No way out. 2.6 kernel for newer libc6.
I had my bash murdered by this problem because I had a profile item
pretending! that I had a 2.4 kernel. That was enough to kill most everything.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:49:12 -0800
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Andrew,
> never pass up a good excuse for more hardware!! ;)
It doesn't even have to be good; *Any* excuse will do, IMO. :-)
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:08:07PM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 12:35:22PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> > But now that the damage is done, I don't have much advice. Probably
> > your best bet is to move up to sarge manually replacing packages as
> > needed to remove
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 11:05:37AM -0800, epic winter wrote:
>
> Now i need to figure out how to move forward...
Define forward. I see from later posts that you want to revert to
Woody. I have a complete set (all 7 CDs) of Woody, but I'm on dialup so
it would take about a month to upload them s
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 12:35:22PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> But now that the damage is done, I don't have much advice. Probably
> your best bet is to move up to sarge manually replacing packages as
> needed to remove the etch upgrades.
Disagree. In my mind the best bet is to get a
take a deep breath and begin to analyse the system in detail -- look
at installed versions of packages versus woody versions, figure out
what you've changed and change it back piece-by-piece. use
apt-show-versions, apt-cache, etc.
good luck.
A
>
>
> -ryan
>
>
> > Date
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 11:05:37AM -0800, epic winter wrote:
Now i need to figure out how to move forward...
You must first install a 2.6 kernel. If you are building your own
kernels, compile one yourself. If you are using the distribution kernel,
install the appropriate linux-image-2.6-* pac
Thanks. Sanity restored.
Now i need to figure out how to move forward...
> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:56:17 -0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: apt-get torture - deadlock libc6
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:34:20AM -0800,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:34:20AM -0800, epic winter wrote:
>
> Ok, but how do i get out of the deadlock? I can't use apt at all right now.
probably take stable, testing and unstable out of your sources.list
and apt* update would do it.
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Ok, but how do i get out of the deadlock? I can't use apt at all right now.
> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:27:56 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: apt-get torture - deadlock libc6
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 09:54:54AM -
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 09:54:54AM -0800, epic winter wrote:
libc6 that seems to be associated with a 2.6 kernel. I am running a
2.4 kernel and have no intentions of upgrading. I see lots of messages
[snip]
WARNING: POSIX threads library NPTL requires kernel version
2.6.8 or later. If you use
I was doing a dist-upgrade on an older debian install and I got stuck
in a apt deadlock because it is trying to install a new version of
libc6 that seems to be associated with a 2.6 kernel. I am running a
2.4 kernel and have no intentions of upgrading. I see lots of messages
about this problem
cat deadlock.c
#include
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
pthread_mutex_t lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
pthread_mutex_lock(&lock);
pthread_mutex_lock(&lock);
}
$ gcc -g -O0 deadlock.c -o deadlock -lpthread
$ gdb ./deadlock
...
(gdb) run
Starting program: /home/sears/deadlock/
I have a pb while installing exim4 because the exim4-base wants exim4-config to be
configured before configuring itself and exim4-config wants the same with exim4-base
:-|
Thanks
François
tanna:/usr/share/doc/horde2# dpkg --configure -a
Setting up exim4-base (4.14
Dear Rob:
In the 2.4.20, the last line of boot is
start pppd link-
then everything stop there no matter what keyborard I push
after I enter save mode, fsck /dev/hdc2
startx
it showed
hostname(none)
but I do put a line in my /etc/hostname
www.linuxspice.com
and
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:51:29AM -0700, eric wrote:
> Dear Linuxer or/and httpd of apache users:
>
> After recent update upgrade, using unstable, after I reboot, it is
> deadlock in pppd link
> in my 2.4.20 kernel, it also dead lock in 2.2.18 after
> detect ? usb...
Dear Linuxer or/and httpd of apache users:
After recent update upgrade, using unstable, after I reboot, it is
deadlock in pppd link
in my 2.4.20 kernel, it also dead lock in 2.2.18 after
detect ? usb...
Also what may cause other side can not access my documentation root's file
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 11:04:20AM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please clear these two doubts of mine :
> 1. When does a deadlock happen on a Unix/Linux system ?
Hopefully never. ;)
> 2. What is a deadlock ?
My favorite explanation of deadlock wasn't talking about computer
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 6:34
Subject: deadlock
> Please clear these two doubts of mine :
> 2. What is a deadlock ?
I'll answer this one first since it makes more sense.
A deadlock can be defined as bl
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please clear these two doubts of mine :
> 1. When does a deadlock happen on a Unix/Linux system ?
> 2. What is a deadlock ?
Deadlock isn't a Unix/Linux concept, it's a programming concept. It
happens when you have two processes
Please clear these two doubts of mine :
1. When does a deadlock happen on a Unix/Linux system ?
2. What is a deadlock ?
Thanks,
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Shyam
te
> appear a message like this: IRQ DEADLOCK DETECTED BY CPU 1, and the system
> hangs
> . I don't know what's the matter with this problem. Somebody can help me.
> Thank's
I think I remeber reading something about this on the Linux-Kernel mailing
list, but I d
I have installed debian linux 1.3.1 on my computer,a two proccesor
I need the kernel linux-2.0.34-pre14.tar.gz because I have an Adaptec
aic 7895. Linux starts normally without any error, but after one or two minute
appear a message like this: IRQ DEADLOCK DETECTED BY CPU 1, and the system
Chris Albertson wrote:
> There is one more thing you need to do, or so say the textbooks. That
> is deadlock detection or if you can do it, deadlock prevention. This
> is a function of a lock queue manager.
>
> Also you need one lock queue for each lockable object. If locking
24 matches
Mail list logo
