribution (an interface with GAMESS).
Hi,
I'd like to be able to compile a package from source (ghemical, FWIW) so
that I can add so additional parameters not normally included which will
enhance the app for my purposes. The enhancements are part of the
upstream distribution (an interface with GAMESS).
Is there a way to do this usin
Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 02:19:49AM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
Ok, i started again, but i still get the md5sum error. Could the
downloaded debian package be in error?
With the errors you're getting, this seems unlikely.
I've downloaded it twice from the bottom of this page:
htt
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 09:39:59PM +0100, Pigeon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 02:39:13PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:26:13PM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
> > > tar -xzvf gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
> > > gunzipgtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.diff.gz
> > >
> > > patch -p0 <
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 02:39:13PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:26:13PM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
> > I'm trying to build gtk2.0-dbg .deb from source.
> >
> > I downloaded:
> > gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.dsc
> > gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.d
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 02:19:49AM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
> Ok, i started again, but i still get the md5sum error. Could the
> downloaded debian package be in error?
With the errors you're getting, this seems unlikely.
> I've downloaded it twice from the bottom of this page:
> http://packages
Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:19:42AM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
That's a ... convoluted (and wrong) way to extract a source package.
Remove that gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig directory, and try this instead:
dpkg-source -x gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.dsc
I thought there was an easi
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 12:19:42AM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> >That's a ... convoluted (and wrong) way to extract a source package.
> >Remove that gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig directory, and try this instead:
> >
> > dpkg-source -x gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.dsc
>
> I thought there was an easi
Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:26:13PM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
I'm trying to build gtk2.0-dbg .deb from source.
I downloaded:
gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.dsc
gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.diff.gz
gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
then:
tar -xzvf gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
gunzipgtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.di
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 11:26:13PM +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
> I'm trying to build gtk2.0-dbg .deb from source.
>
> I downloaded:
> gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.dsc
> gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.diff.gz
> gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
>
> then:
> tar -xzvf gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig.tar.
Hi,
I'm trying to build gtk2.0-dbg .deb from source.
I downloaded:
gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.dsc
gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.diff.gz
gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
then:
tar -xzvf gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig.tar.gz
gunzipgtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.diff.gz
patch -p0 < gtk+2.0_2.2.1-6.diff
cd gtk+2.0_2.2.1.orig
~/
This one time, at band camp, Robert James Kaes said:
> Thanks for the information. I'll give it a try. One last question: how
> much space does the chroot environment consume on the hard drive? Take
> the woody distribution as an example, if you could.
> -- Robert
steve@gashuffer:~$ du -H
On Wed, 06 Nov 2002, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Look into pbuilder - it's designed for doing stuff exactly like this. I
> have a testing machine as my day to day desktop machine (it's also the
> fastest of my non-server boxes) so I use it compile things for the other
> boxes. pbuilder sets up a chroot
Robert James Kaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-06 11:57:11 -0500]:
> Hopefully this will be a quick question: is it possible to build a woody
> debian package on a "testing" machine? My server is at woody, but I don't
> really want to build packages on a production machine.
Because of the words u
This one time, at band camp, Robert James Kaes said:
> Hi,
> Hopefully this will be a quick question: is it possible to build a woody
> debian package on a "testing" machine? My server is at woody, but I don't
> really want to build packages on a production machine.
>
> Any information you can pr
Hi,
Hopefully this will be a quick question: is it possible to build a woody
debian package on a "testing" machine? My server is at woody, but I don't
really want to build packages on a production machine.
Any information you can provide would be helpful.
-- Robert
--
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:45:39AM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
> Then (in /usr/local/src/gsl/gsl-0.9.3) issue "dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc
> -rfakeroot". You will need to do all this as root.
fakeroot exists so that you don't have to do any of this as root. Since
you've already recommended -rfakeroot,
On Sat, 6 Oct 2001, Pontus Edvardsson wrote:
> Hi,
> I believe I need to use 'dpkg -b /sourcedir ' but when trying
> to build a package of the current iptables-1.2.3, it fails with an error
> about not finding '../DEBIAN/control'... I then tried the option '--nocheck'
> to no avail. Please point
Although I successfully created a powerpc deb of qmail, I have
several questions about my methods.
I knew I need to start with the source, so using apt-get and the
following sources.list line:
#deb-src ftp://ftp.eecs.umich.edu/debian stable main contrib non-free
I retrieved (If i remember exactl
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000 18:33:01 + (UTC), pollywog said:
> I installed the packages, but when I start Licq, it says it cannot find the
> qt
> plugin, which is right were Licq says it is not. I ran ldd on the plugin but
> it also says the plugin is not there. The plugins have world-readable
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000 16:27:40 +, Peter Palfrader said:
>
> On Sat, 19 Aug 2000 18:22:14 +0200, Peter Palfrader said:
>
> > As you see, you don't need libqt2 to build it, you need libqt2__-dev__.
> >
> > In most cases you need the -dev packages of libraries if you want to
> > build
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000 18:22:14 +0200, Peter Palfrader said:
> As you see, you don't need libqt2 to build it, you need libqt2__-dev__.
>
> In most cases you need the -dev packages of libraries if you want to
> build stuff against them.
Yes, I do have that installed, but not as a Debian package
Hi pollywog!
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, pollywog wrote:
> I downloaded the source package (and dsc and diff) for Licq and then modified
> debian/rules and then built Licq with my own config options.
> The problem is that I have QT installed from source, and no Debian packages
> for
> QT were found:
E
I downloaded the source package (and dsc and diff) for Licq and then modified
debian/rules and then built Licq with my own config options.
The problem is that I have QT installed from source, and no Debian packages for
QT were found:
dh_fixperms
dh_installdeb
dh_shlibdeps
dpkg: /usr/local/qt/lib/l
31 matches
Mail list logo
